The CsNPR1 gene expression modulation in citrus and understanding the defense mechanism against Huanglongbing by screening CsNPR1-interacting proteins

2021 ◽  
Vol 288 ◽  
pp. 110375
Author(s):  
Qianqian Wu ◽  
M. Moniruzzaman ◽  
Huanxue Yan ◽  
Yuanda Lv ◽  
Bo Jiang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 522
Author(s):  
Noreen Falak ◽  
Qari Muhammad Imran ◽  
Adil Hussain ◽  
Byung-Wook Yun

Plants are in continuous conflict with the environmental constraints and their sessile nature demands a fine-tuned, well-designed defense mechanism that can cope with a multitude of biotic and abiotic assaults. Therefore, plants have developed innate immunity, R-gene-mediated resistance, and systemic acquired resistance to ensure their survival. Transcription factors (TFs) are among the most important genetic components for the regulation of gene expression and several other biological processes. They bind to specific sequences in the DNA called transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) that are present in the regulatory regions of genes. Depending on the environmental conditions, TFs can either enhance or suppress transcriptional processes. In the last couple of decades, nitric oxide (NO) emerged as a crucial molecule for signaling and regulating biological processes. Here, we have overviewed the plant defense system, the role of TFs in mediating the defense response, and that how NO can manipulate transcriptional changes including direct post-translational modifications of TFs. We also propose that NO might regulate gene expression by regulating the recruitment of RNA polymerase during transcription.


2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1693-1707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Qin ◽  
Yoh Sakuma ◽  
Lam-Son Phan Tran ◽  
Kyonoshin Maruyama ◽  
Satoshi Kidokoro ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. E. Vorontsova ◽  
R. O. Cherezov ◽  
O. G. Zatsepina ◽  
M. S. Slezinger ◽  
B. A. Kuzin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
ROSSANA FRANZIN ◽  
Fabio Sallustio ◽  
Claudia Curci ◽  
Simona Simone ◽  
Angela Picerno ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Cisplatin, is a nonspecific cytotoxic agent that primarily interferes with cellular DNA replication and the cell cycle, nevertheless it lacks tumor selectivity and acts also in normal cells. The most serious adverse reaction of cisplatin is Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), limiting its use and efficacy in chemotherapy. Cisplatin nephrotoxicity is observed in more than 30% of older patients, however the mechanism of nephrotoxicity remains unclear and specific preventive measures are not available. Today, there is an urgent need for specific nephroprotective strategies to be used during cisplatin chemotherapy. Recently, we found that tubular stem/progenitor cells (tARPC) are able to protect the tubular epithelial (RPTEC) from cisplatin induced injury, preserving their proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis. The aim of this study was to identify the molecular mechanisms involved in tARPC-mediated resistance to cisplatin. Method Co-cultures of RPTEC cells and tARPCs were exposed to cisplatin (2.5 µM) for 6 h and then kept in culture for 96 h. Gene expression profile was obtained from tARPCs and RPTECs by Agilent SurePrint G3 Human Gene Expression Microarrays. Genespring and R software were used for the analysis. Gene expression data were validated by Real-time PCR. Extracellular vesicles were isolated from cell culture supernatant by miRCURY Exosome Cell/Urine/CSF Kit (Qiagen) and RNA contained in extracellular vesicles was purified, analyzed in quality by Bioanalyzer (RNA nano) and evaluated by qPCR. The BrdU assay and caspase 3 were used to measure proliferation and apoptosis levels. Immunohistochemical expression of activated caspase-3 was used as a marker of apoptosis in RPTECs. Results By a whole-genome gene expression analysis, we found 107 genes specifically modulated by RPTECs in response to cisplatin and, among these, 30 genes induced by ARPCs following the cisplatin damage. In particular, we found a strong upregulation of the CYP1B1 gene (false discovery rate corrected p value <0.05; fold change=4,1). The qPCR confirmed the increase in CYP1B1 levels in the co-cultures with respect to the respective basal conditions (p <0.05). Interestingly, the CYP1B1 mRNA was also enveloped in Extracellular Vesicles released in the cell co-culture media by tARPC and RPTEC after cisplatin exposition. The CYP1B1 gene encodes a member of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes and the produced enzyme metabolizes procarcinogens, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. CYP1B1 has been shown to be active within tumors and is also capable of metabolizing a structurally diverse range of anticancer drugs. It is responsible for the resistance to docetaxel, cisplatin, tamoxifen and nucleoside analogues. CYP1B1 is involved in the detoxification of the body by various exogenous toxic agents, including cisplatin. We found that CYP1B1 gene was expressed at low levels in RPTECs and in cisplatin-damaged RPTECs. Moreover, 96 h days after 2.5 μM exposure to cisplatin, RPTECs reduced the proliferation and underwent in apoptosis, as showed by caspase 3. However, in co-culture with ARPCs, ARPC cellular and extracellular vesicles CYP1B1 gene expression significantly increased, the apoptotic process was stopped and RPTECs increased their proliferation rate. These data support the hypothesis that ARPCs are sensor of cisplatin damaged-RPTEC and confers cisplatin resistance by transferring CYP1B1 gene in extracellular vesicles. Conclusion This is the first evidence of a cisplatin-induced overexpression of CYP1b1 in renal epithelial cells as a defense mechanism against cisplatin toxicity. This is consistent with our previous data showing that renal progenitors are resistant to cisplatin. The findings may have biological and clinical significance in terms of their implications in cellular communications and potential use of CYP1B1 as biomarkers for AKI induced by cisplatin or as protective agent.


