dipole tilt
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

74
(FIVE YEARS 24)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
J. P. Reistad ◽  
K. M. Laundal ◽  
N. Østgaard ◽  
A. Ohma ◽  
A. G. Burrell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jone Peter Reistad ◽  
Karl Magnus Laundal ◽  
Anders Ohma ◽  
Nikolai Østgaard ◽  
Spencer Hatch ◽  
...  

<p>Lobe reconnection is usually considered to play an important role in geospace dynamics only when the Interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) is mainly northward. This is because the most common signature of lobe reconnection is the strong sunward convection in the polar cap ionosphere observed during these conditions. During more typical conditions, when the IMF is mainly in a dawn-dusk direction, plasma flows initiated by dayside as well as lobe reconnection map to high latitude ionospheric locations in close proximity to each other. This has been emphasized in the literature earlier, mainly on a conceptual level, but quantifying the relative importance of lobe reconnection to the observed ionospheric convection is highly challenging during these IMF By dominated conditions, since one has to identify and distinguish these regions. By normalizing the ionospheric convection (observed by SuperDARN) to the polar cap boundary (inferred from simultaneous AMPERE observations), we are able to do this separation, allowing us to quantify the relative contribution of both lobe reconnection and dayside/nightisde reconnection to the ionospheric convection pattern. Using this segmentation technique we can get new quantitative insights into the importance of the various mechanisms that affect the lobe reconnection rate. In this presentation we will describe the technique and show results of analysis of periods when the IMF is mainly in the dawn-dusk direction. Our quantification of the average lobe reconnection rate during various conditions yields quantitative knowledge of the importance of the lobe reconnection process, which can act independently in the two hemispheres. We will specifically constrain the influence from parameters such as the dipole tilt angle and the product of IMF transverse component and solar wind velocity.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suleiman Baraka ◽  
Olivier Le Contel ◽  
Lotfi Ben-Jaffel ◽  
Bill Moore

<p>The boundary between the solar wind (SW) and the Earth’s magnetosphere, named the magnetopause (MP), is highly dynamic. Its location and shape can vary as a function of different SW parameters such as density, velocity, and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) orientations. We employ a 3D kinetic Particle-In-Cell (IAPIC) code to simulate these effects.  We investigate the impact of radial (B = Bx) and quasi-radial (Bz < Bx, By) IMF on the shape and size of Earth’s MP for a dipole tilt of 31<sup>o</sup> using both maximum density steepening and pressure system balance methods for identifying the boundary. We find that, compared with northward or southward-dominant IMF conditions, the MP position expands asymmetrically by 8 to 22% under radial IMF. In addition, we construct the MP shape along the tilted magnetic equator and the OX axes showing that the expansion is asymmetric, not global, stronger on the MP flanks, and is sensitive to the ambient IMF. Finally, we investigate the contribution of SW backstreaming ions by the bow shock to the MP expansion, the temperature anisotropy in the magnetosheath, and a strong dawn-dusk asymmetry in MP location.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reham Elhawary ◽  
Karl Laundal ◽  
Jone Reistad ◽  
Anders Ohma ◽  
Spencer Hatch ◽  
...  

<p>Substorm onset location varies over a range of magnetic local time (MLT) and magnetic latitudes (MLat). It is well known that about 5% of the variation in onset MLT can be explained by variations in interplanetary magnetic field orientation and dipole tilt angle. Both parameters introduce an azimuthal component in the magnetic field in the magnetosphere such that the projection of the onset MLT in the ionosphere is shifted. The MLT of the onset near the magnetopsheric equatorial plane is even less predictable. Recent studies have suggested that gradients in the ionospheric Hall conductance lead to a duskward shift of tail dynamics, which could also influence the location of substorm onset. Our goal is to test these ideas by quantifying the dependence of the spatial variation of the onset location on external and internal conditions. We focus on the correlation between the substorm onset location with conditions prior to the onset, such as the interplanetary magnetic field By component, dipole tilt angle, and estimates of the Hall conductance. Linear regression analysis is used to determine the substorm onset location dependence on the proposed variables.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Thor ◽  
Anita Kullen ◽  
Lei Cai

<p>Transpolar arcs (TPAs) are predicted by many models to appear in both hemispheres, as so-called conjugate TPAs. However, some observations have suggested that this is not always the case, and that there is an IMF B<sub>x</sub> dependence on whether TPAs appear on both hemispheres or not. Specifically, it has been suggested that TPAs only appear on the northern hemisphere for negative IMF B<sub>X</sub> and vice versa for positive IMF B<sub>X</sub>. Furthermore, a positive Earth dipole tilt is predicted to have a similar effect on TPA occurrences as a negative IMF B<sub>X</sub> and vice versa. It is also known that TPAs appear on different locations on the auroral oval, i.e., dawn-, dusk- or both sides of the oval, depending on IMF B<sub>Y</sub>. However, the role of IMF B<sub>X</sub> and IMF B<sub>Z</sub> for the TPA location remains unclear, with some previous observations suggesting a correlation with IMF B<sub>X</sub>.</p><p>In this study, we investigate the influence of IMF B<sub>X</sub> and dipole tilt on TPAs by statistically analyzing observational data. We analyze TPA datasets from four previous studies, as well as our own TPA dataset, created from DMSP satellite measurements. At first glance, the data suggests that there is a strong correlation between both IMF B<sub>X</sub> and dipole tilt, and TPA observations in a specific hemisphere. However, when normalizing the data to the solar wind distribution and when taking observational bias into account, this correlation disappears. We therefore conclude that there is no clear correlation between neither IMF B<sub>X</sub> nor dipole tilt and in which hemisphere a TPA appears. We further analyze four of the five datasets with respect to dawn-dusk appearances of TPAs and its correlation to IMF B<sub>X</sub>, B<sub>Y</sub> and B<sub>Z</sub>. Here, the results for the datasets mostly agree with previous observations. Finally, we discuss the potential causes for the few non-conjugate TPAs, by studying our own TPA dataset in further detail.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfang Zhong ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Zhichao Zheng ◽  
Yangfan He ◽  
Luyuan Sun ◽  
...  

