New Physics II: Spin Picture, Particle Structure, and Fundamental Interactions

Experimental data sometimes fails to render the expected truth, such as high-speed bullets smashing into pieces on a water surface cannot verify the water’s hardness. By re-examining the essence underneath quantum phenomena and analyzing their relevance to universal classical theory, this study has thoroughly revealed the classical counterpart of spin. Subsequently, the equivalence between spin angular momentum (of energy or charge) and vorticity flux (of energy or charge) has also been unveiled, thus intuitively clarifying many abstruse physical concepts, like spin magnetic moment, virtual electron, relativistic time dilation, neutrino chirality, quark origin, and fundamental interactions (including gravitons). From now on, almost all quantum puzzles (e.g., wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, Schrödinger’s cat) can be understood classically, just as prominent physicists such as Planck, Einstein, and Schrödinger longed for back then. This paper can be considered a blueprint of the Theory of Everything (TOE).

Derivation of the set of the fundamental interactions from first principles

Global conservation laws require the fundamental interactions to be processes which transfer information from one particle to another. Therefore, in order to show what types of interactions may exist, we derive from the very first principles a set of the most fundamental information transfers and their basic properties. Within these information transfers, we identify candidates for gravitational, electromagnetic and strong scattering, and also for weak decay. We do it by taking the characteristic properties of each fundamental interaction, such as confinement or parity violation, and by using them to rule out information transfers without these properties. The found mapping then makes possible to study the information transfers in order to get knowledge about the corresponding fundamental interactions.

New Physics II: Spin Picture, Particle Structure, and Fundamental Interactions

Experimental data sometimes fails to render the expected truth, such as high-speed bullets smashing into pieces on a water surface cannot verify the water’s hardness. By re-examining the essence underneath quantum phenomena and analyzing their relevance to universal classical theory, this study has thoroughly revealed the classical counterpart of spin. Subsequently, the equivalence between spin angular momentum (of energy or charge) and vorticity flux (of energy or charge) has also been unveiled, thus intuitively clarifying many abstruse physical concepts, like spin magnetic moment, virtual electron, relativistic time dilation, neutrino chirality, quark origin, and fundamental interactions (including gravitons). From now on, almost all quantum puzzles (e.g., wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, Schrödinger’s cat) can be understood classically, just as prominent physicists such as Planck, Einstein, and Schrödinger longed for back then. This paper can be considered a blueprint of the Theory of Everything (TOE).

New Physics II: Spin Picture, Particle Structure, and Fundamental Interactions

Experimental data sometimes fails to render the expected truth, such as high-speed bullets smashing into pieces on a water surface cannot verify the water’s hardness. By re-examining the essence underneath quantum phenomena and analyzing their relevance to universal classical theory, this study has thoroughly revealed the classical counterpart of spin. Subsequently, the equivalence between spin angular momentum (of energy or charge) and vorticity flux (of energy or charge) has also been unveiled, thus intuitively clarifying many abstruse physical concepts, like spin magnetic moment, virtual electron, relativistic time dilation, neutrino chirality, quark origin, and fundamental interactions (including gravitons). From now on, almost all quantum puzzles (e.g., wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, Schrödinger’s cat) can be understood classically, just as prominent physicists such as Planck, Einstein, and Schrödinger longed for back then. This paper can be considered a blueprint of the Theory of Everything (TOE).

New Physics II: Spin Picture, Particle Structure, and Fundamental Interactions

Experimental data sometimes fails to render the expected truth, such as high-speed bullets smashing into pieces on a water surface cannot verify the water’s hardness. By re-examining the essence underneath quantum phenomena and analyzing their relevance to universal classical theory, this study has thoroughly revealed the classical counterpart of spin. Subsequently, the equivalence between spin angular momentum (of energy or charge) and vorticity flux (of energy or charge) has also been unveiled, thus intuitively clarifying many abstruse physical concepts, like spin magnetic moment, virtual electron, relativistic time dilation, neutrino chirality, quark origin, and fundamental interactions (including gravitons). From now on, almost all quantum puzzles (e.g., wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, Schrödinger’s cat) can be understood classically, just as prominent physicists such as Planck, Einstein, and Schrödinger longed for back then. This paper can be considered a blueprint of the Theory of Everything (TOE).

An introduction to the superunified theory of quantum fields & fundamental interactions (Discoveries in pure mathematics)

This is intended to describe the physical Universe as self-excited and self-organized mathematical continuum. There does exist the universal pure (not applied) mathematical machine perceived by the intelligent observers in a capacity of certain material world. In this short article we are able to indicate only some key points of the theory which suggests practically infinite amount of combinatorics.

Substantial Motion: from Mulla Sadra's Philosophy to Physics

Substantial motion is Mulla Sadra's philosophical innovation in material existence. Since the four fundamental interactions are the major topics of physics, in this comparative study, substantial motion is tested based on physical achievements. The study aimed to find answers to the following questions: do the achievements made in physics strengthen or weaken the theory of substantial motion? If science strengthens it, which physical interactions are examples of substantial motion? Based on the results of the physics, how can some of the accidental changes be considered as Substantial motion? Mulla Sadra proved that material existence has a constant inherent fluidity. Three centuries later, quantum physics proved the dynamism within matter. Mulla Sadra showed that accidental motion is the cause of substantial motion. Similarly, science confirmed that any change in the properties of an object results from the internal interactions of the matter and the object. Furthermore, any motion in an object occurs along with the exchange of the particles carrying force. Accordingly, internal transformations in the matter including the intermolecular, intramolecular, atomic, and subatomic (at elementary particles and quarks level) are subsets of the substantial motion.

Strategies of grain number determination differentiate barley row types

Gaining knowledge on fundamental interactions of various yield components is crucial to improve yield potential in small grain cereals. It is well known in barley that increasing grain number greatly improves yield potential; however, the yield components determining grain number and their association in barley row types are less explored. In this study, we assessed different yield components such as potential spikelet number (PSN), spikelet survival (SSL), spikelet number (SN), grain set (GS), and grain survival (GSL), as well as their interactions with grain number by using a selected panel of two- and six-rowed barley types. Also, to analyze the stability of these interactions, we performed the study in the greenhouse and the field. From this study, we found that in two-rowed barley, grain number determination is strongly influenced by PSN rather than SSL and/or GS in both growth conditions. Conversely, in six-rowed barley, grain number is associated with SSL instead of PSN and/or GS. Thus, our study showed that increasing grain number might be possible by augmenting PSN in two-rowed genotypes, while for six-rowed genotypes SSL needs to be improved. We speculate that this disparity of grain number determination in barley row types might be due to the fertility of lateral spikelets. Collectively, this study revealed that grain number in two-rowed barley largely depends on the developmental trait, PSN, while in six-rowed barley, it mainly follows the ability for SSL.