Plants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1121
Author(s):  
Mehede Hassan Rubel ◽  
Md. Abuyusuf ◽  
Ujjal Kumar Nath ◽  
Arif Hasan Khan Robin ◽  
Hee Jeong Jung ◽  
...  

Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) is an economically important crop in the family Brassicaceae. Black rot disease is a top ranked cabbage disease, which is caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) and may reduce 50% crop loss. Therefore, we need a clear understanding of black rot disease resistance for sustainable disease management. The secondary metabolites, like Glucosinolate (GSL) presents in Brassica species, which plays a potential role in the defense mechanism against pathogens. However, there is little known about GSL-regulated resistance mechanisms and GSL biosynthesis and the breakdown related gene expression after black rot disease infection in cabbage. In this study, relative expression of 43 biosynthetic and breakdown related GSLs were estimated in the black rot resistant and susceptible cabbage lines after Xcc inoculation. Ten different types of GSL from both aliphatic and indolic groups were identified in the contrasting cabbage lines by HPLC analysis, which included six aliphatic and four indolic compounds. In the resistant line, nine genes (MYB122-Bol026204, MYB34-Bol017062, AOP2-Bo9g006240, ST5c-Bol030757, CYP81F1-Bol017376, CYP81F2-Bol012237, CYP81F4-Bol032712, CYP81F4-Bol032714 and PEN2-Bol030092) showed consistent expression patterns. Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed positive and significant association between aliphatic GSL compounds and expression values of ST5c-Bol030757 and AOP2-Bo9g006240 genes as well as between indolic GSL compounds and the expression of MYB34-Bol017062, MYB122-Bol026204, CYP81F2-Bol012237, CYP81F4-Bol032712 and CYP81F4-Bol032714 genes. This study helps in understanding the role of GSL biosynthesis and breakdown related genes for resistance against black rot pathogen in cabbage, which could be further confirmed through functional characterization either by overexpression or knock-out mutation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1700217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Marx ◽  
Clemens Grünwald-Gruber ◽  
Nina Bydlinski ◽  
Heena Dhiman ◽  
Ly Ngoc Nguyen ◽  
...  

BMC Genomics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro J Alcolea ◽  
Ana Alonso ◽  
Manuel J Gomez ◽  
Alicia Sanchez-Gorostiaga ◽  
Mercedes Moreno-Paz ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document