scholarly journals Comparison of the diagnostic yield of aCGH and genome-wide sequencing across different neurodevelopmental disorders

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Martinez-Granero ◽  
Fiona Blanco-Kelly ◽  
Carolina Sanchez-Jimeno ◽  
Almudena Avila-Fernandez ◽  
Ana Arteche ◽  
...  

AbstractMost consensus recommendations for the genetic diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) do not include the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) and are still based on chromosomal microarrays, such as comparative genomic hybridization array (aCGH). This study compares the diagnostic yield obtained by aCGH and clinical exome sequencing in NDD globally and its spectrum of disorders. To that end, 1412 patients clinically diagnosed with NDDs and studied with aCGH were classified into phenotype categories: global developmental delay/intellectual disability (GDD/ID); autism spectrum disorder (ASD); and other NDDs. These categories were further subclassified based on the most frequent accompanying signs and symptoms into isolated forms, forms with epilepsy; forms with micro/macrocephaly and syndromic forms. Two hundred and forty-five patients of the 1412 were subjected to clinical exome sequencing. Diagnostic yield of aCGH and clinical exome sequencing, expressed as the number of solved cases, was compared for each phenotype category and subcategory. Clinical exome sequencing was superior than aCGH for all cases except for isolated ASD, with no additional cases solved by NGS. Globally, clinical exome sequencing solved 20% of cases (versus 5.7% by aCGH) and the diagnostic yield was highest for all forms of GDD/ID and lowest for Other NDDs (7.1% versus 1.4% by aCGH) and ASD (6.1% versus 3% by aCGH). In the majority of cases, diagnostic yield was higher in the phenotype subcategories than in the mother category. These results suggest that NGS could be used as a first-tier test in the diagnostic algorithm of all NDDs followed by aCGH when necessary.

Author(s):  
M Parfyonov ◽  
I Guella ◽  
DM Evans ◽  
S Adam ◽  
C DeGuzman ◽  
...  

Background: West syndrome (WS) is characterized by the onset of epileptic spasms usually within the first year of life. Global developmental delay with/without regression is common. Advances in high-throughput sequencing have supported the genetic heterogeneity of this condition. To better understand the genetic causes of this disorder, we investigated the results of targeted exome sequencing in 29 patients with WS. Methods: Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on an Ion ProtonTM and variant reporting was restricted to sequences of 620 known epilepsy genes. Diagnostic yield and treatment impact are described for 29 patients with WS. Results: A definitely/likely diagnosis was made in 10 patients (34%), which included 10 different genes (ALG13, PAFAH1B1, SLC35A2, DYNC1H1, ADSL, DEPDC5, ARX, CDKL5, SCN8A, STXBP1) known to be associated with epilepsy or WS. Most variants were de novo dominant (X-linked/autosomal) except for ARX (X-linked recessive) and ADSL (autosomal recessive). 4 out of 10 (40%) had a genetic diagnosis with potential treatment implications. Conclusions: These results emphasize the genetic heterogeneity of WS. The high diagnostic yield, along with the significant genetic variability, and the potential for treatment impact, supports the early use of this testing in patients with unexplained WS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Servetti ◽  
Livia Pisciotta ◽  
Elisa Tassano ◽  
Maria Cerminara ◽  
Lino Nobili ◽  
...  

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) are a heterogeneous class of brain diseases, with a complex genetic basis estimated to account for up to 50% of cases. Nevertheless, genetic diagnostic yield is about 20%. Array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) is an established first-level diagnostic test able to detect pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs), however, most identified variants remain of uncertain significance (VUS). Failure of interpretation of VUSs may depend on various factors, including complexity of clinical phenotypes and inconsistency of genotype-phenotype correlations. Indeed, although most NDD-associated CNVs are de novo, transmission from unaffected parents to affected children of CNVs with high risk for NDDs has been observed. Moreover, variability of genetic components overlapped by CNVs, such as long non-coding genes, genomic regions with long-range effects, and additive effects of multiple CNVs can make CNV interpretation challenging. We report on 12 patients with complex phenotypes possibly explained by complex genetic mechanisms, including involvement of antisense genes and boundaries of topologically associating domains. Eight among the 12 patients carried two CNVs, either de novo or inherited, respectively, by each of their healthy parents, that could additively contribute to the patients’ phenotype. CNVs overlapped either known NDD-associated or novel candidate genes (PTPRD, BUD13, GLRA3, MIR4465, ABHD4, and WSCD2). Bioinformatic enrichment analyses showed that genes overlapped by the co-occurring CNVs have synergistic roles in biological processes fundamental in neurodevelopment. Double CNVs could concur in producing deleterious effects, according to a two-hit model, thus explaining the patients’ phenotypes and the incomplete penetrance, and variable expressivity, associated with the single variants. Overall, our findings could contribute to the knowledge on clinical and genetic diagnosis of complex forms of NDD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Ruml Stojanovic ◽  
Aleksandra Miletic ◽  
Borut Peterlin ◽  
Ales Maver ◽  
Marija Mijovic ◽  
...  

