literacy teaching
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

326
(FIVE YEARS 98)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daris Hadianto ◽  
Vismaia S. Damaianti ◽  
Yeti Mulyati ◽  
Andoyo Sastromiharjo

2022 ◽  
pp. 120-140
Author(s):  
Darci L. Gueta ◽  
Alexandra Babino

This chapter presents a preliminary introduction into the topic of Latinx immigration in texts. To begin, the authors discuss the demographic divide between majoritarian teachers and multiply minoritized students in the U.S. literacy classroom. Then, the authors briefly share their experiences regarding their work in light of major trends relating to literacy teaching before outlining the key tenets of culturally relevant and culturally sustaining pedagogies. The majority of the chapter will focus on detailing how teachers can support Latinx students around the topic of immigration by providing examples of culturally relevant and sustaining practices with an abbreviated lesson plan of how to facilitate discourse addressing the topic of immigration using a text featuring Latinx characters.


2022 ◽  
pp. 94-110
Author(s):  
Janeen Pizzo ◽  
Natalie Sue Svrcek ◽  
Kathleen Colantonio-Yurko

This chapter addresses how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted teaching and practice for secondary educators. The authors consider how content area secondary educators, in light of the pandemic, can support adolescent students' understanding of discipline specific concepts through discussion in virtual spaces. Discussion is integral to literacy learning in the disciplines because it provides students with the tools they need to be successful learners and active participants in their learning. The authors use critical literacy, TPACK, and SAMR to provide educators with a framework to evaluate and interrogate disciplinary literacy teaching methods. The chapter provides educators with tools for secondary educators to engage in the thoughtful reconstruction of the learning experiences they design for students.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Margaret James ◽  
Suzanne(Sue) M. Hudson ◽  
Alexandra Lasczik

PurposeBeing literate can change the lives of Australian students. Therefore, graduating effective teachers of literacy is an imperative for Australian schools. Professional experience provides an opportunity for preservice teachers to refine their skills for teaching literacy under the guidance of a mentor teacher. This study investigates from the perspective of preservice teachers, the attributes and practices primary mentor teachers demonstrate when mentoring literacy teaching during professional experience.Design/methodology/approachThis investigation utilised survey design to gather data from primary preservice teachers (n = 402) from seven Australian universities. The 34 survey items were underpinned by the Five Factor Model of Mentoring and literacy practices prescribed by the Australian curriculum. Preservice teachers self-reported their responses about their literacy mentoring experiences on a five-point Likert scale. The Five Factor Model of Mentoring provided a framework to analyse and present the data using descriptive statistics.FindingsFindings revealed 70% or more of preservice teachers agreed or strongly agreed mentor teachers had the personal attributes, shared the pedagogical knowledge, modelled best practice and provided feedback for effective literacy teaching. Conversely, only 58.7% of the participants reported their mentor teachers shared the system requirements for effective literacy teaching.Research limitations/implicationsThe preservice teachers self-reported their experiences, and although this may be their experience, it does not necessarily mean the mentor teachers did not demonstrate the attributes and practices reported, it may mean they were not identified by the preservice teachers. While there were 402 participants in this study, the viewpoints of these preservice teachers' may or may not be indicative of the entire population of preservice teachers across Australia. This study included primary preservice teachers, so the experiences of secondary and early childhood teachers have not been reported. An extended study would include secondary and early childhood contexts.Practical implicationsThis research highlighted that not all mentor teachers shared the system requirements for literacy teaching with their mentee. This finding prompts a need to undertake further research to investigate the confidence of mentor teachers in their own ability to teach literacy in the primary school. Teaching literacy is complex, and the curriculum is continually evolving. Providing professional learning in teaching literacy will position mentor teachers to better support preservice teachers during professional experience. Ultimately, the goal is to sustain high quality literacy teaching in schools to promote positive outcomes for all Australian school students.Originality/valueWhile the role of mentor teacher is well recognised, there is a dearth of research that explores the mentoring of literacy during professional experience. The preservice teachers in this study self-reported inconsistencies in mentor teachers' attributes and practices for mentoring literacy prompting a need for further professional learning in this vital learning area.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2115-2136
Author(s):  
Muniroh Munawar ◽  
Fakhruddin Fakhruddin ◽  
Rodiyah Rodiyah ◽  
Titi Prihatin

Education needs to formulate a curriculum that suits the digital era, especially in terms of digital literacy and cyber wellness. This research was conducted to get an overview of digital literacy curriculum management in kindergarten. A total of 122 kindergartens were purposely selected to take part in a survey of this study. Of the 122 kindergartens, 27 kindergartens have integrated digital literacy education in schools, while 95 kindergartens have no integrated digital literacy education in schools. Then, the 27 kindergartens joined a focus group discussion and the results showed that there were six valid and reliable indicators to evaluate the implementation of digital literacy curriculum management in kindergarten, they are: 1)availability of digital infrastructure; 2) competence of managers and teachers in digital literacy; 3) curriculum objectives related to mastery of  basic digital literacy competencies in children; 4) digital literacy implementation in school (children’s learning experiences); 5) digital literacy teaching materials and strategies in schools and 6) parental involvement in curriculum development. In addition, there is a need for a technology integration development module in kindergarten classes that can become a guide for teachers and parents when using digital technology with children.   Keywords: Curriculum, management, digital, literacy, kindergarten.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nunung Fatimah ◽  
Surya Ningsyih

Reading is part of literacy in the lower grades carried out at school. At the elementary school level, literacy activities are the starting point for understanding other sciences. The success of the early stages is crucial for advancing to the next level. Effective literacy teaching in the early grades needs to pay attention to the learning environment and materials that suit the needs of students so that researchers are interested in conducting development research in this study specifically for low-grade students and for the place of research that is carried out at SDN Sari Kalampa. The development of interactive comic media for the Mbojo story based on the school literacy movement to increase students' reading interest carried out at SDN Sari Kalampa, Woha District, Bima Regency is very necessary. The purpose of this study is to find out the importance of using or developing a comic medium for the Mbojo story where this media will be reading material that aims to increase literacy activities. The results showed that the learning media for interactive comics based on the mbojo story based on the school literacy movement could increase students' reading interest with the average score of student responses being   which was included in the "very good" category and the teacher's response was  which meant the "very good" category.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document