scholarly journals Alcohol consumption and risk of fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoli Cao ◽  
Tingzhuang Yi ◽  
Qianqian Liu ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Shaohui Tang

Background Observational studies have shown inconsistent results regarding alcohol consumption and risk of fatty liver. We performed a meta-analysis of published literature to investigate the association between alcohol consumption and fatty liver disease (FLD). Methods We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and several Chinese databases, identifying studies that reported an association between alcohol consumption and the risk of FLD. Results A total of 16 studies with 76,608 participants including 13 cross-sectional studies, two cross-sectional following longitudinal studies, and one cohort study met the inclusion criteria. For light to moderate alcohol consumption (LMAC), there was a 22.6% reduction in risk of FLD (odds ratio [OR] = 0.774, 95% confidence interval CI [0.695–0.862], P <0.001), and subgroup analysis showed that a greater reduction in risk of FLD was found in the female drinkers (30.2%) and the drinkers with BMI ≥25 kg/m2(31.3%) compared with the male drinkers (22.6%) and the drinkers with BMI <25 kg/m2(21.3%), respectively. For heavy alcohol consumption, there was no significant influence on risk of FLD (OR = 0.869, 95% CI [0.553–1.364], P = 0.541) in Japanese women, but there was a 33.7% reduction in risk of FLD (OR = 0.663, 95% CI [0.574–0.765], P < 0.001) in Japanese men and a significant increased risk of FLD (OR = 1.785, 95% CI [1.064–2.996], P = 0.028) in Germans. Conclusion LMAC is associated with a significant protective effect on FLD in the studied population, especially in the women and obese population. However, the effect of heavy alcohol consumption on FLD remains unclear due to limited studies and small sample sizes.

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toufik Mahfood Haddad ◽  
Shadi Hamdeh ◽  
Mahesh Anantha Narayanan ◽  
Arun Kanmanthareddy ◽  
Venkata M Alla

Background: Numerous studies have assessed the association of Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) withcardiovascular disease (CVD). However, results have been conflicting due to variability in definitionsof NAFLD and ascertainment of CVD, often combining clinical and surrogate endpoints. We therefore systematically reviewed published literature to assess the association between NAFLD and clinical cardiovascular events. Methods: We searched Medline, Cochrane, google scholar, CINAHL, and Web of Sciencedatabasesusing terms “nonalcoholic fatty liver disease”, “cardiovascular disease”, and their combinations to identify studies published through March 2015. Data from selected studies was extracted and meta-analysis was then performed using Random effects model following the PRISMA guidelines. Publication bias and heterogeneity wereassessed. The main outcome measure was Odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI. Clinical CVD was defined as symptomatic coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, coronary or peripheral intervention, ischemic stroke, and symptomatic peripheral vascular disease. Results: A total of 7 studies with 14634 patients (NAFLD: 4204; controls: 10430) were included in the final analysis. 3 studies were cross- sectional reporting prevalence, while 4 studies were prospective cohort studies reporting incidence. Patients with NAFLD had a significantly higher risk of clinical CVD compared to controls [OR: 3.17; 95% CI: 1.89-5.30, P<0.01) (figure 1A). There was significant heterogeneity (I2=93%). Funnel plot and Begg’s test did not reveal significant publication bias. Separate analyses of the cohort and cross sectional studies and exclusion sensitivity analysis did not alter the findings (figure 1B). Conclusion: NAFLD is associated with a three fold increase in the risk of clinical CVD compared to controls without NAFLD. These results need to be conformed in large prospective studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Péter Jenő Hegyi ◽  
Szilárd Váncsa ◽  
Klementina Ocskay ◽  
Fanni Dembrovszky ◽  
Szabolcs Kiss ◽  
...  

Background: The most common pre-existing liver disease, the metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) formerly named as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), may have a negative impact on the severity of COVID-19. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate if MAFLD or NAFLD are associated with a more severe disease course of COVID-19.Methods: A systematic search was performed in five databases for studies comparing severity, the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality of COVID-19 patients with and without MAFLD or NAFLD. In meta-analysis, pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.Results: Altogether, we included nine studies in our quantitative and qualitative synthesis. MAFLD was associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 compared to the non-MAFLD group (28 vs. 13%, respectively; OR = 2.61, CI: 1.75–3.91). Similarly, in the NAFLD vs. non-NAFLD comparison, NAFLD proved to be a risk factor as well (36 vs. 12%, respectively; OR = 5.22, CI: 1.94–14.03). On the other hand, NAFLD was not associated with an increased risk of ICU admission (24 vs. 7%, respectively; OR = 2.29, CI: 0.79–6.63). We were unable to perform meta-analysis to investigate the association of MAFLD with the rate of ICU admission and with mortality.Conclusion: In conclusion, patients with MAFLD and NAFLD showed a more severe clinical picture in COVID-19. Our results support the importance of close monitoring of COVID-19 patients with MAFLD. Further research is needed to explore the cause of increased severity of COVID-19 in MAFLD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1079-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Johnston ◽  
Janisha Patel ◽  
Christopher D. Byrne

