charpy impact toughness
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

57
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Mehdi Soltan Ali Nezhad ◽  
Sadegh Ghazvinian ◽  
Mahmoud Amirsalehi ◽  
Amir Momeni

Abstract Three steels were designed based on HSLA-100 with additional levels of Mn, Ni, Cr and Cu. The steels were prepared by controlled rolling and tempered at temperatures in range of 550–700°C. The continuous cooling time curves were shifted to longer times and lower temperatures with the increased tendency for the formation of martensite at lower cooling rates. The microstructures revealed that controlled rolling results in austenite with uniform fine grain structure. The steel with the highest amount of Mn showed the greatest strength after tempering at 750 °C. The top strength was attributed to the formation of Cu-rich particles. The steel with 1.03 wt.% Mn, tempered at 650 °C exhibited the best Charpy impact toughness at –85°C. On the other hand, the steel that contained 2.11 wt.% Mn and tempered at 700 °C showed the highest yield strength of 1 097.5 MPa (∼159 ksi) and an impact toughness of 41.6 J at –85°C.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Keiji Ueda ◽  
Daichi Izumi ◽  
Toshinori Ishida ◽  
Takako Yamashita ◽  
Atsushi Takada ◽  
...  

Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Jaka Burja ◽  
Blaž Šuler ◽  
Marko Češnjaj ◽  
Aleš Nagode

Standard heat treatment of martensitic stainless steel consists of quenching and tempering. However, this results in high strength and hardness, while Charpy impact toughness shows lower values and a large deviation in its values. Therefore, a modified heat treatment of 0.1C-13Cr-3Ni martensitic stainless steel (PK993/1CH13N3) with intercritical annealing between Ac1 and Ac3 was introduced before tempering to study its effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties (yield strength, tensile strength, hardness and Charpy impact toughness). The temperatures of intercritical annealing were 740, 760, 780 and 800 °C. ThermoCalc was used for thermodynamic calculations. Microstructure characterization was performed on an optical and scanning electron microscope, while XRD was used for the determination of retained austenite. Results show that intercritical annealing improves impact toughness and lowers deviation of its values. This can be attributed to the dissolution of the thin carbide film along prior austenite grain boundaries and prevention of its re-occurrence during tempering. On the other hand, lower carbon concentration in martensite that was quenching from the intercritical region resulted in lower strength and hardness. Intercritical annealing refines the martensitic microstructure creating a lamellar morphology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 128328
Author(s):  
Shiwei Zhang ◽  
Yadong Wang ◽  
Minhao Zhu ◽  
Zhijie Zhang ◽  
Pulin Nie ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mark Kirk ◽  
Masato Yamamoto ◽  
Marjorie Erickson

Abstract The toughness requirements for the ferritic steels used to construct the primary pressure boundary of a nuclear power plant include both transition temperature metrics as well as upper-shelf metrics. These separate specifications for transition and upper shelf toughness find their origins in decisions made during the 1970s and 1980s, a time when there was much less empirical and theoretical knowledge concerning the relationship between these quantities. Currently, significant evidence exists to demonstrate a systematic relationship between transition and upper shelf toughness metrics for RPV-grade steels and weldments (e.g., the equations in draft Code Case N-830-1, empirical correlation between Charpy transition temperature and upper shelf metrics, etc.). This paper explores these relationships and demonstrates that, in many cases, the joint specification of transition temperature and upper shelf toughness values is redundant and, therefore, unnecessary.


2020 ◽  
Vol 786 ◽  
pp. 139442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Lun Gu ◽  
Guan-Nan Yang ◽  
Pan Gong ◽  
Yang Shao ◽  
Ke-Fu Yao

2020 ◽  
Vol 230 ◽  
pp. 106965
Author(s):  
Michihiro Kunigita ◽  
Shuji Aihara ◽  
Tomoya Kawabata ◽  
Tadashi Kasuya ◽  
Yoshiomi Okazaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document