A Mobile App to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Acceptance Among Finnish and Polish Preschoolers: Randomized Trial

Background Early childhood education and care (ECEC) centers are ideal venues for food education. As smartphones and tablets are becoming increasingly popular in ECEC centers, technology can be used to deliver such pedagogical content. Evidence suggests that video games can affect fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption among 9- to 12-year-old children, but studies among preschoolers are scarce. Objective This paper describes the development of the Mole’s Veggie Adventures app and its effectiveness in increasing FV acceptance among Finnish and Polish preschoolers aged 3 to 6 years. Methods A multiprofessional team created an app to be used in ECEC centers in groups of 3 to 10 children. The app aimed to increase vegetable acceptance, and it was built using elements that support the development of self-regulation and social skills. Altogether, 7 Finnish and 4 Polish ECEC centers participated in the study. Before randomization, parents reported background factors and their children’s willingness to taste different FVs. The ECEC professionals in the intervention arm were instructed to use the app at least once a week during the 3- to 4-week intervention period. The main outcomes in this unblinded, cluster-randomized study were FV acceptance and relative FV acceptance. The first was calculated as a sum variable describing the children’s willingness to taste 25 different FVs, the second as FV acceptance divided by the number of FVs served. We used analysis of covariance to compare the FV acceptance and relative FV acceptance scores between the intervention and control groups at follow-up. Results A total of 221 children were included in the analysis. At follow-up, the intervention group (115/221, 52%) had higher FV acceptance scores (baseline adjusted difference of mean 7.22; 95% CI 1.41-13.03) than the control group (106/221, 48%). The intervention effect was parallel for relative FV acceptance scores (baseline adjusted difference of mean 0.28; 95% CI 0.05-0.52). Conclusions The Mole’s Veggie Adventures app has the potential to increase FV acceptance among preschoolers and can be a valuable tool in supporting food education in ECEC centers. Furthermore, the app can be feasibly incorporated into preschool routines in countries with different educational environments. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05173311; https://tinyurl.com/4vfbh283

P-EGS11 The Theatre Training Checklist: A Toolkit to Revive Post Pandemic Operative Training

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant negative impact on operative surgical training, with trainee logbook numbers reduced by more than 50% compared to 2019. The operating theatre is expensive, costing approximately £1200 per hour to run. It is a crucial learning environment for many different trainees: anaesthetists, surgeons, operation department practitioners and surgical first assistants. For individuals to achieve their training requirements, the operating theatre as a training environment must be shared between all trainees. This requires excellent teamwork and leadership. The recovery phase of the COVID-19 pandemic is a unique opportunity to adopt novel training strategies. Methods The Theatre Training Checklist is a simple framework that aims to facilitate awareness, understanding, coordination and cooperation of training for all members of the team (Figure 1). It is a practical strategy that can be adopted in any setting. Usually, trainers discuss informally with their trainees about their individual Skills, Experience, Expectationsand what is Achievable in a planned theatre list (SEEA). However, there currently is limited opportunity to discuss this between different disciplines and the wider team. This tool aims to refine communication, optimize training, manage expectations and ensure equity across the board. The checklist has been introduced and trialed locally. Results The checklist is completed at the start of the list during the theatre brief. It identifies all trainees and their specific needs within the operating theatre session to the whole team. An agreed strategy is developed on how to achieve identified training goals (figure 2). Sometimes it may not be possible to allow a trainee to perform a particular procedure. However, other opportunities for training in theatre exist, such as: patient positioning, choice of equipment, types of techniques, discussions around consenting and complications etc. Feedback undertaken from the multiprofessional team after local trialing of the checklist has been positive. Conclusions The Theatre Training Checklist aims to create dialogue and shared understanding of training needs among all parties within the operating theatre. The Theatre Training Checklist Toolkit is available for use and consists of the checklist tool and an instructional video. The Theatre Training checklist is being piloted in some centers and we hope to have the opportunity to present some early findings at AUGIS 2021.

Exploration of therapists’ views of practice within critical care

IntroductionTherapists are increasing recognised as core members of the critical care multiprofessional team. Each therapy profession provides specialist assessments and interventions, but also work collaboratively across the rehabilitation pathway. Despite inclusion in several national guidance documents, there remains a lack of evidence regarding the perceived role of therapists working within critical care, the unique contributions of each profession and opinion on the day-to-day tasks and responsibilities of each therapy profession.MethodA descriptive qualitative methodology was used involving seven focus groups. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit therapists via professional specialist interest groups. All focus groups were uniprofessional and discussions based on a predesigned framework. Data were analysed thematically.ResultsParticipants (n=65) from across the UK were recruited to seven focus groups with an average of 18.3 years postgraduate clinical experience of which 11.6 years was within critical care. Three core themes were generated from 875 codes and 237 potential subthemes. The final themes were (1) professional characteristics; (2) multidisciplinary team and (3) staffing. An additional theme of ‘COVID-19 pandemic’ was also identified. Findings were similar across all profession groups particularly regarding the need for holistic, patient-centred care. Expected variation was observed for professional characteristics especially regarding specific assessments and interventions.DiscussionTherapy services are an essential component to the delivery of critical care especially regarding recovery and rehabilitation. Through three core themes, this qualitative study has provided new evidence of the perceptions and opinions of the role that therapists undertake within critical care.

