Adenosine Signaling Perturbs Erythropoiesis and Promotes Myeloid Differentiation

Background Adenosine is a major signaling nucleoside that activates cellular signaling pathways through a family of four different G protein-coupled adenosine receptors (ARs), A 1, A 2A, A 2B, and A 3. At steady state conditions, extracellular levels of adenosine remain low (10 to 200 nM) either through its rapid cellular uptake by specialized nucleoside transporters, mainly through the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1), or its degradation by adenosine deaminases. However, the extracellular levels of adenosine can be rapidly elevated up to 100 μM in response to hypoxia, inflammation, or tissue injury. Under pathophysiological conditions, adenosine signaling is involved in modulating inflammation, fibrosis, and ischemic tissue injury. In sickle cell disease (SCD), adenosine signaling is enhanced and contributes to the pathophysiology of the disease. Despite the importance of adenosine signaling in regulating cell proliferation, and stem cell regeneration, as well as in red blood cell functions and adaptation to hypoxia, very little is known about its implication in hematopoiesis, and more specifically during erythropoiesis. Here, we aimed to investigate the effects of high extracellular adenosine on the erythroid commitment and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitors, and to decipher the implication of ARs in these processes. Results To investigate the role of high extracellular adenosine in regulating erythroid commitment and differentiation of hematopoietic progenitors, we performed ex vivo erythropoiesis of healthy CD34 + cells in the presence or absence of increased extracellular adenosine concentrations ranging from 10 to 200 µM. Our results showed that adenosine decreases erythroid proliferation in a dose dependent manner. High adenosine levels (>50μM) inhibited the proliferation of erythroid precursors and increased apoptosis via a cell cycle arrest in G1. Accordingly, western blots revealed the accumulation of p53 and its downstream target p21, a well-known mediator of G1 cell-cycle arrest, in adenosine-treated cells. Moreover, adenosine treatment led to the persistence of a non-erythroid GPA neg subpopulation expressing myeloid markers (CD18, CD11a, CD13, CD33). May-Grünwald Giemsa staining of this subset revealed granular cells at different stages of differentiation. The culture of FACS-sorted CD36 + and CD36 - cells suggested that this adenosine-induced GPA neg population originates from the survival of CD36 - myeloid progenitors even in the presence of erythropoietin. Importantly, these effects were specific to adenosine as neither guanosine, uridine nor cytidine affected the proliferation and differentiation of erythroid precursors. Furthermore, we have recently shown that ENT1-mediated adenosine uptake is essential for optimal erythroid differentiation. Therefore, we suggested that elevated extracellular adenosine perturbs erythropoiesis via its signaling upon ARs activation. To confirm this hypothesis, we assessed the effect of ARs activation during erythropoiesis. Given that A 2B and A 3 are the only known ARs expressed in human hematopoietic progenitors and erythroid precursors, we used BAY60-6583 and CI-IB-MECA, two highly selective agonists for A 2B and A 3 receptors, respectively. Both BAY60-6583 and CI-IB-MECA increased apoptosis and decreased erythroblast maturation and enucleation, while only Cl-IB-MECA led to the upregulation of CD33 and CD11a myeloid markers and promoted the differentiation of a GPA neg myeloid subpopulation. Conclusion Overall, our results place adenosine signaling as a new player in hematopoiesis regulation. Adenosine signaling via A 3 perturbs erythropoiesis and promotes the survival and differentiation of myeloid progenitors even in an erythroid favoring environment. While the activation of A 2B hampers optimal erythropoiesis without impacting the myeloid differentiation. As both ineffective erythropoiesis and increased leucocyte counts are reported in SCD, and given the detrimental role of high adenosine levels in its pathophysiology, further studies are ongoing to address the impact of adenosine signaling on hematopoiesis in this disease. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Role of Adenosine Kinase In Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 1-Induced Mechano-Hypersensitivities

