scholarly journals Snm1B/Apollo mediates replication fork collapse and S Phase checkpoint activation in response to DNA interstrand cross-links

Oncogene ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (37) ◽  
pp. 5045-5056 ◽  
Author(s):  
J-B Bae ◽  
S S Mukhopadhyay ◽  
L Liu ◽  
N Zhang ◽  
J Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Interstrand Cross Links ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

scholarly journals The yeast S phase checkpoint enables replicating chromosomes to bi-orient and restrain spindle extension during S phase distress

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (7) ◽  
pp. 999-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bachant ◽  
Shannon R. Jessen ◽  
Sarah E. Kavanaugh ◽  
Candida S. Fielding
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Origin Of Replication ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Hydroxyurea Treatment ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The budding yeast S phase checkpoint responds to hydroxyurea-induced nucleotide depletion by preventing replication fork collapse and the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. Although the block to chromosome segregation has been thought to occur by inhibiting anaphase, we show checkpoint-defective rad53 mutants undergo cycles of spindle extension and collapse after hydroxyurea treatment that are distinct from anaphase cells. Furthermore, chromatid cohesion, whose dissolution triggers anaphase, is dispensable for S phase checkpoint arrest. Kinetochore–spindle attachments are required to prevent spindle extension during replication blocks, and chromosomes with two centromeres or an origin of replication juxtaposed to a centromere rescue the rad53 checkpoint defect. These observations suggest that checkpoint signaling is required to generate an inward force involved in maintaining preanaphase spindle integrity during DNA replication distress. We propose that by promoting replication fork integrity under these conditions Rad53 ensures centromere duplication. Replicating chromosomes can then bi-orient in a cohesin-independent manner to restrain untimely spindle extension.

scholarly journals Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA Helicase Promotes Genome Integrity by Preventing Replication Fork Stalling: Viability of rrm3 Cells Requires the Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint and Fork Restart Activities

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 3198-3212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Z. Torres ◽  
Sandra L. Schnakenberg ◽  
Virginia A. Zakian
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Normal Growth ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Rrm3p is a 5′-to-3′ DNA helicase that helps replication forks traverse protein-DNA complexes. Its absence leads to increased fork stalling and breakage at over 1,000 specific sites located throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. To understand the mechanisms that respond to and repair rrm3-dependent lesions, we carried out a candidate gene deletion analysis to identify genes whose mutation conferred slow growth or lethality on rrm3 cells. Based on synthetic phenotypes, the intra-S-phase checkpoint, the SRS2 inhibitor of recombination, the SGS1/TOP3 replication fork restart pathway, and the MRE11/RAD50/XRS2 (MRX) complex were critical for viability of rrm3 cells. DNA damage checkpoint and homologous recombination genes were important for normal growth of rrm3 cells. However, the MUS81/MMS4 replication fork restart pathway did not affect growth of rrm3 cells. These data suggest a model in which the stalled and broken forks generated in rrm3 cells activate a checkpoint response that provides time for fork repair and restart. Stalled forks are converted by a Rad51p-mediated process to intermediates that are resolved by Sgs1p/Top3p. The rrm3 system provides a unique opportunity to learn the fate of forks whose progress is impaired by natural impediments rather than by exogenous DNA damage.

scholarly journals Basal CHK1 activity safeguards its stability to maintain intrinsic S-phase checkpoint functions

2019 ◽  
Vol 218 (9) ◽  
pp. 2865-2875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jone Michelena ◽  
Marco Gatti ◽  
Federico Teloni ◽  
Ralph Imhof ◽  
Matthias Altmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Steady State Activity ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The DNA replication machinery frequently encounters impediments that slow replication fork progression and threaten timely and error-free replication. The CHK1 protein kinase is essential to deal with replication stress (RS) and ensure genome integrity and cell survival, yet how basal levels and activity of CHK1 are maintained under physiological, unstressed conditions is not well understood. Here, we reveal that CHK1 stability is controlled by its steady-state activity during unchallenged cell proliferation. This autoactivatory mechanism, which depends on ATR and its coactivator ETAA1 and is tightly associated with CHK1 autophosphorylation at S296, counters CHK1 ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation, thereby preventing attenuation of S-phase checkpoint functions and a compromised capacity to respond to RS. Based on these findings, we propose that steady-state CHK1 activity safeguards its stability to maintain intrinsic checkpoint functions and ensure genome integrity and cell survival.

scholarly journals Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint Activation by Direct CDK2 Inhibition

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (14) ◽  
pp. 6268-6277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghong Zhu ◽  
Carmen Alvarez ◽  
Ronald Doll ◽  
Hirokazu Kurata ◽  
Xiao Min Schebye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Stability ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Cdk2 Activity ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Dependent Pathway ◽  
Number Of Cells ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT To ensure proper progression through a cell cycle, checkpoints have evolved to play a surveillance role in maintaining genomic integrity. In this study, we demonstrate that loss of CDK2 activity activates an intra-S-phase checkpoint. CDK2 inhibition triggers a p53-p21 response via ATM- and ATR-dependent p53 phosphorylation at serine 15. Phosphorylation of other ATM and ATR downstream substrates, such as H2AX, NBS1, CHK1, and CHK2 is also increased. We show that during S phase when CDK2 activity is inhibited, there is an unexpected loading of the minichromosome maintenance complex onto chromatin. In addition, there is an increased number of cells with more than 4N DNA content, detected in the absence of p53, suggesting that rereplication can occur as a result of CDK2 disruption. Our findings identify an important role for CDK2 in the maintenance of genomic stability, acting via an ATM- and ATR-dependent pathway.

