scholarly journals Evidence for functional GABAA but not GABAC receptors in mouse cone photoreceptors

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sercan Deniz ◽  
Eric Wersinger ◽  
Serge Picaud ◽  
Michel J. Roux
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Gaba Receptors ◽  
Information Transfer ◽  
Direct Action ◽  
Synaptic Cleft ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Morphological Criteria

AbstractAt the first retinal synapse, horizontal cells (HCs) contact both photoreceptor terminals and bipolar cell dendrites, modulating information transfer between these two cell types to enhance spatial contrast and mediate color opponency. The synaptic mechanisms through which these modulations occur are still debated. The initial hypothesis of a GABAergic feedback from HCs to cones has been challenged by pharmacological inconsistencies. Surround antagonism has been demonstrated to occur via a modulation of cone calcium channels through ephaptic signaling and pH changes in the synaptic cleft. GABAergic transmission between HCs and cones has been reported in some lower vertebrates, like the turtle and tiger salamander. In these reports, it was revealed that GABA is released from HCs through reverse transport and target GABA receptors are located at the cone terminals. In mammalian retinas, there is growing evidence that HCs can release GABA through conventional vesicular transmission, acting both on autaptic GABA receptors and on receptors expressed at the dendritic tips of the bipolar cells. The presence of GABA receptors on mammalian cone terminals remains equivocal. Here, we looked specifically for functional GABA receptors in mouse photoreceptors by recording in the whole-cell or amphotericin/gramicidin-perforated patch clamp configurations. Cones could be differentiated from rods through morphological criteria. Local GABA applications evoked a Cl− current in cones but not in rods. It was blocked by the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline methiodide and unaffected by the GABAC receptor antagonist TPMPA [(1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid]. The voltage dependency of the current amplitude was as expected from a direct action of GABA on cone pedicles but not from an indirect modulation of cone currents following the activation of the GABA receptors of HCs. This supports a direct role of GABA released from HCs in the control of cone activity in the mouse retina.

scholarly journals Efficient stimulus-secretion coupling at ribbon synapses requires RIM-binding protein tethering of L-type Ca2+channels

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (38) ◽  
pp. E8081-E8090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fujun Luo ◽  
Xinran Liu ◽  
Thomas C. Südhof ◽  
Claudio Acuna
Keyword(s):  
Active Zone ◽  
Neurotransmitter Release ◽  
Information Transfer ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Tight Coupling ◽  
Ribbon Synapses ◽  
Vesicle Exocytosis ◽  
Stimulus Secretion Coupling

Fast neurotransmitter release from ribbon synapses via Ca2+-triggered exocytosis requires tight coupling of L-type Ca2+channels to release-ready synaptic vesicles at the presynaptic active zone, which is localized at the base of the ribbon. Here, we used genetic, electrophysiological, and ultrastructural analyses to probe the architecture of ribbon synapses by perturbing the function of RIM-binding proteins (RBPs) as central active-zone scaffolding molecules. We found that genetic deletion of RBP1 and RBP2 did not impair synapse ultrastructure of ribbon-type synapses formed between rod bipolar cells (RBCs) and amacrine type-2 (AII) cells in the mouse retina but dramatically reduced the density of presynaptic Ca2+channels, decreased and desynchronized evoked neurotransmitter release, and rendered evoked and spontaneous neurotransmitter release sensitive to the slow Ca2+buffer EGTA. These findings suggest that RBPs tether L-type Ca2+channels to the active zones of ribbon synapses, thereby synchronizing vesicle exocytosis and promoting high-fidelity information transfer in retinal circuits.

scholarly journals Random spatial patterning of cone bipolar cell mosaics in the mouse retina

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
PATRICK W. KEELEY ◽  
JASON J. KIM ◽  
SAMMY C.S. LEE ◽  
SILKE HAVERKAMP ◽  
BENJAMIN E. REESE
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Statistical Properties ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Dendritic Arbors ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells ◽  
Cholinergic Amacrine Cells

AbstractRetinal bipolar cells spread their dendritic arbors to tile the retinal surface, extending them to the tips of the dendritic fields of their homotypic neighbors, minimizing dendritic overlap. Such uniform nonredundant dendritic coverage of these populations would suggest a degree of spatial order in the properties of their somal distributions, yet few studies have examined the patterning in retinal bipolar cell mosaics. The present study examined the organization of two types of cone bipolar cells in the mouse retina, the Type 2 cells and the Type 4 cells, and compared their spatial statistical properties with those of the horizontal cells and the cholinergic amacrine cells, as well as to random simulations of cells matched in density and constrained by soma size. The Delauney tessellation of each field was computed, from which nearest neighbor distances and Voronoi domain areas were extracted, permitting a calculation of their respective regularity indexes (RIs). The spatial autocorrelation of the field was also computed, from which the effective radius and packing factor (PF) were determined. Both cone bipolar cell types were found to be less regular and less efficiently packed than either the horizontal cells or cholinergic amacrine cells. Furthermore, while the latter two cell types had RIs and PFs in excess of those for their matched random simulations, the two types of cone bipolar cells had spatial statistical properties comparable to random distributions. An analysis of single labeled cone bipolar cells revealed dendritic arbors frequently skewed to one side of the soma, as would be expected from a randomly distributed population of cells with dendrites that tile. Taken together, these results suggest that, unlike the horizontal cells or cholinergic amacrine cells which minimize proximity to one another, cone bipolar cell types are constrained only by their physical size.

