The Protection of Cultural Heritage Sites from Geo-Hazards: The PROTHEGO Project

2016 ◽  
pp. 91-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriacos Themistocleous ◽  
Branka Cuca ◽  
Athos Agapiou ◽  
Vasiliki Lysandrou ◽  
Marios Tzouvaras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Protection Of Cultural Heritage

scholarly journals P.D.Baranovsky. Unknown Pages in the Protection of Architectural Monuments of the Russian North (1920-1970)

2018 ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Vladimir A. Tsvetnov
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Cultural Landscape ◽  
Landscape Approach ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Archival Documents ◽  
Russian North ◽  
Territorial Approach ◽  
Natural Settings ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Protection Of Cultural Heritage

This article explores views of Petr Baranovsky (1892-1984), well-known preservationist and architectural conservator, about issues concerning the protection of architectural monuments of the Russian North. In the 1920s P.D. Baranovsky organized the first Russian skansen - an open-air museum of wooden architecture in Kolomenskoye outside Moscow and became its director. He managed to bring to Kolomenskoye several examples of wooden architecture that otherwise might have been destroyed. In the process of transportation the monuments hardly survived. One of them - the "Mokhovaya Tower of the Sumsky Ostrog" - was assembled and installed in Kolomenskoye only in the 1990s. The author argues that P.D. Baranovsky changed his views over time. In the 1970s he, along with his colleagues and members of the Architectural section of the VOOPIK (All-Russan Society for Protection of Monuments of History and Culture) began developing a new "territorial" approach to protection of cultural heritage. Instead of bringing buildings together in a museum, they advocated protection of cultural heritage sites and structures in their original historical and natural settings. This is similar to the modern "cultural landscape" approach, although that name was not in use at Baranovsky's time. The article is based on unpublished archival documents.

scholarly journals Administrative transformations of the cultural heritage protection authorities in Krasnoyarsk Krai (1980-2010)

2021 ◽  
pp. 59-71
Author(s):  
Alisa Sergeevna Ivanova
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Institutional Development ◽  
Krasnoyarsk Krai ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
History Of ◽  
Heritage Protection ◽  
The Government ◽  
State Protection ◽  
Protection Of Cultural Heritage

The subject of this research is the peculiarities of the historical processes of establishment and development of the system of state protection of historical and cultural heritage in the largest Siberian region – Krasnoyarsk Krai. The author explores the period of institutional development of the system in form of designated institutions since its establishment in the mid-1980s to the present. The object of this research is the system of administrative arrangement and control of the heritage protection authority in Krasnoyarsk Krai. Detailed analysis is conducted on the content of official documents, resolutions and executive orders of the government of Krasnoyarsk Krai, which served as the basic sources on the history of the organization of state protection of historical sites in the region. The author determines the peculiarities of functioning of the system of state protection of cultural heritage sites in Krasnoyarsk Krai, depending on its place in the time-varying administrative hierarchy of regional government. The research is based on the analysis of administrative transformations in the sphere of state protection of heritage through outlining gradual historical stages in the development of control (subordination) system of the cultural and historical l heritage protection authorities in Krasnoyarsk Krai The obtained conclusions lie in the peculiarities of current functioning of the system of state protection of heritage in Krasnoyarsk Krai. This article is first to trace the history of development of the system of state protection of historical and cultural heritage from the perspective of its hierarchical status in administrative governance of the region. It is indicated that the division of the state protection of monuments into an independent structure with separate authority increases the role and significance of the branch of state protection of cultural heritage sites in the region.

Harmonious Coexistence of Cultural Heritage Protection and Tourism: The Mount Lushan Comprehensive Tourism Platform

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Zhenrao ◽  
Fang Chaoyang ◽  
Zhang Qian ◽  
Chen Fulong
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Laser Scanning ◽  
Heritage Tourism ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Tourism Marketing ◽  
Heritage Protection ◽  
Internet Of Things Technology ◽  
Tourist Flow ◽  
Cultural Heritage Tourism ◽  
Protection Of Cultural Heritage

Abstract The coordinated development of heritage protection and tourism is the goal of both cultural heritage sites and sustainable heritage tourism. However, the development of sustainable heritage tourism can be restricted due to insufficient resources for heritage tourism marketing as well as insufficient cultural heritage protection measures. This study uses digital methods such as oblique photography, 3D laser scanning technology and panoramic technology to digitize the cultural landscape heritage site. Using these methods, we build a virtual tourism subsystem to improve tourists’ experience of cultural heritage tourism resources and enhance the attraction of cultural heritage tourism. In addition, we build a tourist flow and environmental monitoring and management subsystem based on the Internet of Things technology. This subsystem can help managers adjust and regulate tourist flow according to the tourism carrying capacity threshold. We also conduct an ecological environment health assessment and management simulation according to the “Pressure-Status- Response” model, in doing so, we aim to enhance the protection of cultural heritage sites. Finally, we develop a comprehensive platform to integrate tourism marketing and heritage protection management functions. The results of this study provide a new approach for the coordination of and symbiosis between the protection of cultural heritage and tourism activity.

scholarly journals Cadet, military, aerotechnical, suvorov...

