scholarly journals Monoclonal antibodies for preventive treatment of episodic and chronic migraine

2015 ◽  
Vol 357 ◽  
pp. e459-e460
Author(s):  
M. Bigal
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Preventive Treatment

scholarly journals Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies Versus Botulinum Neurotoxin a in the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: An Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparison Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao-Yao Chen ◽  
Xiao-Qian Ye ◽  
Tai-Chun Tang ◽  
Tian-Wei She ◽  
Min Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Botulinum Neurotoxin ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Botulinum Neurotoxin A ◽  
Related Peptide ◽  
Calcitonin Gene

Purpose: Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) are new agents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for preventive treatment of chronic migraine. Comparison between CGRPmAbs and previously approved Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) will inform optimal preventive treatment of chronic migraine, but head-to-head trials are lacking. We therefore aimed to perform adjusted indirect comparison between CGRPmAbs and BoNT-A through a meta-analysis.Methods: OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, clinical registries, and government websites were searched from inception to September 2019. Randomized controlled trials comparing CGRPmAbs or BoNT-A with placebo in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine were included. The primary outcomes were headache days and migraine days measured at week 12. Data were synthesized by using a frequentist approach; and the treatments were ranked by P-score.Results: We included 10 trials (n = 4,678) after screening 1049 candidates. Six trials were with low risk of bias. Fremanezumab had an effect similar to BoNT-A in the reduction of headache days at week 12 (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.08, 95%CI -0.55 to -0.7). Galcanezumab reduced more migraine days than BoNT-A at week 12 (SMD, -0.94, 95%CI −1.24 to −0.63); fremanezumab showed similar findings (SMD, −0.55, 95%CI −0.85 to −0.24). Galcanezumab and fremanezumab had better effect in mitigating headache impact at week 12. CGRPmAbs and BoNT-A had similar adverse event rate.Conclusion: CGRPmAbs and BoNT-A had similar effect in the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. BoNT-A might be preferentially selected owing to its cost-effectiveness profiles. Further studies with direct comparison of the two treatments are warranted.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1091-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo E Bigal ◽  
Lars Edvinsson ◽  
Alan M Rapoport ◽  
Richard B Lipton ◽  
Egilius L H Spierings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

Looking for the identikit of refractory chronic migraine patients in the CGRP-monoclonal antibodies scenario: Insight from the real-word experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 119260
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Scotto Di Clemente ◽  
Alessandro Tessitore ◽  
Marcello Silvestro ◽  
Giorgia Battista ◽  
Gioacchino Tedeschi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Real Word ◽  
The Real ◽  
Refractory Chronic Migraine

TOP-PRO study: A randomized double-blind controlled trial of topiramate versus propranolol for prevention of chronic migraine

Cephalalgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 033310242110474
Author(s):  
Debashish Chowdhury ◽  
Luv Bansal ◽  
Ashish Duggal ◽  
Debabrata Datta ◽  
Ankit Mundra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Objective The aim of the TOP-PRO-study, a double-blind randomized controlled trial, was to assess the efficacy (non-inferiority) and tolerability of propranolol compared to topiramate for the prevention of chronic migraine. Background Except for topiramate, oral preventive treatment for chronic migraine lacks credible evidence. Methods Chronic migraine patients aged above 18 years and less than 65 years of age, not on any preventive treatment were randomly allocated to receive topiramate (100 mg/day) or propranolol (160 mg/day). The primary efficacy outcome was the mean change in migraine days per 28 days at the end of 24 weeks from baseline. A mean difference of 1.5 days per four weeks was chosen as the cut-off delta value. Multiple secondary efficacy outcomes and treatment emergent adverse events were also assessed. Results As against the planned sample size of 244, only 175 patients could be enrolled before the spread of the corona virus disease-2019 pandemic and enforcement of lockdown in India. Of the 175 randomized patients, 95 (topiramate 46 and propranolol 49) completed the trial. The mean change in migraine days was −5.3 ± 1.2 vs −7.3 ± 1.1 days (p = 0.226) for topiramate and propranolol groups respectively. Propranolol was found to be non-inferior and not superior to topiramate (point estimate of −1.99 with a 95% confidence interval of −5.23 to 1.25 days). Multiple secondary outcomes also did not differ between the two groups. Intention to treat analysis of 175 patients and per-protocol analysis of 95 patients yielded concordant results. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusion Propranolol (160mg/day) was non-inferior, non-superior to topiramate (100mg/day) for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine and had a comparable tolerability profile. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry-India CTRI/2019/05/018997)

