Chloroplast volume: cell water potential relationships and acclimation of photosynthesis to leaf water deficits

1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mane Santakumari ◽  
Gerald A. Berkowitz
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Cell Water ◽  
Water Deficits ◽  
Chloroplast Volume ◽  
Volume Cell

scholarly journals Vine water deficit : among the 3 applications of pressure chamber, stem water potential is the most sensitive indicator

OENO One ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Xavier Choné ◽  
Olivier Trégoat ◽  
Cornelis Van Leeuwen ◽  
Denis Dubourdieu
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Deficit ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Water Status ◽  
Pressure Chamber ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Sensitive Indicator ◽  
Stem Water Potential ◽  
Water Deficits ◽  
Stem Water

<p style="text-align: justify;">Vine water status is an important factor in grape quality. High tannin and anthocyanin content in red grape berries are related to moderate vine water deficits. Hence, a simple and sensitive indicator is required to determine vine water status and especially water constraint. Pressure chamber allows a quick and easy to practice determination of water status in the vineyard. Three applications of pressure chamber are known: predawn leaf water potential (ΨB), leaf water potential (ΨF) and stem water potential (ΨT). Only ΨB and ΨF are widely used on vines. In this survey ΨB, ΨF, ΨT and transpiration flow were measured on mature leaves to determine non-irrigated vine water status in field grown vines during the growing season. In California as well as in France, stem Ψ was the most discriminating indicator for both moderate and severe water deficits. In every plot surveyed ΨT was much better correlated to leaf transpiration than ΨF. Moreover, ΨT revealed nascent water deficit earlier than ΨB did. Among the three application of pressure chamber, ΨT was the only one to indicate short term water deficit after a rainfall. Hence, ΨT appears to be a useful indicator for grapevine management in both non-irrigated and irrigated vineyards.</p>

Effect of Water Deficit on Carbon Dioxide Exchange and Leaf Elongation Rate of Panicum maximum Var. trichoglume

1976 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 401 ◽  
Author(s):  
MM Ludlow ◽  
TT Ng
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Net Photosynthesis ◽  
Stomatal Resistance ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Exchange ◽  
Leaf Elongation ◽  
Water Deficits ◽  
Water Potentials

The responses of carbon dioxide exchange and leaf elongation of potted P. maximum var. trichoglume plants to water deficits were investigated in controlled environments and outdoors during drying cycles down to -92 bars leaf water potential, The sensitivities of net photosynthesis and leaf elongation to water deficits were similar. The leaf water potentials at which net photosynthesis and elongation ceased (c. -12 bars), and stomatal resistance increased substantially (- 6 bars), were relatively unaffected by nitrogen supply, environmental conditions during growth, and whether plants had previously experienced stress. However, these factors influenced the rate of net photosynthesis, at high leaf water potentials by affecting stomatal resistance and at moderate water potentials by affecting both stomatal and intracellular resistances. Stomata1 resistance was more sensitive than intracellular resistance to water deficits. Dark respiration rate decreased with leaf water potential, and was higher in plants receiving additional nitrogen. At moderate leaf water potentials (-7 to -9 bars), net photosynthesis of this C4 grass exhibited light saturation and rates similar to C3 plants. We suggest that the difference in behaviour of controlled-environment-grown and field-grown plants to water deficits observed with some species is unlikely to be due to differences in the aerial environment, but may result from differences in the rate at which stress develops. The ecological significance and evolution of the C4 syndrome are discussed briefly.

Osmotic Adjustment of Sorghum and Sunflower Crops in Response to Water Deficits and Its Influence on the Water Potential at Which Stomata Close

1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 597 ◽  
Author(s):  
NC Turner ◽  
JE Begg ◽  
ML Tonnet
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Osmotic Adjustment ◽  
Osmotic Potential ◽  
Stomatal Closure ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Water Deficits ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Leaf Osmotic Potential ◽  
Response To Water

