cognitive variability
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

53
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Kaitlin E. Riegler ◽  
Margaret Cadden ◽  
Erin T. Guty ◽  
Jared M. Bruce ◽  
Peter A. Arnett

Abstract Objective: People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) and healthy controls (HCs) were evaluated on cognitive variability indices and we examined the relationship between fatigue and cognitive variability between these groups. Intraindividual variability (IIV) on a neuropsychological test battery was hypothesized to mediate the group differences expected in fatigue. Method: Fifty-nine PwMS and 51 HCs completed a psychosocial interview and battery of neuropsychological tests and questionnaires during a 1-day visit. Fatigue in this study was measured with the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS), a self-report multidimensional measure of fatigue. IIV was operationalized using two different measures, a maximum discrepancy score (MDS) and intraindividual standard deviation (ISD), in two cognitive domains, memory and attention/processing speed. Two mediation analyses with group (PwMS or HCs) as the independent variable, variability composite (memory or attention/processing speed) measures as the mediators, total residual fatigue (after accounting for age) as the outcome, and depression as a covariate were conducted. The Baron and Kenny approach to testing mediation and the PROCESS macro for testing the strength of the indirect effect were used. Results: Results of a mediation analysis using 5000 bootstrap samples indicated that IIV in domains of both attention/processing speed and memory significantly mediated the effect of patient status on total residual fatigue. Conclusion: IIV is an objective performance measure that is related to differences in fatigue impact between PwMS and HCs. PwMS experience more variability across tests of attention/processing speed and memory and this experience of variable performance may increase the impact of fatigue.


Author(s):  
Kevin J. Manning ◽  
Joshua Preciado‐Pina ◽  
Lihong Wang ◽  
Kimberly Fitzgibbon ◽  
Grace Chan ◽  
...  

BJPsych Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimosthenis Tsapekos ◽  
Rebecca Strawbridge ◽  
Tim Mantingh ◽  
Matteo Cella ◽  
Til Wykes ◽  
...  

Background People with bipolar disorder have moderate cognitive difficulties that tend to be more pronounced during mood episodes but persist after clinical remission and affect recovery. Recent evidence suggests heterogeneity in these difficulties, but the factors underlying cognitive heterogeneity are unclear. Aims To examine whether distinct cognitive profiles can be identified in a sample of euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder and examine potential differences between subgroups. Method Cognitive performance was assessed across four domains (i.e. processing speed, verbal learning/memory, working memory, executive functioning) in 80 participants. We conducted a hierarchical cluster analysis and a discriminant function analysis to identify cognitive profiles and considered differences in cognitive reserve, estimated cognitive decline from premorbid cognitive functioning, and clinical characteristics among subgroups. Results Four discrete cognitive profiles were identified: cognitively intact (n = 25; 31.3%); selective deficits in verbal learning and memory (n = 15; 18.8%); intermediate deficits across all cognitive domains (n = 30; 37.5%); and severe deficits across all domains (n = 10; 12.5%). Cognitive decline after illness onset was greater for the intermediate and severe subgroups. Cognitive reserve scores were increasingly lower for subgroups with greater impairments. A smaller proportion of cognitively intact participants were using antipsychotic medications compared with all other subgroups. Conclusions Our findings suggest that individuals with cognitively impaired profiles demonstrate more cognitive decline after illness onset. Cognitive reserve may be one of the factors underlying cognitive variability across people with bipolar disorder. Patients in the intermediate and severe subgroups may be in greater need of interventions targeting cognitive difficulties.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Hommelsen ◽  
Shivakumar Viswanathan ◽  
Silvia Daun

ABSTRACTIndividual human brains plastically reorganize over extended timescales ranging from days to years, which makes these changes difficult to track. One promising tracking indicator is the neural activity at rest. However, the rest state (RS) is vulnerable to incidental inter-day cognitive variability that can confound the detection of changes to underlying neurophysiology. Here we show that this confounding is minimized by tracking changes to the distinctiveness of an individual’s RS activity, which is shaped by individual neurophysiology. Using longitudinal (5-day) RS acquired with EEG, we devised empirical simulations of distinctiveness changes confounded by cognitive variation. These inter-day changes were correctly classified with over 96% accuracy from 2-second snapshots of instantaneous oscillatory power from RS and confounded-RS. Surprisingly, the individual indicators of distinctiveness were concentrated at characteristic fronto-central and occipital zones. These findings support the suitability of longitudinal RS for individualized inferences about neurophysiological change in health and disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 100754 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Iuculano ◽  
A. Padmanabhan ◽  
L. Chen ◽  
J. Nicholas ◽  
S. Mitsven ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Lauren A. Rutter ◽  
Ipsit V. Vahia ◽  
Eliza Passell ◽  
Brent P. Forester ◽  
Laura Germine

Abstract Objectives: Cognitive impairments are directly related to severity of symptoms and are a primary cause for functional impairment. Intraindividual cognitive variability likely plays a role in both risk and resiliency from symptoms. In fact, such cognitive variability may be an earlier marker of cognitive decline and emergent psychiatric symptoms than traditional psychiatric or behavioral symptoms. Here, our objectives were to survey the literature linking intraindividual cognitive variability, trauma, and dementia and to suggest a potential research agenda. Design: A wide body of literature suggests that exposure to major stressors is associated with poorer cognitive performance, with intraindividual cognitive variability in particular linked to the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the aftermath of severe trauma. Measurements: In this narrative review, we survey the empirical studies to date that evaluate the connection between intraindividual cognitive variability, PTSD, and pathological aging including dementia. Results: The literature suggests that reaction time (RT) variability within an individual may predict future cognitive impairment, including premature cognitive aging, and is significantly associated with PTSD symptoms. Conclusions: Based on our findings, we argue that intraindividual RT variability may serve as a common pathological indicator for trauma-related dementia risk and should be investigated in future studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 889-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrthe J. Ottenhoff ◽  
◽  
André B. Rietman ◽  
Sabine E. Mous ◽  
Ellen Plasschaert ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document