Emerging evidence implicates the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor subtype 1 (S1PR1) in the development of neuropathic pain. Continued investigation of the signaling pathways downstream of S1PR1 are needed to support development of S1PR1 antagonists. In rodents, intrathecal (i.th.) injection of SEW2871, a selective S1PR1 agonist, activates the nod-like receptor family, pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, increases interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and causes behavioral hypersensitivity. I.th. injection of a IL-1β receptor antagonist blocks SEW2871-induced hypersensitivity, suggesting that IL-1β contributes to S1PR1’s actions. Interestingly, previous studies have suggested that IL-1β increases the expression/activity of adenosine kinase (ADK), a key regulator of adenosine signaling at its receptors (ARs). Increased ADK expression reduces adenosine signaling whereas inhibiting ADK restores the action of adenosine. Here, we show that SEW287-induced behavioral hypersensitivity is associated with increased expression of ADK in astrocytes of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (DH-SC). Moreover, the ADK inhibitor, ABT702, blocks SEW2871-induced hypersensitivity. These findings link ADK activation to S1PR1. If SEW2871-induced pain is mediated by IL-1β, which in turn activates ADK and leads to mechano-allodynia, then blocking ADK should attenuate IL-1β effects. In support of this idea, recombinant rat (rrIL-1β)-induced allodynia was blocked by at least 90% with ABT702, functionally linking ADK to IL-1β. Moreover, the selective A3AR antagonist, MRS1523, prevents the ability of ABT702 to block SEW2871 and IL-1β-induced allodynia, implicating A3AR signaling in the beneficial effects exerted by ABT702. Our findings provide novel mechanistic insight into how S1PR1 signaling in the spinal cord produces hypersensitivity through IL1-b and ADK activation.

Estradiol influences adenosinergic signaling and nonrapid eye movement sleep need in adult female rats

Gonadal steroids and gender are risk factors for sleep disruptions and insomnia in women. However, the relationship between ovarian steroids and sleep is poorly understood. In rodent models, estradiol (E2) suppresses sleep in females suggesting that E2 may reduce homeostatic sleep need. The current study investigates whether E2 decreases sleep need and the potential mechanisms that govern E2 suppression of sleep. Our previous findings suggest that the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO) is a key nexus for E2 action on sleep. Using behavioral, neurochemical, and pharmacological approaches, we tested whether (1) E2 influenced the sleep homeostat and (2) E2 influenced adenosine signaling in the MnPO of adult female rats. In both unrestricted baseline sleep and recovery sleep from 6-h sleep deprivation, E2 significantly reduced nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep-delta power, NREM-slow wave activity (NREM-SWA, 0.5–4.0 Hz), and NREM-delta energy suggesting that E2 decreases homeostatic sleep need. However, coordinated with E2-induced changes in physiological markers of homeostatic sleep was a marked increase in MnPO extracellular adenosine (a molecular marker of homeostatic sleep need) during unrestricted and recovery sleep in E2-treated but not oil control animals. While these results seemed contradictory, systemically administered E2 blocked the ability of CGS-21680 (adenosine A2A receptor agonist) microinjected into the MnPO to increase NREM sleep suggesting that E2 may block adenosine signaling. Together, these findings provide evidence that E2 may attenuate the local effects of the A2A receptors in the MnPO, which in turn may underlie estrogenic suppression of sleep behavior as well as changes in homeostatic sleep need.

Contribution of the Adenosine 2A Receptor to Behavioral Effects of Tetrahydrocannabinol, Cannabidiol and PECS-101

The cannabis-derived molecules, ∆9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), are both of considerable therapeutic interest for a variety of purposes, including to reduce pain and anxiety and increase sleep. In addition to their other pharmacological targets, both THC and CBD are competitive inhibitors of the equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (ENT-1), a primary inactivation mechanism for adenosine, and thereby increase adenosine signaling. The goal of this study was to examine the role of adenosine A2A receptor activation in the effects of intraperitoneally administered THC alone and in combination with CBD or PECS-101, a 4′-fluorinated derivative of CBD, in the cannabinoid tetrad, elevated plus maze (EPM) and marble bury assays. Comparisons between wild-type (WT) and A2AR knock out (A2AR-KO) mice were made. The cataleptic effects of THC were diminished in A2AR-KO; no other THC behaviors were affected by A2AR deletion. CBD (5 mg/kg) potentiated the cataleptic response to THC (5 mg/kg) in WT but not A2AR-KO. Neither CBD nor THC alone affected EPM behavior; their combination produced a significant increase in open/closed arm time in WT but not A2AR-KO. Both THC and CBD reduced the number of marbles buried in A2AR-KO but not WT mice. Like CBD, PECS-101 potentiated the cataleptic response to THC in WT but not A2AR-KO mice. PECS-101 also reduced exploratory behavior in the EPM in both genotypes. These results support the hypothesis that CBD and PECS-101 can potentiate the cataleptic effects of THC in a manner consistent with increased endogenous adenosine signaling.

