Simultaneous evaluation of the effect of mixing efficiency on power consumption and methane production in an anaerobic digester with different wastewaters

2021 ◽  
pp. 125554
Author(s):  
Mohammad Esmaeel Kashfi ◽  
Ramin Kouhikamali ◽  
Gholam Khayati
2019 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 797-808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iftikhar Zeb ◽  
Jingwei Ma ◽  
Farrakh Mehboob ◽  
Gopi Krishna Kafle ◽  
Bilal Ahmad Zafar Amin ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 1252-1257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan D. Park ◽  
Ronald W. Thring ◽  
Steve S. Helle

Fruit and vegetable waste (FVW) was co-digested with first stage (FSS) and second stage anaerobic digester sludge (SSS) separately, over the course of 10 days, in batch reactors. Addition of FVW significantly increased the methane production in both sludges. After 10 days of digestion FSS + FVW produced 514 ± 57 L CH4 kg VS−1added compared with 392 ± 16 L CH4 for the SSS + FVW. The increased methane yield was most likely due to the higher inoculum substrate ratio of the FSS. The final VS and COD contents of the sewer sludge and FVW mixtures were not significantly different from the control values suggesting that all of the FVW added was degraded within 10 days. It is recommended that FVW be added to the first stage of the anaerobic digester in order to maximize methane generation.


Fermentation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 251
Author(s):  
Buta Singh ◽  
Kornél L. Kovács ◽  
Zoltán Bagi ◽  
József Nyári ◽  
Gábor L. Szepesi ◽  
...  

The appropriate mixing system and approach to effective management can provide favorable conditions for the highly sensitive microbial community, which can ensure process stability and efficiency in an anaerobic digester. In this study, the effect of mixing intensity on biogas production in a lab-scale anaerobic digester has been investigated experimentally and via modeling. Considering high mixing efficiency and unique feature of producing axial flow, helical ribbon (HR) impeller is used for mixing the slurry in this experiment under various conditions. Three parallel digesters were analyzed under identical operating conditions for comparative study and high accuracy. Effects of different mixing speeds (10, 30, and 67 rpm for 5 min h−1) on biogas production rate were determined in 5-L lab-scale digesters. The results demonstrated 15–18% higher biogas production at higher mixing speed (67 rpm) as compared to 10 rpm and 30 rpm and the results proved statistically significant (p < 0.05). Biogas production at 10, 30, and 67 rpm were 45.6, 48.6, and 52.5 L, respectively. Higher VFA concentrations (7.67 g L−1) were recorded at lower mixing intensity but there was no significant difference in pH and ammonia at different speeds whereas the better mixing efficiency at higher speeds was also the main reason for increase in biogas production. Furthermore, model simulation calculations revealed the reduction of dead zones and better homogeneous mixing at higher mixing speeds. Reduction of dead zones from 18% at 10 rpm to 2% at 67 rpm was observed, which can be the major factor in significant difference in biogas production rates at various mixing intensities. Optimization of digester and impeller geometry should be a prime focus to scale-up digesters and to optimize mixing in full-scale digesters.


Author(s):  
Yuewei Fan ◽  
Shibo Wang ◽  
Hua Wang ◽  
Jianxin Xu ◽  
Qingtai Xiao ◽  
...  

Abstract The isolated mixed region (IMR) is gradually formed during stirring and reduces the mixing efficiency. The unsteady-state formation process of the IMR was modeled and its formation mechanism was analyzed. The rotating frequency of the impeller was optimized using the chaos mathematical theory to improve the stirring efficiency without increasing the power consumption. The calculated results demonstrate that the IMR is a coherent structure, and its formation process is based on the free shear effect of the mixed layer. The chaotic stirring method can accelerate the momentum dissipation process by 37% by eliminating the IMR, and increase the speed by up to 31%. Therefore, chaotic mixing can eliminate the IMR in a shorter time and lower the power consumption.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6668
Author(s):  
Buta Singh ◽  
Narinder Singh ◽  
Zsolt Čonka ◽  
Michal Kolcun ◽  
Zoltán Siménfalvi ◽  
...  

The effect of slurry mixing in an anaerobic digester on biogas production was intensively studied in the last few years. This subject is still debatable due to fact that this process involves three phases, solid-gas-liquid, along with the involvement of microbes during biochemical reactions, which are highly vulnerable to changes in hydrodynamic shear stresses and mixing conditions. Moreover, the complexity in the direction of optimization of mixing magnifies due to the implication of both fluid mechanics and biochemical engineering to study the effect of mixing in anaerobic digestion (AD). The effect of mixing on AD is explored using recent literature and theoretical analysis, concentrating on the multi-phase and multi-scale aspects of AD. The tools and methods available to experimentally quantify the function of mixing on both the global and local scales are summarized in this study. The major challenge for mixing in an anaerobic digester is to minimize dead zones and maintain uniform distribution of viscosity and shear at low mixing intensities without disrupting the microbial flocs and syntrophic relationships between the bacteria during the AD process. This study is a critical analysis of various techniques and approaches adopted by researchers to evaluate the effectiveness of mixing regimes and mixing equipment. Most studies describe biogas production performance and hydrodynamic characteristics of the digesters separately, but the evaluation of mixing requires interdisciplinary experts, which include mechanical engineers, microbiologists and hydrodynamic experts. Through this review, the readers will be guided through intensive literature regarding agitation, the best possible way to scrutinize the agitation problems and the approach to answering the question “why is the optimization of mixing in an anaerobic digester still a debatable subject?”.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document