2021 ◽  
pp. 122-131
Author(s):  
Anna Sidorenko ◽  
Alexei Chertilov
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
The State ◽  
Town Planning ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Recreational Value ◽  
State Register ◽  
Irkutsk Region ◽  
Protection Of Cultural Heritage

The article is devoted to the complex of Irkutsk cadet corps (school), which was unreasonably withdrawn from the list of monuments of regional significance and the State Register of Cultural Heritage Sites by the Service for the Protection of Cultural Heritage of the Irkutsk Region. Disagreeing with the opinion of officials, the authors reveal the historical and cultural potential of this ensemble and prove its historical, memorial, town-planning, architectural, landscape and recreational value.

scholarly journals PRINCIPLES OF PROTECTION AND USE OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES IN TERMS OF ECOLOGICAL OPTIMIZATION OF RESIDENTIAL AREAS

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (164) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
V. Volkov
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
The State ◽  
Residential Areas ◽  
Protection Zones ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Cultural Heritage Object ◽  
Capital Construction ◽  
Cultural Heritage Objects ◽  
Ecological Optimization ◽  
Protection Of Cultural Heritage

The article investigates the principles of protection and use of cultural heritage sites in terms of ecological optimization of residential areas. The concept of cultural heritage object is defined and the order of definition of protection zones of cultural heritage objects in the conditions of ecological optimization of settlement territories is established. The principles of formation of the status of a cultural heritage object are revealed and the legislative basis is described. The concept of "territory of cultural purpose" is separated. Describes the problems of protection of cultural heritage sites, the main of which include the complexity of the content of objects, the search for the necessary funds for restoration, to solve which it is necessary to attract external sources of funding other than the state. The generally accepted ways of solving the outlined problems are given and the principles of their realization are substantiated, namely the necessity of complex application is emphasized. The classification of the process of reconstruction of cultural heritage is presented, the main directions of which include: restoration, regeneration, revitalization, revaluation, improvement and new construction. Each of these classes is described according to the method of implementation on site. It is emphasized that the protection zones of cultural heritage sites are areas adjacent to the included in the register of monuments and ensembles, and within which, in order to ensure the preservation of cultural heritage sites and compositional and species links, the construction of capital construction projects and their reconstruction related to changes in height, number of floors, area, except for construction and reconstruction of linear objects. The boundaries of the protection zone of the cultural heritage object are structured according to the zones of location of the latter. The directions of the relation of the state supervision in the field of protection of objects of cultural heritage to the principles of realization of the state support are defined. The list of possible measures of influence of citizens and legal entities in the field of protection of cultural heritage objects in the conditions of ecological optimization of settlement territories is offered.

scholarly journals Optimization of Stabilizing Systems in Protection of Cultural Heritage: The Case of the Historical Retaining Wall in the Wisłoujście Fortress

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 8570
Author(s):  
Piotr Chudoba ◽  
Jarosław Przewłócki ◽  
Piotr Samól ◽  
Lesław Zabuski
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approach ◽  
Optimal Method ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Explicit Finite Difference ◽  
Method Construction ◽  
Construction Works ◽  
Explicit Finite Difference Method ◽  
Protection Of Cultural Heritage

The aim of the paper is to propose new quantitative criteria for selecting the optimal method of securing and repairing a historical object, which take into account Structural, Conservation and Architectural aspects (the S–C–A method). Construction works on cultural heritage sites tend to be challenging and require an interdisciplinary approach. Therefore, they are strictly related to the philosophy of sustainable development which seeks adequate proportions between factors indicated on the natural and social environment. Optimization of several systems stabilizing retaining structure that are a historic object was considered in the paper. Appropriate formulas for scores meeting additional conservation and aesthetic requirements were proposed. The method is used in the stabilization of the brick retaining wall, a part of the Wisłoujście Fortress located in Gdańsk, Poland. In order to compute the displacement of the wall and its stability, numerical analysis was performed by the two-dimensional explicit Finite Difference Method (using the FLAC2D software). The algorithm proposed could be beneficial to the protection of cultural heritage since it could also be applied to other structures, such as roof trusses, masonry walls, pillars, etc.

The Reconstruction Project of Illumination Devices at the Krasnoselskaya Station of the Moscow Metro

2019 ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
Ksenia I. Nechaeva
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Historical Analysis ◽  
Metro Station ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Passenger Transportation ◽  
Fluorescent Lamps ◽  
Current State ◽  
Heritage Site ◽  
Lighting Environment ◽  
Incandescent Lamps

The current state of the Moscow Metro station of the first priority that became operational in 1935 does not allow it to be called a cultural heritage site. This is due to the fact that lighting modernisation carried out by the Moscow Metro was based on fluorescent lamps. Such lamps are more energy efficient compared to incandescent lamps, which were used in original lighting devices specified in the Station Lighting Project developed by architects and designers. However, they significantly changed the station appearance, transforming the originally designed station with entire well visible architectural tectonics?1 from the standpoint of lighting into a simple, flat, unremarkable, and little loaded station of the Moscow Metro./br> This paper describes a method of lighting reconstruction at Krasnoselskaya station by means of original lighting devices that meet modern standards and requirements for cultural heritage sites. The historical analysis on the development of the station lighting environment was conducted during its operation in order to understand what kind of station was conceived by its architects, what changes occurred with its lighting over time, and how it influenced the station appearance and safety of passenger transportation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document