Paternal influence on the timing of DNA replication in pronuclei during the first cell cycle of bovine zygote

1998 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 269
Author(s):  
P. Comizzoli ◽  
Y. Heyman ◽  
J.P. Renard
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Paternal Influence

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

scholarly journals Regulation of DNA Replication Licensing and Re-Replication by Cdt1

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 5195
Author(s):  
Hui Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Repair Synthesis ◽  
Ubiquitin E3 Ligase

In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication licensing is precisely regulated to ensure that the initiation of genomic DNA replication in S phase occurs once and only once for each mitotic cell division. A key regulatory mechanism by which DNA re-replication is suppressed is the S phase-dependent proteolysis of Cdt1, an essential replication protein for licensing DNA replication origins by loading the Mcm2-7 replication helicase for DNA duplication in S phase. Cdt1 degradation is mediated by CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase, which further requires Cdt1 binding to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) through a PIP box domain in Cdt1 during DNA synthesis. Recent studies found that Cdt2, the specific subunit of CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase that targets Cdt1 for degradation, also contains an evolutionarily conserved PIP box-like domain that mediates the interaction with PCNA. These findings suggest that the initiation and elongation of DNA replication or DNA damage-induced repair synthesis provide a novel mechanism by which Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2 are both recruited onto the trimeric PCNA clamp encircling the replicating DNA strands to promote the interaction between Cdt1 and CRL4Cdt2. The proximity of PCNA-bound Cdt1 to CRL4Cdt2 facilitates the destruction of Cdt1 in response to DNA damage or after DNA replication initiation to prevent DNA re-replication in the cell cycle. CRL4Cdt2 ubiquitin E3 ligase may also regulate the degradation of other PIP box-containing proteins, such as CDK inhibitor p21 and histone methylase Set8, to regulate DNA replication licensing, cell cycle progression, DNA repair, and genome stability by directly interacting with PCNA during DNA replication and repair synthesis.

scholarly journals Targeting Non-Oncogene Addiction for Cancer Therapy

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Hae Ryung Chang ◽  
Eunyoung Jung ◽  
Soobin Cho ◽  
Young-Jun Jeon ◽  
Yonghwan Kim
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Oncogene Addiction ◽  
Clinical Biomarkers ◽  
Cycle Regulation

While Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and technological advances have been useful in identifying genetic profiles of tumorigenesis, novel target proteins and various clinical biomarkers, cancer continues to be a major global health threat. DNA replication, DNA damage response (DDR) and repair, and cell cycle regulation continue to be essential systems in targeted cancer therapies. Although many genes involved in DDR are known to be tumor suppressor genes, cancer cells are often dependent and addicted to these genes, making them excellent therapeutic targets. In this review, genes implicated in DNA replication, DDR, DNA repair, cell cycle regulation are discussed with reference to peptide or small molecule inhibitors which may prove therapeutic in cancer patients. Additionally, the potential of utilizing novel synthetic lethal genes in these pathways is examined, providing possible new targets for future therapeutics. Specifically, we evaluate the potential of TONSL as a novel gene for targeted therapy. Although it is a scaffold protein with no known enzymatic activity, the strategy used for developing PCNA inhibitors can also be utilized to target TONSL. This review summarizes current knowledge on non-oncogene addiction, and the utilization of synthetic lethality for developing novel inhibitors targeting non-oncogenic addiction for cancer therapy.

scholarly journals Polycomb proteins control proliferation and transformation independently of cell cycle checkpoints by regulating DNA replication

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Piunti ◽  
Alessandra Rossi ◽  
Aurora Cerutti ◽  
Mareike Albert ◽  
Sriganesh Jammula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Polycomb Proteins

Evaluation of genomic sequence-based growth rate methods for synchronized Synechococcus cultures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Carroll ◽  
Nicolas Van Oostende ◽  
Bess B. Ward
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Growth Rates ◽  
Genomic Sequence ◽  
Niche Differentiation ◽  
Trophic Levels ◽  
Individual Species ◽  
Cell Counts

Standard methods for calculating microbial growth rates (μ) through the use of proxies, such as in situ fluorescence, cell cycle, or cell counts, are critical for determining the magnitude of the role bacteria play in marine carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycles. Taxon-specific growth rates in mixed assemblages would be useful for attributing biogeochemical processes to individual species and understanding niche differentiation among related clades, such as found in Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus . We tested three novel DNA sequencing-based methods (iRep, bPTR, and GRiD) for evaluating growth of light synchronized Synechococcus cultures under different light intensities and temperatures. In vivo fluorescence and cell cycle analysis were used to obtain standard estimates of growth rate for comparison with the sequence-based methods (SBM). None of the SBM values were correlated with growth rates calculated by standard techniques despite the fact that all three SBM were correlated with percentage of cells in S phase (DNA replication) over the diel cycle. Inaccuracy in determining the time of maximum DNA replication is unlikely to account entirely for the absence of relationship between SBM and growth rate, but the fact that most microbes in the surface ocean exhibit some degree of diel cyclicity is a caution for application of these methods. SBM correlate with DNA replication but cannot be interpreted quantitatively in terms of growth rate. Importance Small but abundant, cyanobacterial strains such as the photosynthetic Synechococcus spp. are essential because they contribute significantly to primary productivity in the ocean. These bacteria generate oxygen and provide biologically-available carbon, which is essential for organisms at higher trophic levels. The small size and diversity of natural microbial assemblages means that taxon-specific activities (e.g., growth rate) are difficult to obtain in the field. It has been suggested that sequence-based methods (SBM) may be able to solve this problem. We find, however, that SBM can detect DNA replication and are correlated with phases of the cell cycle but cannot be interpreted in terms of absolute growth rate for Synechococcus cultures growing under a day-night cycle, like that experienced in the ocean.

A murine replication protein accumulates temporarily in the heterochromatic regions of nuclei prior to initiation of DNA replication

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 927-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Starborg ◽  
E. Brundell ◽  
K. Gell ◽  
C. Larsson ◽  
I. White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Metaphase Chromosomes ◽  
Licensing Factor ◽  
Mammalian Homologue ◽  
Initiation Of Dna Replication

We have analyzed the expression of the murine P1 gene, the mammalian homologue of the yeast MCM3 protein, during the mitotic cell cycle. The MCM3 protein has previously been shown to be of importance for initiation of DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that the murine P1 protein was present in the nuclei of mammalian cells throughout interphase of the cell cycle. This is in contrast to the MCM3 protein, which is located in the nuclei of yeast cells only between the M and the S phase of the cell cycle. Detailed analysis of the intranuclear localization of the P1 protein during the cell cycle revealed that it accumulates transiently in the heterochromatic regions towards the end of G1. The accumulation of the P1 protein in the heterochromatic regions prior to activation of DNA replication suggests that the mammalian P1 protein is also of importance for initiation of DNA replication. The MCM2-3.5 proteins have been suggested to represent yeast equivalents of a hypothetical replication licensing factor initially described in Xenopus. Our data support this model and indicate that the murine P1 protein could function as replication licensing factor. The chromosomal localization of the P1 gene was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization to region 6p12 in human metaphase chromosomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document