scholarly journals Continued nucleic acid tests for SARS-CoV-2 following discharge of patients with COVID-19 in Lu’an, China

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e11617
Author(s):  
Yong Lyu ◽  
Danni Wang ◽  
Xiude Li ◽  
Tianqi Gong ◽  
Pengpeng Xu ◽  
...  

Background Studies have shown that discharged Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have retested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during a follow-up RT-PCR test. We sought to assess the results of continued nucleic acid testing for SARS-CoV-2 patients in COVID-19 patients after they were discharged in Lu’an, China. Methods We conducted RT-PCR tests on sputum, throat swabs, fecal or anal swabs, and urine samples collected from 67 COVID-19 patients following discharge. Samples were collected on the 7th and 14th days following discharge. Patients testing positive on the 7th or 14th day were retested after 24 hours until they tested negative twice. Results Seventeen (17/67, 25.4%) discharged COVID-19 patients had a positive RT-PCR retest for SARS-CoV-2. Among them, 14 (82.4%) were sputum positive, five (29.4%) were throat swab positive, seven (41.2%) were fecal or anal swab positive, one (5.9%) was urine sample positive, five (29.4%) were both sputum and throat swab positive, four (23.5%) were both sputum and fecal test positive, and one (5.9%) was positive of all four specimens. The shortest period of time between discharge and the last positive test was 7 days, the longest was 48 days, and the median was 16 days. The proportion of positive fecal or anal swab tests increased from the third week. The median Cq cut-off values after onset were 26.7 after the first week, 37.7 the second to sixth week, and 40 after the sixth week. There were no significant differences between the RT-PCR retest positive group and the unrecovered positive group. Conclusions There was a high proportion of patients who retested positive for COVID-19. Discharge criteria have remained fairly consistent so we encourage regions affected by COVID-19 to appropriately amend their current criteria.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Chi ◽  
Xinjian Dai ◽  
Xiangao Jiang ◽  
Lefei Zhu ◽  
Junyan Du ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since December 2019, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected more than 2,310,000 people and killed over hundreds of thousands people worldwide. However, Differential diagnosis remains difficult for suspected cases of COVID-19 and need to be improved to reduce misdiagnosis. Methods Sixty-eight cases of suspected COVID-19 treated in Wenzhou Central Hospital from January 21 to February 20, 2020 were divided into confirmed and COVID-19-negative groups based on the results of real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nucleic acid testing of the novel coronavirus in throat swab specimens to compare the clinical symptoms and laboratory and imaging results between the groups. Results Among suspected patients, 17 were confirmed to COVID-19-positive group and 51 were distinguished to COVID-19-negative group. Patients with reduced white blood cell (WBC) count were more common in the COVID-19-positive group than in the COVID-19-negative group (29.4% vs 3.9%, P = 0.003). Subsequently, correlation analysis indicated that there was a significant inverse correlation existed between WBC count and temperature in the COVID-19-positive patients (r=-0.587, p = 0.003), instead of the COVID-19-negative group. But reduced lymphocyte count was no different between the two groups (47.1% vs 25.5%, P = 0.096). More common chest imaging characteristics of the confirmed COVID-19 cases by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) included ground-glass opacities (GGOs), multiple patchy shadows, and consolidation with bilateral involvement than COVID-19-negative group (82.4% vs 31.4%, p = 0.0002; 41.2% vs 17.6% vs p = 0.048; 76.5% vs 43.1%, p = 0.017; respectively). Through multiplex RT-PCR nucleic acid testing, 2 case of influenza A, 3 cases of influenza B, 2 cases of adenovirus, 2 cases of Chlamydia pneumonia, and 7 cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae were diagnosed in the COVID-19-negative group. Conclusions Reduced WBC count inversely correlating with the severity of fever, GGOs, multiple patchy shadows, and consolidation in chest HRCT and clustered infection are features in the confirmed COVID-19 group but not unique. Multiplex RT-PCR nucleic acid testing helped exclude pathogenic diagnosis in COVID-19 patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
