scholarly journals Impact of molecular alterations on quality of life and prognostic understanding over time in patients with incurable lung cancer: a multicenter, longitudinal, prospective cohort study

Author(s):  
Jonas Kuon ◽  
Miriam Blasi ◽  
Laura Unsöld ◽  
Jeannette Vogt ◽  
Anja Mehnert ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate changes over time in quality of life (QoL) in incurable lung cancer patients and the impact of determinants like molecular alterations (MA). Methods In a prospective, longitudinal, multicentric study, we assessed QoL, symptom burden, psychological distress, unmet needs, and prognostic understanding of patients diagnosed with incurable lung cancer at the time of the diagnosis (T0) and after 3 (T1), 6 (T2) and 12 months (T3) using validated questionnaires like FACT-L, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer (DT), PHQ-4, SCNS-SF-34, and SEIQoL. Results Two hundred seventeen patients were enrolled, 22 (10%) with reported MA. QoL scores improved over time, with a significant trend for DT, PHQ-4, and SCNS-SF-34. Significant determinants for stable or improving scores over time were survival > 6 months, performance status at the time of diagnosis, and presence of MA. Patients with MA showed better QoL scores (FACT-L at T1 104.4 vs 86.3; at T2 107.5 vs 90.0; at T3 100.9 vs 92.8) and lower psychological distress (NCCN DT at T1 3.3 vs 5; at T2 2.7 vs 4.5; at T3 3.7 vs 4.5; PHQ-4 at T1 2.3 vs 4.1; at T2 1.7 vs 3.6; at T3 2.2 vs 3.6), but also a worsening of the scores at 1 year and a higher percentage of inaccurate prognostic understanding (27 vs 17%) compared to patients without MA. Conclusion Patients with tumors harboring MA are at risk of QoL deterioration during the course of the disease. Physicians should adapt their communication strategies in order to maintain or improve QoL.

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 370-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingela Henoch ◽  
Bengt Bergman ◽  
Marianne Gustafsson ◽  
Fannie Gaston-Johansson ◽  
Ella Danielson

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15605-15605
Author(s):  
A. Giedzinska-Simons ◽  
K. M. Christie ◽  
B. E. Meyerowitz ◽  
M. Gross ◽  
D. B. Agus

15605 Background: Physicians increasingly are asked about changes in quality of life (QOL) following treatment. This is especially relevant for prostate cancer (PC), a disease for which different primary treatments expose patients to differing risks of adverse effect with similar expected benefits in terms of survival. Few studies have compared QOL for the major treatment approaches in a prospective, longitudinal design. Methods: 53 PC patients completed mailed questionnaires assessing general, emotional, social, functional, physical, and prostate-specific QOL with the FACT; stress with the Impact of Events Scale-R (IES-R); and mood with the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. Data were collected prior to treatment and at 1 month and 6 months post-primary disease treatment. Patients’ primary treatments were radical prostatectomy (RP; N=22), radiation (N=16), or conservative therapy (androgen deprivation treatment only (ADT); N=15). Responses were compared in a mixed-factorial ANCOVA design, controlling for disease severity (Gleason score) and age. Results: Although there were no main effect differences by treatment group, treatment by time interactions emerged for physical QOL (p=.002), stress (p=.04), and negative affect (p=.01). Examination of patterns of response indicated that physical difficulties remained fairly consistent for RP and radiation patients over time, whereas ADT patients showed a gradual decline in physical QOL. For stress and negative affect, RP patients reported highest levels of distress prior to treatment and experienced a gradual recovery over time. Radiation patients followed a similar, although less dramatic, trajectory for stress but showed little change in negative affect. ADT patients had relatively low levels of stress at each time point. Their levels of negative affect were similar to those of radiation patients. Conclusions: Even after controlling for age and disease severity, this examination of patient QOL over time suggests the pre-treatment period is especially stressful for RP patients, and that ADT patients exhibit a gradual decline in physical QOL over time. These results may help physicians anticipate and discuss treatment-specific trends in QOL with their patients, thus enhancing patient care. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7607-7607
Author(s):  
Divine Ewane Ediebah ◽  
Corneel Coens ◽  
Efstathios Zikos ◽  
Chantal Quinten ◽  
Jolie Ringash ◽  
...  

