scholarly journals 345 - 7 Critical factors for safely supporting dementia patients in mental health crisis in community

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
pp. 105-106
Author(s):  
Sabarigirivasan Muthukrishnan ◽  
Kate Hydon ◽  
Lucy Young ◽  
Cristie Howells
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Home Treatment ◽  
List Type ◽  
Critical Factors ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Person With Dementia ◽  
At Home

Background:Best practice in dementia care is support in the home. Yet, crisis is common and can result in hospital admission. Home-treatment of crisis is an alternative to hospital admission that can have better outcomes and is the preference of people living with dementia.Purpose:To report an investigation of the management of crisis for people with dementia living at home and managed by a Home Treatment Crisis Team.Objective:To identify critical factors for successful resolution of crisis and avoidance of hospital admissionMethods:The research was mixed-methods case study design. It was an in depth investigation of what happens during crisis in people with dementia and how it is managed by a home treatment crisis team to resolution and outcome at six weeks and six months. Methods were observation of the management of crisis in the home setting for 15 people with dementia (max 3 per person, total 41 observations), interviews with people with dementia (n=5), carers (n=13), and 14 professionals (range 1 to 6 per person, total 29), a focus group with professionals (n=9) and extraction from medical records of demographics and medical history.The analysis focused on the identification of key treatments, behaviours, education and context important for home treatment to prevent hospital admission.Findings:The study recruited 15 of the 88 accepted referrals to the service for management of a crisis in a person with dementia.The seven key factors key for crisis resolution were a systems approach with embedded respect for personhood,attention to carer needs independently of the person with dementia,review and monitoring of the effect of medications,awareness and promotion of potential benefits with treatment at home,education of the health and social care workforce in dementia care,local availability of respite and other social care services.a dynamic and flexible working ethos and meaningful MDT working with flattened hierarchyThe Home Treatment Crisis Team created a ‘Safe Dementia Space’ for the person with dementia in crisis. In the first instance, this was immediate but temporary with on-going assessment and intervention until negotiated permanent support was in place coproduced and agreed by stakeholders to be a sustainable dementia space with acceptable risk of harm to the person with dementia or others. The approach enabled avoidance of hospital admission in more than 80% of referrals.Conclusion:This is the first study to collect data during crisis at home for people with dementia and to investigate process and management. It reveals the Home Treatment Crisis Team created sustainable ‘Safe Dementia Space’ to enable the person with dementia to continue to live in the community during and after crisis, thus avoiding hospital admission. The identified key components of the management approach for crisis resolution are important considerations in the design and delivery of home treatment services for people with dementia in the UK and beyond.

scholarly journals 305 - What happens before, during and after crisis for someone with dementia living at home

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
pp. 62-63
Author(s):  
Sabarigirivasan Muthukrishnan ◽  
Jane Hopkinson ◽  
Kate Hydon ◽  
Lucy Young ◽  
Cristie Howells
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Home Treatment ◽  
List Type ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Person With Dementia ◽  
At Home

Background:Best practice in dementia care is support in the home. Yet, crisis is common and can result in hospital admission. Home-treatment of crisis is an alternative to hospital admission that can have better outcomes and is the preference of people living with dementia.Purpose:To report an investigation of the management of crisis for people with dementia living at home and managed by a Home Treatment Crisis Team.Objective:To identify critical factors for successful resolution of crisis and avoidance of hospital admissionMethods:The research was mixed-methods case study design. It was an in depth investigation of what happens during crisis in people with dementia and how it is managed by a home treatment crisis team to resolution and outcome at six weeks and six months. Methods were observation of the management of crisis in the home setting for 15 people with dementia (max 3 per person, total 41 observations), interviews with people with dementia (n=5), carers (n=13), and 14 professionals (range 1 to 6 per person, total 29), a focus group with professionals (n=9) and extraction from medical records of demographics and medical history.The analysis focused on the identification of key treatments, behaviours, education and context important for home treatment to prevent hospital admission.Findings:The study recruited 15 of the 88 accepted referrals to the service for management of a crisis in a person with dementia.Factors key for crisis resolution were a systems approach with embedded respect for personhood,attention to carer needs independently of the person with dementia,review and monitoring of the effect of medications,awareness and promotion of potential benefits with treatment at home,education of the health and social care workforce in dementia care, local availability of respite and other social care services.The Home Treatment Crisis Team created a ‘Safe Dementia Space’ for the person with dementia in crisis. In the first instance, this was immediate but temporary with on-going assessment and intervention until negotiated permanent support was in place coproduced and agreed by stakeholders to be a sustainable dementia space with acceptable risk of harm to the person with dementia or others. The approach enabled avoidance of hospital admission in more than 80% of referrals.Conclusion:This is the first study to collect data during crisis at home for people with dementia and to investigate process and management. It reveals the Home Treatment Crisis Team created sustainable ‘Safe Dementia Space’ to enable the person with dementia to continue to live in the community during and after crisis, thus avoiding hospital admission. The identified key components of the management approach for crisis resolution are important considerations in the design and delivery of home treatment services for people with dementia in the UK and beyond.