scholarly journals Exploring the Intracrine Functions of VEGF-A

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 128
Author(s):  
Sophie Wiszniak ◽  
Quenten Schwarz
Keyword(s):  
Cell Growth ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Direct Action ◽  
Cancer Therapeutics ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Signalling Molecule ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor ◽  
Important Signalling Molecule ◽  
Vegf Signalling

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A or VEGF) is a highly conserved secreted signalling protein best known for its roles in vascular development and angiogenesis. Many non-endothelial roles for VEGF are now established, with the discovery that VEGF and its receptors VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 are expressed in many non-vascular cell-types, as well as various cancers. In addition to secreted VEGF binding to its receptors in the extracellular space at the cell membrane (i.e., in a paracrine or autocrine mode), intracellularly localised VEGF is emerging as an important signalling molecule regulating cell growth, survival, and metabolism. This intracellular mode of signalling has been termed “intracrine”, and refers to the direct action of a signalling molecule within the cell without being secreted. In this review, we describe examples of intracrine VEGF signalling in regulating cell growth, differentiation and survival, both in normal cell homeostasis and development, as well as in cancer. We further discuss emerging evidence for the molecular mechanisms underpinning VEGF intracrine function, as well as the implications this intracellular mode of VEGF signalling may have for use and design of anti-VEGF cancer therapeutics.

Subcellular Localization and Complements of GABAA and GABAC Receptors on Bullfrog Retinal Bipolar Cells

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 666-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiu-Lin Du ◽  
Xiong-Li Yang
Keyword(s):  
Subcellular Localization ◽  
Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Gaba Receptor ◽  
Drug Application ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Inner Retina ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Retinal Bipolar Cells

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors on retinal bipolar cells (BCs) are highly relevant to spatial and temporal integration of visual signals in the outer and inner retina. In the present work, subcellular localization and complements of GABAA and GABACreceptors on BCs were investigated by whole cell recordings and local drug application via multi-barreled puff pipettes in the bullfrog retinal slice preparation. Four types of the BCs (types 1–4) were identified morphologically by injection of Lucifer yellow. According to the ramification levels of the axon terminals and the responses of these cells to glutamate (or kainate) applied at their dendrites, types 1 and 2 of BCs were supposed to be off type, whereas types 3 and 4 of BCs might be on type. Bicuculline (BIC), a GABAA receptor antagonist, and imidazole-4-acetic acid (I4AA), a GABAC receptor antagonist, were used to distinguish GABA receptor-mediated responses. In all BCs tested, not only the axon terminals but also the dendrites showed high GABA sensitivity mediated by both GABAA and GABACreceptors. Subcellular localization and complements of GABAA and GABAC receptors at the dendrites and axon terminals were highly related to the dichotomy of offand on BCs. In the case of off BCs, GABAA receptors were rather evenly distributed at the dendrites and axon terminals, but GABAC receptors were predominantly expressed at the axon terminals. Moreover, the relative contribution of GABAC receptors to the axon terminals was prevalent over that of GABAA receptors, while the situation was reversed at the dendrites. In the case of on BCs, GABAA and GABAC receptors both preferred to be expressed at the axon terminals; relative contributions of these two GABA receptor subtypes to both the sites were comparable, while GABAC receptors were much less expressed than GABAA receptors. GABAA, but not GABAC receptors, were expressed clusteringly at axons of a population of BCs. In a minority of BCs, I4AA suppressed the GABAC responses at the dendrites, but not at the axon terminal, implying that the GABAC receptors at these two sites may be heterogeneous. Taken together, these results suggest that GABAA and GABAC receptors may play different roles in the outer and inner retina and the differential complements of the two receptors on off and on BCs may be closely related to physiological functions of these cells.

Modulation by Zn2+ of GABA responses in bipolar cells of the mouse retina

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. KANEDA ◽  
B. ANDRÁSFALVY ◽  
A. KANEKO
Keyword(s):  
Axon Terminal ◽  
Inhibitory Action ◽  
Phosphinic Acid ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Induced Responses ◽  
Inhibitory Interaction ◽  
Cell Recording ◽  
Recording Conditions

