Recent Advances in Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Class A Lipid GPCRs: Opportunities and Challenges for Drug Discovery

Great progress has been made over the past decade in understanding the structural, functional, and pharmacological diversity of lipid GPCRs. From the first determination of the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin in 2000, much progress has been made in the field of GPCR structural biology. The extraordinary progress in structural biology and pharmacology of GPCRs, coupled with rapid advances in computational approaches to study receptor dynamics and receptor-ligand interactions, has broadened our comprehension of the structural and functional facets of the receptor family members and has helped usher in a modern age of structure-based drug design and development. First, we provide a primer on lipid mediators and lipid GPCRs and their role in physiology and diseases as well as their value as drug targets. Second, we summarize the current advancements in the understanding of structural features of lipid GPCRs, such as the structural variation of their extracellular domains, diversity of their orthosteric and allosteric ligand binding sites, and molecular mechanisms of ligand binding. Third, we close by collating the emerging paradigms and opportunities in targeting lipid GPCRs, including a brief discussion on current strategies, challenges, and the future outlook.

Simple Models to Study Spectral Properties of Microbial and Animal Rhodopsins: Evaluation of the Electrostatic Effect of Charged and Polar Residues on the First Absorption Band Maxima

A typical feature of proteins from the rhodopsin family is the sensitivity of their absorption band maximum to protein amino acid composition. For this reason, studies of these proteins often require methodologies that determine spectral shift caused by amino acid substitutions. Generally, quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics models allow for the calculation of a substitution-induced spectral shift with high accuracy, but their application is not always easy and requires special knowledge. In the present study, we propose simple models that allow us to estimate the direct effect of a charged or polar residue substitution without extensive calculations using only rhodopsin three-dimensional structure and plots or tables that are provided in this article. The models are based on absorption maximum values calculated at the SORCI+Q level of theory for cis- and trans-forms of retinal protonated Schiff base in an external electrostatic field of charges and dipoles. Each value corresponds to a certain position of a charged or polar residue relative to the retinal chromophore. The proposed approach was evaluated against an example set consisting of twelve bovine rhodopsin and sodium pumping rhodopsin mutants. The limits of the applicability of the models are also discussed. The results of our study can be useful for the interpretation of experimental data and for the rational design of rhodopsins with required spectral properties.

Cross-linking of bovine rhodopsin with sulfosuccinimidyl 4-(N maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate affects its functionality

Rhodopsin is the photoreceptor protein involved in visual excitation in retinal rods. The functionality of bovine rhodopsin was determined following treatment with sulfosuccinimidyl 4-(N maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (sulfo-SMCC), a bifunctional reagent capable of forming covalent cross-links between suitable placed lysines and cysteines. Denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed that rhodopsin incubated with sulfo-SMCC generated intermolecular dimers, trimers, and higher oligomers, although most of the sulfo-SMCC-treated protein remained as a monomer. Minor alterations on the absorption spectrum of light-activated sulfo-SMCC-treated rhodopsin were observed. However, only ∼2% stimulation of the guanine nucleotide binding activity of transducin was measured in the presence of sulfo-SMCC-cross-linked photolyzed rhodopsin. Moreover, rhodopsin kinase was not able of phosphorylating sulfo-SMCC-cross-linked rhodopsin after illumination. Rhodopsin was purified in the presence of either 0.1% or 1% n-dodecyl β-d-maltoside, to obtain dimeric and monomeric forms of the protein, respectively. Interestingly, no generation of the regular F1 and F2 thermolytic fragments was perceived with sulfo-SMCC-cross-linked rhodopsin either in the dimeric or monomeric state, implying the formation of intramolecular connections in the protein that might thwart the light-induced conformational changes required for interaction with transducin and rhodopsin kinase. Structural analysis of the rhodopsin three-dimensional structure suggested that the following lysine and cysteine pairs: Lys66/Lys67 and Cys316, Cys140 and Lys141, Cys140 and Lys248, Lys311 and Cys316, and/or Cys316 and Lys325 are potential candidates to generate intramolecular cross-links in the protein. Yet, the lack of fragmentation of sulfo-SMCC-treated Rho with thermolysin is consistent with the formation of cross-linking bridges between Lys66/Lys67 and Cys316, and/or Cys140 and Lys248.

Spectral tuning mediated by helix III in butterfly long wavelength-sensitive visual opsins revealed by heterologous action spectroscopy

Absorption spectra of opsin-based pigments are tuned from the UV to the red regions by interactions of the chromophore with surrounding amino acid residues. Both vertebrates and invertebrates possess long-wavelength-sensitive (LWS) opsins, which underlie color vision involving “red” sensing. The LWS opsins have independently evolved in each lineage, which suggests the existence of diverse mechanisms in spectral tuning. In vertebrate LWS opsins, the mechanisms underlying spectral tuning have been well characterized by spectroscopic analyses with recombinant pigments of wild type (WT) and mutant opsins. However in invertebrate LWS opsins including insect ones, the mechanisms are largely unknown due to the difficulty in obtaining recombinant pigments. Here we have overcome the problem by analyzing heterologous action spectra based on light-dependent changes in the second messenger in opsin-expressing cultured cells. We found that WTs of two LWS opsins of the butterfly, Papilio xuthus, PxRh3 and PxRh1 have the wavelengths of the absorption maxima at around 570 nm and 540 nm, respectively. Analysis of a series of chimeric mutants showed that helix III is crucial to generating a difference of about 15 nm in the wavelength of absorption maxima of these LWS opsins. Further site-directed mutations in helix III revealed that amino acid residues at position 116 and 120 (bovine rhodopsin numbering system) are involved in the spectral tuning of PxRh1 and PxRh3, suggesting a different spectral tuning mechanism from that of primate LWS opsins.

Crystal structure of jumping spider rhodopsin-1 as a light sensitive GPCR

Light-sensitive G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)—rhodopsins—absorb photons to isomerize their covalently bound retinal, triggering conformational changes that result in downstream signaling cascades. Monostable rhodopsins release retinal upon isomerization as opposed to the retinal in bistable rhodopsins that “reisomerize” upon absorption of a second photon. Understanding the mechanistic differences between these light-sensitive GPCRs has been hindered by the scarcity of recombinant models of the latter. Here, we reveal the high-resolution crystal structure of a recombinant bistable rhodopsin, jumping spider rhodopsin-1, bound to the inverse agonist 9-cis retinal. We observe a water-mediated network around the ligand hinting toward the basis of their bistable nature. In contrast to bovine rhodopsin (monostable), the transmembrane bundle of jumping spider rhodopsin-1 as well that of the bistable squid rhodopsin adopts a more “activation-ready” conformation often observed in other nonphotosensitive class A GPCRs. These similarities suggest the role of jumping spider rhodopsin-1 as a potential model system in the study of the structure–function relationship of both photosensitive and nonphotosensitive class A GPCRs.