Clinical Features and Current Therapeutic Status of Newly Diagnosed Young Patients with Multiple Myeloma in Asia Pacific

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. e12
Author(s):  
J. Hou
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3349-3349
Author(s):  
Tomoko Narita ◽  
Atsushi Inagaki ◽  
Tsutomu Kobayashi ◽  
Yoshiaki Kuroda ◽  
Toshihiro Fukushima ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell neoplasm developing through long-term multistep genetic events. Biological and clinical features of the MM are known to be associated in part with relatively early genetic aberrations such as chromosomal translocations involving IGH. The t(14;16)(q32;q23) involving c-MAF oncogene locus is an important chromosomal aberration observed in approximately 5 percent of newly diagnosed MM. Various studies have suggested that MM carrying t(14;16) is associated with specific clinical characteristics. However, these studies were not definitive, since the number of the patients analyzed was relatively small. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical features of patients with newly diagnosed MM harboring t(14;16) detected by double-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in Japan. Methods Clinical and laboratory features of t(14;16)-positive MM diagnosed between 2002 and 2013 were collected retrospectively as a nationwide study in Japan after approval by each institutional ethical committee. The t(14;16) translocation was detected by FISH analysis using bone marrow or peripheral blood samples from all patients. Expression of surface antigens such as CD56 and CD20 was detected by flow cytometric analysis (FCM) and defined as positive when more than 20% of the CD38-positive plasma cells were positive. To compare t(14;16)-positive and t(14;16)-negative MM, we also assessed 132 patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM and without c-MAF mRNA expression, as confirmed by global RQ/RT-PCR using purified plasma cells (Tajima E, et al.:Haematologica 2005; 90: 559, Inagaki A et al.: Leuk Res 2013; 37: 1648) at Nagoya City University Hospital. Results In total, 37 patients carrying t(14;16)-positive MM were enrolled from 19 institutions. Median ages of the MM patients with or without t(14;16) at diagnosis were 62 and 68, respectively. Regarding the cell surface phenotype, none of the t(14;16)-positive MM cells was positive for CD56 (Fig. 1), whereas 82 of 118 (69%) t(14;16)-negative ones were positive. Positivity for CD20 antigen was more common in t(14;16)-positive MM cells (11/23, 48%) than in t(14;16)-negative ones (16/115, 14%)(p= 0.001). The proportion of patients with additional chromosome aberrations other than t(14;16), determined by G-banded karyotyping, was higher in patients with t(14;16) (16/30, 53%) than in those without (19/131 cases, 15%) (p< 0.001). Moreover, MM patients with t(14;16) showed higher frequencies of IgG subtype M protein, leukocytosis (p= 0.001), thrombocytopenia (p< 0.001) and hyperproteinemia (p= 0.001), and a lower frequency of hypercalcemia (p= 0.001), compared to those without t(14;16). Overall survival (OS) of the patients with t(14;16) was significantly shorter than that of those without t(14;16) even though the patients received one or more lines of treatment containing novel drugs such as bortezomib, thalidomide and lenalidomide (p= 0.014) (Fig. 2). Poor PS (PS ≥ 2-4), low PLT count (<100x103/ƒÊL), or high LDH levels (>1.0N) were significantly unfavorable prognostic factors for OS in patients with t(14;16)-positive MM, whereas they were not in those without t(14;16). Progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with t(14;16) was also significantly shorter than those without t(14;16) (p= 0.002) Conclusion The t(14;16)-positive MM comprises a specific category in MM, which is featured by negativity for CD56, higher positivity for CD20 and unfavorable outcome, even in the novel drug era. Unraveling biological characteristics of this specific disease category will lead us to establish novel treatment strategies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5600-5600
Author(s):  
Artur Jurczyszyn ◽  
Sarah Goldman-Mazur ◽  
Jorge J. Castillo ◽  
Anna Waszczuk-Gajda ◽  
Norbert Grząśko ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM) is based upon complex biological and clinical features. One of the strongest predictors of outcome are the intrinsic genetic abnormalities in the malignant plasma cells. t(14;20), as other chromosome 14 abnormalities, deregulates the c-musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma (c-MAF) oncogene. Due to the relative rarity of t(14;20) [<1.5% of newly diagnosed MM; slightly higher in monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance- about 5%], there are no large databases which provide the natural history of this abnormality. Its meaning remains controversial due to the small sample sizes in previously published reports in contrast to t(4;14) and 17p- abnormalities which have been described independently in the literature. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical features and outcomes of patients t(14;20) from 5 clinical centers in Germany, Italy and the United States. Newly diagnosed MM patients according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria were enrolled. The t(14;20) was detected by double color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using bone marrow samples. Baseline characteristics at diagnosis, comorbidities, patient treatment regimens and clinical outcomes were collected using unified case report forms. Clinical responses were assessed according to the IMWG uniform response criteria. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period between the date of initial diagnosis and the date of death or the date of the last observation. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the period between the date of initial diagnosis and either the date of the first relapse or death of any causes or the date of the last observation. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was applied to assess risk factors of death. Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank and Breslow-Gehan-Wilcoxon tests. Results 26 patients were included in analysis including 11 males (42.3%). Median age at MM diagnosis was 68.5 years (range 56-71). Immunoglobulin isotype included: IgG (n=14, 53.8%), IgA (n=9, 34.6%), light chain (n=3, 11.5%). R-ISS stage at diagnosis included: stage III (n=8, 30.8%); stage II (n=9, 34.6%) and stage I (n=1, 3.8%)- the staging for remaining 8 patients is unknown. Anemia (<10g/dl) was observed in 13 (50%), impaired renal function (creatinine clearance <40 mL per minute or serum creatinine >2 mg/dl) in 3 (11.5%). In 14 (53.8%) cases osteolytic lesions were present. In 15 patients (57.7%) the t(14;20) was associated with other cytogenetic aberrations, including del17p in 2 patients (7.7%), t(4;14) in 5 patients (19.2%) and t(14;16) in 4 patients (15.4%). First line treatment for MM included mostly PIs + IMIDs in 8 patients (30.8%), PIs + IMIDs + chemotherapy in 7 patients (26.9%) or PIs alone in 3 cases (11.5%). Auto-PBSCT was performed in 8 cases (30.7%). Median PFS was 30 months (CI 95% 17.8 months; Figure 1, panel A). Median OS was not reached (Figure 1, panel B). 5-year OS from MM diagnosis was 77.5% (±10.6%). Conclusion In this study of 26 patients with t(14;20) the median PFS and 5-year OS were 30 months and not reached, respectively. Historically, the presence of a t(14;20) is considered to be a very poor prognostic factor-this was not observed in this multi-institutional retrospective analysis. In comparison to the recent studies (Ross et al, Haematologica, 2010; n=27; median survival 14.4 months), the PFS and OS of patients with t(14;20) in our analysis are better than expected. It should be highlighted that most probably in the Ross et al. study patients were not treated with novel drug therapies. Nonetheless, this controversy remains to be elucidated in the future studies. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Castillo: Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hari:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Goldberg:COTA Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Hematology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (1) ◽  
pp. 498-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
María-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Jesús F. San Miguel

