Block Ownership, Trading Activity, and Market Liquidity

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1403-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Brockman ◽  
Dennis Y. Chung ◽  
Xuemin (Sterling) Yan
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Informed Trading ◽  
Secondary Market ◽  
Market Liquidity ◽  
Inverse Relation ◽  
Trading Activity ◽  
Relative Lack ◽  
Friction Effect ◽  
The Impact

AbstractWe examine the impact of block ownership on the firm’s trading activity and secondary-market liquidity. Our empirical results show that block ownership takes potential trading activity off the table relative to a diffuse ownership structure and impairs the firm’s market liquidity. These adverse liquidity effects disappear, however, once we control for trading activity. Our findings suggest that block ownership is detrimental to the firm’s market liquidity because of its adverse impact on trading activity—a real friction effect. After controlling for this real friction effect, we find little evidence that block ownership has a negative impact on informational friction. Our results suggest that the relative lack of trading, and not the threat of informed trading, explains the inverse relation between block ownership and market liquidity.

A Comparative Analysis of Drivers of Secondary Market Liquidity in Financial Markets for Investment Analysis

2019 ◽  
pp. 340-366
Author(s):  
Hakki Karatas ◽  
Nildag Basak Ceylan ◽  
Ayhan Kapusuzoglu
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Stock Markets ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Bond Market ◽  
Secondary Market ◽  
Market Liquidity ◽  
Investment Analysis ◽  
Secondary Bond ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of this chapter is to examine the drivers of secondary bond market and stock market liquidity for investment analysis after global financial crisis in Turkey. The literature in Turkey mainly focuses only on the volatility of return for driving liquidity in both bond and stock markets. However, it is argued that other types of volatilities including domestic and international volatilities have also a deteriorating impact on secondary market liquidity in Turkey. In this context, it is empirically tested whether the volatility and/or uncertainty that stem from the FED and ECB policies within the last 10 years had a negative impact on liquidity both in government bond and stock markets. Moreover, the impact of non-residents in bond and stock markets on secondary market liquidity is examined by including their holdings in stock and bond market.

scholarly journals The Impact of Private Ownership Structure on Risk Taking by Pakistani Banks: An Empirical Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sajjad Hussain ◽  
Muhammad Muhaizam Bin Musa Musa ◽  
Muhammad Muhaizam Bin Musa Musa ◽  
Abdelnaser Omran Ali
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Risk Taking ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Bank Risk ◽  
Private Ownership ◽  
Private Banks ◽  
The Impact

The financial crisis of 2007-09 was converted the focus of researchers and regulators toward bank risk-taking and this study is also analyzed the private ownership structure impact on Pakistani bank’s risk-taking. This study selects the all Pakistani private banks for investigation and data is collected from financial statements from 2005 to 2016. Most of the past studies found a negative impact of private ownership structure on bank risk-taking and this study is also indicated the negative relationship between private ownership and bank risk-taking. On the other, non-performing loans are double than the international standards that highlighted the owner’s attention toward high risky investments for high return. Thus, this study suggests that check this relationship with other factors that forced the owner’s behavior toward risk.

scholarly journals Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance and Capital Structure of Non-Financial Firms of Pakistan

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-46
Author(s):  
Hassan Ahmad ◽  
Nasreen Akhter ◽  
Tariq Siddiq ◽  
Zahid Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Debt Ratio ◽  
Significant Negative Impact ◽  
The Impact

This study is undertaken with the purpose of investigating the impact of ownership structure and corporate governance on the capital structure of Pakistani listed firms from 2011-2014, feasible general least square is used to investigate the impact of ownership structure and corporate governance on capital structure of KSE 100 index firms. Explanatory variables include ownership concentration, managerial ownership, foreign ownership, institutional ownership, board size, board independence and CEO duality along with the three control variables namely firm size, firm profitability and liquidity. There is insignificant positive relationship between ownership concentration and capital structure, managerial ownership has a significant negative impact on debt ratio. Foreign ownership has also a significant negative impact on firm capital structure and institutional ownership has significant positive impact on capital structure. Board size is positively related to capital structure, board independence also positively related to firm’s debt ratio but CEO duality negatively related to the dependent variable, all these variables have significant impact on capital structure of Pakistani firms. 

