chromosome territory
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

64
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 2)

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e12661
Author(s):  
Magdalena A. Tkacz ◽  
Kornel Chromiński ◽  
Dominika Idziak-Helmcke ◽  
Ewa Robaszkiewicz

This document presents a new and improved, more intuitive version of a novel method for visually representing the location of objects relative to each other in 3D. The motivation and inspiration for developing this new method came from the necessity for objective chromosome territory (CT) adjacency analysis. The earlier version, Distance Profile Chart (DPC), used octants for 3D orientation. This approach did not provide the best 3D space coverage since space was divided into just eight cones and was not intuitive with regard to orientation in 3D. However, the version presented in this article, called DPC12, allows users to achieve better space coverage during conification since space is now divided into twelve cones. DPC12 is faster than DPC and allows for a more precise determination of the location of objects in 3D. In this article a short introduction about the conification idea is presented. Then we explain how DPC12 is designed and created. After that, we show DPC12 on an instructional dataset to make it easier to understand and demonstrate how they appear and how to read them. Finally, using DPC12 we present an example of an adjacency analysis (AA) using the model of Chromosome Territories (CTs) distribution in the rice nucleus.


Author(s):  
Ishita S. Mehta ◽  
Kumars Riyahi ◽  
Rita Torres Pereira ◽  
Karen J. Meaburn ◽  
Martin Figgitt ◽  
...  

This study demonstrates, and confirms, that chromosome territory positioning is altered in primary senescent human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). The chromosome territory positioning pattern is very similar to that found in HDFs made quiescent either by serum starvation or confluence; but not completely. A few chromosomes are found in different locations. One chromosome in particular stands out, chromosome 10, which is located in an intermediate location in young proliferating HDFs, but is found at the nuclear periphery in quiescent cells and in an opposing location of the nuclear interior in senescent HDFs. We have previously demonstrated that individual chromosome territories can be actively and rapidly relocated, with 15 min, after removal of serum from the culture media. These chromosome relocations require nuclear motor activity through the presence of nuclear myosin 1β (NM1β). We now also demonstrate rapid chromosome movement in HDFs after heat-shock at 42°C. Others have shown that heat shock genes are actively relocated using nuclear motor protein activity via actin or NM1β (Khanna et al., 2014; Pradhan et al., 2020). However, this current study reveals, that in senescent HDFs, chromosomes can no longer be relocated to expected nuclear locations upon these two types of stimuli. This coincides with a entirely different organisation and distribution of NM1β within senescent HDFs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Collombet ◽  
Isabell Rall ◽  
Claire Dugast-Darzacq ◽  
Alec Heckert ◽  
Aliaksandr Halavatyi ◽  
...  

Sub-nuclear compartmentalization has been proposed to play an important role in gene regulation by segregating active and inactive parts of the genome in distinct physical and biochemical environments, where transcription and epigenetic factors are either concentrated or depleted. The inactive X chromosome offers a paradigm for studying sub-nuclear compartmentalization. When the non-coding Xist RNA coats the X chromosome, it recruits repressors and chromatin factors that trigger gene silencing, and forms a dense body of heterochromatin from which the transcription machinery appears to be excluded. Phase separation has been proposed to be involved in X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) and might explain exclusion of the transcription machinery by preventing its diffusion into the Xist-coated territory. Here, using quantitative fluorescence microscopy and single particle tracking, we show that RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) freely accesses the Xist territory during initiation of XCI, and that its diffusion is not prevented by biophysical constraints. Instead, the apparent depletion of RNAPII is due to the loss of its chromatin bound fraction. These findings demonstrate that initial exclusion of RNA Pol2 from the inactive X is a consequence of its reduced binding rate at the chromatin and gene level, rather than the biophysical compartmentalization of the inactive X heterochromatin domain. The Xist silent compartment is thus a biochemical rather than a biophysical compartment, at least during initiation of XCI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 4280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominika Idziak-Helmcke ◽  
Tomasz Warzecha ◽  
Marta Sowa ◽  
Marzena Warchoł ◽  
Kinga Dziurka ◽  
...  

The nucleus architecture of hybrid crop plants is not a well-researched topic, yet it can have important implications for their genetic stability and usefulness in the successful expression of agronomically desired traits. In this work we studied the spatial distribution of introgressed maize chromatin in oat × maize addition lines with the number of added maize chromosomes varying from one to four. The number of chromosome additions was confirmed by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Maize chromosome-specific simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers were used to identify the added chromosomes. GISH on 3-D root and leaf nuclei was performed to assess the number, volume, and position of the maize-chromatin occupied regions. We revealed that the maize chromosome territory (CT) associations of varying degree prevailed in the double disomic lines, while CT separation was the most common distribution pattern in the double monosomic line. In all analyzed lines, the regions occupied by maize CTs were located preferentially at the nuclear periphery. A comparison between the tissues showed that the maize CTs in the leaf nuclei are positioned closer to the center of the nucleus than in the root nuclei. These findings shed more light on the processes that shape the nucleus architecture in hybrids.


2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachery R. Belak ◽  
Joshua. A. Pickering ◽  
Zoe. E. Gillespie ◽  
Gerald Audette ◽  
Mark Eramian ◽  
...  

We previously demonstrated that genome reorganization, through chromosome territory repositioning, occurs concurrently with significant changes in gene expression in normal primary human fibroblasts treated with the drug rapamycin, or stimulated into quiescence. Although these events occurred concomitantly, it is unclear how specific changes in gene expression relate to reorganization of the genome at higher resolution. We used computational analyses, genome organization assays, and microscopy, to investigate the relationship between chromosome territory positioning and gene expression. We determined that despite relocation of chromosome territories, there was no substantial bias in the proportion of genes changing expression on any one chromosome, including chromosomes 10 and 18. Computational analyses identified that clusters of serum deprivation and rapamycin-responsive genes along the linear extent of chromosomes. Chromosome conformation capture (3C) analysis demonstrated the strengthening or loss of specific long-range chromatin interactions in response to rapamycin and quiescence induction, including a cluster of genes containing Interleukin-8 and several chemokine genes on chromosome 4. We further observed that the LIF gene, which is highly induced upon rapamycin treatment, strengthened interactions with up- and down-stream intergenic regions. Our findings indicate that the repositioning of chromosome territories in response to cell stimuli, this does not reflect gene expression changes occurring within physically clustered groups of genes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document