Hydrocarbon source rocks can be adequately approximated as transversely isotropic (TI) media. The elastic properties of a TI medium are defined by five stiffness parameters: c11, c33, c44, c66, and c13. The laboratory estimation of c11, c33, c44, and c66 is straightforward, with each of the stiffness parameters determined by a single velocity measurement in an orthogonal direction. For c13, we need the information of c11, c33, c44, and at least one oblique velocity. Consequently, it is usually more difficult to estimate c13 than the other stiffness parameters in the laboratory, and it is even more challenging to acquire it from the field. Therefore, it is important to find the relations between c13 and the other stiffness parameters so that c13 can be estimated from the orthogonal elastic tensor elements c11, c33, c44, and c66 that can be much more economically and reliably acquired. There are phenomenological models for estimating c13 from the other stiffness parameters, but their accuracy is not always satisfactory. We found that c13 has strong correlations with c33 − 2 c44 and c11 − 2 c66, and that c33 − 2 c44 generally underestimates c13 and c11 − 2 c66 generally overestimates c13. The average of c33 − 2 c44 and c11 − 2 c66 can be a much more precise phenomenological model to approximate c13. We also found that c11 − 2 c66 is generally greater than c33 − 2 c44 for hydrocarbon source rocks. Therefore, we evaluated that c13 should lie between c33 − 2 c44 and c11 − 2 c66 for hydrocarbon source rocks.