The soil and plant water status of irrigated and unirrigated sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench cv. TX610] and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv. Hysun 30) crops were compared on several days from the late vegetative to the early grain-filling stages of development. Additionally, the stems of plants from the irrigated and unirrigated plots of both species were cut near their base; this caused the plants to quickly dry until the stomata closed. The leaf water potential and leaf osmotic potential were measured when the stomatal resistance reached 6 s cm-� to give the water potential for stomatal closure and to provide osmotic potentials at equal turgor. Carbohydrate and potassium levels of leaves were also monitored. The mean daily minimum leaf water potentials in the irrigated sorghum and sunflower did not decrease below - 1 7 MPa and - 2.0 MPa, respectively, but decreased to - 2.1 MPa in the unirrigated sorghum and -2.6 MPa in the unirrigated sunflower. The osmotic potential at stomatal closure in the rapidly dried plants decreased with increasing leaf water deficit in both sunflower and sorghum: in both species the osmotic potential decreased approximately 0.6 MPa for each megapascal decrease in leaf water potential. The results indicate that both sorghum and sunflower adjusted osmotically in response to water deficits and that adjustment occurred at a rate of at least 0.1 MPa per day. The lowering of osmotic potential persisted less than 9 days after the relief of stress in both sunflower and sorghum. The soluble sugar concentration increased linearly in both sunflower and sorghum with osmotic adjustment: the rate of increase of soluble sugars was significantly greater in sunflower than sorghum. No changes in potassium concentration were observed during osmotic adjustment. The water potential at which the stomata closed varied from - 1.5 to -2.6 MPa in sorghum and - 1.7 to -2.7 MPa in sunflower: the water potential that induced stomatal closure decreased as the osmotic potential decreased. Stomatal closure occurred at a mean turgor of -0-5 MPa in both species: systematic error in the measurement of osmotic potential on frozen and thawed leaf tissue is considered the reason for the low turgor potentials at stomatal closure. The adaxial stomatal closed before the abaxial stomata in the sorghum and unirrigated sunflower but, since the leaf water potential initially fell rapidly and then became stable before the adaxial stomata closed, both the adaxial and abaxial stomata closed at the same leaf water potential.

Yield and components of seed yield of indeterminate narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) subjected to transient water deficit

1999 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Palta ◽  
Z. Plaut
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Water Deficit ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Leaf Conductance ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Water Deficits ◽  
Pod Number

The effect of transient water deficits on seed yield and components of seed yield of narrow-leafed lupin was measured in plants grown in a controlled environment under simulated field conditions. Lupins were grown in large columns of soil and transient water deficits were induced at pod set on the mainstem and first-order apical branches by withholding water for a 5-day period. Soil water content, leaf water potential, turgor pressure, and leaf conductance declined similarly during each period of transient water deficit. Differences in these parameters were apparent 2 days after water was withheld, and over the 5-day period, leaf water potential declined to −1.3 MPa and leaf conductance fell to 44% of the well-watered controls. Total dry matter per plant was reduced by the transient water deficit treatments. The reduction resulted from less accumulation of dry matter on the first, second, and third order apical branches. Leaf area on these branches was also reduced by abscission of the leaves after the water deficit was released. Seed yield per plant after each period of transient water deficit was reduced by 30–33%, relative to the well-watered controls. The reduction was largely due to a reduction in seed yield on the branches, mainly because they had fewer pods and seeds per pod. Seed dry weight and harvest index were not significantly affected by each period of transient water deficit. We conclude that differences in final seed yield between the well- watered controls and the transient water deficit treatments resulted from differences in pod number and seeds per pod. Low dry matter accumulation and reduction in leaf area on the first- and second-order apical branches under the transient water deficit were associated with the differences. Whereas the differences in pod number generated differences in the size of the reproductive sink, the differences in leaf area generated differences in the source capacity for assimilates for pod set and pod-filling.

Agronomic and Physiological Responses of Soybean and Sorghum Crops to Water Deficits. IV. Photosynthesis, Transpiration and Water Use Efficiency in Leaves

1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 195 ◽  
Author(s):  
HM Rawson ◽  
NC Turner ◽  
JE Begg
Keyword(s):  
Water Use Efficiency ◽  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Flag Leaf ◽  
Grain Filling ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Water Deficits ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Soybean Leaves

Detailed diurnal measurements of photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of leaves of sorghum and soybean were made during the reproductive growth of field plants. Photosynthesis was measured mainly by infrared gas techniques. The indication in well watered plants was that diurnal net carbon fixation per unit area of sorghum leaves was some 2.3 times greater than that of comparably illuminated soybean leaves while concurrent transpiration losses were less. Simple carbon budgets for the two crops over 24 h suggested that the assimilation by a leaf area equivalent to that of the flag leaf was required solely to sustain respiration by the sorghum head during mid- grain filling, while approximately 5 cm� of leaf was required to sustain respiration of each soybean pod. The comparisons made on a diurnal basis between plants of soybean exposed to different water deficits during grain filling demonstrated the increasing importance of early morning and late afternoon photosynthesis as water became less available. They also showed the rapidity with which plants can recover from stress once water is supplied. It is calculated that, for continuously clear conditions, as daily minimum leaf water potential fell from - 1 .5 to - 2.5 MPa, the integrated daily assimilation by leaves was reduced by about 9 % for every 0.1 MPa change; soybean leaves were not measured at leaf water potentials much below - 2.6 MPa. A ratio between gas phase and residual resistances remained relatively stable over the range of leaf water potential measured. However, the water use efficiency of single leaves was reduced with increasing soil water deficits because of changes in leaf temperature and leaf-to-air vapour pressure differences.

