Risk factors associated with in-hospital serious adverse events after stenting of severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 59-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Cheng ◽  
Liqun Jiao ◽  
Peng Gao ◽  
Gang Song ◽  
Sichang Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Intracranial Stenosis ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Factors Associated

Statin-induced adverse effects – facts and genes

2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-92
Author(s):  
Mariann Harangi ◽  
Noémi Zsíros ◽  
Lilla Juhász ◽  
György Paragh
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Statin Therapy ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Single Nucleotide

Statin therapy is considered to be safe and rarely associated with serious adverse events. However, a significant proportion of patients on statin therapy show some degree of intolerance which can lead to decreased adherence to statin therapy. The authors summarize the symptoms, signs and frequencies of the most common statin-induced adverse effects and their most important risk factors including some single nucleotide polymorphisms and gene mutations. Also, they review the available approaches to detect and manage the statin-intolerant patients. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 83–92.

scholarly journals Risk factors associated with adverse events during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e0189347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang Hyuck Lee ◽  
Eun Young Kim ◽  
Juhee Cho ◽  
Danbee Kang ◽  
Seungmin Bang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Tissue Sampling ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Factors Associated

scholarly journals The effect of the duration of the procedure on the risk of complications during pediatric cardiac catheterization

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-473
Author(s):  
Kübra Evren Şahin
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cardiac Catheterization ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Heart Catheterization ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory ◽  
Study Results

Background: This study aims to evaluate the frequency of and associated risk factors for adverse events caused by cardiac catheterization procedures in pediatric patients. Methods: Between January 2009 and January 2012, a total of 599 pediatric patients (320 males, 279 females; mean age 5.4±4.7 years; range, 1 day to 21 years) who underwent cardiac catheterization in our cardiac catheterization laboratory were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical data of the patients including the duration of the procedure, management of anesthesia, the American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics, and procedure-related serious adverse events were recorded. Results: The incidence of procedure-related serious adverse events was 9.18%. Potential risk factors associated with serious adverse events were identified as interventional heart catheterization, high scores obtained from the Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics, the use of endotracheal tube in airway control, and prolonged procedural duration. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that prolonged duration of catheterization is a potential risk factor for procedure-related adverse events and the duration of the procedure needs to be included as a variable in the Catheterization Risk Score for Pediatrics scoring system for predicting procedure-related adverse events.

scholarly journals Factors associated with mechanical and systemic adverse events after colonoscopy (France, 2010-2015)

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Laanani ◽  
A Weill ◽  
P O Blotière ◽  
J Pouchot ◽  
F Carbonnel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Acute Renal Failure ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Experienced Endoscopists

Abstract Background More than one million colonoscopies are performed every year in France. They are associated with risks of mechanical and systemic serious adverse events (SAEs) which can be associated with patient, procedure, endoscopist, and facility characteristics. We tried to identify the factors associated with colonic perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, splenic injury, shock, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, acute renal failure, and urolithiasis after colonoscopy. Methods We analysed data from the French national claims databases (SNDS). A total of 4,088,799 patients, 30 years or older, undergoing a first screening or diagnostic colonoscopy between 2010 and 2015 were identified. SAE rates were estimated, and risk factors associated with SAEs were identified using multilevel logistic regression models, adjusted for patient, colonoscopy, endoscopist, and facility characteristics. Results Increasing age was associated with an increasing incidence of mechanical and systemic SAEs. Cancer and cardiovascular comorbidities were associated with mechanical SAEs, and a higher number of pre-existing conditions was associated with shock and acute renal failure. Polypectomy, especially of polyps larger than 1 cm, was associated with an increased risk of perforation (OR = 4.1; 95% CI, 3.4-5.0) and bleeding (OR = 13.3; 95% CI, 11.7-15.1). Mechanical SAEs were associated with the endoscopist’s experience, while systemic SAEs were more frequent in public hospitals than in private clinics. Conclusions SAEs related to colonoscopy were more frequent in older patients and in those with comorbidities. Mechanical SAEs were more frequent when colonoscopy was performed by less experienced endoscopists. Systemic SAEs were more frequent in public hospitals, reflecting patient selection processes. The risk of both mechanical and systemic SAEs should be taken into account when deciding to perform colonoscopy, particularly in older patients with multiple pre-existing conditions. Key messages Systemic SAEs are not uncommon after colonoscopy and, together with intestinal SAEs, should be considered when considering the need for colonoscopy. Patients at risk of SAEs should be identified and colonoscopy should be performed by experienced endoscopists in these patients. Less invasive alternatives should also be considered in these patients.

scholarly journals Erratum on “Risk factors associated with the occurrence of adverse events in plateletpheresis donation” [Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2014;36(3):191–5]

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 307
Author(s):  
Maria Helena Barbosa ◽  
Karla Fabiana Nunes da Silva ◽  
Dieska Quintiliano Coelho ◽  
Jordânia Lumênia Tavares ◽  
Luciana Falcão da Cruz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Factors Associated

scholarly journals Invasive Fungal Infections in Infants—Focus on Anidulafungin

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. CMPed.S8028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Wilke
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Fungal Infections ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Small Body ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Invasive Fungal Infections ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Good Safety Profile