scholarly journals Divergent S Phase Checkpoint Activation Arising from Prereplicative Complex Deficiency Controls Cell Survival

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 3953-3964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Lau ◽  
Gary G. Chiang ◽  
Robert T. Abraham ◽  
Wei Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Multiple Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Prereplicative Complex ◽  
Stress Damage ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The DNA replication machinery plays additional roles in S phase checkpoint control, although the identities of the replication proteins involved in checkpoint activation remain elusive. Here, we report that depletion of the prereplicative complex (pre-RC) protein Cdc6 causes human nontransformed diploid cells to arrest nonlethally in G1-G1/S and S phase, whereas multiple cancer cell lines undergo G1-G1/S arrest and cell death. These divergent phenotypes are dependent on the activation, or lack thereof, of an ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR)-dependent S phase checkpoint that inhibits replication fork progression. Although pre-RC deficiency induces chromatin structural alterations in both nontransformed and cancer cells that normally lead to ATR checkpoint activation, the sensor mechanisms in cancer cells seem to be compromised such that higher levels of DNA replication stress/damage are required to trigger checkpoint response. Our results suggest that therapy-induced disruption of pre-RC function might exert selective cytotoxic effects on tumor cells in human patients.

scholarly journals Distinct roles of BRCA2 in replication fork protection in response to hydroxyurea and DNA interstrand cross-links

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 832-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Rickman ◽  
Raymond J. Noonan ◽  
Francis P. Lach ◽  
Sunandini Sridhar ◽  
Anderson T. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Interstrand Cross Links ◽  
Cross Links

scholarly journals Schizosaccharomyces pombe Checkpoint Response to DNA Interstrand Cross-Links

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
pp. 4728-4737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Lambert ◽  
Sarah J. Mason ◽  
Louise J. Barber ◽  
John A. Hartley ◽  
Jackie A. Pearce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Repair Gene ◽  
Phase Arrest ◽  
S Phase Arrest ◽  
Interstrand Cross Links ◽  
Cross Links

ABSTRACT Drugs that produce covalent interstrand cross-links (ICLs) in DNA remain central to the treatment of cancer, but the cell cycle checkpoints activated by ICLs have received little attention. We have used the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, to elucidate the checkpoint responses to the ICL-inducing anticancer drugs nitrogen mustard and mitomycin C. First we confirmed that the repair pathways acting on ICLs in this yeast are similar to those in the main organisms studied to date (Escherichia coli, budding yeast, and mammalian cells), principally nucleotide excision repair and homologous recombination. We also identified and disrupted the S. pombe homologue of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNM1/PSO2 ICL repair gene and found that this activity is required for normal resistance to cross-linking agents, but not other forms of DNA damage. Survival and biochemical analysis indicated a key role for the “checkpoint Rad” family acting through the chk1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint in the ICL response. Rhp9-dependent phosphorylation of Chk1 correlates with G2 arrest following ICL induction. In cells able to bypass the G2 block, a second-cycle (S-phase) arrest was observed. Only a transient activation of the Cds1 DNA replication checkpoint factor occurs following ICL formation in wild-type cells, but this is increased and persists in G2 arrest-deficient mutants. This likely reflects the fraction of cells escaping the G2 damage checkpoint and arresting in the subsequent S phase due to ICL replication blocks. Disruption of cds1 confers increased resistance to ICLs, suggesting that this second-cycle S-phase arrest might be a lethal event.

scholarly journals Activation of the DNA Damage Checkpoint in Mutants Defective in DNA Replication Initiation

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 4374-4382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Yin ◽  
Alexandra Monica Locovei ◽  
Gennaro D'Urso
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, blocks to DNA replication elongation trigger the intra-S phase checkpoint that leads to the activation of the Cds1 kinase. Cds1 is required to both prevent premature entry into mitosis and to stabilize paused replication forks. Interestingly, although Cds1 is essential to maintain the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication elongation, mutants defective in DNA replication initiation require the Chk1 kinase. This suggests that defects in DNA replication initiation can lead to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint independent of the intra-S phase checkpoint. This might result from reduced origin firing that leads to an increase in replication fork stalling or replication fork collapse that activates the G2 DNA damage checkpoint. We refer to the Chk1-dependent, Cds1-independent phenotype as the rid phenotype (for replication initiation defective). Chk1 is active in rid mutants, and rid mutant viability is dependent on the DNA damage checkpoint, and surprisingly Mrc1, a protein required for activation of Cds1. Mutations in Mrc1 that prevent activation of Cds1 have no effect on its ability to support rid mutant viability, suggesting that Mrc1 has a checkpoint-independent role in maintaining the viability of mutants defective in DNA replication initiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document