scholarly journals Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Among Healthcare Workers at a Tertiary Academic Hospital in New York City

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 2485-2486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayce Mansour ◽  
Emily Leven ◽  
Kimberly Muellers ◽  
Kimberly Stone ◽  
Damodara Rao Mendu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Wang ◽  
Stephanie H. Chang ◽  
Eric J. Kim ◽  
Jamie L. Bessich ◽  
Joshua K. Sabari ◽  
...  

Management of patients with lung cancer continues to be challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic, due to the increased risk of complications in this subset of patients. During the COVID-19 surge in New York City, New York University Langone Health adopted triage strategies to help with care for lung cancer patients, with good surgical outcomes and no transmission of COVID-19 to patients or healthcare workers. Here, we will review current recommendations regarding screening and management of lung cancer patients during both a non-surge phase and surge phase of COVID-19.


2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 299-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Ratner ◽  
Natalie Neu ◽  
Kathleen Jakob ◽  
Surah Grumet ◽  
Nora Adachi ◽  
...  

AbstractWe describe a nosocomial rotavirus outbreak among pediatric cardiology patients and the impact of a prospective, laboratory-based surveillance program for rotavirus in our university-affiliated, quartenary-care pediatric hospital in New York City. Improved compliance with infection control and case-finding among patients and healthcare workers halted the outbreak.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander D Bryan ◽  
Kathleen Tatem ◽  
Jillian Diuguid-Gerber ◽  
Caroline Cooke ◽  
Anya Romanoff ◽  
...  

Objective: Estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among New York City Health + Hospitals healthcare workers, and identify demographic and occupational factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers. Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional study using data from SARS-CoV-2 serological tests accompanied by a demographic and occupational survey administered to healthcare workers. Participants were employed by New York City Health + Hospitals (NYC H+H) and either completed serologic testing at NYC H+H between April 30 and June 30, 2020, or completed SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing outside of NYC H+H and were able to self-report results. Results: Seven hundred twenty-seven survey respondents were included in analysis. Participants had a mean age of 46 years (SD= 12.19) and 543 (75%) were women. Two hundred fourteen (29%) participants tested positive or reported testing positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG+). Characteristics associated with positive SARS-CoV-2 serostatus were Black race (25% IgG+ vs. 15% IgG-, p=0.001), having someone in the household with COVID symptoms (49% IgG+ vs. 21% IgG-, p<0.001), or having a confirmed COVID-19 case in the household (25% IgG+ vs 5% IgG-, p<0.001). Characteristics associated with negative SARS-CoV-2 serostatus included working on a COVID patient floor (27% IgG+ vs. 36% IgG-, p=0.02), working in the ICU (20% IgG+ vs. 28% IgG-, p=0.03), or having close contact with a patient with COVID-19 (51% IgG+ vs. 62% IgG-, p=0.03). Conclusions: Results underscore the significance of community factors and inequities might have on SARS-CoV-2 exposure for healthcare workers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 2702
Author(s):  
Melissa K. Meghpara ◽  
Bhavana Devanabanda ◽  
Mercy Jimenez ◽  
Martine A. Louis ◽  
Neil Mandava

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a critical need in treating severe respiratory disease while providing adequate protection to healthcare workers. Critically ill COVID-19 patients have required prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation, not limited to those with multiple comorbidities or the elderly. At the height of the pandemic in New York City; our institution intubated 192 COVID-19 patients. Many institutions have avoided performing tracheostomy in this population due to high risk of virus aerosolization. This study is a retrospective, IRB approved, single center case series of 14 consecutive tracheostomies in COVID-19 patients at a community hospital in Flushing, New York City. Data from 1 March to 31 May 2020 was collected from electronic medical records. All COVID-19 positive patients undergoing tracheostomy were included; patients undergoing tracheostomy that were not COVID-19 positive were excluded. Fourteen patients underwent tracheostomy during the study period. Average age was 62 and 64.3% were male (n=9). Hispanic males represented 50% of patients undergoing tracheostomy and 71.4% were from home. Average days from initial intubation to tracheostomy was 20.6, ranging from 12 to 43 days. With the exception of two patients, all underwent a single intubation. No involved operating room staff became ill during or after these procedures. Tracheostomy may be safely performed in COVID-19 patients while minimizing risk to staff; however, patient outcomes may not be significantly altered. Further research is needed to determine the optimal timing and overall benefit of tracheostomy in this population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 222 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan N. Caridi ◽  
Michael J. Humann ◽  
Xiaoming Liang ◽  
Feng-Chiao Su ◽  
Aleksandr B. Stefaniak ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Fran A. Ganz-Lord ◽  
Kathryn R. Segal

NARRATIVE ABSTRACT This study compared the risk of COVID-19 between clinical and non-clinical HCWs while adjusting for home zip codes. Clinical HCWs did not have higher risk of COVID-19, but living in higher-risk zip codes was associated with increased infection rates. However, environmental services workers showed increased risk of COVID-19.


2019 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 1011-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Cerfolio ◽  
Dana Ferrari-Light ◽  
Christine Ren-Fielding ◽  
George Fielding ◽  
Nissa Perry ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 825-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nahid Bhadelia ◽  
Rajiv Sonti ◽  
Jennifer Wright McCarthy ◽  
Jaclyn Vorenkamp ◽  
Haomiao Jia ◽  
...  

Background and Objective.Assessing the impact of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) on healthcare workers (HCWs) is important for pandemic planning.Methods.We retrospectively analyzed employee health records of HCWs at a tertiary care center in New York City with influenza-like illnesses (ILI) and confirmed influenza from March 31, 2009, to February 28, 2010. We evaluated HCWs' clinical presentations during the first and second wave of the pandemic, staff absenteeism, exposures among HCWs, and association between high-risk occupational exposures to respiratory secretions and infection.Results.During the pandemic, 40% (141/352) of HCWs with ILI tested positive for influenza, representing a 1% attack rate among our 13,066 employees. HCWs with influenza were more likely to have fever, cough, and tachycardia. When compared with the second wave, cases in the first wave were sicker and at higher risk of exposure to patients' respiratory secretions (P = .049). HCWs with ILI- with and without confirmed influenza-missed on average 4.7 and 2.7 work days, respectively (P = .001). Among HCWs asked about working while ill, 65% (153/235) reported they did so (mean, 2 days).Conclusions.HCWs in the first wave had more severe ILI than those in the second wave and were more likely to be exposed to patients' respiratory secretions. HCWs with ILI often worked while ill. Timely strategies to educate and support HCWs were critical to managing this population during the pandemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document