scholarly journals Regional abdominal adiposity is associated with BMI‐related brain regions in middle‐aged adults at high risk of Alzheimer’s dementia

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sapir Golan ◽  
Ethel Boccara ◽  
Ramit Ravona‐Springer ◽  
Yael Inbar ◽  
Iscka Yore ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. S667-S667
Author(s):  
Sterling C. Johnson ◽  
Taylor W. Schmitz ◽  
Michele L. Ries ◽  
Mehul A. Trivedi ◽  
Craig Atwood ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca West ◽  
Ramit Ravona‐Springer ◽  
Inbal Sharvit‐Ginon ◽  
Sapir Golan ◽  
Anthony Heymann ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal N Karmali ◽  
Hongyan Ning ◽  
Donald M Lloyd-Jones

Introduction: Ten-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and absolute benefit from antihypertensive therapy vary at any given BP based on associated risk factor levels. Thus, implications of treatment and control rates at a particular BP vary substantially in different risk groups. Objectives: We examined the prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension (HTN) by risk group in US adults without prevalent CVD. Methods: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 to 2010 for adults age 40-79 years without prevalent CVD (n=4,066). We estimated 10-year risk for an atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) event using the ACC/AHA 2013 Pooled Cohort risk equations. We examined HTN treatment and control rates according to current guidelines in middle-aged (40-59 years) and older (60-79 years) adults with: 10-year ASCVD risk <7.5% (no diabetes/kidney disease); 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5% (no diabetes/kidney disease); and either diabetes or kidney disease. Results: The proportion of adults with treatment-eligible HTN was 39.3% for those with 10-year ASCVD risk <7.5%, 32.2% for those with 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5%, and 28.4% for those with either diabetes or kidney disease (see Table 1). Treatment rates across the risk groups varied from 51.5% to 79.0% for middle-aged adults and 81.8% to 90.2% for older adults. HTN control rates were highest (87.7%) in older adults with 10-year ASCVD risk <7.5% but were lowest (29.3%) in middle-aged individuals with 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5%. Conclusions: US HTN guidelines, based solely on BP thresholds, identify a higher proportion of low-risk adults and a lower proportion of high-risk adults as being eligible for treatment. Control rates remain suboptimal in high-risk individuals, particularly middle-aged adults. Future guidelines should consider pre-treatment risk stratification to identify those at increased pretreatment ASCVD risk who would benefit most from more intensive therapy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. S741-S742
Author(s):  
Masahiro Nakatsuka ◽  
Kenichi Meguro ◽  
Masahiro Tsuboi ◽  
Kei Nakamura ◽  
Kyoko Akanuma ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. S74-S74
Author(s):  
Sterling C. Johnson ◽  
Taylor W. Schmitz ◽  
Michele L. Ries ◽  
Mehul A. Trivedi ◽  
Craig S. Atwood ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Tam ◽  
Christian Dansereau ◽  
Yasser Itturia-Medina ◽  
Sebastian Urchs ◽  
Pierre Orban ◽  
...  

AbstractClinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease need to enroll patients whose cognition will decline over time, if left untreated, in order to demonstrate the efficacy of an intervention. Machine learning models used to screen for patients at risk of progression to dementia should therefore favor specificity (detecting only progressors) over sensitivity (detecting all progressors), especially when the prevalence of progressors is low. Here, we explore whether such high-risk patients can be identified using cognitive assessments and structural neuroimaging, by training machine learning tools in a high specificity regime. A multimodal signature of Alzheimer’s dementia was first extracted from ADNI1. We then validated the predictive value of this signature on ADNI1 patients with mild cognitive impairment (N=235). The signature was optimized to predict progression to dementia over three years with low sensitivity (55.1%) but high specificity (95.6%), resulting in only moderate accuracy (69.3%) but high positive predictive value (80.4%, adjusted for a “typical” 33% prevalence rate of true progressors). These results were replicated in ADNI2 (N=235), with 87.8% adjusted positive predictive value (96.7% specificity, 47.3% sensitivity, 85.1% accuracy). We found that cognitive measures alone could identify high-risk individuals, with structural measurements providing a slight improvement. The signature had comparable receiver operating characteristics to standard machine learning tools, yet a marked improvement in positive predictive value was achieved over the literature by selecting a high specificity operating point. The multimodal signature can be readily applied for the enrichment of clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document