Najya Nasrin K Z ◽  
Anitha S Prabhu ◽  
Mithun H K ◽  
Shyam Sudhir

MATERIAL & METHOD: This retrospective study was conducted during the period of June-August 2020 for 3months in newborns born to COVID-19 positive mothers at YMCH after obtaining ethical clearance. All newborns born to mothers with COVID-19 positive status during any trimester of pregnancy, irrespective of neonatal COVID-19 RT-PCR test, and delivered at YMCH during the study period were included. Relevant history and complete systemic examination ndings of the neonate were noted down from the case records and laboratory results of RT-PCR test on nasopharyngeal and throat swab if done was noted down which was done at 24-48hours of birth.RESULT:Total of 25newborns born to COVID-19 positive mothers were included in the study. Among the neonates born, 64% were female and 36% were male. 76% of the pregnant mothers were asymptomatic at the time of detection of COVID-19 infection. The neonatal outcome found to have only 1 newborn with positive COVID-19 infection compared to 24 healthy newborns. CONCLUSION: Signicant measures for preventing neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection are to prevent maternal illness and to decrease the potential of neonatal viral exposure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Chi ◽  
Xinjian Dai ◽  
Xiangao Jiang ◽  
Lefei Zhu ◽  
Junyan Du ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since December 2019, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected more than 12,322,000 people and killed over 556,000 people worldwide. However, Differential diagnosis remains difficult for suspected cases of COVID-19 and need to be improved to reduce misdiagnosis. Methods Sixty-eight cases of suspected COVID-19 treated in Wenzhou Central Hospital from January 21 to February 20, 2020 were divided into confirmed and COVID-19-negative groups based on the results of real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nucleic acid testing of the novel coronavirus in throat swab specimens to compare the clinical symptoms and laboratory and imaging results between the groups. Results Among suspected patients, 17 were confirmed to COVID-19-positive group and 51 were distinguished to COVID-19-negative group. Patients with reduced white blood cell (WBC) count were more common in the COVID-19-positive group than in the COVID-19-negative group (29.4% vs 3.9%, P = 0.003). Subsequently, correlation analysis indicated that there was a significant inverse correlation existed between WBC count and temperature in the COVID-19-positive patients (r = − 0.587, P = 0.003), instead of the COVID-19-negative group. But reduced lymphocyte count was no different between the two groups (47.1% vs 25.5%, P = 0.096). More common chest imaging characteristics of the confirmed COVID-19 cases by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) included ground-glass opacities (GGOs), multiple patchy shadows, and consolidation with bilateral involvement than COVID-19-negative group (82.4% vs 31.4%, P = 0.0002; 41.2% vs 17.6% vs P = 0.048; 76.5% vs 43.1%, P = 0.017; respectively). The rate of clustered infection was higher in COVID-19-positive group than COVID-19-negative group (64.7% vs 7.8%, P = 0.001). Through multiplex PCR nucleic acid testing, 2 cases of influenza A, 3 cases of influenza B, 2 cases of adenovirus, 2 cases of Chlamydia pneumonia, and 7 cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae were diagnosed in the COVID-19-negative group. Conclusions WBC count inversely correlated with the severity of fever, GGOs, multiple patchy shadows, and consolidation in chest HRCT and clustered infection are common but not specific features in the confirmed COVID-19 group. Multiplex PCR nucleic acid testing helped differential diagnosis for suspected COVID-19 cases.