scholarly journals The Role of Ownership Structure and Board Characteristics in Stock Market Liquidity

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Wajih Abbassi ◽  
Ahmed Imran Hunjra ◽  
Suha Mahmoud Alawi ◽  
Rashid Mehmood
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Stock Market ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Fixed Effect Model ◽  
Market Liquidity ◽  
Board Characteristics ◽  
Stock Market Liquidity ◽  
The Impact

Corporate governance plays a significant role in the value of shareholders and share prices, hence stock market liquidity is affected. Previous research has mainly focused on the issue in developed markets, whereas in developing countries there is a need to analyze the influence of corporate governance on stock market liquidity. Therefore, the present study aims to examine the impact of ownership structure and board characteristics on stock market liquidity of non-financial firms of South Asian countries such as Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and India. The data in the study is collected from the DataStream for the 2011–2020 period. The study uses a fixed effect model for the analysis of the data and hypotheses testing and generalized method of moments (GMM) is used to check the robustness of the results. The findings of the study indicate that institutional ownership, board size, board independence, and CEO duality have a significant and positive impact on stock market liquidity, whereas managerial ownership has a significant and negative effect on stock market liquidity.

scholarly journals Secondary Market Liquidity and Primary Market Pricing of Corporate Bonds

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Goldstein ◽  
Edith S. Hotchkiss ◽  
David J. Pedersen
Keyword(s):  
Asset Prices ◽  
Cost Of Capital ◽  
Secondary Market ◽  
Market Liquidity ◽  
Corporate Bond ◽  
Yield Spread ◽  
Market Pricing ◽  
Yield Spreads ◽  
Ex Ante ◽  
The Impact

This paper studies the link between secondary market liquidity for a corporate bond and the bond’s yield spread at issuance. Using ex-ante measures of expected liquidity at the time of issuance, based on the characteristics of the underwriting syndicate, we find an economically large impact of liquidity on yield spreads. We estimate that a 10% increase in expected liquidity implies a decrease in the yield spread at issuance of between 8% and 14%. Our results suggest that liquidity has an important effect on firms’ cost of capital, and they contribute to the literature which examines the impact of liquidity on asset prices.

scholarly journals Stock market liquidity, the great lockdown and the COVID-19 global pandemic nexus in MENA countries

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas Alaoui Mdaghri ◽  
Abdessamad Raghibi ◽  
Cuong Nguyen Thanh ◽  
Lahsen Oubdi
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Market Liquidity ◽  
Mena Region ◽  
Stock Market Returns ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mena Countries ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Stock Market Liquidity ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of the global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on stock market liquidity, while taking into account the depth and tightness dimensions.Design/methodology/approachThe author used a panel data regression on stock market dataset, representing 314 listed firms operating in six Middle East and North African (MENA) countries from February to May 2020.FindingsThe regression results on the overall sample indicate that the liquidity related to the depth measure was positively correlated with the growth in the confirmed number of cases and deaths and stringency index. Moreover, the market depth was positively related to the confirmed cases of COVID-19. The results also indicate that the liquidity of small cap and big cap firms was significantly impacted by the confirmed number of cases, while the stringency index is only significant for the liquidity depth measure. Moreover, the results regarding sectors and country level analysis confirmed that COVID-19 had a significant and negative impact of stock market liquidity.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper confirms that the global coronavirus pandemic has decreased the stock market liquidity in terms of both the depth and the tightness dimensions.Originality/valueWhile most empirical papers focused on the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on stock market returns, this paper investigated liquidity chock at firm level in the MENA region using both tightness and depth dimensions.

scholarly journals Ownership structure and corporate diversification decision: a study of Vietnamese listed firms

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duc Nam Phung ◽  
Thi Bich Nguyet Phan ◽  
Thi Lien Hoa Nguyen ◽  
Thi Phuong Vy Le
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
State Ownership ◽  
Corporate Diversification ◽  
Diversification Strategy ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
The Impact

