scholarly journals Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and chromosome 1 amplification have poor outcomes despite the use of novel triplet regimens

2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 616-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noa Biran ◽  
Jyoti Malhotra ◽  
Emilia Bagiella ◽  
Hearn Jay Cho ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381984906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Li ◽  
Jing Ma ◽  
Han Li ◽  
Wengui Xu ◽  
Zeng Cao ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship of prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma having extramedullary involvement (EMM) with the 18F- fluorodeoxyglucose(18F-FDG) maximum standardized uptake value and the expression of Ki-67 in biopsy samples. Sixty-five patients were newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma presenting with EMM at our hospital from January 2005 to January 2015. Of these 65 patients, 20 were enrolled in this study. Over the last decade, both the maximum standardized uptake value and Ki-67 expression in these extramedullary lesions significantly correlated with progression-free survival, respectively ( P= .039, P =.009). After combining—the maximum standardized uptake value and the Ki-67 expression as an integral—there was a significant correlation between both the overall survival ( P = .027) and progression-free survival ( P= .014). Patients have poor outcomes when EMM is detected at presentation. Both the maximum standardized uptake value and Ki-67 expression could aid in accurately evaluating EMM patient prognosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (23) ◽  
pp. 8962-8969
Author(s):  
Li Bao ◽  
Yutong Wang ◽  
Minqiu Lu ◽  
Bin Chu ◽  
Lei Shi ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4996-4996
Author(s):  
Noa Biran ◽  
Vesna Najfeld ◽  
Emily Bagiella ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Ajai Chari

Abstract Abstract 4996 BACKGROUND: In patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), a gain of the long arms of chromosome 1 is found in approximately 20% of patients by cytogenetics and 40% by FISH. A few studies have not found these abnormalities to be predictive of inferior progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on multivariate analysis. The many studies that have were prior to the use of novel therapies in induction. Currently, testing for a gain or amplification of 1q21 locus is not included in the high risk genetic abnormalities by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). Recently, two groups have reported inferior outcomes with bortezomib based induction regimens followed by high dose melphalan consolidation and maintenance therapy. The gain of 1q21 was either detected by cytogenetics or gene expression profiling (GEP70) at the University of Arkansas (Waheed et al, Cancer 2011) or by FISH in CD138 selected cells by the HOVON group (Neben et al, JCO 2012). However, the outcomes of these patients when treated with a bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone induction regimen, which is associated with an overall response rate (ORR) of 100% and VGPR or better rate of 74% is unknown (Richardson et al. Blood 2010). Here, we describe the poor outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed MM with gain of 1q21 by FISH in unselected bone marrow aspirates despite novel agent triplet therapy. METHODS: The inclusion criteria for this IRB approved retrospective study were patients with symptomatic MM starting in June of 2008 who had a gain of 1q21 by FISH in 200 bone marrow interphase cells at the time of diagnosis. Patients with 1q amplification had at least 3 or more copies. PFS and OS were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: 23 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 59. 7 (range 46–71) and twenty patients (87%) were DS III at diagnosis, 13/23(57%) were ISS Stage 3. 6/23 (26%) had hypercalcemia, 8/23 (35%) had renal insufficiency, and 19/23 (83%) had anemia. Lytic lesions were present in 17/23 (74%) of patients at diagnosis. Of note, while 4 patients had deletion 13 by cytogenetics only 2 patients had other high risk findings, one with t(4;14) and another with deletion 17. All patients were treated with novel agent induction therapy. 19/23 (83%) were treated with triplet regimens (bortezomib, dexamethasone, and either lenalidomide or cyclophosphamide i. e. VRD or VCD). Disappointingly, primary induction failure, defined by PD or SD after 3–4 cycles, was observed in 30% of all patients. Of the 17 patients who received upfront triplet VRD or VCD therapy (with or without HDM plus SCR) the overall response rate (ORR) was only 77% (13/17), and 47% (8/17) achieved VGPR or better. More specifically, 3/17 (18%) had CR, 5/17 (29%) had VGPR, 5/17 (29%) had PR, 1/17 (6%) had SD and 1/19 (6%) had PD. Of the 4 patients who received novel doublet therapy (VD or RD) upfront, only 1 had a VGPR, one had SD and 2 had PD. The responses noted were not very durable, with a median PFS of 14 months. Although 3 patients have died (after 11–13 months from diagnosis), the median OS has not been reached with a median follow up of 13 months. Plasmacytomas of the bone with soft tissue expansion were present in 48% of the patients and 3 of 23 (13%) had spinal cord compression. Extra-osseous MM within 3 months of diagnosis was observed in 5/23 (22%) patients and 4/5 did not have any other high risk cytogenetics. Three patients (13%) had CNS MM at median of 5. 