Frailty Phenotype | ScienceGate

Introduction: Physical symptoms and frailty are common in older adults. A previous study has reported that multiple somatic symptoms are associated with frailty. In this study, we aimed to describe the picture of physical symptoms in older adults in western China and examine the relationship of multiple physical symptoms and frailty, as well as the sex difference of this relationship. Methods: Cross-sectional analyses were based on the West China Health and Aging Trend (WCHAT) study comprising 4,106 community-dwelling older adults (60–95 years). Frailty was assessed using the physical frailty phenotype (PFP). Participants’ experience of 28 different physical symptoms in the past 4 weeks was assessed. Physical symptoms were divided into several categories according to organ systems. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between frailty and multiple physical symptoms. Results: Nearly half of the subjects reported experiencing at least 1 physical symptom during the past 4 weeks. Musculoskeletal symptoms were the most prevalent symptoms. More than 5 physical symptoms were more likely to be frailty, even when all covariates were controlled. A significant association between multiple musculoskeletal symptoms and frailty also was found after adjusted for all covariates and multiple symptoms of other organ systems. Similar results were obtained for multiple cardiopulmonary symptoms. Furthermore, there were sex differences in these relationships. Conclusion: Multiple physical symptoms appear to have a detrimental impact on frailty in older adults. Compared with counting total symptoms, multiple symptoms of the same organ system may have a greater impact on frailty. Effective interventions and management of multiple physical symptoms are warranted to prevent frailty.

Download Full-text

Frailty Phenotype and Healthcare Costs in Women in Late Life: The SOF study

Innovation in Aging ◽

10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2814 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 778-778

Author(s):

Lisa Langsetmo ◽

Allyson Kats ◽

John Schousboe ◽

Tien Vo ◽

Brent Taylor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Healthcare Costs ◽

Functional Limitations ◽

Late Life ◽

Cost Ratio ◽

Deficit Accumulation ◽

Frailty Phenotype ◽

Medicare Claims ◽

Accumulation Index ◽

Direct Healthcare Costs ◽

Frailty Indicator

Abstract We used data from 1324 women (mean age 83) at the 2002-2004 exam linked with their Medicare claims to determine the association of the frailty phenotype with healthcare costs. The frailty phenotype was categorized as robust, pre-frail or frail. Multimorbidity and a frailty indicator (approximating the deficit accumulation index) were derived from claims. Functional limitations were assessed by asking about difficulty performing IADL. Total direct healthcare costs were ascertained during 36 months following the exam. Compared with robust, pre-frailty and frailty were associated with higher costs after accounting for demographics, multimorbidity, functional limitations and the frailty indicator (cost ratio 1.37 [1.10-1.71] among pre-frail and 1.63 [1.28-2.08] among frail). Discrimination of high-cost (top decile) women was improved by adding the phenotype and functional limitations to a model containing demographics and the claims-based measures. Findings suggest that assessment of the phenotype may improve identification of individuals at higher risk of costly care.

Download Full-text

Frailty, with or without Cognitive Impairment, is a Strong Predictor of Recurrent Falls in a US Population-Representative Sample of Older Adults

The Journals of Gerontology Series A ◽

10.1093/gerona/glab083 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Mei-Ling Ge ◽