Clinical exome sequencing is currently being used in diagnostics of various genetic disorders, but studies supporting its application in clinical setting are scarce. The aim of this study was to establish diagnostic and clinical utility of clinical exome sequencing in patients with moderate and severe global developmental delay/intellectual disability. Clinical diagnosis was made in 49 of 88 investigated patients, with overall diagnostic yield of 55.7%. Molecular findings are characterized in detail, including the impact of newly made diagnosis on clinical management. Several previously unreported genotype-phenotype correlations and 33 novel variants are described. Genetic and clinical data were shared through publicly available database. In conclusion, clinical exome sequencing allows identification of causative variants in a significant proportion of patients in investigated clinical subgroup. Compared to whole exome sequencing, it shows similar diagnostic and clinical utility with reduced costs, which could be of particular importance for institutions with limited resources.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliann M. Savatt ◽  
Scott M. Myers

Neurodevelopmental disorders are the most prevalent chronic medical conditions encountered in pediatric primary care. In addition to identifying appropriate descriptive diagnoses and guiding families to evidence-based treatments and supports, comprehensive care for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders includes a search for an underlying etiologic diagnosis, primarily through a genetic evaluation. Identification of an underlying genetic etiology can inform prognosis, clarify recurrence risk, shape clinical management, and direct patients and families to condition-specific resources and supports. Here we review the utility of genetic testing in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders and describe the three major testing modalities and their yields – chromosomal microarray, exome sequencing (with/without copy number variant calling), and FMR1 CGG repeat analysis for fragile X syndrome. Given the diagnostic yield of genetic testing and the potential for clinical and personal utility, there is consensus that genetic testing should be offered to all patients with global developmental delay, intellectual disability, and/or autism spectrum disorder. Despite this recommendation, data suggest that a minority of children with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability have undergone genetic testing. To address this gap in care, we describe a structured but flexible approach to facilitate integration of genetic testing into clinical practice across pediatric specialties and discuss future considerations for genetic testing in neurodevelopmental disorders to prepare pediatric providers to care for patients with such diagnoses today and tomorrow.


Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 560
Author(s):  
Ana Arteche-López ◽  
Maria José Gómez Rodríguez ◽  
Maria Teresa Sánchez Calvin ◽  
Juan Francisco Quesada-Espinosa ◽  
Jose Miguel Lezana Rosales ◽  
...  

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a prevalent and extremely heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) with a strong genetic component. In recent years, the clinical relevance of de novo mutations to the aetiology of ASD has been demonstrated. Current guidelines recommend chromosomal microarray (CMA) and a FMR1 testing as first-tier tests, but there is increasing evidence that support the use of NGS for the diagnosis of NDDs. Specifically in ASD, it has not been extensively evaluated and, thus, we performed and compared the clinical utility of CMA, FMR1 testing, and/or whole exome sequencing (WES) in a cohort of 343 ASD patients. We achieved a global diagnostic rate of 12.8% (44/343), the majority of them being characterised by WES (33/44; 75%) compared to CMA (9/44; 20.4%) or FMR1 testing (2/44; 4.5%). Taking into account the age at which genetic testing was carried out, we identified a causal genetic alteration in 22.5% (37/164) of patients over 5 years old, but only in 3.9% (7/179) of patients under this age. Our data evidence the higher diagnostic power of WES compared to CMA in the study of ASD and support the implementation of WES as a first-tier test for the genetic diagnosis of this disorder, when there is no suspicion of fragile X syndrome.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Stefanski ◽  
Yamile Calle-López ◽  
Costin Leu ◽  
Eduardo Pérez-Palma ◽  
Elia Pestana-Knight ◽  
...  

