scholarly journals Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy for treatment resistant depression: 18-Month follow-up of the Halifax depression trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 273 ◽  
pp. 194-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel M. Town ◽  
Allan Abbass ◽  
Chris Stride ◽  
Abraham Nunes ◽  
Denise Bernier ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 520-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Watts ◽  
Camilla Day ◽  
Jacob Krzanowski ◽  
David Nutt ◽  
Robin Carhart-Harris

Objective: To identify patients’ perceptions of the value of psilocybin as a treatment for depression. Method: Twenty patients enrolled in an open-label trial of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression participated in a semistructured interview at 6-month follow-up. Thematic analysis was used to identify patients’ experiences of the treatment and how it compared with previous treatments. Results: Two main change processes were identified in relation to the treatment. The first concerned change from disconnection (from self, others, and world) to connection, and the second concerned change from avoidance (of emotion) to acceptance. A third theme concerned comparison between psilocybin and conventional treatments. Patients reported that medications and some short-term talking therapies tended to reinforce their sense of disconnection and avoidance, whereas treatment with psilocybin encouraged connection and acceptance. Conclusions: These results suggest that psilocybin treatment for depression may work via paradigmatically novel means, antithetical to antidepressant medications, and some short-term talking therapies.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S334-S334
Author(s):  
Timothy Ming ◽  
Tom Denee ◽  
Gemma Scott ◽  
Joachim Morrens ◽  
Christopher Weatherburn

AimsTo assess the incidence and treatments currently used in clinical practice for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in Scotland.BackgroundPatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have not responded to at least two successive antidepressant (AD) treatments in a single episode are described as having Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). Epidemiological data on TRD in Scotland is lacking. Furthermore, there is no data to our knowledge on therapies prescribed in Scottish clinical practice to treat TRD.MethodA retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) medical records. Adult patients were indexed on AD prescription, requiring MDD diagnosis within 90 days, from Jan 2011-May 2018 with 360-day baseline and 180-day minimum follow-up periods. Failure of ≥2 adequate oral AD regimens following indexing constituted TRD classification. Incidence rates of MDD and TRD (within the MDD cohort) and treatment lines following TRD classification were derived.ResultThe analysis included 20,059 patients with MDD (mean age 44 years, 63% female, median follow-up 59 months); 1,374 (6.8%) were classified as TRD. Median time-to-TRD classification was 25 months. The incidence rate of MDD was 15.9 per 1,000 patient-years and for TRD was 14.7 per 1,000 MDD-patient-years. For all first four post-TRD treatment lines, SSRI monotherapy was the most commonly prescribed therapy, followed by combination (dual/triple) therapy and augmentation therapy (at least one oral AD supplemented with lithium, an antipsychotic or an anticonvulsant therapy). At first-line of TRD treatment, 1,050 (76.4%) patients received monotherapy AD, 212 (15.4%) received combination AD therapy and 112 (8.2%) received augmentation therapy. The most common monotherapy treatments at first-line TRD were sertraline (15.6%), mirtazapine (13.8%), fluoxetine (12.2%) and venlafaxine (11.6%). Among combination therapies, mirtazapine, venlafaxine, sertraline and amitriptyline were frequently used. Among the TRD and MDD cohort, no somatic treatments were coded in CPRD, although the use of these treatments was likely underestimated.ConclusionMonotherapy AD treatment was the most common therapy type for all four post-TRD treatment lines. These data support the need for new treatments that can achieve and maintain therapeutic response, and avoid continuous cycling through similar AD therapies.This study was sponsored by Janssen Cilag Ltd.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Yrondi ◽  
Bruno Aouizerate ◽  
Djamila Bennabi ◽  
Raphaëlle Richieri ◽  
Thierry D'Amato ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 201 (5) ◽  
pp. 369-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abebaw Fekadu ◽  
Lena J. Rane ◽  
Sarah C. Wooderson ◽  
Kalypso Markopoulou ◽  
Lucia Poon ◽  
...  

BackgroundSystematic studies on the outcome of treatment-resistant depression are scarce.AimsTo describe the longer-term outcome and predictors of outcome in treatment-resistant depression.MethodOut of 150 patients approached, 118 participants with confirmed treatment-resistant depression (unipolar, n= 7; bipolar, n=27; secondary, n=14) treated in a specialist in-patient centre were followed-up for between 8 and 84 months (mean=39, s.d.=22).ResultsThe majority of participants attained full remission (60.2%), most of whom (48.3% of total sample) showed sustained recovery (full remission for at least 6 months). A substantial minority had persistent subsyndromal depression (19.5%) or persistent depressive episode (20.3%). Diagnosis of bipolar treatment-resistant depression and poorer social support were associated with early relapse, whereas strong social support, higher educational status and milder level of treatment resistance measured with the Maudsley Staging Method were associated with achieving quicker remission. Exploratory analysis of treatment found positive associations between treatment with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOl) in unipolar treatment-resistant depression and attaining remission at discharge and at final follow-up, and duloxetine use predicted attainment of remission at final follow-up.ConclusionsAlthough many patients with treatment-resistant depression experience persistent symptomatology even after intensive, specialist treatment, most can achieve remission. The choice of treatment and presence of good social support may affect remission rates, whereas those with low social support and a bipolar diathesis should be considered at higher risk of early relapse. We suggest that future work to improve the long-term outcome in this disabling form of depression might focus on social interventions to improve support, and the role of neglected pharmacological interventions such as MAOIs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 168 (5) ◽  
pp. 502-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney H. Kennedy ◽  
Peter Giacobbe ◽  
Sakina J. Rizvi ◽  
Franca M. Placenza ◽  
Yasunori Nishikawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document