institutional leadership
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

164
(FIVE YEARS 72)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 3)

AERA Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 233285842110695
Author(s):  
Sudipta Roy ◽  
Shannon Brown

Higher education in India was caught completely unawares by the COVID-19 pandemic and the necessitated closure of educational institutions. Despite almost a decade of experience with online and distance learning at some top-tier and private institutions, the vast majority were unprepared and looked for quick solutions for different components of teaching–learning depending on the need of the hour. The immediate tool sought was a videoconferencing platform to substitute in-class lectures. With no access to a learning management system, faculty chose one platform for videoconferencing, one for interaction with students, and another for uploading class notes. Disparity in students’ access to devices and the internet presented challenges. Assessment of learning, which hitherto was largely pen and paper based, was delayed for lack of a viable solution. Experiences documented in this study demonstrate faculty resilience, but lack of institutional leadership and preparedness is starkly evident.


Author(s):  
Sara Grummert ◽  
Raquel Rall

The authors aim to further theoretical conceptualizations of sexual abuse in college sport by providing a wider framework to better identify and combat abuse within organizations. Building on the Toxic Triangle of Destructive Leadership, the authors offer an analysis of destructive leadership from an organizational perspective that reconceptualizes destructive leadership as a group and organizational phenomena by centering governing board actions in previous cases of abuse. Through analysis of the NCAA governance structure and the governance structure of higher education at large, the authors provide rationale for advancing governing boards as a sport governing body and demonstrate how governing boards are inseparable from the governance structure of the NCAA. In analyzing the literature on organizational responses to sexual abuse in intercollegiate athletics, the authors posit a new framework to better identify, prevent, and combat abuse in sport and call for enhanced proactivity from institutional leadership to address sexual abuse.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S370-S370
Author(s):  
Pratish C Patel ◽  
Ayne Adenew ◽  
Angela McKnight ◽  
Kevin Jeng ◽  
Angelike P Liappis

Abstract Background In the setting of the global pandemic due to COVID-19, high-risk patients with mild to moderate disease were identified as a group who would benefit from COVID-19 monoclonal antibody (mAB) treatment to mitigate progression to severe disease or hospitalization. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) approved multiple COVID-19 mAB therapies with specific criteria for eligibility of candidates, documentation of discussion with patients, and reporting of all errors and serious adverse events. Methods A cross discipline working group implemented a mAB clinic at complexity level 1a VA Medical Center in metropolitan Washington, D.C. through collaboration of personnel committed to patient care. The team successfully persuaded hospital leadership to provide space and leveraged technologies for rapid communication and dissemination of education. A stewardship driven medical center wide surveillance system rapidly identified outpatients for screening; primary care and ED providers were engaged through various electronic methods of education, including email, web-based team communication, intranet webpages and other electronic modalities. Within the EMR, an order panel was implemented to assure that the key requirements of the EUA were met and the provider was guided to the appropriate mAB, nursing, and PRN rescue medication orders. Results Of over 17,000 COVID-PCR tests were performed at our medical center, 198 outpatients were screened and 16 received COVID-19 mAB infusions between January 2, 2021 to May 31, 2021. One patient experienced a reaction requiring the infusion to be stopped and supportive medications to be administered; there were no long-term sequalae reported as a result of this event. Conclusion A multidisciplinary collaboration is well suited to implement innovative processes and policies for novel therapies in the middle of a pandemic. An agile workflow, regular communications between members of the workgroup, and commitment of institutional leadership helped facilitate the changes necessary to provide our patients the opportunity to receive potentially life-saving therapies. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 11405
Author(s):  
Dian-Fu Chang ◽  
Wen-Ching Chou

In this study, we designed a structural model to determine the relationships among push–pull factors, institutional situations, and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. The 17 selected indicators fell under five domains, namely push factors, pull factors, institutional leadership, international strategies, and satisfaction. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to verify the assumptions of the model. Based on 1005 degree-seeking international students' views, this study found that push and pull factors may coincidentally exist, and their functions can be modified by institutional situations. The findings suggested pull factors will, through institutional leadership, impact students' satisfaction, while push factors will not. Moreover, the detection of institutional mediation can provide useful information for specific institutes to develop their future recruiting or retaining strategies. These findings enriched our knowledge of the field for higher education sustainable development. For future studies, this design may be useful to interpret the phenomena of global student mobility in higher education settings.


