Monitoring and Lowering the Readmission Rate

2018 ◽  
pp. 189-201
Author(s):  
Nidhish Dhru
Keyword(s):  
Readmission Rate

Total Hospital Costs and Readmission Rate of Patient-Specific Instrument in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Thomas ◽  
Ankur Patel ◽  
Corey Patrick ◽  
Gary Delhougne
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Hospital Cost ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
P Value ◽  
Total Hospital Cost ◽  
Total Hospital ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractDespite advancements in surgical technique and component design, implant loosening, stiffness, and instability remain leading causes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Patient-specific instruments (PSI) aid in surgical precision and in implant positioning and ultimately reduce readmissions and revisions in TKA. The objective of the study was to evaluate total hospital cost and readmission rate at 30, 60, 90, and 365 days in PSI-guided TKA patients. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a primary TKA for osteoarthritis from the Premier Perspective Database between 2014 and 2017 Q2. TKA with PSI patients were identified using appropriate keywords from billing records and compared against patients without PSI. Patients were excluded if they were < 21 years of age; outpatient hospital discharges; evidence of revision TKA; bilateral TKA in same discharge or different discharges. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to control patients, hospital, and clinical characteristics. Generalized Estimating Equation model with appropriate distribution and link function were used to estimate hospital related cost while logistic regression models were used to estimate 30, 60, and 90 days and 1-year readmission rate. The study matched 3,358 TKAs with PSI with TKA without PSI patients. Mean total hospital costs were statistically significantly (p < 0.0001) lower for TKA with PSI ($14,910; 95% confidence interval [CI]: $14,735–$15,087) than TKA without PSI patients ($16,018; 95% CI: $15,826–$16,212). TKA with PSI patients were 31% (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.51–0.95; p-value = 0.0218) less likely to be readmitted at 30 days; 35% (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50–0.86; p-value = 0.0022) less likely to be readmitted at 60 days; 32% (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53–0.88; p-value = 0.0031) less likely to be readmitted at 90 days; 28% (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60–0.86; p-value = 0.0004) less likely to be readmitted at 365 days than TKA without PSI patients. Hospitals and health care professionals can use retrospective real-world data to make informed decisions on using PSI to reduce hospital cost and readmission rate, and improve outcomes in TKA patients.

Impact of Michigan’s new opioid prescribing laws on spine surgery patients: analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Paul Park ◽  
Victor Chang ◽  
Hsueh-Han Yeh ◽  
Jason M. Schwalb ◽  
David R. Nerenz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVEIn 2017, Michigan passed new legislation designed to reduce opioid abuse. This study evaluated the impact of these new restrictive laws on preoperative narcotic use, short-term outcomes, and readmission rates after spinal surgery.METHODSPatient data from 1 year before and 1 year after initiation of the new opioid laws (beginning July 1, 2018) were queried from the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative database. Before and after implementation of the major elements of the new laws, 12,325 and 11,988 patients, respectively, were treated.RESULTSPatients before and after passage of the opioid laws had generally similar demographic and surgical characteristics. Notably, after passage of the opioid laws, the number of patients taking daily narcotics preoperatively decreased from 3783 (48.7%) to 2698 (39.7%; p < 0.0001). Three months postoperatively, there were no differences in minimum clinically important difference (56.0% vs 58.0%, p = 0.1068), numeric rating scale (NRS) score of back pain (3.5 vs 3.4, p = 0.1156), NRS score of leg pain (2.7 vs 2.7, p = 0.3595), satisfaction (84.4% vs 84.7%, p = 0.6852), or 90-day readmission rate (5.8% vs 6.2%, p = 0.3202) between groups. Although there was no difference in readmission rates, pain as a reason for readmission was marginally more common (0.86% vs 1.22%, p = 0.0323).CONCLUSIONSThere was a meaningful decrease in preoperative narcotic use, but notably there was no apparent negative impact on postoperative recovery, patient satisfaction, or short-term outcomes after spinal surgery despite more restrictive opioid prescribing. Although the readmission rate did not significantly increase, pain as a reason for readmission was marginally more frequently observed.