2020 ◽  
Vol 215 (4) ◽  
pp. 834-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph V. Waller ◽  
Parveer Kaur ◽  
Amy Tucker ◽  
Keldon K. Lin ◽  
Michael J. Diaz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Saksha Dholakiya ◽  
Pooja S. Singh ◽  
Jaishree Bamniya ◽  
Haresh U. Doshi

Background: Pregnant women are likely to represent a high-risk population during current coronavirus 2019 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. The aim and objective of this study was to evaluate how COVID-19 pandemic has affected the mode of delivery and whether complications of the disease and mortality rate are higher in pregnant women than in non‐pregnant women.Methods: This ambispective observational study was conducted in department of obstetrics and gynaecology of our institute. Pregnant women diagnosed with positive for COVID-19 via the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in the third trimester and all neonates with complete COVID-19 testing and delivery data. This data was analysed.Results: Out of total 66 cases studied, 48 patients (72.7%) were asymptomatic, while 13 (19.7%) had mild respiratory or gastro intestinal symptoms on initial assessment at admission, including cough, sore throat, fever, weakness or diarrhoea. Cesarean sections were performed in 57.6% of cases. There were no cases of maternal or neonatal mortality.Conclusions: The study revealed that COVID-19 positive pregnant women are usually asymptomatic or mild-moderately symptomatic, similar to COVID-19 positive non-pregnant women. There was a noted rise in the rate of caesarean sections as a mode of delivery. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilya Tsimafeyeu ◽  
Maria Volkova ◽  
Galina Alekseeva ◽  
Maria Berkut ◽  
Alexander Nosov ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To our knowledge, there is no clinical data pertaining to COVID-19 outcomes and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in Russian patients with genitourinary (GU) malignancies. Aim of our analysis was to describe the characteristics of the COVID-19 infection course as well as preliminary safety and efficacy of Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine in patients with active GU malignancies. Methods Patients were retrospectively identified at nine cancer centers in different regions. Patients were included if COVID-19 was diagnosed by a polymerase chain reaction. Data from additional patients with GU cancers who had no positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test before vaccination and who received two doses of Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) between 11 February and 31 August 2021 were collected for safety assessment. Anonymized data were collected through an online registry covering demographics, treatments, and outcomes. Results The Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine was well tolerated; no grade 3–5 toxicities were reported in 112 vaccinated metastatic GU cancer patients. The most common grade 1 adverse events (81%) were injection site reactions (76%), flu-like illness (68%), and asthenia (49%). Five patients experienced grade 2 chills (4.5%) and 3 patients had grade 2 fever (2.7%). With median follow-up of 6.2 months, two COVID-19 cases were confirmed by RT-PCR test in the vaccine group (of 112 participants; 1.8%). Eighty-eight patients with COVID-19 disease were included in the analysis. The average age as of the study enrollment was 66 (range 39–81) and the majority of patients were male with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thirty-six patients (41%) had evidence of metastatic disease, of these 22 patients were receiving systemic therapy. More than half of patients required hospitalization. Fifty-four patients (61%) experienced complications. Sixteen patients who developed COVID-19 pneumonia required mechanical ventilator support. Sixteen patients (18%) died in a median of 23.5 days after the date of COVID-19 diagnosis was established. The 3-month survival rate was 82%. Clinical and/or radiographic progression of cancer during COVID-19 infection or the subsequent 3 months was observed in 10 patients (11.4%). Conclusion Patients with GU malignancies are at increased risk of mortality from COVID-19 infection when compared to the general population. Vaccination could be safe in GU cancer patients. Trial registration: retrospectively registered.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiong Chi ◽  
Xinjian Dai ◽  
Xiangao Jiang ◽  
Lefei Zhu ◽  