Agronomic and Physiological Responses of Soybean and Sorghum Crops to Water Deficits. III. Components of Leaf Water Potential, Leaf Conductance, 14co2 Photosynthesis and Adaptation to Water Deficits.

1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 179 ◽  
Author(s):  
NC Turner ◽  
JE Begg ◽  
HM Rawson ◽  
SD English ◽  
AB Hearn
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Content ◽  
Soil Water ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Relative Water Content ◽  
Leaf Conductance ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Starch Accumulation ◽  
Water Deficits ◽  
Relative Water

Concurrent measurements of leaf water potential, leaf osmotic potential, leaf relative water content, quantum flux density, leaf conductance, 14CO2 photosynthesis, soluble and insoluble sugars, starch and potassium concentrations were made diurnally on six occasions between flowering and maturity on upper leaves of irrigated and rainfed crops of soybean (cvv. Ruse and Bragg) and a rainfed crop of sorghum (cv. TX 610). With adequate soil water, sorghum had lower values of leaf conductance than did soybeans at high light and yet had higher rates of photosynthesis. Stage of plant development had no effect on either leaf conductance or photosynthesis of the youngest fully expanded leaves of both sorghum and soybean, but starch accumulation in the leaf over the day was less at grain-filling than at flowering in the soybean. Starch and sugar levels in the leaf had no apparent effect on photosynthesis. The daily minimum leaf water potential decreased in Ruse soybean from - 1.5 to -2.7 MPa as soil water was depleted. Late in the drying cycle, the daily minimum leaf water potential was higher in Bragg than in Ruse. In both cultivars, stomatal closure and decrease in 14CO2 photosynthesis commenced at leaf water potentials below - 1.5 MPa. Thus, the effect of water deficits on leaf conductance and photosynthesis occurred later in the drying cycle in Bragg than Ruse. As photosynthesis decreased with the depletion of soil water, starch accumulation in leaves of both cultivars of soybean decreased; changes in soluble and insoluble sugars and in potassium were small. The relationships among leaf water potential, osmotic potential, turgor potential, and leaf relative water content did not change with season or soil water depletion. Bragg and Ruse soybeans showed a similar response and both approached zero turgor at the same relative water content (82-83 %) and the same leaf water potential (- 1.5 to - 1.7 MPa). No evidence ofr osmotic adjustment was found in either soybean cultivar.

Water deficits change dry matter partitioning and seed yield in narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.)

1991 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 471 ◽  
Author(s):  
RJ French ◽  
NC Turner
Keyword(s):  
Water Potential ◽  
Water Deficit ◽  
Leaf Water Potential ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Leaf Water ◽  
Reproductive Growth ◽  
Water Deficits ◽  
First Order ◽  
Severe Water Deficit

lrrigation treatments were imposed in the field on an indeterminate cultivar of narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L., cv. Danja) and on a breeding line with reduced branching (75A/329) so that they experienced no water-deficits (frequently irrigated), a transient mild water-deficit or a transient severe water-deficit during early reproductive growth, or continuous severe water-deficit during reproductive growth (unirrigated). Both leaf water potential and leaf conductance declined in all treatments in which a water-deficit was imposed. Differences in leaf conductance were apparent before differences in leaf water potential: conductance declined to 40% and 30% of the frequently irrigated controls in the transient mild and severe water-deficit treatments, respectively. Leaf water potential declined to -1 - 1 MPa and -1.6 MPa, respectively, in the transient mild and severe water-deficit treatments, compared to between -0 - 65 and -0 - 95 MPa for the frequently irrigated controls. Seed yield and total dry weight were reduced in the transient severe water-deficit and unirrigated treatments, but were no different from the frequently irrigated treatment when the water-deficit was transient and mild. However both transient water-deficit treatments produced more main-stem seed yield than the frequently irrigated treatment, especially in the reduced-branching line 75A/329. The transient mild water-deficit treatment also produced more first-order apical axis yield than the frequently irrigated treatment. These yield increases were mainly due to a greater yield of seed per pod, although on the first-order apical axes there was also a tendency to set more pods. The greater seed yield per pod in the transient water-deficit treatments was due to an apparent redirection of assimilate from vegetative to reproductive growth. This was not due to a smaller reduction in reproductive growth rates than in vegetative growth rates, but to an acceleration of reproductive growth that was maintained after stress relief. The same early acceleration of reproductive growth was also observed in unirrigated treatments, but the severe stress which persisted throughout later reproductive growth reduced pod growth rates and negated the early advantage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document