The localization of endogenous Zn2+ in the mouse retina was examined histochemically and the inhibitory action of Zn2+ on GABA-induced responses was studied in bipolar cells isolated from the mouse retina. Accumulation of endogenous Zn2+ was detected in photoreceptors, bipolar, and/or amacrine cells by either the bromopyridylazo-diethylaminophenol method or the dithizone method. Under whole-cell recording conditions, GABA induced a Cl− current in isolated bipolar cells. The current consisted of two components. The first component was inhibited completely by application of 100 μM bicuculline, suggesting that this is a GABAA-receptor mediated current. The second component was inhibited completely by 100 μM 3-aminopropyl-(methyl)-phosphinic acid, suggesting that this is a GABAC-receptor mediated current. GABAC receptors were present at a higher density on the axon terminal than on dendrites. Zn2+ inhibited both GABAA and GABAC receptors. GABAC receptors were more susceptible to Zn2+; the IC50 for the GABAA receptor was 67.4 μM and that for the GABAC receptor was 1.9 μM. These results suggest that Zn2+ modulates the inhibitory interaction between amacrine and bipolar cells, particularly that mediated by the GABAC receptor.

Receptive field of the retinal bipolar cell: a pharmacological study in the tiger salamander

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 2005-2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. A. Hare ◽  
W. G. Owen
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Gaba Receptors ◽  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Horizontal Cell ◽  
Pharmacological Study ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Horizontal Cells ◽  
Gaba Uptake ◽  
Gamma Aminobutyric Acid ◽  
Gabaergic Synapse

1. It is widely believed that signals contributing to the receptive field surrounds of retinal bipolar cells pass from horizontal cells to bipolar cells via GABAergic synapses. To test this notion, we applied gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) agonists and antagonists to isolated, perfused retinas of the salamander Ambystoma tigrinum while recording intracellularly from bipolar cells, horizontal cells, and photoreceptors. 2. As we previously reported, administration of the GABA analogue D-aminovaleric acid in concert with picrotoxin did not block horizontal cell responses or the center responses of bipolar cells but blocked the surround responses of both on-center and off-center bipolar cells. 3. Surround responses were not blocked by the GABA, antagonists picrotoxin or bicuculline, the GABAB agonist baclofen or the GABAB antagonist phaclofen, and the GABAC antagonists picrotoxin or cis-4-aminocrotonic acid. Combinations of these drugs were similarly ineffective. 4. GABA itself activated a powerful GABA uptake mechanism in horizontal cells for which nipecotic acid is a competitive agonist. It also activated, both in horizontal cells and bipolar cells, large GABAA conductances that shunted light responses but that could be blocked by picrotoxin or bicuculline. 5. GABA, administered together with picrotoxin to block the shunting effect of GABAA activation, did not eliminate bipolar cell surround responses at concentrations sufficient to saturate the known types of GABA receptors. 6. Surround responses were not blocked by glycine or its antagonist strychnine, or by combinations of drugs designed to eliminate GABAergic and glycinergic pathways simultaneously. 7. Although we cannot fully discount the involvement of a novel GABAergic synapse, the simplest explanation of our findings is that the primary pathway mediating the bipolar cell's surround is neither GABAergic nor glycinergic.

scholarly journals The Effect of PKCα on the Light Response of Rod Bipolar Cells in the Mouse Retina

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 4961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Hong Xiong ◽  
Ji-Jie Pang ◽  
Mark E. Pennesi ◽  
Robert M. Duvoisin ◽  
Samuel M. Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Light Response ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells

Type 4 OFF cone bipolar cells of the mouse retina express calsenilin and contact cones as well as rods

2007 ◽  
Vol 507 (1) ◽  
pp. 1087-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silke Haverkamp ◽  
Dana Specht ◽  
Sriparna Majumdar ◽  
Nikhat F. Zaidi ◽  
Johann Helmut Brandstätter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

scholarly journals Probing spermatogenesis in Drosophila with P-element enhancer detectors

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Gonczy ◽  
S. Viswanathan ◽  
S. DiNardo
Keyword(s):  
Germ Line ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
P Element ◽  
Structural Reorganization ◽  
Germ Cell Differentiation ◽  
Distinct Cell ◽  
Morphological Criteria ◽  
Cyst Cells ◽  
A Cell

Formation of motile sperm in Drosophila melanogaster requires the coordination of processes such as stem cell division, mitotic and meiotic control and structural reorganization of a cell. Proper execution of spermatogenesis entails the differentiation of cells derived from two distinct embryonic lineages, the germ line and the somatic mesoderm. Through an analysis of homozygous viable and fertile enhancer detector lines, we have identified molecular markers for the different cell types present in testes. Some lines label germ cells or somatic cyst cells in a stage-specific manner during their differentiation program. These expression patterns reveal transient identities for the cyst cells that had not been previously recognized by morphological criteria. A marker line labels early stages of male but not female germ cell differentiation and proves useful in the analysis of germ line sex-determination. Other lines label the hub of somatic cells around which germ line stem cells are anchored. By analyzing the fate of the somatic hub in an agametic background, we show that the germ line plays some role in directing its size and its position in the testis. We also describe how marker lines enable us to identify presumptive cells in the embryonic gonadal mesoderm before they give rise to morphologically distinct cell types. Finally, this collection of marker lines will allow the characterization of genes expressed either in the germ line or in the soma during spermatogenesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document