Piloting a first‐year resident‐as‐teacher workshop to foster evidence‐based teaching

2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22
Author(s):  
Michael D. Wolcott ◽  
Elizabeth C. Kornegay ◽  
Jennifer L. Brame
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad ◽  
Astrid Klopstad Wahl ◽  
Torbjørn Moum ◽  
Eivind Engebretsen ◽  
Marit Helen Andersen

Abstract Background Following an implementation plan based on dynamic dialogue between researchers and clinicians, this study implemented an evidence-based patient education program (tested in an RCT) into routine care at a clinical transplant center. The aim of this study was to investigate renal recipients’ knowledge and self-efficacy during first year the after the intervention was provided in an everyday life setting. Methods The study has a longitudinal design. The sample consisted of 196 renal recipients. Measurement points were 5 days (baseline), 2 months (T1), 6 months (T2), and one-year post transplantation (T3). Outcome measures were post-transplant knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-perceived general health. Results No statistically significant changes were found from baseline to T1, T2, and T3. Participants’ levels of knowledge and self-efficacy were high prior to the education program and did not change throughout the first year post transplantation. Conclusion Renal recipients self-efficacy and insight in post-transplant aspects seem to be more robust when admitted to the hospital for transplantation compared to baseline observations in the RCT study. This may explain why the implemented educational intervention did not lead to the same positive increase in outcome measures as in the RCT. This study supports that replicating clinical interventions in real-life settings may provide different results compared to results from RCT’s. In order to gain a complete picture of the impacts of an implemented intervention, it is vital also to evaluate results after implementing findings from RCT-studies into everyday practice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Reidt ◽  
Keri Hager ◽  
James Beattie ◽  
Amy Pittenger ◽  
Maureen Smith ◽  
...  

This case study describes a longitudinal curricular sequence implemented to teach evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills. The longitudinal sequence is innovative in its approach, design, and assessment of EBM. This approach moves away from the conventional strategy of teaching drug information and drug literature evaluation as stand-alone courses and instead embraces the EBM Framework and its use in the context of authentic problem solving. The EBM Framework—Ask, Acquire, Appraise, and Apply—was used as the basis for defining seven EBM skills. These skills were targeted in the evidence-based, integrated design of 17 learning episodes delivered with eight faculty members through six courses in the first year. Student perceptions of relevance of EBM and performance on assessments and learning activities throughout the sequence suggest that integrating EBM across the first year of the curriculum is an effective strategy for teaching EBM skills. Three themes emerged from analysis of the data and experience, including the need for: a strong teaching team, a whole task approach with a focus on solving authentic problems, and care in interpreting the progression of assessments and patterns of student performance. Through instructor observations and peer review, the longitudinal sequence has been refined and has had an impact on the rest of the curriculum.   Type: Case Study


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e117-118
Author(s):  
Luckshi Rajendran

It was early in my first year of medical school that I learned about the “brainbow” - an innovative means of using genetic expression of various fluorescent proteins to colourfully label individual neurons, allowing for the visualization of neural networks within the brain. I was fascinated by the beautiful complexity of these axonal interconnections. In reflection, I drew parallels to my journey through medicine, and the intricacies of navigating human interpersonal relationships. Medical practice includes both the soft and the hard sciences. Academic institutions teach us the hard sciences: the pathophysiology of disease, and the evidence-based practice for diagnosis and management. Over the years of my clinical training, I am learning that much of the soft science of medicine is in the human connection. It is in our ongoing practice of communication and interpersonal skills, and the subsequent relationships that we develop (or sometimes, lose) with our friends, partners, and colleagues, as we face the miracles and the hardships throughout our medical training. It is in our patient interactions: the emotions we share, the empathy we convey, and the rapport that we build in order to provide compassionate patient care. Much like the brain’s neural network, these connections are complex and ever-changing - some connections are strengthened, and others are unfortunately, and perhaps painfully, pruned. My piece “The emotional brainbow” uses fine multicolours of sewn thread to reflect the intricate axonal connections of brain centres involved in processing and expressing emotions: the cortex, the limbic system, the brainstem, and the cerebellum. These crucial structures communicate to facilitate our ability to understand and empathize with others, and contributes towards our continually developing practice of manoeuvering interpersonal relationships. There is a complex, overlapping interplay of these neural connections within the emotion-regulating brain centres, much like the beautifully intricate emotional human connections, which we, as health care professionals, both create and navigate.


