Following the meteoric rise of TikTok in the global market and the
dominance of Douyin in the Chinese market, this article maps academic scholarship focusing
on Douyin and TikTok. Examining Chinese and English journal articles studying Douyin and
TikTok, we address three research questions: Firstly, what are the disciplinary approaches
and methodologies employed by researchers in studying Douyin and TikTok? Secondly, what are
the foci of research questions put forth by researchers? Thirdly, how is the academic
scholarship on these platforms developing independently? In terms of disciplinary leanings,
Douyin publications tended to be published by scholars in the humanities and social sciences
while TikTok and comparative publications demonstrated a broader scope of disciplinary
leanings. Regarding methodology, Douyin publications tended to employ qualitative ones.
Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches for TikTok publications were more balanced.
Qualitative and quantitative approaches were observed in comparative publications. Data
collection methods across publications included digital fieldwork, surveys, interviews,
experiments, media texts, and ethnography; while data analyses included content, thematic,
statistical, network, critical discourse, and descriptive forms of analyses. Regarding
research questions, articles on Douyin tended to engage with e-commerce, the development of
short form videos, and practices, cultures and communities. Articles on TikTok tended to
engage with platform logics and governance concerns, fame, virality and influencers, and
representation of events or information. Comparative publications tended to engage with
platformization, expression of cultural differences, fan engagement strategies and factors
underlying app usage. Finally, academic scholarship on Douyin and TikTok are largely based
in independent geographic regions.