3 months after diagnosis. One patient had concomitant parenchymal brain lesions, myleomatous meningitis, and intra spinal cord disease. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the era of novel agent induction therapies, in our series of newly diagnosed 23 patients with a gain of 1q21, the failure rate of induction was 30% with a median PFS of 14 months. Moreover, these patients had a particularly aggressive clinical course with both medullary and extramedullary plasmacytomas, suggesting that PET-CTs, rather than just skeletal surveys should be considered for initial staging and monitoring. Also, given an unusually high incidence (13%) of early onset CNS disease, prompt CSF evaluation and brain MRI should be performed on patients with neurologic symptoms or signs. We recommend that gain or amplification of q21 identified either by FISH (even without CD138 selection – as demonstrated here) or GEP be prospectively studied in patients with newly diagnosed MM with consideration of novel therapeutic approaches. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2874-2874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Grzasko ◽  
Marek Hus ◽  
Marta Morawska ◽  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Anna Dmoszynska

Abstract Abstract 2874 Introduction Cytogenetic abnormalities are concerned the major novel prognostic factors in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Chromosome 1 abnormalities, mainly 1q gain and 1p loss, are regarded as major prognostic factor in MM and their presence was shown to be associated with unfavourable disease course, although they often coexist with other genetic changes and amp1q21 alone was not showed to be an adverse prognostic factor in all studies. Methods We explored the prognostic value of amp1q21 alone and in coexistence with del17p13, del13q14 and t(4, 14) detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in newly diagnosed MM patients. The study was conducted in a cohort of 79 newly diagnosed MM patients upon the local Ethics Committee approval and according to guidelines of Declaration of Helsinki. All patients received first line regimens including thalidomide in a daily dose of 100 mg: 59 (75%) patients were treated with CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone) and 20 (25%) patients with MPT (melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide). Then 28 (35%) patients previously treated with CTD were given high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell support (HDT/ASCT). Results FISH analysis detected amp1q21 in 39 (49%), del13q14 in 38 (48%), t(4;14) in 16 (20%) and del17p13 in 13 (16%) patients. In 24 (30%) patients amp1q21 was combined with del13q14, in 12 (15%) with t(4;14) and in 5 (6%) with del17p13. The presence of amp1q21 correlated significantly with del13q14 and t(4;14). In the whole cohort of patients, the median PFS was 32.3 months in amp1q21-negative and 14.4 months in amp1q21-positive patients (p=0.049); the median OS was accordingly 40.0 and 26.2 months (p=0.027). In amp1q21-positive patients, the coexistence of additional aberrations made the outcome worse: del13q14 significantly shortened both PFS (22.8 vs 8.5 months, p=0.018) and OS (not reached vs 27 months, p=0.033), del17p13 significantly shortened OS (27.6 vs 11.5 months, p=0.048) and t(4;14) also significantly shortened OS (not reached vs 18.9 months, p=0.012). Moreover, analysis of patients with isolated amp1q21 showed that they have similar prognosis as amp1q21-negative patients (PFS not reached vs 22.7 months, p>0.05 and OS not reached for both, p>0.05). On the other hand, the amp1q21-positive patients with any of additional aberrations have significantly shortened survival: the median PFS of 8.5 months was significantly shortened in comparison both with amp1q21-negative patients (p=0.006) and with patients with isolated amp1q21 (p=0.018); the median OS of 16.7 months was significantly shortened in comparison with both of abovementioned groups (accordingly p=0.032 and p=0.033). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and OS are illustrated in Figure 1. Conclusions We demonstrate that isolated amp1q21 is not associated with poor prognosis in newly diagnosed MM patients treated with thalidomide. Our data clearly show that patients carrying amp1q21 accompanied by other genetic abnormalities, like del13q14, del17p13 or t(4;14), have significantly shortened PFS and OS than patients without amp1q21 or isolated amp1q21 and thalidomide-based regimens should not be recommended in this subset of patients. Acknowledgments The work was supported by a grant from the State Committee for Scientific Research, No. NN402287236.Figure 1Figure 1. Amp1q21-positive patients with additional aberrations had significantly shortened PFS and OS than amp1q21-negative patients (PFS: 8.5 months vs not reached, p=0.006: OS: 16.7 months vs not reached, p=0.032) and than patients with isolated amp1q21 (PFS: 8.5 vs 22.7 months, p=0.018; OS: 16.7 months vs not reached, p=0.033). The difference in PFS and OS between amp1q21-negative patients and patients with isolated amp1q21 was not statistically significant (p>0.05 for both). Disclosures: Dmoszynska: Mundipharma: ; Roche: Honoraria.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihua Zhang ◽  
Xiaosui Ling ◽  
Fan Li ◽  
Tonghua Yang ◽  
Keqian Shi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aim: A cure for the heterogeneous hematological malignancy Multiple Myeloma (MM) is yet to be developed. To date, the early risk factors associated with poor outcomes in MM have not been fully elucidated. Studies have shown an aberrant complement system in MM patients, but the precise association necessitates elucidation. Therefore, this study scrutinizes the correlation between serum complement level and the disease outcome of MM patients.Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of 72 MM patients (new diagnosis) with complement C4 and C3 along with common laboratory indicators was done. The Pearson’s χ2 test and the Mann–Whitney U test were done to evaluate categorical or binary variables and inter-group variance, respectively. Kaplan-Meier test and Cox’s proportional hazards regression were employed for quantitation of overall survival (OS) and univariate or multivariate analyses, respectively.Results: The Cox proportional hazard model analysis unveiled the following: platelet≤115.5×10^9/L(HR=5.82,95%CI=2.522-13.436, P<0.001), complement C4≤0.095g/L(HR=3.642, 95%CI=1.486-8.924,P=0.005), age≥67 years(HR=0.191, 95%CI=0.078-0.47, P<0.001),bone marrow plasma cell percentage≥30.75% (HR=0.171, 95%CI=0.06-0.482, P=0.001) can be employed as independent predictors of OS. Of these, advanced age, low platelet level, and a high proportion of bone marrow plasma cells have been implicated in poor outcomes in MM patients. Interestingly, a low complement 4 level can function as a new indicator of poor prognosis in MM patients.Conclusion: Low levels of C4 are indicative of a poor outcome in newly diagnosed MM patients.


Haematologica ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (10) ◽  
pp. 1611-1617 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Caltagirone ◽  
M. Ruggeri ◽  
S. Aschero ◽  
M. Gilestro ◽  
D. Oddolo ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2833-2833
Author(s):  
Sophie L Corthals ◽  
Mojca Jongen-Lavrencic ◽  
Yvonne de Knegt ◽  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Henk Lokhorst ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2833 Poster Board II-809 Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding single stranded RNAs of 20-22 nucleotides in length. MiRNAs regulate gene expression by binding to the 3' UTR of target mRNAs, which leads to either mRNA degradation or translational inhibition of this target mRNA. MiRNAs play a critical role in cell growth, survival and differentiation and have been suggested to function as tumor suppressor and oncogenes, and/or play a critical role in the pathogenesis of Multiple Myeloma (MM). We investigated miRNA expression in 41 newly diagnosed patients with MM who were included in a clinical trial. MiRNA expression profiling was performed in BM derived CD138 selected plasma cells (PC) obtained from newly diagnosed MM patients with a minimum monoclonal PC purity of > 80%. A quantitative PCR-method (TaqMan low density arrays-microRNA assay', Applied Biosystems) was used for miRNA quantification. The relative expression levels of miRNAs were calculated using the 2-DDCt method and the data was normalized using the endogenous control RNU48. 176/365 miRNAs (48.2%) were expressed in these MM patients. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on the average-linkage method and principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in Partek software (Partek Genomics Suite), showing a differential hierarchy for the chromosomal translocation or gain subgroups. When patients with or without chromosome 13 deletions were compared, no correlation was found between expression levels of miRNAs located on chromosome 13 and the deletion status of this chromosome as determined by FISH. Three miRNAs, i.e. miRNA-126, miRNA-145 and miR-517c were identified that were different between MM patients with or without chromosome 13 deletion. These miRNAs were not located on chromosome 13. Likewise, when comparing the miRNA expression in MM patients with or without chromosome 1q gain, the three most differentially expressed miRNAs were miRNA-23a, miRNA-200a# and miRNA-145, which are not on chromosome 1. In addition, miR-18a, located on chromosome 1 was upregulated in MM patients with 1q gain. MM patients with t(4;14) showed differential expression of miRNA-520g, miRNA-28 and miRNA-502. Currently we evaluate potential association of microRNA expression with the clinical response of MM patients to Bortezomib. In conclusion, our data indicate that miRNAs are differentially expressed in subgroups of MM patients characterized by common cytogenetic abnormalities. Disclosures: Goldschmidt: Johnson and Johnson: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sonneveld:Johnson and Johnson: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5060-5060
Author(s):  
Hian Li Esther Chan ◽  
Leena Gole ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
Wee-Joo J Chng

Abstract Abstract 5060 Introduction In multiple myeloma, cytogenetics is informative in only about a third of patients. Despite this limitation, it remains a commonly available laboratory investigation that has prognostic utility and allows detection of global changes including ploidy. While cytogenetics abnormalities in myeloma have been well documented, a direct comparison between Western and Asian patients has not been performed. Methods Retrospective analysis of 190 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients presenting to the National University Hospital Singapore (NUH) between 2000–2009, and 494 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients from the Mayo Clinic myeloma database from 2000 to 2005 were analyzed. All abnormalities were logged onto an excel spreadsheet where all cytobands were represented. Gains, losses and structural abnormalities including specific translocations were documented separately. Abnormalities present in 5% or more samples with cytogenetic abnormalities were further analysed and compared between the 2 cohorts using chi-square test. Bonferroni correction is used when multiple comparisons were made. Results 80/190 (42%) of NUH patients had an abnormal karyotype compared with 180/494 (36%) in the Mayo clinic cohort (not statistically significant p=0.17). Distribution of ploidy status was very similar between the NUH and Mayo cohort with 35% and 27% being hyperdiploid in the NUH and Mayo cohort respectively (p=0.57). In both cohorts, the most common gains are whole chromosome gains involving chromosomes that are commonly trisomic in hyperdiploid myeloma. However, the pattern of trisomies is different between the NUH and Mayo cohort, with trisomies of chromosome 5, 7, and 19 more common in NUH (p-values <0.0001 for all three comparisons). Loss of 1p21was more common in NUH compared with Mayo (9% vs 2%, p=0.01) although loss of chromosome 7 was more common in Mayo compared to NUH (15% vs 0%, p=0.0002). t(11;14) is the most common translocations for both cohorts. Translocations involving chromosome 1 with different partners are also common in both cohorts. However, there are also interesting differences. Rearrangements involving the IgH (14q32) [10% NUH vs 4% in Mayo] and MYC (8q24) [6% in NUH vs 1% in mayo] loci are more common in the NUH cohort. In fact, when MYC translocations with IgH or IgL are included, 9 (11%) cases in the NUH cohort were affected versus 4 (in the Mayo Clinic cohort (p=0.0002). Recurrent rearrangement of 3q27 was observed in 5% of the NUH cohort while no cases were noted in the Mayo cohort. A search of the Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations and Gene Fusion in Cancer (http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman) showed that only 4 out of 1643 Caucasian myeloma karyotype recorded had this abnormality (p<0.0001). 1q21 deletion and MYC rearrangements are associated with poorer prognosis. Conclusion From this comparison, the general patterns of cytogenetic abnormalities are similar between Asian and Western patients. The most important difference between Asian patients and western patients was the higher incidence of poor prognostic cytogenetic abnormalities in Asian patients including 1p21 deletion and gene rearrangements involving the MYC gene locus. 3q27 was predominantly seen in the Asian patient cohort and rarely in western patients. This could be a unique feature of Asian myeloma patients and more studies will have to be done to confirm this. These differences may have important implication on outcome of patients in Asian and Western Countries, and also unique biology that could potentially be exploited therapeutically. Disclosures: Fonseca: Consulting:Genzyme, Medtronic, BMS, Amgen, Otsuka, Celgene, Intellikine, Lilly Research Support: Cylene, Onyz, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document