Evaluation of laser spallation as a technique for measurement of cell adhesion strength

2007 ◽  
Vol 82A (4) ◽  
pp. 852-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hagerman ◽  
Jaewoo Shim ◽  
Vijay Gupta ◽  
Ben Wu
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D. Boyd ◽  
A.J. Stromberg ◽  
C.S. Miller ◽  
M.E. Grady

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Boyd ◽  
C.S. Miller ◽  
M. E. Grady

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of this study is to quantify the adhesion strength differential between an oral bacterial biofilm and an osteoblast-like cell monolayer to a dental implant-simulant surface and develop a metric that quantifies the biocompatible efficacy of implant surfaces.MethodsHigh-amplitude short-duration stress waves generated by laser pulse absorption are used to spall bacteria and cells from titanium substrates. By carefully controlling laser fluence and calibration of laser fluence with applied stress, the adhesion difference between dental carry Streptococcus mutans biofilms and MG 63 osteoblast-like cell monolayers on smooth and rough titanium substrates is obtained. The Adhesion Index consists of a ratio of cell adhesion strength to biofilm adhesion strength obtaining a nondimensionalized parameter for biocompatibility assessments.ResultsAdhesion strength of 145±42 MPa is measured for MG 63 on smooth titanium, which increases to 288±24 MPa on roughened titanium. Adhesion strength for S. mutans on smooth titanium is 315±9 MPa and remained relatively constant at 332±9 MPa on roughened titanium. The Adhesion Index for smooth titanium is 0.46±0.12 which increased to 0.87±0.05 on roughened titanium.SignificanceThe laser spallation technique provides a platform to examine the tradeoffs of adhesion modulators on both biofilm and cell adhesion. This tradeoff is characterized by the Adhesion Index, which is proposed to aid biocompatibility screening and could result in improved implantation outcomes. The Adhesion Index is implemented to determine surface factors that promote favorable adhesion of cells greater than biofilms. Here, an Adhesion Index >> 1 suggests favorable biocompatibility.Graphical AbstractHighlightsBiofilm and cell monolayer adhesion are measured via the laser spallation techniqueSmooth and roughened dental implant-mimicking titanium surfaces are investigatedSurface roughness increases cell adhesion but does not alter the adhesion of biofilmsAn Adhesion Index is developed to directly quantify the adhesive competition between bacteria and cells on an implant surface


2008 ◽  
Vol 516 (21) ◽  
pp. 7627-7635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soma Sekhar V. Kandula ◽  
Cheryl D. Hartfield ◽  
Philippe H. Geubelle ◽  
Nancy R. Sottos

Author(s):  
Kevin V. Christ ◽  
Kevin T. Turner

Cell adhesion plays a fundamental role in numerous physiological and pathological processes, and measurements of the adhesion strength are important in fields ranging from basic cell biology research to the development of implantable biomaterials. Our group and others have recently demonstrated that microfluidic devices offer advantages for characterizing the adhesion of cells to protein-coated surfaces [1,2]. Microfluidic devices offer many advantages over conventional assays, including the ability to apply high shear stresses in the laminar regime and the opportunity to directly observe cell behavior during testing. However, a key disadvantage is that such assays require cells to be cultured inside closed microchannels. Assays based on closed channels restrict the types of surfaces that can be examined and are not compatible with many standard techniques in cell biology research. Furthermore, while techniques for cell culture in microchannels have become common, maintaining the viability of certain types of cells in channels remains a challenge.


Lab on a Chip ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1612-1620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baris R. Mutlu ◽  
Taronish Dubash ◽  
Claudius Dietsche ◽  
Avanish Mishra ◽  
Arzu Ozbey ◽  
...  

Cell–cell adhesion strength of freely suspended cell clusters can be measured using an oscillatory inertial microfluidic system.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. S575
Author(s):  
A. Bagno ◽  
M. Dettin ◽  
A. Piovan ◽  
P. Brun ◽  
R. Gambaretto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document