Two Reliable Calibration Methods for accurate in-situ U-Pb dating of Scheelite

Scheelite is an important metal mineral in W-related hydrothermal deposits and can be utilized as a reliable geochronometer to directly date the timing of mineralization. Up to now, two previous...

Texture and Trace Element Composition of Rutile in Orogenic Gold Deposits

Rutile from a wide range of orogenic gold deposits and districts, including representative world-class deposits, was investigated for its texture and trace element composition using scanning electron microscopy, electron probe microanalysis, and laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Deposits are hosted in various country rocks including felsic to ultramafic igneous rocks and sedimentary rocks, which were metamorphosed from lower greenschist to middle amphibolite facies and with ages of mineralization that range from Archean to Phanerozoic. Rutile presents a wide range of size, texture, and chemical zoning. Rutile is the dominant TiO2 polymorph in orogenic gold mineralization. Elemental plots and partial least square-discriminant analysis suggest that the composition of the country rocks exerts a strong control on concentrations of V, Nb, Ta, and Cr in rutile, whereas the metamorphic facies of the country rocks controls concentrations of V, Zr, Sc, U, rare earth elements, Y, Ca, Th, and Ba in rutile. The trace element composition of rutile in orogenic gold deposits can be distinguished from rutile in other deposit types and geologic settings. Elemental ratios Nb/V, Nb/Sb, and Sn/V differentiate the rutile trace element composition of orogenic gold deposits compared with those from other geologic settings and environments. A binary plot of Nb/V vs. W enables distinction of rutile in metamorphic-hydrothermal and hydrothermal deposits from rutile in magmatic-hydrothermal deposits and magmatic environments. The binary plot Nb/Sb vs. Sn/V distinguishes rutile in orogenic gold deposits from other geologic settings and environments. Results are used to establish geochemical criteria to constrain the source of rutile for indicator mineral surveys and potentially guide mineral exploration.

An overview of some dating methods of mineralization

One of the most important achievements of applying radioactive isotope in the geological study is to determine the age of mineralization. Based on the synthesis, comparison, and evaluation of the popular isotopic systems in dating mineralization, the Rb - Sr, Re - Os, and Ar - Ar dating methods are discussed in this study. The results show that the Rb - Sr dating method is likely to be successfully applied to sulfide mineralization. If the mineralization contains little or no sulfide minerals, then the method is applied to other minerals in an ore mineral association. The Re - Os dating method has shown great success when it is applied to hydrothermal deposits, especially for the molybdenite - bearing vein deposits. The limitation of the method is that when the concentration of the Os element in molybdenite is low, it is difficult to establish the Re/Os ratio in a single mineral. The Ar - Ar isotope system for dating mineralization often uses mica or feldspar minerals, which are minerals with blocking temperatures ranging from 150÷350 0C, and later metamorphic periods have higher than 350 0C often overprinted these minerals. Generally, tectonic, magmatic, and metamorphic events, which occur after mineralization, can cause difficulty in determining the age of mineralization and collecting analysis samples.

ROLE OF ORE MAGMAS IN THE FORMATION OF DEPOSITS

Notions are substantiated that for a certain group of so-called hydrothermal deposits, not regular lowconcentration hydrothermal solutions, including their more concentrated derivatives, colloids, are not of decisive importance in their formation, but highly concentrated magmatic systems – ore magmas forming deposits by intrusive way, at a time when hydrothermal (including gas-hydrothermal) solutions coexisting with them, being more mobile and chemically active, produce only metasomatic changes in the host rocks and wallrock dissemination, masking the magmatic nature of deposits.