Pharmacy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Maheu ◽  
Marie-Claude Vanier ◽  
Léonie Rouleau ◽  
Nicolas Dugré ◽  
Line Guénette

A needs assessment study of pharmacists working in family medicine groups (FMG) demonstrated the necessity to build a practice-based network. This network would foster a faster integration into FMG and a more efficient collaborative practice. It would also take advantage of an existing practice-based research network (PBRN)—the STAT (Soutien Technologique pour l’Application et le Transfert des pratiques novatrices en pharmacie) network. A working group of nine FMG pharmacists from the different regions of the province of Quebec, Canada, and a committee of partners, including the key pharmacy organizations, were created. Between January 2018 and May 2019, nine meetings took place to discuss the needs assessment results and deploy an action plan. The practice-based network first year activities allowed identifying pharmacists working in FMGs across the province. A directory of these pharmacists was published on the STAT network. The vision, mission, mandate, name («Réseau Québécois des Pharmaciens GMF») and logo were developed. The first few activities include: Bi-monthly newsletters; a mentorship program; short evidence-based therapeutic letters (pharmacotherapeutic capsules) and a start-up kit to facilitate integration of these pharmacists. The Quebec FMG pharmacist practice-based network has been launched. It is planned to evaluate the members’ satisfaction in late Spring 2020 with regards to activities and resources provided.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel McCabe

This case study introduces an assignment from a large midwestern university FYC program, which emphasizes analytical writing by introducing students to a series of increasingly layered texts, including film. This has many advantages: teaching multi-perspective, evidence-based visual and textual analysis. For students to see textual constructedness the author required they remake film scenes using their cellphones, employing and then articulating their use of generic conventions. This article details the original assignment and tracks its evolution due to students’ innovations. One group’s project, a scene from The Shining, highlights multimodal recreation’s capacity to help students re-envision and more fully analyze cinematic elements, adding depth and specificity to students’ analytical writing.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 200-200
Author(s):  
Laurence E. McCahill ◽  
Mary May ◽  
Coralyn Martinez ◽  
Wendy K. Taylor ◽  
Alan T. Davis

200 Background: Treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PanCa) is complex and requires input from multiple physicians. We developed a unique gastrointestinal (GI) cancer program utilizing a multidisciplinary conference, a multidisciplinary clinic (MDC), a GI nurse navigator (NN) and continuous quality assessment with a nurse clinical auditor. The impact of this program, which requires significant additional resources, on adherence to evidence based cancer treatment for newly diagnosed PanCa patients is unknown. Methods: The GI (NN) interviews patients, coordinates staging and biopsies, physician visits and subsequent adjuvant care in the first year of diagnosis. A clinical quality specialist abstracted all treatment received (surgical, radiation, chemotherapy, palliative), and data was entered into a GI Quality database. Treatment received by patients in first year of diagnosis was compared to NCCN guidelines. Results: From January 2010 to April 2012, 68 patients with newly diagnosed PanCA were evaluated/treated. Overall compliance with NCCN treatment guidelines was 83.4%. Compliance was highest for stage I (almost all underwent surgical resection) and stage IV (none underwent surgery). Utilization of adjuvant therapies was 80% (16/20) for patients with stageI/II disease. Eight patients with stage I/II disease did not undergo surgery, due to comorbidities or disease progression. Conclusions: A novel GI cancer program utilizing a multispecialty MDC and a dedicated GI NN demonstrates very high compliance with evidence based therapy for first line treatment for PanCa patients. Although resource intensive, this level of adherence to evidence-based medicine is encouraging and higher than prior reports for PanCa. The relative contribution of the GI MDC clinic format versus the NN warrants further study. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
I.B. Komarova ◽  

Arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) in children is a potentially disabling disease with cumulative rates of relapse in the first year of 12–16%, necessitating secondary prevention of the disease. Both in adults and in pediatric clinical practice, acetylsalicylic acid is most commonly used, much less often – clopidogrel. However, the validity of the use of antiplatelet agents in children with ischemic stroke is still controversial, due to the low level of evidence-based studies and the paucity of publications. The article analyzes and summarizes data on the possibilities and limitations of the use of antiplatelet agents for secondary prevention of AIS in children.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-68
Author(s):  
Mandana Akbarinejad Mousavi ◽  
Mitra Amini ◽  
Somayeh Delavari ◽  
Ali Seifi

Summary Team-based learning (TBL) is a well-established instructional strategy that provides students with the chance to apply conceptual knowledge through a series of actions, including pre-class, individual, team class activity, and immediate feedback. The purpose of the present study was to introduce a course of teaching the evidence-based medicine (EBM) to all first-year medical residents in different disciplines at Shiraz Medical School in Iran country using the TBL instructional strategy. The sample included 86 medical residents at Shiraz Medical School. This study had a quasi-experimental design and was conducted in 12 sessions of evidence-based medicine (EBM) based on team-based learning (TBL) strategy. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software. In all sections, the results of Individual Readiness Assurance Tests (IRATs) and Group Readiness Assurance Tests (GRATs) were added and calculated. Cronbach’s alpha test was implemented to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaires. For the descriptive analysis of data, descriptive statistics were used. ANOVA and T-test were used for analytic analysis. There was a significant difference in answering the questions between individual (3.73 ± 2.33) and group (4.71 ± 2.29) stages. Residents gained higher average grades on working in the team (P-value < 0.02). Results of residents’ response about satisfaction questionnaire are shown that the best scores belong to group activities in TBL. The results of this study showed that TBL could be used as an effective method for residents’ education in different disciplines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document