scholarly journals 288. Follow-Up Blood Cultures in Gram-Negative Bacteremia: How Do They Impact Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S144-S144
Author(s):  
Azza Elamin ◽  
Faisal Khan ◽  
Ali Abunayla ◽  
Rajasekhar Jagarlamudi ◽  
aditee Dash
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background As opposed to Staphylococcus. aureus bacteremia, there are no guidelines to recommend repeating blood cultures in Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia (GNB). Several studies have questioned the utility of follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) in GNB, but the impact of this practice on clinical outcomes is not fully understood. Our aim was to study the practice of obtaining FUBCs in GNB at our institution and to assess it’s impact on clinical outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age admitted with GNB between January 2017 and December 2018. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes in those with and without FUBCs. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, presumed source of bacteremia and need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Presence of fever, hypotension /shock and white blood cell (WBC) count on the day of FUBC was recorded. The primary objective was to compare 30-day mortality between the two groups. Secondary objectives were to compare differences in 30-day readmission rate, hospital length of stay (LOS) and duration of antibiotic treatment. Mean and standard deviation were used for continuous variables, frequency and proportion were used for categorical variables. P-value &lt; 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Results 482 patients were included, and of these, 321 (67%) had FUBCs. 96% of FUBCs were negative and 2.8% had persistent bacteremia. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between those with and without FUBCs (2.9% and 2.7% respectively), or in 30-day readmission rate (21.4% and 23.4% respectively). In patients with FUBCs compared to those without FUBCs, hospital LOS was longer (7 days vs 5 days, P &lt; 0.001), and mean duration of antibiotic treatment was longer (14 days vs 11 days, P &lt; 0.001). A higher number of patients with FUBCs needed ICU care compared to those without FUBCs (41.4% and 25.5% respectively, P &lt; 0.001) Microbiology of index blood culture in those with and without FUBCs Outcomes in those with and without FUBCs FUBCs characteristics Conclusion Obtaining FUBCs in GNB had no impact on 30-day mortality or 30-day readmission rate. It was associated with longer LOS and antibiotic duration. Our findings suggest that FUBCs in GNB are low yield and may not be recommended in all patients. Prospective studies are needed to further examine the utility of this practice in GNB. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Short durations of corticosteroids for hospitalised COVID-19 patients are associated with a high readmission rate

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zain Chaudhry ◽  
Marianne Shawe-Taylor ◽  
Tommy Rampling ◽  
Tim Cutfield ◽  
Gabriella Bidwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Readmission Rate ◽  
High Readmission Rate

scholarly journals 709 Covid-19 Pandemic: Audit on The Management of Acute Cholecystitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Asarbakhsh ◽  
N Lazarus ◽  
P Lykoudis
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Management Option ◽  
Management Guidelines ◽  
Theatre Staff ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Definitive Management ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Abstract Background The definitive management of acute cholecystitis is laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the same admission if the patient is fit. As the Covid-19 pandemic emerged, evidence suggested adverse outcomes for asymptomatic Covid positive patients undergoing surgery, including increased mortality risk. Risks to theatre staff were also highlighted. This prompted changes in acute cholecystitis management guidelines. Method The audit aim was to assess the impact of guideline change on clinical outcomes and readmission rate for acute cholecystitis. The revised Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS) guidelines were the gold standard. All inpatient admissions for acute cholecystitis during the 4-week peak of the pandemic (17/04/2020 – 14/05/2020) were included. Result 24 patients were admitted with acute cholecystitis. 10 patients (41.7%) were managed with antibiotics alone, 4 patients (16.6%) underwent cholecystostomy. 12 patients (50%) were discharged within 3 days. Lack of clinical progress/ongoing symptoms was the indication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 5 cases (20.8%). 5 conservatively managed patients (20.8%) were readmitted with ongoing cholecystitis or pancreatitis. Conclusions 19 patients (80%) were managed non-surgically in accordance with AUGIS guidelines. However conservative management was not always appropriate. We recommend that laparoscopic cholecystectomy should remain a management option for acute cholecystitis during the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic.

