Value of measuring serum procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and mannan antigens to distinguish fungal from bacterial infections

Author(s):  
G. L. Petrikkos ◽  
S. A. Christofilopoulou ◽  
N. K. Tentolouris ◽  
E. A. Charvalos ◽  
C. J. Kosmidis ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Rina Aninda Sidharta ◽  
JB. Suparyatmo ◽  
Avanti Fitri Astuti

Invasive Fungal Infections (IFIs) can cause serious problems in cancer patients and may result in high morbidity andmortality. C-reactive protein levels increase in response to injury, infection, and inflammation. C-reactive protein increasesin bacterial infections (mean of 32 mg/L) and in fungal infections (mean of 9 mg/L). This study aimed to determineC-Reactive Protein (CRP) as a marker of fungal infections in patients with acute leukemia by establishing cut-off values ofCRP. This study was an observational analytical study with a cross-sectional approach and was carried out at the Departmentof Clinical Pathology and Microbiology of Dr. Moewardi Hospital in Surakarta from May until August 2019. The inclusioncriteria were patients with acute leukemia who were willing to participate in this study, while exclusion criteria were patientswith liver disease. There were 61 samples consisting of 30 male and 31 female patients with ages ranging from 1 to 70 years.Fifty-four patients (88.5%) were diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and 30 (49.18%) were in themaintenance phase. The risk factors found in those patients were neutropenia 50-1500 μL (23.8%), use of intravenous line(22%), and corticosteroid therapy for more than one week (20.9%). The median of CRP in the group of patients with positiveculture results was 11.20 mg/L (11.20-26.23 mg/L) and negative culture results in 0.38 mg/L (0.01-18.63 mg/L). The cut-offvalue of CRP using the Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) was 9.54 mg/L (area under curve 0.996 and p. 0.026), with a sensitivityof 100%, specificity of 93.2%, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 33.3%, Negative Predictive Value (PPV) of 100%, PositiveLikelihood Ratio (PLR) of 1.08, Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR) of 0 and accuracy of 93.4%. C-reactive protein can be used asa screening marker for fungal infections in patients with acute leukemia.


Author(s):  
Dr. Sarita Shrivatstva ◽  
Dr. Narayana Kamath ◽  
Mrs. Ashwini Panchmahalkar

150 febrile patients included children (50), adult (50) and neonates (50) from outpatient departments and inpatients of private clinics and hospitals. Patients presented with fever and chills for more than 1 day to 3 days, throat infection, ear infection and cold and fever and only fever as the principal symptoms. After clinical examination all the patients were prescribed for Complete Blood Count (CBC) with differential count(DC) and C-reactive protein(CRP) tests, and in children below 14 years anti-Streptolysin O(ASO) tests ( 75) were prescribed. Patients treated with antibiotics previously two weeks before the study period were not included. Qualitative and quantitative tests were performed on all patients’ samples included in the study depending on the need/prescription by the physician or paediatrician. CBC, neutrophil count and CRP have been very useful indicators and significant in the diagnosis and treatment as well as follow-up of the febrile condition of the patients specially in patients suffering with bacterial infections. Even in patients with Dengue and malaria it gives a fair idea if there were leucocytosis or leukopenia, neutrophilia or neutropenia, thrombocytosis or thrombocytopenia. CBC: Complete blood count, DC: Differential count; MP: malarial parasite, CRP: C-reactive protein, ASO: Anti-Streptolysin O.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 728-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
HYOUN-AH KIM ◽  
JA-YOUNG JEON ◽  
JEONG-MI AN ◽  
BO-RAM KOH ◽  
CHANG-HEE SUH

Objective.C-reactive protein (CRP), S100A8/A9, and procalcitonin have been suggested as markers of infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We investigated the clinical significance of these factors for indication of infection in SLE.Methods.Blood samples were prospectively collected from 34 patients with SLE who had bacterial infections and 39 patients with SLE who had disease flares and no evidence of infection. A second set of serum samples was collected after the infections or flares were resolved.Results.CRP levels of SLE patients with infections were higher than those with flares [5.9 mg/dl (IQR 2.42, 10.53) vs 0.06 mg/dl (IQR 0.03, 0.15), p < 0.001] and decreased after the infection was resolved. S100A8/A9 and procalcitonin levels of SLE patients with infection were also higher [4.69 μg/ml (IQR 2.25, 12.07) vs 1.07 (IQR 0.49, 3.05) (p < 0.001) and 0 ng/ml (IQR 0–0.38) vs 0 (0–0) (p < 0.001), respectively]; these levels were also reduced once the infection disappeared. In the receiver-operating characteristics analysis of CRP, S100A8/A9, and procalcitonin, the area under the curve was 0.966 (95% CI 0.925–1.007), 0.732 (95% CI 0.61–0.854), and 0.667 (95% CI 0.534–0.799), respectively. CRP indicated the presence of an infection with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90%, with a cutoff value of 1.35 mg/dl.Conclusion.Our data suggest that CRP is the most sensitive and specific marker for diagnosing bacterial infections in SLE.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S16-S16
Author(s):  
Sara Kim ◽  
Avni Bhatt ◽  
Silvana Carr ◽  
Frances Saccoccio ◽  
Judy Lew

