uplift force
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

71
(FIVE YEARS 19)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Dai ◽  
Tian Li ◽  
Ning Zhou ◽  
Jiye Zhang ◽  
Weihua Zhang

AbstractAiming at the problem that aerodynamic uplift forces of the pantograph running in the knuckle-downstream and knuckle-upstream conditions are inconsistent, and their magnitudes do not satisfy the corresponding standard, the aerodynamic uplift forces of pantographs with baffles are numerically investigated, and an optimization method to determine the baffle angle is proposed. First, the error between the aerodynamic resistances of the pantograph obtained by numerical simulation and wind tunnel test is less than 5%, which indicates the accuracy of the numerical simulation method. Second, the original pantograph and pantographs equipped with three different baffles are numerically simulated to obtain the aerodynamic forces and moments of the pantograph components. Three different angles for the baffles are −17°, 0° and 17°. Then the multibody simulation is used to calculate the aerodynamic uplift force of the pantograph, and the optimal range for the baffle angle is determined. Results show that the lift force of the baffle increases with the increment of the angle in the knuckle-downstream condition, whereas the lift force of the baffle decreases with the increment of the angle in the knuckle-upstream condition. According to the results of the aerodynamic uplift force, the optimal angle of the baffle is determined to be 4.75° when the running speed is 350 km/h, and pantograph–catenary contact forces are 128.89 N and 129.15 N under the knuckle-downstream and knuckle-upstream operating conditions, respectively, which are almost equal and both meet the requirements of the standard EN50367:2012.


Author(s):  
Imanol Gil ◽  
Joseba Mendiguren ◽  
Lander Galdos ◽  
Endika Mugarra ◽  
Eneko Saenz de Argandoña

AbstractCurrently, a great deal of controversy exists regarding the real forces generated in drawbeads during sheet metal forming processes. The present work focuses on the analysis of the uplift force. First, a detailed literature review is carried out to analyse previous experimental procedures used to measure uplift forces. It is found that previous setups do not perfectly replicate the real geometry of industrial drawbeads. In order to obtain reliable forces, an experimental drawbead tester capable of adequately replicating industrial drawbeads is developed. Later, a variety of steels ranging from mild steels to 3rd-generation ultra-high-strength steels are tested and reliable uplift and also restraining force values are obtained. The main purpose of the work is to share with the research community reliable experimental data that allows precise evaluation of the accuracy of current drawbead models and that supports the generation of new numerical and equivalent drawbead models. In parallel to the experimental procedure, a step forward in the understanding of the drawbead closing phenomena is also achieved through a 2D numerical model. The main purpose of the model is to identify the variables that greatly affect uplift force. Going beyond previous studies, in which some variables were analysed, the present work covers, in a holistic manner, the impact that material properties, the geometry of drawbeads and contact behaviour between sheet and drawbead have on the uplift force. It is determined that surprisingly minor geometrical deviations in the drawbead nominal geometry have a large impact on the uplift force.


Author(s):  
Philippe Van Bogaert

The application of certain parts of Eurocodes may result in surprising conclusions. Three independent examples of code requirements are presented. A first striking example is the fatigue compression resistance of RC or PC bridge girders and the prediction of the resulting lifetime, which may be excessively low. The second issue concerns the limiting value of slenderness of concrete arches, which shows no logical relation to the load bearing capacity. An alternative for the definition of slenderness is proposed. The third item is the necessity to consider an uplift force in the design of connectors, thus excluding virtually the use of block connections. In all three cases, alternatives are being proposed, needing further research or allowing a different approach to these issues. In addition, clarification of some code recommendations may overcome misunderstanding or erroneous application.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document