Association Between Perioperative Fluid Balance and 30-Day Unplanned Readmission After Major Abdominal Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-407
Author(s):  
Tak Kyu Oh ◽  
Ah-Young Oh ◽  
Jung-Won Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Major Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Unplanned Readmission ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Relative Value ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Perioperative positive fluid balance (FB) increases postoperative complication and length of hospital stay. We aimed to investigate 30-day unplanned readmission after major abdominal surgery based on perioperative FB (%) on postoperative days (POD) 0 to 3. This retrospective cohort study analyzed medical records of patients who underwent elective major abdominal surgery (surgery time >2 hours, estimated blood loss >500 mL) at a single tertiary academic hospital from January 2010 to December 2017. Cumulative FB was calculated by total input fluid − output fluid in liters × weight (kg)−1 on admission × 100 during POD 0 (24 hours), 0 to 1 (48 hours), 0 to 2 (72 hours), and 0 to 3 (96 hours). Of the 3650 patients in the final analysis, 503 (13.8%) had unplanned readmission within 30 days. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, FB on POD 0 (24 hours), 0 to 1 (48 hours), 0 to 2 (72 hours), and 0 to 3 (96 hours) showed no significant association with 30-day unplanned readmission (all P > .05). However, an increase of 10 000 points in the total relative value unit scores was associated with 5% increase in 30-day unplanned readmission (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.07; P = .001), and 1-hour increase in surgery time was associated with 10% increase in 30-day unplanned readmission (odds ratio = 1.10, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-1.15; P < .001). This study showed that perioperative FB is not associated with 30-day unplanned readmission rate after a major abdominal surgery. Total relative value unit scores and duration of surgery were significantly associated with 30-day unplanned readmission rate after major abdominal surgery in a single tertiary academic hospital.

scholarly journals Transitional care models for chronic patients: preliminary results from an umbrella review

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M T Riccardi ◽  
M Cicconi ◽  
W Ricciardi ◽  
M M Gianino ◽  
G Damiani
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Transitional Care ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Chronic Patients ◽  
Care Models

Abstract Worldwide, chronic diseases are burdening and the health systems need to be rethought to better manage this epidemiologic shift. One of the critical points in the care pathway of chronic patients is the transition from one care setting to another. Aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current evidence on the impact of transitional care programs on health and economic outcomes for chronic patients Medline, Web of Science and EMBASE were queried for relevant reviews using the Population-Intervention-Context-Outcome (PICO) model. The quality of the included articles was determined using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistic, and comparison among studies carried out in European Union (EU) versus non-EU was performed (Chi-square test was used and a p &lt; 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant) 124 reviews were assessed for eligibility and 14 were eventually included (for a total of 167 primary articles). Quality appraisal was critically low in 60% of the reviews. Both hospital readmission rate and Emergency Department (ED) visit rate were lower than those in usual care group, but this difference was significant in 40% of articles. In EU studies readmission rate was lower in 65% of cases while in non-EU ones the percentage was 51.0%, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.23). Six reviews (43%) investigated the economic impact of the transitional care: most reported an initial increase in cost due to investment in staff training and creation of organizational networks, followed by a sharp decrease in costs due to a better utilization of health services, thus leading to a reduction in overall costs. Compared with usual care, transitional care shows an overall cost reduction, even if with limited effects on re-hospitalization or ED visit rates. These findings should encourage decision makers to invest in the development of this kind of programs in order to identify models that best perform. Key messages The patient transfer supervision from one care setting to another is necessary for continuity of care, but there is no robust evidence about the better performance of transitional care models. Systematically reviewed transitional care models has been shown be more cost saving, with a moderate impact on hospital readmission or emergency department visits rates.

Impact of a pharmacy team–led intervention program on the readmission rate of elderly patients with heart failure

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela M. Moye ◽  
Pui Shan Chu ◽  
Teresa Pounds ◽  
Maria Miller Thurston
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Readmission Rate ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Historical Control Group ◽  
Historical Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Purpose The results of a study to determine whether pharmacy team–led postdischarge intervention can reduce the rate of 30-day hospital readmissions in older patients with heart failure (HF) are reported. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients 60 years of age or older who were admitted to an academic medical center with a primary diagnosis of HF during the period March 2013–June 2014 and received standard postdischarge follow-up care provided by physicians, nurses, and case managers. The rate of 30-day readmissions in that historical control group was compared with the readmission rate in a group of older patients with HF who were admitted to the hospital during a 15-month intervention period (July 2014–October 2015); in addition to usual postdischarge care, these patients received medication reconciliation and counseling from a team of pharmacists, pharmacy residents, and pharmacy students. Results Twelve of 97 patients in the intervention group (12%) and 20 of 80 patients in the control group (25%) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge (p = 0.03); 11 patients in the control group (55%) and 7 patients in the intervention group (58%) had HF-related readmissions (p = 0.85). Conclusion In a population of older patients with HF, the rate of 30-day all-cause readmissions in a group of patients targeted for a pharmacy team–led postdischarge intervention was significantly lower than the all-cause readmission rate in a historical control group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document