This research examines the impact of the ownership structure on corporate diversification decision of listed firms in Vietnam over the period of 2007 and 2012. The empirical results from logit model show that while state ownership has positive impact on corporate diversification decisions of the firms, foreign ownership has negative impact on corporate diversification decision of the firms. This implies that government ownership tends to encourage corporate diversification strategy, while foreign ownership may plays monitoring role and discourage corporate diversification strategy in emerging market context.

scholarly journals The Impact of Investors Overconfidence on Trading Activities and Stock Returns in Pakistan Stock Exchange

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-31
Author(s):  
MUHAMMAD TAHIR KHAN ◽  
GHAYYUR QADIR ◽  
SHAH RAZA KHAN ◽  
ABDUL LATIF
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Trading Activity ◽  
Monthly Return ◽  
Auto Regressive ◽  
Real Value ◽  
Trading Activities ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Impact

This study investigates the hypothesis of investor overconfidence that impact stock activity and stock return, using vector auto regressive model. Data observed consist of Monthly and daily returns from PSX 100 index. The results of the study shows that there are specific months in which the variables respond to each other or they are some actions that appears after some interval or else there is no significant relationship of current monthly return to past months volume, volume with volatility in stock returns as it is not increased with increase in volume. And there is no relationship of current monthly volume with previous market returns, Investor overconfidence has negative impact on trading activity as it keep them high and exaggerated level as it is not the real value of the securities and it may harm the investors. The results further marked that immediate past month return has an impact on current trading activity that is denoted from volume of trade.

scholarly journals Liquidity of the Chinese Agricultural Futures Market and Its Impact on Futures Price—Based on High-Frequency Data

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4579
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Xu ◽  
Chongguang Li
Keyword(s):  
Opposite Effect ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Asset Returns ◽  
Informed Trading ◽  
Price Impact ◽  
Market Liquidity ◽  
Agricultural Commodity ◽  
Agricultural Futures ◽  
Liquidity Costs ◽  
The Impact

This study examines the price impact of intraday trading activity and daily market liquidity of Chinese agricultural futures by analyzing continuous intraday 15-min and daily trading datasets, respectively. Corn and soybean, the necessity of the nation and people’s survival in China, are taken as case studies. Our main findings are threefold. Firstly, there is evidence of the presence of informed trading through persistent effects of trade size for both purchases and sales. The magnitude of effects and the seasonality of informed trading vary among varieties, which support the importance of night trading for price smoothing. Secondly, the impact of liquidity costs on returns does not permanently persist. For example, there appears a significant Friday effect with a linear negative relationship in the soybean market, while an exact opposite effect can be found in the corn market for Monday. Thirdly, while the results show no effect of holding position on asset returns in the corn market, the market size of soybean futures exerts a positive Thursday effect, which is prior to the Friday effect of transaction cost. A better understanding of liquidity costs and liquidity pricing is of great significance to a sustainable development of the agricultural commodity market in China.

Impact of Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance on Capital Structure: The case of Vietnamese Firms

2013 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 11-19
Author(s):  
Do Xuan-Quang ◽  
Wu Zhong-Xin
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Pecking Order Theory ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
Corporate Ownership Structure ◽  
The Impact

This article attempts to explore how corporate governance and ownership structure affect capital structure in the context of an emerging economy like Vietnam by considering impact level of three groups of factors which are corporate governance, ownership structure and firm elements. Method of Multivariable Regression Analysis used with cross-panel data collected from non-financial firms listed on Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchanges in the period 2009-2012 shows that corporate governance measures have a significant impact on decision of capital structure, while ownership structure has not given evidences with statistical significance of its impact on capital structure choice, except the fact that managerial ownership has negative impact on capital structure of State-owned Enterprises (SOEs). Especially, the study shows that characteristics which cause effects on corporate governance measures of Vietnamese SOEs include Board size, Non-executive Directors (NEDs), CEO duality and corporate ownership structure. Besides, pecking – order theory can explain basically the impact of classical firm elements such as growth, profitability, tangibility and firm size on capital structure of Vietnamese firms. Finally, our research concludes that ownership structure and corporate governance have a certain impact on decisions of capital structure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document