scholarly journals Closures of locally divergent orbits of maximal tori and values of homogeneous forms

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-36
Author(s):  
GEORGE TOMANOV

Abstract Let ${\mathbf {G}}$ be a semisimple algebraic group over a number field K, $\mathcal {S}$ a finite set of places of K, $K_{\mathcal {S}}$ the direct product of the completions $K_{v}, v \in \mathcal {S}$ , and ${\mathcal O}$ the ring of $\mathcal {S}$ -integers of K. Let $G = {\mathbf {G}}(K_{\mathcal {S}})$ , $\Gamma = {\mathbf {G}}({\mathcal O})$ and $\pi :G \rightarrow G/\Gamma $ the quotient map. We describe the closures of the locally divergent orbits ${T\pi (g)}$ where T is a maximal $K_{\mathcal {S}}$ -split torus in G. If $\# S = 2$ then the closure $\overline {T\pi (g)}$ is a finite union of T-orbits stratified in terms of parabolic subgroups of ${\mathbf {G}} \times {\mathbf {G}}$ and, consequently, $\overline {T\pi (g)}$ is homogeneous (i.e. $\overline {T\pi (g)}= H\pi (g)$ for a subgroup H of G) if and only if ${T\pi (g)}$ is closed. On the other hand, if $\# \mathcal {S}> 2$ and K is not a $\mathrm {CM}$ -field then $\overline {T\pi (g)}$ is homogeneous for ${\mathbf {G}} = \mathbf {SL}_{n}$ and, generally, non-homogeneous but squeezed between closed orbits of two reductive subgroups of equal semisimple K-ranks for ${\mathbf {G}} \neq \mathbf {SL}_{n}$ . As an application, we prove that $\overline {f({\mathcal O}^{n})} = K_{\mathcal {S}}$ for the class of non-rational locally K-decomposable homogeneous forms $f \in K_{\mathcal {S}}[x_1, \ldots , x_{n}]$ .

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 773-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Cao

Let $G$ be a connected linear algebraic group over a number field $k$. Let $U{\hookrightarrow}X$ be a $G$-equivariant open embedding of a $G$-homogeneous space $U$ with connected stabilizers into a smooth $G$-variety $X$. We prove that $X$ satisfies strong approximation with Brauer–Manin condition off a set $S$ of places of $k$ under either of the following hypotheses:(i)$S$ is the set of archimedean places;(ii)$S$ is a non-empty finite set and $\bar{k}^{\times }=\bar{k}[X]^{\times }$.The proof builds upon the case $X=U$, which has been the object of several works.


2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
YEN-MEI J. CHEN ◽  
YEN-LIANG KUAN

AbstractLet $\Bbb A$ be a commutative algebraic group defined over a number field K. For a prime ℘ in K where $\Bbb A$ has good reduction, let N℘,n be the number of n-torsion points of the reduction of $\Bbb A$ modulo ℘ where n is a positive integer. When $\Bbb A$ is of dimension one and n is relatively prime to a fixed finite set of primes depending on $\Bbb A_{/K}$, we determine the average values of N℘,n as the prime ℘ varies. This average value as a function of n always agrees with a divisor function.


Author(s):  
LUCAS FRESSE ◽  
IVAN PENKOV

AbstractLet G be one of the ind-groups GL(∞), O(∞), Sp(∞), and let P1, ..., Pℓ be an arbitrary set of ℓ splitting parabolic subgroups of G. We determine all such sets with the property that G acts with finitely many orbits on the ind-variety X1 × × Xℓ where Xi = G/Pi. In the case of a finite-dimensional classical linear algebraic group G, the analogous problem has been solved in a sequence of papers of Littelmann, Magyar–Weyman–Zelevinsky and Matsuki. An essential difference from the finite-dimensional case is that already for ℓ = 2, the condition that G acts on X1 × X2 with finitely many orbits is a rather restrictive condition on the pair P1, P2. We describe this condition explicitly. Using the description we tackle the most interesting case where ℓ = 3, and present the answer in the form of a table. For ℓ ≥ 4 there always are infinitely many G-orbits on X1 × × Xℓ.


2020 ◽  
pp. 12-23
Author(s):  
Vadym Chuiko ◽  
Valerii Atamanchuk-Angel

Almost all philosophy about the state system has concentrated on the authorities. Any function of the state can be represented as a superposition of the functions of violence / coercion. Ultimately, the state appears to be a kind of plurality of subjects with a definite crater power / coercion / violence operation on it. The algebra of trust on the multiplicity of owners of themselves, endowed with free future, is each of them is only a part of nature, еру carrier of the part of the general human culture, and for their completeness, they have and understand the need for the Other. This is the philosophy of solving political, environmental, and climate challenges not through violent / voluntaristic methods, but by the recognition of sovereign rights and the search for ways to achieve sustainable development. Any cracy / power / coercion / violence must be separated from the models of society, the state. Public agreement is not an agreement with the abstract notion of the state, but an agreement with definite elected people who have gained the trust of those to whom they temporarily render their services. Contract is temporary, limited by period, with obligatory full responsibility of the parties. Scientific novelty. For more than two thousand years, long before Aristotle and Plato, European philosophical thought, reflecting on the structure of society, wanders in the labyrinths of kratia. Modern achievements of mathematics provide an opportunity to build ideal political objects, and a direct product of material and ideal government building. (Example of a trust algebra [4].)