Author(s):  
Dian-Fu Chang ◽  
Wen-Ching Chou

In this study, we designed a structural model to determine the relationships among push–pull factors, institutional situations, and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. The 17 selected indicators fell under five domains, namely push factors, pull factors, institutional leadership, international strategies, and satisfaction. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to verify the assumptions of the model. Based on 1005 degree-seeking international students' views, this study found that push and pull factors may coincidentally exist, and their functions can be modified by institutional situations. The findings suggest pull factors will, through institutional leadership, impact students' satisfaction, while push factors will not. Moreover, the detection of institutional mediation can provide useful information for specific institutes to develop their future recruiting or retaining strategies. These findings enriched our knowledge of the field during the pandemic. For future studies, this design may be useful to interpret the phenomena of global student mobility in higher education settings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-129
Author(s):  
Lucas Dejard Moreira Mendonça ◽  
Adriano Madureira dos Santos ◽  
Harold Dias de Mello Junior ◽  
Rita de Cássia Romeiro Paulino ◽  
Karla Figueiredo ◽  
...  

This article examined the personal profiles of the Heads of Government of countries in South/North America and how they communicated with their audiences on institutional measures to contain COVID-19. Analyses were carried out on data collected from Twitter from November-2019 to November-2020. This study includes: i)quantitative analysis, measuring categories and emphases in the communication of tweets, retweets, likes, and comments on matters relevant to the pandemic; ii)qualitative analysis that allowed evaluating speeches to identify political interference and the effectiveness of communication at critical moments of the pandemic. It was possible to infer that each president has his singularities and understanding about Social Media’s use as a more direct communication tool with his audience. It was also found that successful communication is not directly proportional to the volume of messages on Twitter, but to socio-political aspects and institutional leadership that can make a difference in Social Media in combating COVID-19.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayden Holmes ◽  
Oli Rafael Moraes ◽  
Lauren Rickards ◽  
Wendy Steele ◽  
Mette Hotker ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore emerging synergies and tensions between the twin moves to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs) and online learning and teaching (L&T) in higher education institutions (HEIs). Design/methodology/approach A preliminary global exploration of universities’ SDG-based L&T initiatives was undertaken, using publicly available grey and academic literature. Across a total sample of 179 HEIs – identified through global university rankings and analysis of all 42 Australian universities – 150 SDG-based L&T initiatives were identified. These were analysed to identify common approaches to embedding the SDGs. Findings Five key approaches to embedding the SDGs into online (and offline) HEI L&T were identified: designing curricula and pedagogy to address the SDGs; orienting the student experience towards the SDGs; aligning graduate outcomes with the SDGs; institutional leadership and capability building; and participating in cross-institutional networks and initiatives. Four preliminary conclusions were drawn from subsequent analysis of these themes and their relevance to online education. Firstly, approaches to SDG L&T varied in degree of alignment between theory and practice. Secondly, many initiatives observed already involve some component of online L&T. Thirdly, questions of equity need to be carefully built into the design of online SDG education. And fourthly, more work needs to be done to ensure that both online and offline L&T are delivering the transformational changes required for and by the SDGs. Research limitations/implications The research was limited by the availability of information on university websites accessible through a desk-top review in 2019; limited HEI representation; and the scope of the 2019 THE Impact Rankings. Originality/value To date, there are no other published reviews, of this scale, of SDG L&T initiatives in universities nor analysis of the intersection between these initiatives and the move to online L&T.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document