scholarly journals Improving quality and assessment of referrals to the Enfield Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team (ECRHTT)

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S202-S202
Author(s):  
Margarita Kousteni ◽  
John Cousins ◽  
Ajay Mansingh ◽  
Maja Elia ◽  
Yumnah Ras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Home Treatment ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
List Type ◽  
Treatment Team ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Consultant Psychiatrist ◽  
The Impact

AimsTriaging referrals to crisis resolution and home treatment teams is a significant undertaking requiring experienced and dedicated staff. We observed that the volume of inappropriate referrals to ECRHTT was high, and that staff processing these often felt inexperienced or lacking in confidence to discharge them back to the referrers and signpost them to appropriate services.The aims of this quality improvement project (QIP) were: a)to reduce the number of inappropriate referrals received by the teamb)to reduce the number of inappropriate referrals accepted by the teamThis would significantly improve access and flow to the service and facilitate better patient care.MethodA pilot study was first completed of the quality (appropriateness/ inappropriateness) and source of all referrals to ECRHTT in January 2019 (n = 177).Subsequently, the consultant psychiatrist for ECRHTT based himself within the assessment team. He was able to closely monitor the referrals, at the same time as providing medical input to patients at their first point of contact. To evaluate the impact of this intervention, the percentage of inappropriate referrals accepted pre- and post-change was compared by re-auditing all referrals received in February 2019 (n = 175).Further interventions were instigated to improve referral quality. These included continuation of psychiatric medical input to the assessment team, teaching sessions for GPs and the crisis telephone service, and weekly meetings with psychiatric liaison and community mental health teams (CMHTs). Change was measured by reassessing the quality of all referrals made to ECRHTT in February 2020 (n = 215).Result46.9% of inappropriate referrals to ECRHTT were accepted in January 2019 compared to 16.9% in February 2019 following the addition of medical input to the assessment team. The absolute difference was 30% (95% CI: 14%–44%, p < 0.001).71% of referrals from GPs were inappropriate in January 2019 compared to 36% in February 2020 post-intervention (difference 35%, 95% CI: 8.84%–55.4%, p < 0.05). Inappropriate referrals from CMHTs decreased from 55.5% to 12% (difference 43.5%, 95% CI: 9.5%–70.3%, p < 0.05). Overall, the percentage of inappropriate referrals fell from 38% to 27.4%, a difference of 10.6% (95% CI: 1.3%–19.8%, p < 0.05). The percentage of inappropriate referrals from liaison teams did not change significantly.ConclusionThis piece of work shows that better engagement with referral sources significantly improved the quality of referrals made to ECRHTT. Interventions included medical input at the point of referral, teaching sessions for general practitioners as well as ongoing liaison with referring teams.

scholarly journals Differences in assistive technology installed for people with dementia living at home who have wandering and safety risks

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor Curnow ◽  
Robert Rush ◽  
Sylwia Gorska ◽  
Kirsty Forsyth
Keyword(s):  
Assistive Technology ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Living Situation ◽  
Caregiver Support ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Multiple Characteristics ◽  
Person Characteristics ◽  
Person With Dementia ◽  
The Impact ◽  
At Home

Abstract Background Assistive Technology for people with dementia living at home is not meeting their care needs. Reasons for this may be due to limited understanding of variation in multiple characteristics of people with dementia including their safety and wandering risks, and how these affect their assistive technology requirements. This study therefore aimed to explore the possibility of grouping people with dementia according to data describing multiple person characteristics. Then to investigate the relationships between these groupings and installed Assistive Technology interventions. Methods Partitioning Around Medoids cluster analysis was used to determine participant groupings based upon secondary data which described the person characteristics of 451 people with dementia with Assistive Technology needs. Relationships between installed Assistive Technology and participant groupings were then examined. Results Two robust clustering solutions were identified within the person characteristics data. Relationships between the clustering solutions and installed Assistive Technology data indicate the utility of this method for exploring the impact of multiple characteristics on Assistive technology installations. Living situation and caregiver support influence installation of assistive technology more strongly than level of risk or cognitive impairment. People with dementia living alone received different AT from those living with others. Conclusions Results suggest that caregiver support and the living situation of the person with dementia influence the type and frequency of installed Assistive Technology. Reasons for this include the needs of the caregiver themselves, the caregiver view of the participants’ needs, caregiver response to alerts, and the caregiver contribution to the assistive technology assessment and selection process. Selection processes should be refined to account for the needs and views of both caregivers and people with dementia. This will require additional assessor training, and the development of validated assessments for people with dementia who have additional impairments. Policies should support the development of services which provide a wider range of AT to facilitate interventions which are focused on the needs of the person with dementia.