Eleanor M Simonsick ◽

Bi-Rong Dong ◽

Judith D Kasper ◽

Qian-Li Xue

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Cognitive Impairment ◽

Strong Predictor ◽

Word Recall ◽

Physical Frailty ◽

Frailty Phenotype ◽

Clock Drawing Test ◽

Recurrent Falls ◽

Health Aging ◽

Marginal Means

Abstract Background Physical frailty and cognitive impairment have been separately associated with falls. The purpose of the study is to examine the associations of physical frailty and cognitive impairment separately and jointly with incident recurrent falls among older adults. Methods The analysis included 6000 older adults in community or non-nursing home residential care settings who were ≥65 years and participated in the National Health Aging Trends Study (NHATS). Frailty was assessed using the physical frailty phenotype; cognitive impairment was defined by bottom quintile of clock drawing test or immediate and delayed 10-word recall, or self/proxy-report of diagnosis of dementia, or AD8 score≥ 2. The marginal means/rates models were used to analyze the associations of frailty (by the physical frailty phenotype) and cognitive impairment with recurrent falls over 6 years follow-up (2012-2017). Results Of the 6000 older adults, 1,787 (29.8%) had cognitive impairment only, 334 (5.6%) had frailty only, 615 (10.3%) had both, and 3,264 (54.4%) had neither. After adjusting for age, sex, race, education, living alone, obesity, disease burden, and mobility disability, those with frailty (with or without cognitive impairment) at baseline had higher rates of recurrent falls than those without cognitive impairment and frailty (frailty only: Rate ratio (RR)=1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.18-1.44; both: RR=1.28, 95% CI=1.17-1.40). The association was marginally significant for those with cognitive impairment only (RR=1.07, 95% CI=1.00-1.13). Conclusions Frailty and cognitive impairment were independently associated with recurrent falls in non-institutionalized older adults. There was a lack of synergistic effect between frailty and cognitive impairment.

Download Full-text

Low levels of frailty in HIV-positive older adults on antiretroviral therapy in northern Tanzania

Journal of NeuroVirology ◽

10.1007/s13365-020-00915-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Clare Bristow ◽

Grace George ◽

Grace Hillsmith ◽

Emma Rainey ◽

Sarah Urasa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antiretroviral Therapy ◽

High Standard ◽

Female Gender ◽

Screening Tools ◽

Sub Saharan Africa ◽

Hiv Care ◽

Diagnostic Tools ◽

Clinical Frailty Scale ◽

Frailty Phenotype ◽

Sub Saharan

Abstract There are over 3 million people in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) aged 50 and over living with HIV. HIV and combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) exposure may accelerate the ageing in this population, and thus increase the prevalence of premature frailty. There is a paucity of data on the prevalence of frailty in an older HIV + population in SSA and screening and diagnostic tools to identify frailty in SSA. Patients aged ≥ 50 were recruited from a free Government HIV clinic in Tanzania. Frailty assessments were completed, using 3 diagnostic and screening tools: the Fried frailty phenotype (FFP), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Brief Frailty Instrument for Tanzania (B-FIT 2). The 145 patients recruited had a mean CD4 + of 494.84 cells/µL, 99.3% were receiving cART and 72.6% were virally suppressed. The prevalence of frailty by FFP was 2.758%. FFP frailty was significantly associated with female gender (p = 0.006), marital status (p = 0.007) and age (p = 0.038). Weight loss was the most common FFP domain failure. The prevalence of frailty using the B-FIT 2 and the CFS was 0.68%. The B-FIT 2 correlated with BMI (r = − 0.467, p = 0.0001) and CD4 count in females (r = − 0.244, p = 0.02). There is an absence of frailty in this population, as compared to other clinical studies. This may be due to the high standard of HIV care at this Government clinic. Undernutrition may be an important contributor to frailty. It is unclear which tool is most accurate for detecting the prevalence of frailty in this setting as levels of correlation are low.

Download Full-text

Dairy Product Intake and Long-Term Risk for Frailty among French Elderly Community Dwellers

Nutrients ◽

10.3390/nu13072151 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (7) ◽

pp. 2151

Author(s):

Berna Rahi ◽

Hermine Pellay ◽

Virginie Chuy ◽

Catherine Helmer ◽

Cecilia Samieri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Dairy Product ◽

Food Group ◽

Community Dwelling ◽

Physical Frailty ◽

Frailty Phenotype ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Sectional Analysis ◽