7607 Background: Over 60 cancer clinical trials have shown that baseline health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores are prognostic for patient survival. Few studies have investigated the added value of change in HRQoL scores. Our aim was to investigate if change in HRQoL scores from baseline over time is also associated with survival. Methods: We analyzed data from an EORTC 3-arm randomized clinical trial (RCT) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, comparing gemcitabine+cisplatin, versus paclitaxel+gemcitabine, versus standard arm paclitaxel+cisplatin. HRQoL was measured in 394 patients using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and after each chemotherapy cycle. The prognostic significance of sex, age and WHO performance status (0-1 vs. 2) and the 15 QLQ-C30 subscales were assessed with Cox proportional hazard models stratified for treatment (level of significance 0.05). Changes in HRQoL scores from baseline to each chemotherapy cycle assessment were categorized as “improved”, “stable” and “worsened” using a threshold of 10 points difference. Due to expected attrition, the analysis was limited to changes from baseline up to cycle 3. Results: There were 248 patients in cycle 1, 212 in cycle 2 and 196 in cycle 3. We performed analyses separately using data at cycle 1, cycle 2, and cycle 3. In all analyses, HRQoL in various subscales and socio-demographic and clinical variables (physical functioning (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98; p=0.0103), pain (1.11, 1.05-1.17; p= 0.0004), age (0.98, 0.97-1.00, p=0.0413) and WHO performance status (1.77, 1.09-2.89; p=0.0218) at cycle 1; pain (1.11, 1.03-1.20; p=0.0016), age (0.98, 0.96-1.00; p=0.0217) and sex (0.63, 0.42-0.95; p=0.0081) at cycle 2; and role functioning (0.93, 0.88-1.00; p=0.0128) and age (0.98, 0.96-1.00; p=0.0081) at cycle 3) predicted survival; however, change in HRQoL was only an independent predictor for improvement at cycle 1. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that change from baseline over time in HRQoL, as measured on subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30, contains added prognostic value for survival independent of baseline HRQoL scores. Further work is needed to assess the robustness and sensitivity of these findings.


2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane L Carroll ◽  
Glenys A Hamilton ◽  
Barbara J Kenney

Background: Living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has positive health benefits but the impact on well-being and quality of life over a period of time has not been studied in depth. Aim: To follow patients prospectively over the first year and to compare the changes from time of ICD implantation, to 6 months and 1 year. Methods: Generalized linear models were used to assess changes through examination of health status (SF-36), psychological distress (POMS), and quality of life (QLI) scores. Results: There were 19 females (27%) and 51 males (73%) in the sample with a mean age of 64 years. There were significant improvements over time in 3 of the 8 sub-concepts of health status: role physical ( P<0.001), vitality ( P<0.013) and social functioning ( P<0.001). The Profile of Mood States revealed significantly less total psychological distress at 6 months with a non-significant leveling off or increase at 1 year. The quality of life index revealed no significant changes over time. Conclusions: The effects of living with an ICD are not well understood. Research should continue to identify the impact over time in this population and sub-groups so that health care providers can address the social and psychological needs of this population.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7648-7648
Author(s):  
L. R. Pilz ◽  
N. Thatcher ◽  
C. Kortsik ◽  
G. Koschel ◽  
J. Mezger ◽  
...  

7648 Background: Treatment efficacy and toxicity of the three studies have been presented at ASCO (2006, Abstract # 7035). Patients (pts) received gemcitabine or docetaxel either as single agents in different schedules and doses or as a platinum free doublet. Our retrospective analysis is to identify the clinical factors which would influence patient prognosis. Methods: Patients eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV, performance status (PS) 0–2, and no prior chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was similar in all three studies. 819 pts were enrolled in 1998–2004 and 798 pts of them were evaluable for this analysis: 85% of pts had stage IV disease and PS=1. Univariate and multivariate (stepwise) Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of baseline characteristics and quality of life (QoL) on OS. Results: Factors which have a significant impact on OS are the laboratory parameters hemoglobin (HGB) and LDH (p<0.0001), WHO performance status (PS) (p=0.001) and the quality of life measure for lung cancer of the EORTC, LC13, (p=0.0006), respectively (see table ). Gender measured univariately also influences significantly OS (p=0.0085) but has less impact in the multivariate model (p=0.07). Age (<65 vs 65 and older) is not of prognostic value with OS (HR=0.92, p=0.39), as well as histology (adeno/sqamous/other) (HR=0.99, p=0.90). Other factors as tumor stage (wet IIIB vs IV), presence of extra-thoracic metastases, number of co-morbidities, and surgical and radiological pretreatment also have no prognostic influence on OS. Analysis for the effect of smoking on OS could not be performed since only few pts never smoked. Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis confirms the prognostic value of serum HGB, and LDH, WHO-PS, and QoL LC13 as clinical determinants for OS. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Åsa Kettis ◽  
Hanna Fagerlind ◽  
Jan-Erik Frödin ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Lena Ring

