A Weibo-based approach to disaster informatics: incidents monitor in post-disaster situation via Weibo text negative sentiment analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 1177-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Bai ◽  
Guang Yu
Keyword(s):  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Disaster Situation ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
Post Disaster

Document Preprocessing with TF-IDF to Improve the Polarity Classification Performance of Unstructured Sentiment Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 235-242
Author(s):  
Farrikh Alzami ◽  
Erika Devi Udayanti ◽  
Dwi Puji Prabowo ◽  
Rama Aria Megantara
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Feature Extraction ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Classification Performance ◽  
Document Preparation ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Polarity Classification ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Sentiment analysis in terms of polarity classification is very important in everyday life, with the existence of polarity, many people can find out whether the respected document has positive or negative sentiment so that it can help in choosing and making decisions. Sentiment analysis usually done manually. Therefore, an automatic sentiment analysis classification process is needed. However, it is rare to find studies that discuss extraction features and which learning models are suitable for unstructured sentiment analysis types with the Amazon food review case. This research explores some extraction features such as Word Bags, TF-IDF, Word2Vector, as well as a combination of TF-IDF and Word2Vector with several machine learning models such as Random Forest, SVM, KNN and Naïve Bayes to find out a combination of feature extraction and learning models that can help add variety to the analysis of polarity sentiments. By assisting with document preparation such as html tags and punctuation and special characters, using snowball stemming, TF-IDF results obtained with SVM are suitable for obtaining a polarity classification in unstructured sentiment analysis for the case of Amazon food review with a performance result of 87,3 percent.

The Effects of Different Kernels in SVM Sentiment Analysis on Mass Social Distancing

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
Komang Dhiyo Yonatha Wijaya ◽  
Anak Agung Istri Ngurah Eka Karyawati
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Kernel Method ◽  
Idle Time ◽  
Linear Kernel ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
The Social ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
F Measure ◽  
Kernel Yield

During this pandemic, social media has become a major need as a means of communication. One of the social medias used is Twitter by using messages referred to as tweets. Indonesia currently undergoing mass social distancing. During this time most people use social media in order to spend their idle time However, sometimes, this result in negative sentiment that used to insult and aimed at an individual or group. To filter that kind of tweets, a sentiment analysis was performed with SVM and 3 different kernel method. Tweets are labelled into 3 classes of positive, neutral, and negative. The experiments are conducted to determine which kernel is better. From the sentiment analysis that has been performed, SVM linear kernel yield the best score Some experiments show that the precision of linear kernel is 57%, recall is 50%, and f-measure is 44%

scholarly journals Analysis of Social Media Users Sentiments against Omnibus Law Based on Hashtags on Twitter

SISTEMASI ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Okta Fanny ◽  
Heri Suroyo
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Main Topic ◽  
Accuracy Score ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
The Public ◽  
Average Accuracy ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment

From the research that has been done, it can be concluded that Sentiment Analysis can be used to know the sentiment of the public, especially Twitter netizens against omnibus law. After the sentiment analysis, it looks neutral artmen with the largest percentage of 55%, then positive sentiment by 35% and negative sentiment by 10%. The results of the analysis showed that the Naïve Bayes Classifier method provides classification test results with accuracy in Hashtag Pro with an average accuracy score of 92.1%, precision values with an average of 94.8% and recall values with an average of 90.7%. While Hashtag Counter For data classification, with an average accuracy value of 98.3%, precision value with an average of 97.6% and recall value with an average of 98.7%. The result of text cloud analysis conducted on a combination of hashtags both Hashtag pros and Hashtags cons, the dominant word appears is Omnibus Law which means that all hashtags in scrap is really discussing the main topic that is about Omnibus Law

scholarly journals Sentiment Analysis on Government Performance in Tourism During The COVID-19 Pandemic Period With Lexicon Based

CAUCHY ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-39
Author(s):  
Adri Priadana ◽  
Ahmad Ashril Rizal
Keyword(s):  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Tourism Industry ◽  
Naive Bayes Classifier ◽  
Bayes Classifier ◽  
Naïve Bayes Classifier ◽  
Trending Topics ◽  
The Government ◽  
Negative Sentiment

The COVID-19 pandemic impact has affected all industries in Indonesia and even the world, including the tourism industry. Researchers have a role in researching to answer the needs of the tourism industry, especially in making tourism and business destination management programs and carrying out activities oriented to meet the needs of the tourism industry. Meanwhile, the government has a role in making policies, especially in the roadmap, for developing the tourism industry. This study aims to track trending topics in social media Instagram since COVID-19 hit. The results of trending topics will be classified by sentiment analysis using a Lexicon-based and Naive Bayes Classifier. Based on Instagram data taken since January 2020, it shows the five highest topics in the tourism sector, namely health protocols, hotels, homes, streets, and beaches. Of the five topics, sentiment analysis was carried out with the Lexicon-based and Naive Bayes classifier, showing that beaches get an incredibly positive sentiment, namely 80.87%, and hotels provide the highest negative sentiment 57.89%. The accuracy of the Confusion matrix's sentiment results shows that the accuracy, precision, and recall are 82.53%, 86.99%, and 83.43%, respectively.