Community Dwelling Older Adults

Dairy products (DP) are part of a food group that may contribute to the prevention of physical frailty. We aimed to investigate DP exposure, including total DP, milk, fresh DP and cheese, and their cross-sectional and prospective associations with physical frailty in community-dwelling older adults. The cross-sectional analysis was carried out on 1490 participants from the Three-City Bordeaux cohort. The 10-year frailty risk was examined in 823 initially non-frail participants. A food frequency questionnaire was used to assess DP exposure. Physical frailty was defined as the presence of at least 3 out of 5 criteria of the frailty phenotype: weight loss, exhaustion, slowness, weakness, and low physical activity. Among others, diet quality and protein intake were considered as confounders. The baseline mean age of participants was 74.1 y and 61% were females. Frailty prevalence and incidence were 4.2% and 18.2%, respectively. No significant associations were observed between consumption of total DP or DP sub-types and frailty prevalence or incidence (OR = 1.40, 95%CI 0.65–3.01 and OR = 1.75, 95%CI 0.42–1.32, for a total DP consumption >4 times/d, respectively). Despite the absence of beneficial associations of higher DP consumption on frailty, older adults are encouraged to follow the national recommendations regarding DP.

Download Full-text

The Framingham risk score is associated with incident frailty, or is it?

BMC Geriatrics ◽

10.1186/s12877-021-02387-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Hui Shi ◽

Mei-Ling Ge ◽

Birong Dong ◽

Qian-Li Xue

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Risk Score ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Activity Level ◽

Cvd Risk ◽

Frailty Phenotype ◽

Frailty Status ◽

Adverse Health Outcomes ◽

Comorbidity Burden

Abstract Backgrounds Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are individually associated with frailty. This study examined whether Framingham CVD risk score (FRS) as an aggregate measure of CVD risk is associated with incident frailty among Chinese older adults. Methods This study used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. A sample of 3,618 participants aged 60 to 95 years and without CVD at baseline were followed for four years. FRS was calculated at baseline. Frailty status was defined as not-frail (0–2 criteria) or frail (3–5 criteria) based on the physical frailty phenotype consisting of five binary criteria (weakness, slowness, exhaustion, low activity level, and weight loss). After excluding subjects who were frail (n = 248) at baseline, discrete-time Cox regression was used to evaluate the relationship between FRS and incident frailty. Results During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 323 (8 %) participants developed CVD and 318 (11 %) subjects had frailty onset. Higher FRS was associated with greater risk of incident frailty (HR: 1.03, 95 % CI: 1.00 to 1.06) after adjusting for education, marital status, obesity, comorbidity burden, and cognitive function. This association however was no longer significant (HR: 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.97 to 1.03) after additionally adjusting for age. These findings remained essentially unchanged after excluding subjects with depression (n = 590) at baseline or incident CVD (n = 323) during the 4-year follow-up. Conclusions The FRS was not independently associated with incident frailty after adjusting for chronological age. More research is needed to assess the clinical utility of the FRS in predicting adverse health outcomes other than CVD in older adults.

Download Full-text

Frailty Status and All-Cause Mortality in the Community-Dwelling Older People: An Umbrella Review

Innovation in Aging ◽

10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1580 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 488-489

Author(s):

A R M Saifuddin Ekram ◽

Joanne Ryan ◽

Carlene Britt ◽

Sara Espinoza ◽

Robyn Woods

Keyword(s):

Older People ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Community Dwelling ◽

Umbrella Review ◽

Frailty Phenotype ◽

Frailty Status ◽

Increased Risk ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Community Dwelling Older People ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract Frailty is increasingly recognised for its association with adverse health outcomes including mortality. However, various measures are used to assess frailty, and the strength of association could vary depending on the specific definition used. This umbrella review aimed to map which frailty scale could best predict the relationship between frailty and all-cause mortality among community-dwelling older people. According to the PRISMA guidelines, Medline, Embase, EBSCOhost and Web of Science databases were searched to identify eligible systematic reviews and meta-analyses which examined the association between frailty and all-cause mortality in the community-dwelling older people. Relevant data were extracted and summarised qualitatively. Methodological quality was assessed by AMSTAR-2 checklist. Five moderate-quality systematic reviews with a total of 374,529 participants were identified. Of these, two examined the frailty phenotype and its derivatives, two examined the cumulative deficit models and the other predominantly included studies assessing frailty with the FRAIL scale. All of the reviews found a significant association between frailty status and all-cause mortality. The magnitude of association varied between individual studies, with no consistent pattern related to the frailty measures that were used. In conclusion, regardless of the measure used to assess frailty status, it is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality.