Introduction Invasive fungal infection in pediatric intensive care units (PICU) is a rising challenge. Candida species are the most common microorganisms in these infections. Due to growing resistance against fluconazole, echinocandins are being used for the appropriate therapy. However, the recent IDSA guidelines recommend them only in cases where fluconazole or Amphotericin B cause treatment failure or are contraindicated. In a literature review, the importance of invasive fungal infections in PICU settings and the role of anidulafungin shall be examined. Materials and Methods Articles were retrieved form PubMed covering the years 2000–2012. Various search terms were used. Then the articles were clustered in different types like ‘review,’ ‘pharmacokinetics,’ ‘case reports’ and others. Results From 67 search results, 14 articles were selected. Of these, 7 were related to anidulafungin, while 7 were related to echinocandins or fungal infections in the PICU. Anidulafungin was examined in 4 PK/PD studies where a good safety profile was found. No serious adverse events occurred. The articles reporting risk factors show that central venous catheters, receipt of antibiotics, receipt of parenteral nutrition, and neutropenia are the most important independent risk factors for invasive fungal infections in PICU. Three reviews of antifungal agents show that echinocandins may be useful due to their safety profile; micafungin is the best examined one and further trials are needed. Discussion The published literature on invasive fungal infections in PICU settings has grown over the years. There are only a few articles, however, which are directly related to the use of anidulafungin in this setting. A most recent publication showed good PK/PD dynamics and a good safety profile for anidulafungin. So far, no RCT in the area of invasive candidiasis in infants and neonates has been published. A review of currently registered trials at ClinicalTrials.gov has shown one more trial related to PK/PD and two trials that investigate the use of anidulafungin or anidulafungin in combination with Voriconazole in pediatrics. Conclusion The small body of existing literature on anidulafungin in infants shows success in treatment, no drug-related adverse events, and good pharmacodynamics. A dosing of 0.75 mg/kg/day or 1.5 mg/kg/day is as effective as 50 mg/day or 100 mg/day in adults. More trials on the use in clinical reality of PICU or NICU should follow.

Factors associated with the incidence of serious adverse events in patients admitted with COPD acute exacerbation

2016 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-T. García-Sanz ◽  
J.-C. Cánive-Gómez ◽  
N. García-Couceiro ◽  
L. Senín-Rial ◽  
S. Alonso-Acuña ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Exacerbation ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Factors Associated

Adverse Events and Risk Factors Associated with the Sedation of Children by Nonanesthesiologists

1997 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 1207-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shobha Malviya ◽  
Terri Voepel-Lewis ◽  
Alan R. Tait
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Factors Associated

scholarly journals Procedural Pain and Serious Adverse Events with Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy: Real World Experience from India

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 38-38
Author(s):  
Chepsy C Philip ◽  
Inderjit Singh ◽  
Rachel Thaper ◽  
Alice David ◽  
Suvir Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Bone Marrow Aspiration ◽  
Procedural Pain ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Serious Adverse Event ◽  
Factors Associated

Background: Bone Marrow aspiration and Biopsy (BMAB) is perceived by patients as a painful procedure with fearsome complications. Though informed as safe and well tolerated; there is limited data about the complications and degree of pain experienced by patients undergoing BMAB.[1] Further scarce is data from the developing world where procedural fear discourages patients from pursuing treatment and diagnosis.[2] Methods Aims: To estimate the level of pain and frequency of serious adverse eventsexperienced by patients undergoing BMAB at our center. We also attempted to identify factors associated with increased pain perception. Study setting: This study was conducted at a tertiary level teaching hospital, the Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana. Ethics approval was obtained from the Institutional research committee (CMC/1495). Study period: 01 April 2015 through 30 Nov 2019 Study Design: This is a comparative cross sectional study where comparison of those with relatively more pain to those with less was done to elicit the factors associated with pain perception. Study Population: All consecutive patients who underwent a BMAB and provided informed consent which was taken pre-procedure, were included. We excluded patients who underwent the procedure under general anesthesia. Logistics of the Study: The BMAB was performed variably by Consultant Physicians, Trainee Physicians and Physician Assistants. All patients were pre-medicated with tramadol intravenous pre-procedure, and the preferred approach was from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) in a left lateral decubitus under local anesthesia with lignocain. Patients were sent home or returned to their ward after upto 60 minutes of observation. A serious adverse event was considered as one requiring a prolonged observation beyond routine practice or extending to an admission to manage adverse events following and related to the BMAB. Data sources and variables Information regarding age at diagnosis, address and sex, indication to perform the BMAB, coded as malignant and non-malignant was collected from each patient. Number of prior procedures and details regarding food intake were collected as recalled by the patient. Level of pain was noted soon after the BMAB using a combined Wong-Baker grimace with numeric pain scale by the patient themselves. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics were used to characterize variables. Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression were used to identify factors associated with higher pain severity (Score >2). Results: A total of 942 BMAB procedures were performed in this period. Baseline characteristics as tabulated below (Table1). Although the Mean + SD pain score was only 2.7 + 1.39, fourteen patients (1.48%) reported severe pain (>8). The following risk-factors were associated with increased pain on multivariate analysis: those experiencing their first BMAB procedure had very low odds of pain (OR (95 % CI): 0.23 (0.15-0.37)). However, when more than one attempt of biopsy was made, the odds of pain was much higher (OR (95 % CI): 1.62 (1.29-2.05)). Food and drink intake prior to procedure was associated only at the univariate level. Those who did not take any food prior to procedure had very high odds of pain (odds ratio (OR) 1.81 (95 % CI 1.01-3.22)). However, those who took juice had very low odds (OR (95 % CI): 0.619 (0.43-0.90)). Nine (0.95%) serious adverse events were reported. There were no deaths. The major serious adverse event was hemorrhage resulting from pseudo-aneurysm of the posterior iliac artery, which comprised 2 of the 9 serious adverse events. Other serious adverse events included persistent vomiting and severe aching pain in the ipsilateral leg. Conclusions: In our analysis BMAB is associated with a low level of procedural pain and is safe. The pain perception was not influenced by the operator. Factors associated with decreased pain perception were first procedural BMAB experience and successful completion of the procedure in the first attempt. Having at least a snack or a juice pre-procedure could reduce pain perception. Serious adverse events are rare in our experience. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document