scholarly journals Mining social media data to investigate patient perceptions regarding DMARD pharmacotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1432-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanakya Sharma ◽  
Samuel Whittle ◽  
Pari Delir Haghighi ◽  
Frada Burstein ◽  
Roee Sa'adon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Computer Algorithms ◽  
Social Media Platforms ◽  
Synthetic Agents ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
Media Data

ObjectivesWe hypothesise that patients have a positive sentiment regarding biological/targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) and a negative sentiment towards conventional synthetic agents (csDMARDs). We analysed discussions on social media platforms regarding DMARDs to understand the collective sentiment expressed towards these medications.MethodsTreato analytics were used to download all available posts on social media about DMARDs in the context of rheumatoid arthritis. Strict filters ensured that user generated content was downloaded. The sentiment (positive or negative) expressed in these posts was analysed for each DMARD using sentiment analysis. We also analysed the reason(s) for this sentiment for each DMARD, looking specifically at efficacy and side effects.ResultsComputer algorithms analysed millions of social media posts and included 54 742 posts about DMARDs. We found that both classes had an overall positive sentiment. The ratio of positive to negative posts was higher for b/tsDMARDs (1.210) than for csDMARDs (1.048). Efficacy was the most commonly mentioned reason in posts with a positive sentiment and lack of efficacy was the most commonly mentioned reason for a negative sentiment. These were followed by the presence/absence of side effects in negative or positive posts, respectively.ConclusionsPublic opinion on social media is generally positive about DMARDs. Lack of efficacy followed by side effects were the most common themes in posts with a negative sentiment. There are clear reasons why a DMARD generates a positive or negative sentiment, as the sentiment analysis technology becomes more refined, targeted studies could be done to analyse these reasons and allow clinicians to tailor DMARDs to match patient needs.

scholarly journals Post Disaster Situation Awareness and Decision Support Through Interactive Crowdsourcing

2016 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moumita Basu ◽  
Somprakash Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Saptarshi Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Situation Awareness ◽  
Disaster Situation ◽  
Post Disaster

Sentiment annotations for reviews: an information quality perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 579-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng-Li Yang ◽  
August F.Y. Chao
Keyword(s):  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Information Quality ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Sentence Level ◽  
Product Service ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
Internet Information ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose sentiment annotation at sentence level to reduce information overloading while reading product/service reviews in the internet. Design/methodology/approach The keyword-based sentiment analysis is applied for highlighting review sentences. An experiment is conducted for demonstrating its effectiveness. Findings A prototype is built for highlighting tourism review sentences in Chinese with positive or negative sentiment polarity. An experiment results indicates that sentiment annotation can increase information quality and user’s intention to read tourism reviews. Research limitations/implications This study has made two major contributions: proposing the approach of adding sentiment annotation at sentence level of review texts for assisting decision-making; validating the relationships among the information quality constructs. However, in this study, sentiment analysis was conducted on a limited corpus; future research may try a larger corpus. Besides, the annotation system was built on the tourism data. Future studies might try to apply to other areas. Practical implications If the proposed annotation systems become popular, both tourists and attraction providers would obtain benefits. In this era of smart tourism, tourists could browse through the huge amount of internet information more quickly. Attraction providers could understand what are the strengths and weaknesses of their facilities more easily. The application of this sentiment analysis is possible for other languages, especially for non-spaced languages. Originality/value Facing large amounts of data, past researchers were engaged in automatically constructing a compact yet meaningful abstraction of the texts. However, users have different positions and purposes. This study proposes an alternative approach to add sentiment annotation at sentence level for assisting users.

scholarly journals Twitter analysis of the orthodontic patient experience with braces vs Invisalign

2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Noll ◽  
Brendan Mahon ◽  
Bhavna Shroff ◽  
Caroline Carrico ◽  
Steven J. Lindauer
Keyword(s):  
Sentiment Analysis ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Specific Content ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Data Collection Program ◽  
Twitter Analysis ◽  
Twitter Users ◽  
Negative Sentiment ◽  
Collection Program

ABSTRACT Objective: To examine the orthodontic patient experience having braces compared with Invisalign by means of a large-scale Twitter sentiment analysis. Materials and Methods: A custom data collection program was created that collected tweets containing the words “braces” or “Invisalign” for a period of 5 months. A hierarchal Naïve Bayes sentiment analysis classifier was developed to sort the tweets into five categories: positive, negative, neutral, advertisement, or not applicable. Each category was then analyzed for specific content. Results: A total of 419,363 tweets applicable to orthodontics were collected. Users posted significantly more positive tweets (61%) than they did negative tweets (39%; P ≤ .0001). There was no significant difference in the distribution of positive and negative sentiment between braces and Invisalign tweets (P = .4189). Positive orthodontics-related tweets often highlighted gratitude for a great smile accompanied with selfies. Negative orthodontic tweets frequently focused on pain. Conclusion: Twitter users expressed more positive than negative sentiment about orthodontic treatment with no significant difference in sentiment between braces and Invisalign tweets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document