Download Full-text

20 Comparison of Six Frailty Screening Tools in Patients Aged 65+ with An Arm Fragility Fracture

Age and Ageing ◽

10.1093/ageing/afab028.20 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. i1-i6

Author(s):

K Ibrahim ◽

T Lim ◽

M A Mullee ◽

G L Yao ◽

S Zhu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fragility Fracture ◽

Frailty Index ◽

Screening Tools ◽

Frailty Phenotype ◽

Fracture Clinic ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Sensitivity Range ◽

Practical Tool ◽

Acute Trust ◽

Medication Changes

Abstract Introduction Frailty is associated with an increased risk of falling and fracture, but not routinely assessed in fracture clinic. Early identification and management of frailty among older people with arm fragility fracture could help avoid further falls and fractures, especially of the hip. We evaluated the feasibility of assessing frailty in a busy fracture clinic. Methods People aged 65+ years with an arm fracture in one acute trust were recruited. Frailty was assessed in fracture clinics using six tools: Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP), FRAIL scale, PRISMA-7, electronic Frailty Index (e-FI), Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), and Study of Osteoporotic Fracture (SOF). The sensitivity and specificity of each tool was compared against FFP as a reference. Participants identified as frail by 2+ tools were referred for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). Results 100 patients (mean age 75 years±7.2; 20 men) were recruited. Frailty prevalence was 9% (FRAIL scale), 13% (SOF), 14% (CFS > 6), 15% (FFP; e-FI > 0.25), and 25% (PRISMA-7). Men were more likely to be frail than women. Data were complete for all assessments and completion time ranged from one minute (PRISMA-7; CFS) to six minutes for the FFP which required most equipment. Comparing with FFP, the most accurate instrument for stratifying frail from non-frail was the PRISMA-7 (sensitivity = 93%, specificity = 87%) while the remaining tools had good specificity (range 93%–100%) but average sensitivity (range 40%–60%). Twenty patients were eligible for CGA. Five had recently had CGA and 11/15 referred were assessed. CGA led to 3–6 interventions per participant including medication changes, life-style advice, investigations, and onward referrals. Conclusion It was feasible to assess frailty in fracture clinic and to identify patients who benefitted from CGA. Frailty prevalence was 9%—25% depending on the tool used and was higher among men. PRISMA-7 could be a practical tool for routine use in fracture clinics.

Download Full-text

Leveraging Existing Data from CMS-Linked Cohort Studies for the Advancement and Translation of Frailty Research

Innovation in Aging ◽

10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2810 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 777-777

Author(s):

Qian-Li Xue ◽

Kristine Ensrud ◽

Shari Lin

Keyword(s):

Cohort Studies ◽

Healthcare Utilization ◽

Risk Adjustment ◽

Healthcare Services ◽

Self Report ◽

Added Value ◽

Care Organization ◽

Frailty Phenotype ◽

Frailty Assessment ◽

The Impact

Abstract As population aging is accelerating rapidly, there is growing concern on how to best provide patient-centered care for the most vulnerable. Establishing a predictable and affordable cost structure for healthcare services is key to improving quality, accessibility, and affordability. One such effort is the “frailty” adjustment model implemented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that adjusts payments to a Medicare managed care organization based on functional impairment of its beneficiaries. Earlier studies demonstrated added value of this frailty adjuster for prediction of Medicare expenditures independent of the diagnosis-based risk adjustment. However, we hypothesize that further improvement is possible by implementing more rigorous frailty assessment rather than relying on self-report of ADL difficulties as used for the frailty adjuster. This is supported by the consensus and clinical observations that neither multimorbidity nor disability alone is sufficient for frailty identification. This symposium consists of four talks that leverage data from three CMS-linked cohort studies to investigate the utility of assessment of the frailty phenotype for predicting healthcare utilization and costs. Talk 1 and 2 use data from the NHATS cohort to assess healthcare utilization by frailty status in the general population and the homebound subset. Talk 3 and 4 use data from the MrOS study and the SOF study to investigate the impact of frailty phenotype on healthcare costs. Taken together, their findings highlight the potential of incorporating phenotypic frailty assessment into CMS risk adjustment to improve the planning and management of care for frail older adults.

Download Full-text