: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcohol related fatty liver disease (AFLD) both represent a spectrum of liver disease severity from hepatic steatosis to fibrosis and cirrhosis. Both NAFLD and AFLD are common diseases in the general population. NAFLD affects ~25% of the adult global population whilst AFLD has become the commonest indication for liver transplantation in the United States. It is often not possible to distinguish between NAFLD and AFLD on examination of liver histology, consequently, differentiation between NAFLD and AFLD is heavily reliant on a history of alcohol consumption. : Age, smoking, alcohol consumption and sex appear to influence the risk of mortality in NAFLD or AFLD. In NAFLD and AFLD, the key causes of increased liver-related mortality are advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis leading to complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensated cirrhosis. NAFLD and AFLD are also associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality including an increased risk of extra-hepatic malignancy. Non-invasive biomarkers of liver disease severity in NAFLD and AFLD perform poorly to predict mortality. However, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, FIB-4 and the NAFLD Fibrosis Score are independently associated with increased mortality in NAFLD. : Both NAFLD and AFLD are associated with extra-hepatic risk factors and complications such as metabolic syndrome encompassing obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. AFLD is associated with hypertension and cardiovascular disease as well as other organ damage. : This narrative review discusses the associations, risk factors and diagnostic biomarkers linking NAFLD and AFLD with increased mortality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 542-555
Author(s):  
Ramin Jalili ◽  
Mohammad Hossein Somi ◽  
Hossein Hosseinifard ◽  
Fatemeh Salehnia ◽  
Morteza Ghojazadeh ◽  
...  

Purpose : Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis are two forms of fatty liver disease with benign and malignant nature, respectively. These two conditions can cause an increased risk of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Given the importance and high prevalence of NAFLD, it is necessary to investigate the results of different studies in related scope to provide a clarity guarantee of effectiveness. Therefore, this systematic review and metaanalysis aim to study the efficacy of various medications used in the treatment of NAFLD. Methods: A systematic search of medical databases identified 1963 articles. After exclusion of duplicated articles and those which did not meet our inclusion criteria, eta-analysis was performed on 84 articles. Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST) were set as primary outcomes and body mass index (BMI), hepatic steatosis, and NAFLD activity score (NAS) were determined as secondary outcomes. Results: Based on the P-score of the therapeutic effects on the non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), we observed the highest efficacy for atorvastatin, tryptophan, orlistat, omega-3 and obeticholic acid for reduction of ALT, AST, BMI, steatosis and NAS respectively. Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that atorvastatin. life-style modification, weight loss, and BMI reduction had a remarkable effect on NAFLD-patients by decreasing aminotransferases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Pan ◽  
Yijing Han ◽  
Tiantian Zou ◽  
Guiqi Zhu ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
...  

Backgrounds and Aims: Previous studies have investigated that sarcopenia is associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and fibrosis in NAFLD. The study aims to investigate the risk for NAFLD, especially NAFLD-related significant fibrosis among subjects with sarcopenia. Methods: We searched electronic databases until 30, September 2017 and reviewed literature extensively. Effect estimates were pooled using random effect models regarding the risk for NAFLD and fixed effect models concerning the risk for significant fibrosis among sarcopenia patients. Sensitivity analysis was performed for the risk of NAFLD. Results: We identified 6 studies. Our results showed that subjects with sarcopenia exhibited an increased risk for NAFLD compared to those without sarcopenia (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12–1.49) with heterogeneity among the individual studies (I2 = 61%). And the risk for NAFLD-related significant fibrosis appeared to be more pronounced in sarcopenia patients (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.29–1.90) with an I2 of 0%. Sensitivity analysis revealed that neither the direction nor the magnitude of the estimated pooled results for NAFLD was obviously affected. Furthermore, the pooled ORs were both close to initial analysis when omitting the study by Hong et al. [Hepatology 2014; 59: 1772–1778] (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11–1.39, I2 = 47%) or by Hashimoto et al. [Endocr J 2016; 63: 877–884] (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.11–1.59, I2 = 67%), which were considered sources of heterogeneity. Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrated that sarcopenia served not only as a risk factor for the onset of NAFLD but also related to the progression of NAFLD-related significant fibrosis.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 2752-2760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianping Hu ◽  
Yong Xu ◽  
Zemin He ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Xiaoqing Lian ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karn Wijarnpreecha ◽  
Susan Lou ◽  
Panadeekarn Panjawatanan ◽  
Anawin Sanguankeo ◽  
Surakit Pungpapong ◽  
...  

Background & Aims: Recent studies have suggested that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) could be a predisposing factor for urolithiasis but the results have been inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to summarize all available data.Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through March 2018 to identify all studies that compared the risk of urolithiasis among patients with NAFLD versus those without NAFLD. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and combined together using the random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.Results: A total of eight studies with 238,400 participants fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of urolithiasis among patients with NAFLD was significantly higher than in those without NAFLD with a pooled odds ratio of 1.81 (95% confidence interval, 1.29-2.56; I2 92%).Conclusions: A significantly increased risk of urolithiasis among patients with NAFLD was observed in this meta-analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document