Occipital nerve block for the short-term preventive treatment of migraine: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 959-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esma Dilli ◽  
Rashmi Halker ◽  
Bert Vargas ◽  
Joseph Hentz ◽  
Teresa Radam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Placebo Treatment ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Occipital Nerve ◽  
Occipital Nerve Block ◽  
Severe Migraine

Background Occipital nerve (ON) injections with corticosteroids and/or local anesthetics have been employed for the acute and preventive treatment of migraine for decades. However, to date there is no randomized, placebo-controlled evidence to support the use of occipital nerve block (ONB) for the prevention of migraine. Objective The objective of this article is to determine the efficacy of ONB with local anesthetic and corticosteroid for the preventive treatment of migraine. Participants and methods Patients between 18 and 75 years old with ICHD-II-defined episodic (> 1 attack per week) or chronic migraine (modified ICHD-II as patients with > 10 days with consumption of acute medications were permitted into the study) were randomized to receive either 2.5 ml 0.5% bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml (20 mg) methylprednisolone over the ipsilateral (unilateral headache) or bilateral (bilateral headache) ON or 2.75 ml normal saline plus 0.25 ml 1% lidocaine without epinephrine (placebo). Patients completed a one-month headache diary prior to and after the double-blind injection. The primary outcome measure was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the frequency of days with moderate or severe migraine headache in the four-week post-injection compared to the four-week pre-injection baseline period. Results Thirty-four patients received active and 35 patients received placebo treatment. Because of missing data, the full analysis of 33 patients in the active and 30 patients in the placebo group was analyzed for efficacy. In the active and placebo groups respectively, the mean frequency of at least moderate (mean 9.8 versus 9.5) and severe (3.6 versus 4.3) migraine days and acute medication days (7.9 versus 10.0) were not substantially different at baseline. The percentage of patients with at least a 50% reduction in the frequency of moderate or severe headache days was 30% for both groups (10/30 vs nine of 30, Δ 0.00, 95% CI –0.22 to 0.23). Conclusions Greater ONB does not reduce the frequency of moderate to severe migraine days in patients with episodic or chronic migraine compared to placebo. The study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT00915473).

scholarly journals Inflammatory complications of CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a case series

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason C. Ray ◽  
Penelope Allen ◽  
Ann Bacsi ◽  
Julian J. Bosco ◽  
Luke Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
The Body ◽  
Temporal Association ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
The Central Nervous System

Abstract Background Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is expressed throughout the body and is a known mediator of migraine, exerting this biological effect through activation of trigeminovascular, meningeal and associated neuronal pathways located in close proximity to the central nervous system. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting the CGRP pathway are an effective new preventive treatment for migraine, with a generally favourable adverse event profile. Pre-clinical evidence supports an anti-inflammatory/immunoregulatory role for CGRP in other organ systems, and therefore inhibition of the normal action of this peptide may promote a pro-inflammatory response. Cases We present a case series of eight patients with new or significantly worsened inflammatory pathology in close temporal association with the commencement of CGRP mAb therapy. Conclusion This case series provides novel insights on the potential molecular mechanisms and side-effects of CGRP antagonism in migraine and supports clinical vigilance in patient care going forward.

scholarly journals Migraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1407-1427
Author(s):  
Mr. Ghene Mauli Ganesh
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Medication Overuse ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Primary Headaches ◽  
Brain Disorder ◽  
Current State ◽  
The Common ◽  
Chronic Headaches ◽  
Migrainous Headache

Abstract: Migraine is the most common disabling brain disorder. Chronic migraine, a condition characterized by the experience of migrainous headache on at least 15 days per month, is highly disabling. Patients with chronic migraine present to primary care, are often referred for management to secondary care, and make up a large proportion of patients in specialist headache clinics. Many patients with chronic migraine also have medication overuse, defined as using a compound analgesic, opioid, triptan or ergot derivative on at least 10 days per month. All doctors will encounter patients with chronic headaches. A basic working knowledge of the common primary headaches, and a rational manner of approaching the patient with these conditions, allows a specific diagnosis of chronic migraine to be made quickly and safely, and by making this diagnosis one opens up a substantial number of acute and preventive treatment options. This article discusses the current state of management of chronic migraine.

CGRP monoclonal antibodies early onset of efficacy following four weeks of treatment in chronic migraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 119271
Author(s):  
Francesca Schiano Di Cola ◽  
Salvatore Caratozzolo ◽  
Matteo Cortinovis ◽  
Paolo Liberini ◽  
Renata Rao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Early Onset
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document