Junyan Du ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Since December 2019, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has infected more than 12,310322,000 people and killed over 556,000 people worldwide. However, Differential diagnosis remains difficult for suspected cases of COVID-19 and need to be improved to reduce misdiagnosis.Methods: Sixty-eight cases of suspected COVID-19 treated in Wenzhou Central Hospital from January 21 to February 20, 2020 were divided into confirmed and COVID-19-negative groups based on the results of real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) nucleic acid testing of the novel coronavirus in throat swab specimens to compare the clinical symptoms and laboratory and imaging results between the groups.Results: Among suspected patients, 17 were confirmed to COVID-19-positive group and 51 were distinguished to COVID-19-negative group. Patients with reduced white blood cell (WBC) count were more common in the COVID-19-positive group than in the COVID-19-negative group (29.4% vs 3.9%, P = 0.003). Subsequently, correlation analysis indicated that there was a significant inverse correlation existed between WBC count and temperature in the COVID-19-positive patients (r=-0.587, P=0.003), instead of the COVID-19-negative group. But reduced lymphocyte count was no different between the two groups (47.1% vs 25.5%, P= 0.096). More common chest imaging characteristics of the confirmed COVID-19 cases by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) included ground-glass opacities (GGOs), multiple patchy shadows, and consolidation with bilateral involvement than COVID-19-negative group (82.4% vs 31.4%, P=0.0002; 41.2% vs 17.6% vs P=0.048; 76.5% vs 43.1%, P=0.017; respectively). The rate of clustered infection was higher in COVID-19-positive group than COVID-19-negative group (64.7% vs 7.8%, P=0.001). Through multiplex PCR nucleic acid testing, 2 cases of influenza A, 3 cases of influenza B, 2 cases of adenovirus, 2 cases of Chlamydia pneumonia, and 7 cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae were diagnosed in the COVID-19-negative group.Conclusions: WBC count inversely correlated with the severity of fever, GGOs, multiple patchy shadows, and consolidation in chest HRCT and clustered infection are common but not specific features in the confirmed COVID-19 group.Reduced WBC count inversely correlating with the severity of fever, GGOs, multiple patchy shadows, and consolidation in chest HRCT and clustered infection are features in the confirmed COVID-19 group but not unique. Multiplex PCR nucleic acid testing helped differential diagnosis for suspected COVID-19 casesexclude pathogenic diagnosis in COVID-19 patients.


Blood ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 86 (12) ◽  
pp. 4656-4661 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Nagarajan ◽  
RA Brodsky ◽  
NS Young ◽  
ME Medof

Treatment of severe aplastic anemia with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporin leads to clinical remission in a large proportion of patients. As many as 10% to 57% of these patients, however, develop paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). We and others have observed that this secondary PNH appears to be more indolent than classical PNH, which results from an acquired mutation in the PIG-A gene. In the present study, we compared PIG-A mRNA transcripts in affected cells from patients with secondary PNH and patients with classical PNH. All four of our aplastic patients who developed PNH had a negative Ham test at diagnosis. Two of the four showed a positive Ham test within 3 months after ATG/cyclosporin administration, one developed a positive test at 6 months, and another at 18 months after immunosuppressive therapy. All four patients remain transfusion-independent with no thrombotic episodes after a mean follow-up of 30 months (range, 6 to 63 months). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of PIG-A transcripts in DAF-/CD59- neutrophils or lymphocyte lines of the four patients showed PIG-A abnormalities in all cases. Transition of C163 to T was found in one, a 14-bp deletion (positions 1141 to 1154) was found in the second, deletion of C39 was found in the third, and two mutations, transition of C55 to T and transversion of T762 to A, were found in the fourth. These abnormalities compared with findings of abnormal RNA splicing causing a 133-bp deletion, a 4-bp insertion (between positions 578 and 579), loss of A767, and loss of C575 in four patients with primary PNH. We conclude that secondary PNH that evolves out of aplastic anemia, like classical PNH, is associated with mutations in the PIG-A gene. The apparent indolent nature of this disease probably reflects early detection.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3552-3552
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Alencar de Lima Lange ◽  
Ana Sílvia Gouvea Lima ◽  
Rafael Henriques Jacomo ◽  
Raul AM Melo ◽  