Abstract Background Procalcitonin (PCT) and c-reactive protein (CRP) have been utilized in children to assess risk for serious bacterial infections. However, there have been different cut-offs reported for PCT and CRP, which yield different sensitivity and specificity. This study aims to compare the sensitivity and specificity of PCT and CRP in detecting serious bacterial infections (SBIs), specifically urinary tract infections, bacteremia and meningitis. Methods In this retrospective, single center cohort study from January 2018 to June 2019, we analyzed children with a fever greater than 38C with both PCT and CRP value within 24 hours of admission. Each patient had a blood, urine and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture collected within 48 hours of admission. No antibiotics were administered from the admitting hospital prior to collection of the PCT or CRP. Our gold standard was a positive culture obtained from blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine. The statistical analysis included categorical variables as percentages and compared them using the Fisher exact test. The optimal cutoff values for PCT or CRP were based on ROC curve analysis and Youden Index. Sensitivity and specificity analysis were based on literature review cut offs and ROC curves cut offs. Results Among 202 children, we had 45 culture positive patients (11 urinary tract infections, 4 meningitis, and 32 bacteremia). The patients with culture positivity had higher PCT levels (7.9 ng/mL vs 2.5 ng/mL, P=0.0111), CRP levels (110.9 mg/L vs 49.6 mg/L, P&lt;0.0001) and temperature (39.2C vs 39C, P&lt;0.0052). The area under the curve (AUC) comparing culture positivity vs negativity for all culture types was 0.72 (p&lt;0.0001) for PCT and 0.66 (p=0.001) for CRP. In Figure 1, the AUC for culture positive bacteremia was 0.68 (p=0.0011) for PCT and 0.70 (p=0.0003). The AUC for culture positive urinary tract infections (UTI) only was 0.86 (p=0.0001) for PCT and 0.70 (p=0.3607). For the cut-off value for PCT at 0.5 ng/mL, the sensitivity and specificity was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5–0.77) and 70% (95% CI 0.62–0.77) respectively in identifying children with bacterial infection. For the cut-off value for CRP at 20 mg/L, the sensitivity and specificity was 67% (95% CI 0.52–0.79) and 52% (95% CI 0.44–0.59) respectively in identifying children with bacterial infection. Conclusion In this study, PCT and CRP are nearly equivalent classifiers for detecting SBIs as a group and bacteremia, but PCT is statistically better for urinary tract infections; however, the clinical utility is unknown.


1993 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 293-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Nakayama ◽  
S Sonoda ◽  
T Urano ◽  
T Yamada ◽  
M Okada

Abstract We examined serum amyloid protein A (SAA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) as inflammatory markers of viral and bacterial infections. Both acute-phase reactants increased in the acute stage and thereafter decreased in the convalescent stage. In viral infections, the mean serum concentrations of SAA during the acute stage were 141 mg/L in infections with adenovirus, 77 mg/L with measles virus, 63 mg/L with influenza virus, 55 mg/L with parainfluenza virus, 31 mg/L with respiratory syncytial virus, and 31 mg/L in aseptic meningitis. The mean serum concentration of CRP was 19 mg/L for adenovirus infection and &lt; 7 mg/L in all other viral infections. The SAA concentrations were 5- to 11-fold greater than the CRP concentrations. Both the SAA and the CRP concentrations were higher in bacterial infections than in viral infections. Changes in the concentrations of serum SAA paralleled those in serum CRP in bacterial infection; during the course of viral infection, however, serum SAA tended to disappear more quickly than CRP did. SAA appears to be a clinically useful marker of inflammation in acute viral infections, with or without significant changes in the CRP concentration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e002396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Escadafal ◽  
Sandra Incardona ◽  
B Leticia Fernandez-Carballo ◽  
Sabine Dittrich

C reactive protein (CRP), a marker for the presence of an inflammatory process, is the most extensively studied marker for distinguishing bacterial from non-bacterial infections in febrile patients. A point-of-care test for bacterial infections would be of particular use in low-resource settings where other laboratory diagnostics are not always available, antimicrobial resistance rates are high and bacterial infections such as pneumonia are a leading cause of death. This document summarises evidence on CRP testing for bacterial infections in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). With a push for universal health coverage and prevention of antimicrobial resistance, it is important to understand if CRP might be able to do the job. The use of CRP polarised the global health community and the aim of this document is to summarise the ‘good and the bad’ of CRP in multiple settings in LMICs. In brief, the literature that was reviewed suggests that CRP testing may be beneficial in low-resource settings to improve rational antibiotic use for febrile patients, but the positive predictive value is insufficient to allow it to be used alone as a single tool. CRP testing may be best used as part of a panel of diagnostic tests and algorithms. Further studies in low-resource settings, particularly with regard to impact on antibiotic prescribing and cost-effectiveness of CRP testing, are warranted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 435-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. Kargaltseva ◽  
V. I. Kotcherovets ◽  
A. Yu. Mironov ◽  
O. Yu. Borisova ◽  
A. T. Burbello

In response to inflammation there appear « reactants of acute phase» which are nonspecific but they can show the disease gravity and prognosis. The markers of the acute phase are: C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), neopterin (NP), presepsin (PSP), necrosis tumor factor α (NTF-α), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), the total amount of leucocytes, neutrophils, protein fractions (α, β2, γ-globulins), IgM. CRP concentrations rise in the presence of bacterial infections and they are significanly higher in the positive blood cultures than in the contamination or negative ones. PCT levels grow in case of gram-negative bacteremia, but the levels are normal in case of coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteremia. PCT levels are more helpful here than CRP levels with suspected bacteremia. NP levels rise in patients with bacteremia. In the presence of infection, PSP becomes more active than CRP and PCT, and PSP sensitivity is 91,4% in patients with sepsis. Patients with infectious endocarditis have high levels of NTF-α in case of staphylococci infection in blood but the levels of NTF-α are low with enterococci and corynebacterium bloodstream infection. In case of inflammation the acute phase protein level changes are infection markers including bloodstream infection but they are not specific for determining any bacteremia aetiology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document