AbstractMultiple myeloma is the second most frequent hematological disease. The introduction of melphalan as high-dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) for young patients and the availability of novel agents for young and elderly patients with multiple myeloma have dramatically changed the perspective of treatment. However, further research is necessary if we want definitively to cure the disease. Treatment goals for transplant-eligible and non–transplant-eligible patients should be to prolong survival by achieving the best possible response while ensuring quality of life. For young patients, HDT-ASCT is a standard of care for treatment, and its efficacy has been enhanced and challenged by the new drugs. For elderly patients, treatment options were once limited to alkylators, but new upfront treatment combinations based on novel agents (proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs) combined or not with alkylators have significantly improved outcomes. Extended treatment of young and elderly patients improves the quality and duration of clinical responses; however, the optimal scheme, appropriate doses, and duration of long-term therapy have not yet been fully determined. This review summarizes progress in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, addressing critical questions such as the optimal induction, early vs late ASCT, consolidation and/or maintenance for young patients, and how we can choose the best treatment option for non–transplant-eligible patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8113-8113 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Avet-Loiseau ◽  
P. Moreau ◽  
C. Mathiot ◽  
C. Charbonnel ◽  
T. Facon ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1186-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Antonio Palumbo

The treatment of multiple myeloma has undergone significant changes in the past few years. The introduction of novel agents, such as the immunomodulatory drugs thalidomide and lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, has dramatically improved the outcome of this disease and considerably increased the treatment options available. Several trials have shown the advantages linked to the use of novel agents both in young patients, who are considered eligible for transplantation, and elderly patients, for whom a conventional therapy should be considered. These novel agents may increase the efficacy of autologous stem cell transplantation with deeper and long-lasting response. In the transplant setting, different novel agent combinations have proved to be superior to the traditional vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone. Similarly, novel agents have also changed the treatment paradigm of patients not eligible for transplantation, thus replacing the traditional melphalan-prednisone approach. Preliminary data also support the role of consolidation and maintenance therapy to further improve outcomes. This article provides an overview of the latest strategies, including novel agents used to treat patients with multiple myeloma, both in the transplant and nontransplant settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document