Using the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score for Evaluating Patients with Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Radiofrequency Ablation: A Two-Center Retrospective Study

We aimed to investigate the impact of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, an immuno-nutritional biomarker, on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with lenvatinib (LEN). This retrospective study enrolled 164 patients with HCC and treated with LEN (median age 73 years, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B/C 93/71). Factors associated with overall survival (OS) were evaluated using multivariate and decision tree analyses. OS was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and analyzed using the log–rank test. Independent factors for OS were albumin–bilirubin grade 1, BCLC stage B, and CONUT score <5 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.58–5.31, p < 0.001). The CONUT score was the most important variable for OS, with OS rates of 70.0% and 29.0% in the low and high CONUT groups, respectively. Additionally, the median survival time was longer in the low CONUT group than in the high CONUT group (median survival time not reached vs. 11.3 months, p < 0.001). The CONUT score was the most important prognostic variable, rather than albumin–bilirubin grade and BCLC stage, in patients with HCC treated with LEN. Accordingly, immuno-nutritional status may be an important factor in the management of patients with HCC treated with LEN.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Hepatic Resection vs. Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients With Very-Early-Stage or Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study With Stratification by Age and Tumor Size

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2019.00113 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Yi-Quan Jiang ◽

Zi-Xian Wang ◽

Yi-Nan Deng ◽

Yang Yang ◽

Guo-Ying Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Radiofrequency Ablation ◽

Hepatic Resection ◽

Tumor Size ◽

Early Stage ◽

Population Based ◽

Population Based Study

Download Full-text

Use of radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of the SEER-Medicare database.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.463 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 463-463 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Mary Uan-Sian Feng ◽

Vincent D. Marshall ◽

Neehar Parikh

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Radiofrequency Ablation ◽

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽

Early Stage ◽

Rank Test ◽

The West ◽

Liver Decompensation ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Us

463 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an increasingly common and highly morbid malignancy worldwide, including the US. For early stage patients ablative strategies are important potentially curative treatment options. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising non-surgical ablative therapy, although it is technically demanding and its comparison with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remains confined to a single institution retrospective review. We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database to assess RFA and SBRT use in the US. Methods: We identified patients greater than 65 years old who were diagnosed from 2004-11 with stage I or II HCC and treated with RFA or SBRT. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank test. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) and early ( ≤ 90 day) hospital admission post-treatment were identified using propensity score (PS) adjusted multivariate analysis. Results: 825 patients were identified, 747 treated with RFA and 78 SBRT. 22 pts received both treatments and were excluded from this analysis. The mean Charlson comorbidity index was 1.0±1.1. Median age was 74, range 66-90. Patients who received RFA were more likely to live in the West and have liver decompensation. Patients who received SBRT were more likely to be white and treated in the Midwest. After using PS matching there were 78 in each cohort. In these patients, mean overall survival (OS) was 2.25 and 2.04 yrs for RFA and SBRT, p = 0.06. Younger age, lack of liver decompensation, treatment in the West, and liver transplantation were associated with longer OS, HR 0.96, p = 0.05; HR 0.37, p = 0.002; HR 0.57, p = 0.04; HR 0.18, p = 0.008, respectively. 90 day hospitalization rates did not differ between treatments; only liver decompensation was predictive of hospitalization, OR 3.33, p = 0.032. Conclusions: In a national cohort of early stage HCC patients, treatment with RFA vs SBRT resulted in no significant difference in OS. SBRT appears to be a comparable ablative strategy to RFA in this population. This highlights the need for a randomized trial comparing these two modalities.

Download Full-text

A multicenter nonrandomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of surgery versus radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma (SURF cohort trial).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.4581 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4581-4581

Author(s):

Ryosuke Tateishi ◽

Kiyoshi Hasegawa ◽

Yoshikuni Kawaguchi ◽

Tadatoshi Takayama ◽

Namiki Izumi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Radiofrequency Ablation ◽

Early Stage ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Early Hcc ◽

The Difference

4581 Background: In parallel with a multicenter randomized controlled trial that reported an equal recurrence-free survival (RFS) of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent either surgery (SUR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA), we also enrolled HCC patients who fulfilled the enrollment criteria but did not give consent to participate in the RCT. Methods: All patients gave informed consent to participate in this study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: primary HCC with less than or equal to 3 tumors, each measuring 3 cm or smaller; without vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis; Child-Pugh score of 7 or less; and ages between 20 and 79 years. The feasibility for both treatments was confirmed by a joint chart review by surgeons and hepatologists. The primary endpoint was RFS and overall survival. A pre-specified interim analysis was performed to compare RFS. Results: Between April 2009 and August 2015, 740 patients (371 in SUR, 369 in RFA) were enrolled from 49 participating hospitals in Japan. The SUR group had significantly fewer patients with chronic hepatitis C (56.6% vs. 69.4%), higher median value of platelet count (145 vs. 120 × 109/L), and more patients with > 2 cm tumors (49.9% vs. 27.9%); most patients had a single tumor (91.1% vs. 88.3%). During the median follow-up period of 5 years, tumor recurrence was observed in 192 of SUR and 218 of RFA with 3-year RFS being 66.0% and 61.7%, respectively ( P = 0.091). In subgroup analysis, RFS was significantly better in SUR in patients with ≤ 2 cm tumors (62.9% vs. 51.7% in 3 years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.93; P = 0.014), whereas the difference was not significant in those with > 2 cm tumors (52.7% vs. 46.4%; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63-1.18; P = 0.34). The adjusted HR for RFS using inversed probability of treatment weighting was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.72-1.10; P = 0.287). Conclusions: The imbalance in patient characteristics reflected a real-world practice. Factors related to background liver disease rather than tumor characteristics might have a larger impact on the recurrence in early HCC. Clinical trial information: C000001796 .

Download Full-text