Stabilizing Metastable Polymorphs of van der Waals Solid MoS2 on Single Crystal Oxide Substrates: Exploring the Possible Role of Surface Chemistry and Structure

Author(s):  
Swati Parmar ◽  
Abhijit Biswas ◽  
Bishakha Ray ◽  
Suresh Gosavi ◽  
Suwarna Datar ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 1087-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Noorisafa ◽  
Amir Razmjou ◽  
Nahid Emami ◽  
Ze-Xian Low ◽  
Asghar Habibnejad Korayem ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Naxin Zhu ◽  
xiangyi Xue ◽  
Jie Su

Unveiling the microstructural and electronic properties of β-Ga2O3 on different substrates is vital to realize the high quality and performance β-Ga2O3. Here the microstructure disorder, defect characters and orbital structures...


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anoop Gupta ◽  
Folarin Erogbogbo ◽  
Mark T. Swihart ◽  
Hartmut Wiggers

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1026
Author(s):  
Elisa Chiodi ◽  
Allison M. Marn ◽  
Matthew T. Geib ◽  
M. Selim Ünlü

The importance of microarrays in diagnostics and medicine has drastically increased in the last few years. Nevertheless, the efficiency of a microarray-based assay intrinsically depends on the density and functionality of the biorecognition elements immobilized onto each sensor spot. Recently, researchers have put effort into developing new functionalization strategies and technologies which provide efficient immobilization and stability of any sort of molecule. Here, we present an overview of the most widely used methods of surface functionalization of microarray substrates, as well as the most recent advances in the field, and compare their performance in terms of optimal immobilization of the bioreceptor molecules. We focus on label-free microarrays and, in particular, we aim to describe the impact of surface chemistry on two types of microarray-based sensors: microarrays for single particle imaging and for label-free measurements of binding kinetics. Both protein and DNA microarrays are taken into consideration, and the effect of different polymeric coatings on the molecules’ functionalities is critically analyzed.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2100438
Author(s):  
Wouter Mortelmans ◽  
Karel De Smet ◽  
Ruishen Meng ◽  
Michel Houssa ◽  
Stefan De Gendt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Woonbae Sohn ◽  
Ki Chang Kwon ◽  
Jun Min Suh ◽  
Tae Hyung Lee ◽  
Kwang Chul Roh ◽  
...  

AbstractTwo-dimensional MoS2 film can grow on oxide substrates including Al2O3 and SiO2. However, it cannot grow usually on non-oxide substrates such as a bare Si wafer using chemical vapor deposition. To address this issue, we prepared as-synthesized and transferred MoS2 (AS-MoS2 and TR-MoS2) films on SiO2/Si substrates and studied the effect of the SiO2 layer on the atomic and electronic structure of the MoS2 films using spherical aberration-corrected scanning transition electron microscopy (STEM) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS). The interlayer distance between MoS2 layers film showed a change at the AS-MoS2/SiO2 interface, which is attributed to the formation of S–O chemical bonding at the interface, whereas the TR-MoS2/SiO2 interface showed only van der Waals interactions. Through STEM and EELS studies, we confirmed that there exists a bonding state in addition to the van der Waals force, which is the dominant interaction between MoS2 and SiO2. The formation of S–O bonding at the AS-MoS2/SiO2 interface layer suggests that the sulfur atoms at the termination layer in the MoS2 films are bonded to the oxygen atoms of the SiO2 layer during chemical vapor deposition. Our results indicate that the S–O bonding feature promotes the growth of MoS2 thin films on oxide growth templates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document