A importância da Odontologia na assistência a indivíduos com defeitos congênitos

Introduction: Birth defects are structural or functional changes that occur during intrauterine life. The dentist must recognize the craniofacial defects, complement the phenotypic characterization and manage them within a multidisciplinary team. The present review aims to assist the dentist to diagnose these findings and present syndromic conditions typically associated with craniofacial malformations Literature Review: Craniofacial manifestations of birth defects are conditions that must be recognized by dentists, as they are frequently present in their daily practices, and this professional may be the first to identify such findings. The main syndromic clinical pictures typically associated with micrognathia, oral clefts and skeletal dysplasias with craniofacial manifestation are presented, pointing out their clinical and genetic features. Discussion: The dentist must perform a detailed anamnesis including family history, as well as should recognize both clinical and radiographically the dysmorphisms, observing the patient systemically. Conclusion: Dentistry professionals should receive theoretical-practical training for the diagnosis, treatment and surveillance of individuals with congenital defects, either in individual assessment or as part of a multiprofessional team.

Processes of Multiprofessional Child Protection Decision Making in Hospital Settings: Systematic Narrative Review

The aim of this systematic narrative literature review is to explore empirical evidence as to how a multiprofessional approach to child protection decision making is implemented in hospitals settings. Child protection cases where there is a suspicious serious injury suspected sexual abuse or serious neglect are often investigated in hospital, involving a number of relevant professions. Five electronic bibliographic databases were used for the search. To be included in the review studies had to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, report on empirical research, be available full text in English, and have used an identifiable research design. The search was restricted to 10 years, from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, and retrieved 6,934 studies. The review includes 26 studies undertaken in 10 countries. In all the hospital-based settings studied, child protection decision-making tasks were assigned to a designated multiprofessional team. However, there was remarkable diversity in models of team structure, regulation of workflow, structured procedures, and standardized tools through which practice was carried out. Research focused on evaluating the teams’ effectiveness in fulfilling their duties which were, first and foremost, the identification of possible child maltreatment. The analysis identifies various systemic approaches and quality improvement methods to promote effective team-based decision-making processes in hospitals. The interactional aspect of collaborative team-based practice was generally missing from the published research. This article discusses next steps for the development of practice, policy, and research to enhance useful multiprofessional child protection team working in hospitals.

Use of the failure mode and effect analysis tool in the clinical medication process in an intensive care unit

Objective: To describe failure modes and establish contingency measures related to the clinical medication process using medical prescriptions of patients admitted to an Intensive Respiratory Therapy Unit (UTIR), using the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) tool. Methods: This is a descriptive and cross-sectional study carried out in an Intensive Care Unit of a public hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil, from November/2015 to March/2016. Study population included adults aging ≥ 18 years in intensive care at the UTIR. The study included the medical prescriptions released on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. The study was divided in five phases: situational diagnosis, formation of a multiprofessional team, assessment of failure modes (FM), monitoring of FM and calculation of the priority coefficient (PC). In the FM assessment, scoring of the three indicators of the FMEA was used within a range of 1-10, whereas a score of 10 characterized the most concerning situation. Therefore, the indicators gravity (G), prevalence (P) and detection (D) were analyzed. The study was carried out with an active interaction between the subjects of the group and several in-person and virtual sessions were performed. Drugs used in the study were categorized for therapeutic class, according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel® 2013 software. Results: 301 prescriptions were analyzed, with the identification of 452 FMs, which related mostly to systemic antibacterials (21.6%, n = 8), psycholeptics (13.5%, n = 5) and antithrombotic agents (10.8%, n = 4). FMs were divided in eleven categories, from which “drug interaction” (36.8%; n = 14), “dose adjustment” (21.1%, n = 8) and “food-drug interaction” (7.9%, n = 3) were the most frequent. The PC of the detected FMs varied between 28 and 294, and 42.1% (n = 16) of them presented PC above 100. Median of the indicators G (6 – min: 3; max: 9), D (7 – min: 3; max 7) and priority coefficient (72 – min: 28; max: 294) indicate that FM had generally moderate gravity, low prevalence and low detection. For the majority of FMs (72.7%, n = 28), the chosen conduct was ‘not to accept’ and the established contingency measure included a sentinel event notification. Conclusion: The use of FMEA enabled the identification, classification, and prioritization of risks of the clinical medication process in the UTIR. This study indicates the need to implement measures that increase safety in the clinical practice of the study Intensive Care Unit.