<p>The auroral electrojet is an important element of the polar current system and an essential subject in space weather research. Based on the scalar magnetic field data from CHAMP satellite, we studied the influences of solar illumination and the dipole tilt angle (DTA) on the auroral electrojet as well as its seasonal variations. Furthermore, the auroral electrojet measured by satellite was compared with the auroral electrojet indices derived from the ground stations. It is shown that on the dayside, the auroral electrojet is more intense at a smaller solar zenith angle (SZA), whereas it’s more intense on the nightside when the SZA is larger. The daytime current is mainly controlled by the solar illumination, while the nighttime current is affected by the substorm. Compared with the solar illumination, the dipole tilt angle plays a minor role. The auroral electrojet shows an obvious annual and semiannual variation. The eastward electrojet and the dayside westward electrojet are more intense in summer than in winter, while the nightside westward electrojet is more intense in winter than in summer. The daytime westward electrojet is more intense at solstices, whereas the nighttime westward electrojet is more intense at equinoxes. The westward electrojet shows a good correlation with AL and SML indices. The eastward electrojet correlates well with the SMU index, but shows obvious difference with the AU index. The discrepancy can be attributed to the fact that the peak eastward electrojet is located outside the detection range of the auroral electrojet stations.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-51
Author(s):  
Daniel Weimer ◽  
Thom Edwards

Abstract. We have used empirical models for electric potentials and the magnetic fields both in space and on the ground to obtain maps of the height-integrated Pedersen and Hall ionospheric conductivities at high latitudes. This calculation required use of both “curl-free” and “divergence-free” components of the ionospheric currents, with the former obtained from magnetic fields that are used in a model of the field-aligned currents. The second component is from the equivalent current, usually associated with Hall currents, derived from the ground-level magnetic field. Conductances were calculated for varying combinations of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) magnitude and orientation angle, as well as the dipole tilt angle. The results show that reversing the sign of the Y component of the IMF produces substantially different conductivity patterns. The Hall conductivities are largest on the dawn side in the upward, Region 2 field-aligned currents. Low electric field strengths in the Harang discontinuity lead to inconclusive results near midnight. Calculations of the Joule heating, obtained from the electric field and both components of the ionospheric current, are compared with the Poynting flux in space. The maps show some differences, while their integrated totals match to within 1 %. Some of the Poynting flux that enters the polar cap is dissipated as Joule heating within the auroral ovals, where the conductivity is greater.


Author(s):  
Mike Lockwood ◽  
Carl Haines ◽  
Luke A Barnard ◽  
Mathew J. Owens ◽  
Chris J Scott ◽  
...  

We use the am , an, as and the aσ  indices to the explore a previously overlooked factor in magnetospheric electodynamics, namely the inductive effect of diurnal motions of the Earth’s magnetic poles toward and away from the Sun caused by Earth’s rotation.  Because the offset of the (eccentric dipole) geomagnetic pole from the rotational axis is roughly twice as large in the southern hemisphere compared to the northern, the effects there are predicted to be roughly twice the amplitude of those in the northern hemisphere. Hemispheric differences have previously been discussed in terms of polar ionospheric conductivities generated by solar photoionization, effects which we allow for by looking at the dipole tilt effect on the time-of-year variations of the indices.   The electric field induced in a geocentric frame is shown to also be a significant factor and gives a modulation of the voltage applied by the solar wind flow in the southern hemisphere that is typically a ±30% diurnal modulation for disturbed intervals rising to ±76% in quiet times.  For the northern hemisphere these are 15% and 38% modulations.  Motion towards/away from the Sun reduces/enhances the directly-driven ionospheric voltages and reduces/enhances the magnetic energy stored in the tail and we estimate that approximately 10% of the effect appears in directly driven ionospheric voltages and 90% in changes of the rate of energy storage or release in the near-Earth tail.   The hemispheric asymmetry in the geomagnetic pole offsets from the rotational axis is shown to be the dominant factor in driving Universal Time ( UT ) variations and hemispheric differences in geomagnetic activity.  Combined with the effect of solar wind dynamic pressure and dipole tilt on the pressure balance in the near-Earth tail, the effect provides an excellent explanation of how the observed Russell-McPherron pattern with time-of-year F and UT in the driving power input into the magnetosphere is converted into the equinoctial F - UT pattern in average geomagnetic activity (after correction is made for dipole tilt effects on ionospheric conductivity), added to a pronounced UT variation with minimum at 02-10  UT .  In addition, we show that the predicted and observed UT   variations in average geomagnetic activity has implications for the occurrence of the largest events that also show the nett UT variation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Ohma ◽  
Jone Peter Reistad ◽  
Spencer Mark Hatch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document