Corpus Callosum and Motor Development in Healthy Term Infants

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 192-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaw-Liang Chang ◽  
Kun-Long Hung ◽  
Yi-Chen Yang ◽  
Che-Sheng Ho ◽  
Nan-Chang Chiu
2010 ◽  
Vol 152A (9) ◽  
pp. 2360-2364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meike Hengst ◽  
Jens Tücke ◽  
Klaus Zerres ◽  
Marcus Blaum ◽  
Martin Häusler

1998 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Darrah ◽  
Lynn Redfern ◽  
Thomas O Maguire ◽  
A.Paul Beaulne ◽  
Joe Watt

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 935-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Min Lee ◽  
James Cole Galloway

Background Daily experiences are thought to play an important role in motor development during infancy. There are limited studies on the effect of postural and movement experiences on head control. Objective The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of postural and movement experiences on head control through a comprehensive set of measurements beginning when infants were 1 month old. Design This was a prospective, longitudinal, 2-cohort study. Methods Twenty-two full-term infants who were healthy were randomly assigned to either a training group or a control group. Infants were observed every other week from 1 to 4 months of age. Head control was assessed using a standardized developmental assessment tool, the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP), as well as behavioral coding and kinematics of infants' head postures and movements in a supported sitting position. Caregivers performed at least 20 minutes of daily postural and movement activities (training group), or social interaction (control group) for 4 weeks. Results The training group had higher TIMP scores on head control–related items during the training period and after training stopped compared with the control group. Starting from the during training phase, the training group infants had their heads in a vertical and midline position longer compared with the control group infants. After training stopped, the training group infants actively moved their heads forward more often and for larger distances. Limitations The experiences outside daily training were not monitored, and the results may be specific to the experimental setup for infants with typical development. Conclusions Young infants are able to take advantage of postural and movement experiences to rapidly advance their head control as early as 4 to 6 weeks of postnatal life. Infant positioning, caregiver handling, and caregiver-infant interactions were likely contributing factors. This database of comprehensive measures may be useful in future trials focused on head control in infants with special needs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamis W. Pin ◽  
Penelope B. Butler ◽  
Hon-Ming Cheung ◽  
Sandra Lai-Fong Shum

Abstract Background Trunk control is generally considered to be related to gross motor development. However, this assumption has not been validated with clinical data. This pilot study was the first of its kind to examine the longitudinal development of segmental trunk control and gross motor development from 4 to 12 months of age in typically developing full-term infants. Methods A convenience cohort of 20 healthy full-term infants (mean gestation = 39.0 weeks, SD 1.2; mean birthweight = 2975.0 g, SD 297.0; males = 10) was recruited. All study infants were tested and scored monthly by independent assessors using the Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control and the Alberta Infant Motor Scale from 4 to 12 months of age. Results A developmental trend of segmental trunk control was found in the infants. Static vertical upright trunk control developed prior to active and reactive control. Statistically significant correlations were found between trunk control status and gross motor development mainly in prone and sitting positions from 8 months of age onwards (all p < 0.004, Spearman’s r ranged from 0.644 to 0.798). Conclusions This pilot study provides preliminary clinical evidence to support the inter-dependency between vertical upright trunk control and gross motor development in young infants, particularly as upright functional skills are gained. This suggests that a dual focus on training upright trunk control alongside gross motor skills could be of benefit in the treatment of infants with movement disorders.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 529-537
Author(s):  
Paula Piekkala ◽  
Pentti Kero ◽  
Matti Sillanpää ◽  
Risto Erkkola

In a regional birth cohort of 5,356 live-born infants, during 12 consecutive months, 46 (0.9%) infants suffered from respiratory distress syndrome. Ten of them died before the age of 2 years. The cause of death was respiratory distress syndrome in two cases, intracerebral hemorrhage in four cases, asphyxia in one case, and congenital erythropoetic anemia in one case. Of the 36 survivors, 34 could be traced for the follow-up. Growth and development of the survivors with respiratory distress syndrome were compared with that of 3,375 term infants in the birth cohort with birth weights at the tenth percentile or above with no risk factors recognized during pregnancy, labor, delivery, or the neonatal period. Normal development was found in 85% of the survivors with respiratory distress syndrome and 99% of the control infants at the age of 2 years. Intracerebral hemorrhage and low one- and five-minute Apgar scores were associated with unfavorable outcome at 2 years in the survivors with respiratory distress syndrome. The developmental scores were significantly poorer than those of the controls at 2 years for gross motor, audiovisual, and psychosocial categories, whereas for fine motor development, the difference disappeared by the 2 years of age. The growth of the survivors with respiratory distress syndrome was satisfactory even if their heights remained below that of their control peers.


1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Fujii ◽  
Masanori Kuriyama ◽  
Yukuo Konishi ◽  
Masakazu Saito ◽  
Masakatsu Sudo
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giselle Athayde Xavier Coutinho ◽  
Daniela de Mattos Lemos ◽  
Antônio Prates Caldeira

Introduction The population of children born prematurely has increased in line with improving the quality of perinatal care. It is essential to ensure to these children a healthy development. Objective We evaluate the neuromotor development of a group of preterm infants regularly assisted by a physiotherapy service in comparison to full-term newborns, checking, so the impact of the service. Materials and methods We randomly assigned preterm and full-term infants that formed two distinct groups. The group of preterm infants was inserted into a monitoring program of physiotherapy while the other infants were taken as a control group not receiving any assistance in physiotherapy. The groups were compared using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) at forty-week, four and six months of corrected gestational age and the scores were compared using Student's t-test, assuming a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05). Results The preterm group had significantly lower scores at 40th week compared to the control group, but subsequent scores showed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion The timely and adequate stimulation was efficient to promote the motor development of premature infants included in a follow up clinic.


1980 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 229-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne R Burns ◽  
Margaret I Bullock

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 299
Author(s):  
I. Koerte ◽  
B. Ertl-Wagner ◽  
S. Berweck ◽  
R. Stahl ◽  
V. Brodbeck ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 593-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana P. Restiffe ◽  
José Luiz D. Gherpelli

OBJECTIVE: To compare gross motor development of preterm infants (PT) without cerebral palsy with healthy full-term (FT) infants, according to Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS); to compare the age of walking between PT and FT; and whether the age of walking in PT is affected by neonatal variables. METHODS: Prospective study compared monthly 101 PT and 52 FT, from the first visit, until all AIMS items had been observed. Results: Mean scores were similarity in their progression, except from the eighth to tenth months. FT infants were faster in walking attainment than PT. Birth weight and length and duration of neonatal nursery stay were related to walking delay. CONCLUSION: Gross motor development between PT and FT were similar, except from the eighth to tenth months of age. PT walked later than FT infants and predictive variables were birth weight and length, and duration of neonatal intensive unit stay.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document