Rosane Bittencourt ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3552 The International Consortium on Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (IC-APL) is an initiative of the International Members Committee of the ASH that aims to improve the treatment outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients in developing countries, which was launched in Mexico, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay. The protocol is identical to the PETHEMA-LPA2005, except for the replacement of idarubicin by daunorubicin. In our interim analysis, estimated 2-year overall and disease-free survivals are 80% and 90%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 5.6%. The median follow-up among survivors was 23 months (range: 1 – 56 months). A secondary aim of IC-APL was to establish molecular monitoring for minimal residual disease (MRD) as a standard practice for APL patients in these countries and to use the results obtained to guide therapy. According to the IC-APL protocol, testing for the PML-RARA fusion transcript was to be performed at diagnosis, end of induction (optional), after the third cycle of consolidation, and every 3 months during maintenance. Considering that real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) provides a number of advantages compared to conventional non-quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), we retrospectively compared the results obtained by both techniques. We analyzed 400 bone marrow (BM) samples from 97 patients with de novo APL enrolled in the IC-APL protocol in Brazil. Of the 97 patients, 78 were considered eligible. The mean age was of 35.8 years with 46 males. Among eligible patients, 49 corresponded to bcr1 ; one to bcr2 and 28 to bcr3 subtype of PML breakpoint. To quantify the fusion transcript PML-RARA we used standardized assays developed in the Europe Against Cancer (EAC) program, normalized to the expression of the ABL gene. The results were compared to plasmid standards (Ipsogen, Marseille) and expressed as Normalized Copy Numbers (NCN). Follow-up samples were considered PCR positive when PML-RARA transcripts amplified with Cycle Threshold (Ct) values of ≤40 in at least 2 out of 3 replicates, according to EAC criteria. A total of 71 samples at diagnosis, 50 at the end of induction, 47 after the third consolidation, 202 during maintenance phase and 30 samples after completion of treatment were analyzed. The median NCN of PML-RARA transcripts at diagnosis was 0.5151 and 0.5092 for the bcr1 and bcr3 subtypes, respectively. At the end of induction there was a reduction of about 3 logs (0.0004 for bcr1 and 0.0005 for bcr3). In this phase, six discrepant cases were observed, all presenting positivity by RQ-PCR. None of these cases relapsed and presented consecutive negative results. Considering samples obtained at the end of consolidation, we detected one case of molecular persistence detected by both methods, and two discrepant results, one positive by RT and another by RQ-PCR. Both cases did not relapse. Among samples collected during maintenance and after the end of treatment, two patients (2.5%) relapsed. Both of them were molecular relapses, defined as the detection (in the context of morphological remission) of the PML-RARA transcript by RT-PCR in two consecutive samples collected 15 days apart. RQ-PCR analysis provided much earlier warning of recurring disease, testing positive 5 and 6 months, respectively, before documentation of molecular relapse by conventional RT-PCR assay. Figure 1 show the kinetics of NCN in these two cases. Our results reinforce that the PML-RARA transcript may be detected after induction but this finding was not of prognostic value. However, our study underlines the importance of sequential monitoring to distinguish patients likely to be cured following front-line therapy from those destined to relapse. The RQ-PCR technique was shown to be more sensitive than RT-PCR, providing earlier warning of impending relapse, thereby allowing greater opportunity for successful delivery of pre-emptive therapy. Finally, our results demonstrate that the implementation of the IC-APL allowed the improvement of laboratory standards in parallel to advances in clinical management. Disclosures: Pasquini: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Pagnano:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tie-Jun Shui ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
Hong-bing Liu ◽  
Xiaohua Chen ◽  
Bi-ke Zhang

Abstract Background Two months after the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China, tens of thousands of hospitalized patients had recovered, and little is known about the follow-up of the recovered patients. Methods The clinical characteristics, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results from throat swab specimens and the results of serological COVID-19 rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were retrospectively reviewed for a total of 758 recovered patients who were previously hospitalized in 17 hospitals and quarantined at 32 rehabilitation stations in Wuhan, China. Results In total, 59 patients (7.78%) had recurrent positive findings for COVID-19 on RT-PCR from throat swabs. With regard to antibody detection, 50/59 (84.75%) and 4/59 (6.78%) patients had positive IgG or dual positive IgG/IgM RDT results, respectively. Conclusions Some patients who had been quarantined and had subsequently recovered from COVID-19 had recurrent positive RT-PCR results for SARS-CoV-2, and the possibility of transmission of the virus by recovered patients needs further investigation. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR2000033580, Jun 6th 2020. Retrospectively registered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document