Management of dementia

2020 ◽  
pp. 557-570
Author(s):  
Sarah Cullum ◽  
Tesema Taye
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Psychosocial Aspects ◽  
People With Dementia

The cornerstone of dementia care is social care, and much of this is delivered by the families and carers of people with dementia. The management of dementia should therefore focus on supporting and developing the care provided by family members and carers in the community, because their education and enablement will help to optimize the quality of life for all people living with dementia. This chapter concentrates on the assessment and management of people with dementia in the early and later stages of the disorder. At both stages we consider engagement, autonomy, respect, protection, and ethical issues, as well as describing the clinical and psychosocial aspects of treatment. The emphasis is on the broader principles of management, which apply to people with dementia of any aetiology, their families, carers, and communities, and take into account the different settings in which they may present.

Service innovations

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 148-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Tomar ◽  
Neil Brimblecombe ◽  
Geraldine O'Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Diagnostic Category ◽  
First Episode Psychosis ◽  
Community Services ◽  
Home Treatment ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Crisis Resolution ◽  
Episode Psychosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
At Home

Aims and MethodDemographic and clinical details were recorded for individuals with first-episode psychosis, potentially requiring hospital admission, who were assessed by two home treatment/crisis resolution teams over an 18-month period. The aims were to identify the proportion of such individuals that can be treated at home, factors associated with successful home treatment and reasons for hospitalisation when this took place.ResultsSuccessful home management was achieved in 20 (54%) of cases. No significant difference was found in any demographic variable, diagnostic category and initial Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) ratings between those who were hospitalised and those who were not. The most common reason recorded for admission was that of risk to self.Clinical ImplicationsMany patients with first-episode psychosis otherwise requiring hospitalisation can be managed successfully at home by an intensive home-treatment team. These findings have significant implications for both in-patient and community services, in view of the planned increases in home treatment/crisis resolution services proposed in the NHS Plan.

The ethical evaluation of assistive technology for practitioners: a checklist arising from a participatory study with people with dementia, family and professionals

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Godwin
Keyword(s):  
Assistive Technology ◽  
Ethical Dilemmas ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Ethical Evaluation ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Monitoring And Surveillance ◽  
At Home

PurposeUncertainty over ethical impact may hinder uptake of assistive technology (AT) in dementia. This study aims to examine whether AT contributes to person‐centred care, whether users can participate in research and to explore ethical dilemmas with users, family and professional carers.Design/methodology/approachPeople with dementia, at home or in residential care, and carers were allocated equipment and consulted about ethics. In a small, qualitative study, data were collected using semi‐structured interviews and vignettes and content‐analysed to establish themes.FindingsAT in person‐centred dementia care requires meticulous assessment, reliability and availability in rapidly evolving situations. Users displayed insight, logic and empathy in ethical evaluation. They disliked remote monitoring and surveillance, whereas carers were pragmatic, prioritising safety.Research limitations/implicationsThis research provides further evidence that users with dementia can be included in research. It demonstrates a significant potential role for AT in dementia care, with an ethical checklist to help professionals evaluate ethical dilemmas.Originality/valueAT potentially increases wellbeing, enabling users to remain longer at home, delaying or avoiding moves to or between homes.

scholarly journals The extended palliative phase of dementia – An integrative literature review

Dementia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hanson ◽  
Amanda Hellström ◽  
Åsa Sandvide ◽  
Graham A Jackson ◽  
Rhoda MacRae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Educational Opportunities ◽  
Advanced Dementia ◽  
Subsequent Work ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Palliative Phase ◽  
Person With Dementia

This article presents an integrative literature review of the experience of dementia care associated with the extended palliative phase of dementia. The aim was to highlight how dementia is defined in the literature and describe what is known about the symptomatology and management of advanced dementia regarding the needs and preferences of the person with dementia and their family carer/s. There was no consistent definition of advanced dementia. The extended palliative phase was generally synonymous with end-of-life care. Advanced care planning is purported to enable professionals to work together with people with dementia and their families. A lack of understanding of palliative care among frontline practitioners was related to a dearth of educational opportunities in advanced dementia care. There are few robust concepts and theories that embrace living the best life possible during the later stages of dementia. These findings informed our subsequent work around the concept, ‘Dementia Palliare’.

scholarly journals Meeting the needs of older people living at home with dementia who have problems with continence

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vari M. Drennan ◽  
Jill Manthorpe ◽  
Steve Ilifffe
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Service Improvement ◽  
Content Type ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Care Relationships ◽  
The Impact ◽  
At Home

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the question of how to meet the needs of older people living at home with dementia who have problems with continence. The paper is focused on social care practice in community settings. Design/methodology/approach This paper is practice focused and draws on the authors’ research and experiences in clinical care, workforce development and service improvement. Findings This paper summarises research on incontinence and its negative effects on quality of life and care relationships. It describes the impact of incontinence in terms of social embarrassment, restricted social activity, extra work (such as laundry) and costs, but also distress. It links research with care practice, with a focus on people with dementia who may be at particular risk of both continence problems and of assumptions that nothing can be done to assist them. Social implications This paper provides questions that could be addressed in commissioning and provision of services and argues that they need to be informed by care practitioners’ experiences. It provides details of sources of support that are available at national and local levels. Originality/value This paper draws together research on continence and social care practice to provide a series of self-assessment questions for local services. It focuses on social care workers who are at the frontline of practice including personal assistants and carers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document