DAMPening COVID-19 Severity by Attenuating Danger Signals

COVID-19 might lead to multi-organ failure and, in some cases, to death. The COVID-19 severity is associated with a “cytokine storm.” Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are proinflammatory molecules that can activate pattern recognition receptors, such as toll-like receptors (TLRs). DAMPs and TLRs have not received much attention in COVID-19 but can explain some of the gender-, weight- and age-dependent effects. In females and males, TLRs are differentially expressed, likely contributing to higher COVID-19 severity in males. DAMPs and cytokines associated with COVID-19 mortality are elevated in obese and elderly individuals, which might explain the higher risk for severer COVID-19 in these groups. Adenosine signaling inhibits the TLR/NF-κB pathway and, through this, decreases inflammation and DAMPs’ effects. As vaccines will not be effective in all susceptible individuals and as new vaccine-resistant SARS-CoV-2 mutants might develop, it remains mandatory to find means to dampen COVID-19 disease severity, especially in high-risk groups. We propose that the regulation of DAMPs via adenosine signaling enhancement might be an effective way to lower the severity of COVID-19 and prevent multiple organ failure in the absence of severe side effects.

The Good, the Bad, and the Deadly: Adenosinergic Mechanisms Underlying Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy

Adenosine is an inhibitory modulator of neuronal excitability. Neuronal activity results in increased adenosine release, thereby constraining excessive excitation. The exceptionally high neuronal activity of a seizure results in a surge in extracellular adenosine to concentrations many-fold higher than would be observed under normal conditions. In this review, we discuss the multifarious effects of adenosine signaling in the context of epilepsy, with emphasis on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). We describe and categorize the beneficial, detrimental, and potentially deadly aspects of adenosine signaling. The good or beneficial characteristics of adenosine signaling in the context of seizures include: (1) its direct effect on seizure termination and the prevention of status epilepticus; (2) the vasodilatory effect of adenosine, potentially counteracting postictal vasoconstriction; (3) its neuroprotective effects under hypoxic conditions; and (4) its disease modifying antiepileptogenic effect. The bad or detrimental effects of adenosine signaling include: (1) its capacity to suppress breathing and contribute to peri-ictal respiratory dysfunction; (2) its contribution to postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES); (3) the prolonged increase in extracellular adenosine following spreading depolarization waves may contribute to postictal neuronal dysfunction; (4) the excitatory effects of A2A receptor activation is thought to exacerbate seizures in some instances; and (5) its potential contributions to sleep alterations in epilepsy. Finally, the adverse effects of adenosine signaling may potentiate a deadly outcome in the form of SUDEP by suppressing breathing and arousal in the postictal period. Evidence from animal models suggests that excessive postictal adenosine signaling contributes to the pathophysiology of SUDEP. The goal of this review is to discuss the beneficial, harmful, and potentially deadly roles that adenosine plays in the context of epilepsy and to identify crucial gaps in knowledge where further investigation is necessary. By better understanding adenosine dynamics, we may gain insights into the treatment of epilepsy and the prevention of SUDEP.

Mu opioid receptors acutely regulate adenosine signaling in a thalamo-striatal circuit.

Endogenous adenosine plays a crucial role in maintaining energy homeostasis and adenosine levels are tightly regulated across neural circuits. In the dorsal medial striatum (DMS) adenosine inhibits neurotransmitter release, but the source and mechanism underlying its accumulation are largely unknown. Opioids also inhibit neurotransmitter release in the DMS and influences adenosine accumulation after prolonged exposure. However, how these two neurotransmitter systems interact acutely is also largely unknown. This study demonstrates that activation of mu opioid receptors (MORs), but not delta opioid receptors (DORs) or kappa opioid receptors (KORs), inhibits tonic activation of adenosine A1Rs via a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) dependent mechanism in both male and female mice. Further, selectively knocking-out MORs from presynaptic terminals and postsynaptic medium spiny neurons (MSNs) revealed that activation of MORs on D1R positive MSNs, but not D2R positive MSNs, is necessary to inhibit tonic adenosine signaling on presynaptic terminals. Given the role of D1R positive MSNs in movement and motivated behaviors, these findings reveal a novel mechanism by which these neurons regulate their own synaptic inputs.