scholarly journals Phase I dose-escalation single centre clinical trial to evaluate the safety of infusion of memory T cells as adoptive therapy in COVID-19 (RELEASE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 101086
Author(s):  
A. Pérez-Martínez ◽  
M. Mora-Rillo ◽  
C. Ferreras ◽  
P. Guerra-García ◽  
B. Pascual-Miguel ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1765-1765
Author(s):  
Antonio Pérez-Martínez ◽  
Alejandro Martín-Quirós ◽  
Cristina Ferreras ◽  
Karima Al-Akioui ◽  
Marta Mora-Rillo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Adoptive cell immunotherapies for opportunistic virus in immunocompromised patients using haploidentical memory T cells have shown to be safe and effective. Since severe cases of COVID-19 present a dysregulated immune system with T cell lymphopenia and a hyper-inflammatory state we have proposed that a similar strategy could be proven to be efficient for COVID-19 patients. This is a study protocol of an open-label, multicenter, double-arm, randomized, dose-finding phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the administration of a single dose of allogenic SARS-CoV-2 specific memory CD45RA - T cells and Natural Killer (NK) cells in COVID-19 patients with lymphopenia and pneumonia. The aim of the study is to find efficient treatments for patients with moderate/severe COVID-19. Identification of Specific memory T cells and NK cells: i)Memory T Cells: we first determined the existence of SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells within the CD45RA - T memory cells of the blood of convalescent donors. Memory T cells can respond quickly to the infection and provide long-term immune protection to reduce the severity of the COVID-19 symptoms without inducing classically T cell alloreactivity. Also, CD45RA - memory T cells confer protection for other pathogens the donors encountered in their life. ii)NK cells: we determined the phenotype of NK cells after COVID-19 and the main characteristic of SARS-CoV-2 specific NK population in the blood of convalescent donors, as it has been shown for cytomegalovirus infections. Also, NK cells confer protection for other pathogens the donors encountered in their life. Pilot Phase I- Safety, feasibility, and dose escalation: Between September and November 2020 a phase 1, dose-escalation, single-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the infusion of CD45RA - memory T cells containing SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells as adoptive cell therapy against moderate/severe cases of COVID-19. Nine participants with pneumonia and/or lymphopenia and with at least one human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match with the donor were infused. The first three subjects received the lowest dose (1x10 5 cells/kg), the next three received the intermediate dose (5x10 5 cells/kg) and the last three received the highest dose (1x10 6 cells/kg) of CD45RA - memory T cells. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT04578210. Findings: All participants' clinical status measured by National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and 7-category point ordinal scales showed improvement six days after infusion. No serious adverse events were reported. Inflammatory parameters were stabilized post-infusion and the participants showed lymphocyte recovery two weeks after the procedure. Donor microchimerism was observed at least for three weeks after infusion in all patients. Interpretation: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the idea that treatment of COVID-19 patients with moderate/severe symptoms using convalescent SARS-CoV-2 specific CD45RA - memory T cells is feasible and safe. We did not find dose-liming toxicity. The Recommended Phase 2 dose was 1x10 6 CD45RA - T cells. Phase II- Efficacy: Between January 2021 and July 2021 patients have been enrolled based on the matched with the HLA genotype of the convalescent donors and following the protocol inclusion/exclusion criteria. The primary outcome is the incidence of patient recovery at day 14, defined as normalization of fever and oxygen saturation or lymphopenia recovery. Secondary outcomes are the time to normal level of lymphocytes, the proportion of patients showing clinical improvement at day 7, time to first negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, duration of hospitalization, time to discharge, time to improvement by one category a 7-point ordinal scale or NEWS score, the proportion of patients requiring intensive care unit, and all-cause mortality. In addition, lymphocyte recovery by multiparametric flow cytometry and donor chimerism by real-time PCR in the experimental arm was monitored weekly during the first month. This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the idea that treatment of COVID-19 patients with moderate/severe symptoms using convalescent CD45RA - memory T cells is safe and feasible. The phase II clinical trial is ongoing to demonstrate efficacy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Soria: Celgene: Other: Fees; Gilead: Other: Fees; AbbVie: Other: Fees.


BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m3734
Author(s):  
Andy Roemhild ◽  
Natalie Maureen Otto ◽  
Guido Moll ◽  
Mohamed Abou-El-Enein ◽  
Daniel Kaiser ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo assess whether reshaping of the immune balance by infusion of autologous natural regulatory T cells (nTregs) in patients after kidney transplantation is safe, feasible, and enables the tapering of lifelong high dose immunosuppression, with its limited efficacy, adverse effects, and high direct and indirect costs, along with addressing several key challenges of nTreg treatment, such as easy and robust manufacturing, danger of over immunosuppression, interaction with standard care drugs, and functional stability in an inflammatory environment in a useful proof-of-concept disease model.DesignInvestigator initiated, monocentre, nTreg dose escalation, phase I/IIa clinical trial (ONEnTreg13).SettingCharité-University Hospital, Berlin, Germany, within the ONE study consortium (funded by the European Union).ParticipantsRecipients of living donor kidney transplant (ONEnTreg13, n=11) and corresponding reference group trial (ONErgt11-CHA, n=9).InterventionsCD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ nTreg products were given seven days after kidney transplantation as one intravenous dose of 0.5, 1.0, or 2.5-3.0×106 cells/kg body weight, with subsequent stepwise tapering of triple immunosuppression to low dose tacrolimus monotherapy until week 48.Main outcome measuresThe primary clinical and safety endpoints were assessed by a composite endpoint at week 60 with further three year follow-up. The assessment included incidence of biopsy confirmed acute rejection, assessment of nTreg infusion related adverse effects, and signs of over immunosuppression. Secondary endpoints addressed allograft functions. Accompanying research included a comprehensive exploratory biomarker portfolio.ResultsFor all patients, nTreg products with sufficient yield, purity, and functionality could be generated from 40-50 mL of peripheral blood taken two weeks before kidney transplantation. None of the three nTreg dose escalation groups had dose limiting toxicity. The nTreg and reference groups had 100% three year allograft survival and similar clinical and safety profiles. Stable monotherapy immunosuppression was achieved in eight of 11 (73%) patients receiving nTregs, while the reference group remained on standard dual or triple drug immunosuppression (P=0.002). Mechanistically, the activation of conventional T cells was reduced and nTregs shifted in vivo from a polyclonal to an oligoclonal T cell receptor repertoire.ConclusionsThe application of autologous nTregs was safe and feasible even in patients who had a kidney transplant and were immunosuppressed. These results warrant further evaluation of Treg efficacy and serve as the basis for the development of next generation nTreg approaches in transplantation and any immunopathologies.Trial registrationNCT02371434 (ONEnTreg13) and EudraCT:2011-004301-24 (ONErgt11).


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi2-vi3
Author(s):  
Marta Penas-Prado ◽  
Shiao-Pei Weathers ◽  
Shouhao Zhou ◽  
Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka ◽  
Barbara O’Brien ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2035-2035
Author(s):  
Marta Penas-Prado ◽  
Katayoun Rezvani ◽  
Shiao-Pei S. Weathers ◽  
Shouhao Zhou ◽  
Carlos Kamiya-Matsuoka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document