1979 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 121-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Shirai

Let Q be the rational number field, K/Q be a maximal Abelian extension whose degree is some power of a prime l, and let f(K) be the conductor of K/Q; if l = 2, let K be complex, and if in addition f(K) ≡ 0 (mod 2), let f(K) ≡ 0 (mod 16). Denote by (K) the Geschlechtermodul of K over Q and by K̂ the maximal central l-extension of K/Q contained in the ray class field mod (K) of K. A. Fröhlich [1, Theorem 4] completely determined the Galois group of K̂ over Q in purely rational terms. The proof is based on [1, Theorem 3], though he did not write the proof in the case f(K) ≡ 0 (mod 16). Moreover he gave a classification theory of all class two extensions over Q whose degree is a power of l. Hence we know the set of fields of nilpotency class two over Q, because a finite nilpotent group is a direct product of all its Sylow subgroups. But the theory becomes cumbersome, and it is desirable to reconstruct a more elementary one.


1975 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 121-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeru Takeuchi

In this paper we shall investigate the structure of complex Lie groups from function theoretical points of view. A. Morimoto proved in [10] that every connected complex Lie group G has the smallest closed normal connected complex Lie subgroup Ge, such that the factor group G/Ge is Stein. On the other hand there hold the following two basic structure theorems (A1) and (A2) for a connected algebraic group G (cf. [12]). (A1): G has the smallest normal algebraic subgroup N such that the factor group G/N is an affine algebraic group. Moreover N is a connected central subgroup. (A2): G has the unique maximal connected affine algebraic subgroup L, where L is normal and the factor group G/L is an abelian variety.


2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-406
Author(s):  
David McKinnon

AbstractLet V be a K3 surface defined over a number field k. The Batyrev-Manin conjecture for V states that for every nonempty open subset U of V, there exists a finite set ZU of accumulating rational curves such that the density of rational points on U − ZU is strictly less than the density of rational points on ZU. Thus, the set of rational points of V conjecturally admits a stratification corresponding to the sets ZU for successively smaller sets U.In this paper, in the case that V is a Kummer surface, we prove that the Batyrev-Manin conjecture for V can be reduced to the Batyrev-Manin conjecture for V modulo the endomorphisms of V induced by multiplication by m on the associated abelian surface A. As an application, we use this to show that given some restrictions on A, the set of rational points of V which lie on rational curves whose preimages have geometric genus 2 admits a stratification of Batyrev-Manin type.


1957 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Ono

Let K be any field, and L a separable extension of K of finite degree. L has a structure of vector space over K, and we shall denote this space by V. The space of endomorphisms of V will be denoted by Let x be any element of L, and N(x) the norm of x relative to the extension L/K. N is then a function defined on V with values in K. We shall call N the norm form on V. The multiplicative groups of non-zero elements of K and L will be denoted by K* and L* respectively. Let H be any subgroup of if K*. Then the elements z of L* such that N(z)∈H form a subgroup of L*, which we shall denote by GH. On the other hand the elements s of such that N(sx) = Λ(s)N(x) with Λ(s)∈H for all X∈V, form obviously a subgroup of GL(V), which we shall denote by becomes an algebraic group if H=K* or {1}. In case will mean the group of linear transformations of V leaving semi-invariant the norm form of L/K and in case will mean the group of linear transformations of V leaving invariant the norm form of L/K.


1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1493-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Breiman

The theory behind the success of adaptive reweighting and combining algorithms (arcing) such as Adaboost (Freund & Schapire, 1996a, 1997) and others in reducing generalization error has not been well understood. By formulating prediction as a game where one player makes a selection from instances in the training set and the other a convex linear combination of predictors from a finite set, existing arcing algorithms are shown to be algorithms for finding good game strategies. The minimax theorem is an essential ingredient of the convergence proofs. An arcing algorithm is described that converges to the optimal strategy. A bound on the generalization error for the combined predictors in terms of their maximum error is proven that is sharper than bounds to date. Schapire, Freund, Bartlett, and Lee (1997) offered an explanation of why Adaboost works in terms of its ability to produce generally high margins. The empirical comparison of Adaboost to the optimal arcing algorithm shows that their explanation is not complete.


Author(s):  
Andrea Moro

Understanding the nature and the structure of human language coincides with capturing the constraints which make a conceivable language possible or, equivalently, with discovering whether there can be any impossible languages at all. This book explores these related issues, paralleling the effort of a biologist who attempts at describing the class of impossible animals. In biology, one can appeal for example to physical laws of nature (such as entropy or gravity) but when it comes to language the path becomes intricate and difficult for the physical laws cannot be exploited. In linguistics, in fact, there are two distinct empirical domains to explore: on the one hand, the formal domain of syntax, where different languages are compared trying to understand how much they can differ; on the other, the neurobiological domain, where the flow of information through the complex neural networks and the electric code exploited by neurons is uncovered and measured. By referring to the most advanced experiments in Neurolinguistics the book in fact offers an updated descriptions of modern linguistics and allows the reader to formulate new and surprising questions. Moreover, since syntax - the capacity to generate novel structures (sentences) by recombining a finite set of elements (words) - is the fingerprint of all and only human languages this books ultimately deals with the fundamental questions which characterize the search for our origins.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document