Abstract Background Effective patient-physician communication can improve patient understanding, agreement on treatment and adherence. This may, in turn, impact on clinical outcomes and patient quality of life (QoL). One way to improve communication is by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Heretofore, studies of the impact of using PROMs in clinical practice have mostly evaluated the use of standardized PROMs. However, there is reason to believe that individualized instruments may be more appropriate for this purpose. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the standardized QoL-instrument, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30 (EORTC-QOL-C30) and the individualized QoL instrument, the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW), in clinical practice. Methods In a prospective, open-label, controlled intervention study at two hospital out-patient clinics, 390 patients with gastrointestinal cancer were randomly assigned either to complete the EORTC-QOL-C30 or the SEIQoL-DW immediately before the consultation, with their responses being shared with their physician. This was repeated in 3–5 consultations over a period of 4–6 months. The primary outcome measure was patients’ health-related QoL, as measured by FACIT-G. Patients’ satisfaction with the consultation and survival were secondary outcomes. Results There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to study outcomes. Neither intervention instrument resulted in any significant changes in health-related QoL, or in any of the secondary outcomes, over time. This may reflect either a genuine lack of effect or sub-optimization of the intervention. Since there was no comparison to standard care an effect in terms of lack of deterioration over time cannot be excluded. Conclusions Future studies should focus on the implementation process, including the training of physicians to use the instruments and their motivation for doing so. The effects of situational use of standardized or individualized instruments should also be explored. The effectiveness of the different approaches may depend on contextual factors including physician and patient preferences.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Daniela Viramontes-Hörner ◽  
Zoe Pittman ◽  
Nicholas M Selby ◽  
Maarten W Taal

Abstract Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is severely impaired in persons receiving dialysis. Malnutrition has been associated with some measures of poor HRQoL in cross-sectional analyses in dialysis populations, but no studies have assessed the impact of malnutrition and dietary intake on change in multiple measures of HRQoL over time. We investigated the most important determinants of poor HRQoL and the predictors of change in HRQoL over time using several measures of HRQoL. We enrolled 119 haemodialysis and 31 peritoneal dialysis patients in this prospective study. Nutritional assessments (Subjective Global Assessment [SGA], anthropometry and 24-hour dietary recalls) and HRQoL questionnaires (Short Form-36 [SF-36] mental [MCS] and physical component scores [PCS] and European QoL-5 Dimensions [EQ5D] health state [HSS] and visual analogue scores [VAS]) were performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Mean age was 64(14) years. Malnutrition was present in 37% of the population. At baseline, malnutrition assessed by SGA was the only factor independently (and negatively) associated with all four measures of HRQoL. No single factor was independently associated with decrease in all measures of HRQoL over 1 year. However, prevalence/development of malnutrition over one year was an independent predictor of 1-year decrease in EQ5D HSS and 1-year decrease in fat intake independently predicted the 1-year decline in SF-36 MCS and PCS, and EQ5D VAS. These findings strengthen the importance of monitoring for malnutrition and providing nutritional advice to all persons on dialysis. Future studies are needed to evaluate the impact of nutritional interventions on HRQoL and other long-term outcomes.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazel R Scott ◽  
Donald C McMillan ◽  
Duncan J.F Brown ◽  
Lynn M Forrest ◽  
Colin S McArdle ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Á Szabó ◽  
Eva Neely ◽  
C Stephens

© The Author(s) 2019. Community grandparenting may promote the well-being of older adults. We examined the impact of non-kin and grandparental childcare on quality of life and loneliness using longitudinal data from 2653 older New Zealanders collected over 2 years. Providing both non-kin and grandparental childcare predicted greater self-realisation for women only and was associated with reduced levels of control and autonomy for men. Non-kin childcare was also associated with reduced social loneliness over time independent of gender. Findings suggest that non-kin grandparenting has psychosocial benefits for older adults. Surrogate grandparenting offers promising avenues for those without grandchildren to experience the benefits of grandparenting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document