Abstract Importance: Clinical genetic sequencing is frequently utilized to diagnose individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Several reviews have been published regarding clinical genetic testing in various NDD subtypes. However, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis – in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines – which compares the genetic testing yield across neurodevelopmental disorder subtypes and sequencing technology. Objective: To perform a meta-analysis and systematic review of the success rate (diagnostic yield) of clinical sequencing through NGS across NDDs. Data Sources: Systematic review of the literature from PubMed until July 2019 for clinical sequencing studies that utilized NGS in individuals with epilepsy, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), or intellectual disability (ID). Study Selection: Data were taken from clinical sequencing studies that screened more than five genes and performed variant classification in at least 20 individuals with epilepsy, ASD, or ID. 5.6% of identified studies met the selection criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted, reviewed, and categorized according to PRISMA guidelines. Clinical evaluation and grouping were performed by two investigators following the ILAE guidelines. Pooled rates of the diagnostic yield and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with a random-effects model and adjusted for publication bias by the Duval and Tweedie procedure. Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of individuals in a cohort who received a diagnosis based on a positive genetic test with variants identified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Results: We identified 79 studies (epilepsy, n = 54; ASD, n = 13; ID, n = 17) across 29,301 individuals. Targeted gene panel sequencing was used in 53 cohorts and exome sequencing (ES) in 27 cohorts. The diagnostic yield was 16.7% for epilepsy, 20.2% for ASD, 24.8% for ID, and 16.6% overall. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher for exome sequencing compared to panels (33.9% vs. 16.2%, P = 1.38×10−5). We observed that the number of clinical sequencing studies increased annually, particularly studies from Asia (0-2 per year between 2012 and 2017, up to 10 in 2018). No studies from Africa, India, or Latin America were identified. We also found that recent studies are more likely to report variants of uncertain significance and few studies reported benign variants. Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis and systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of clinical sequencing studies of NDDs, which will help guide policymaking and steer decision-making in patient management. Key Points Question What is the diagnostic yield of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in neurodevelopmental disorders and their subtypes? Findings In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 79 studies that include 29,301 individuals, the overall diagnostic yield was 16.6% (16.7% for epilepsy, 20.2% for ASD, and 24.8% for ID). Across all studies, downstream analyses showed a significant difference in yield between exome sequencing (33.9%) and targeted gene panels (16.2%). Meaning Around one in five NDD patients will receive a diagnosis using NGS, especially when investigating the whole exome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ka-Yee Kwong ◽  
Mandy Ho-Yin Tsang ◽  
Jasmine Lee-Fong Fung ◽  
Christopher Chun-Yu Mak ◽  
Kate Lok-San Chan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Movement disorders are a group of heterogeneous neurological diseases including hyperkinetic disorders with unwanted excess movements and hypokinetic disorders with reduction in the degree of movements. The objective of our study is to investigate the genetic etiology of a cohort of paediatric patients with movement disorders by whole exome sequencing and to review the potential treatment implications after a genetic diagnosis. Results We studied a cohort of 31 patients who have paediatric-onset movement disorders with unrevealing etiologies. Whole exome sequencing was performed and rare variants were interrogated for pathogenicity. Genetic diagnoses have been confirmed in 10 patients with disease-causing variants in CTNNB1, SPAST, ATP1A3, PURA, SLC2A1, KMT2B, ACTB, GNAO1 and SPG11. 80% (8/10) of patients with genetic diagnosis have potential treatment implications and treatments have been offered to them. One patient with KMT2B dystonia showed clinical improvement with decrease in dystonia after receiving globus pallidus interna deep brain stimulation. Conclusions A diagnostic yield of 32% (10/31) was reported in our cohort and this allows a better prediction of prognosis and contributes to a more effective clinical management. The study highlights the potential of implementing precision medicine in the patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Montse Pauta ◽  
Berta Campos ◽  
Maria Segura-Puimedon ◽  
Gemma Arca ◽  
Alfons Nadal ◽  
...  

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield of 2 different next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches: gene panel and “solo” clinical exome sequencing (solo-CES), in fetuses with structural anomalies and normal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), in the absence of a known familial mutation. <b><i>Methodology:</i></b> Gene panels encompassing from 2 to 140 genes, were applied mainly in persistent nuchal fold/fetal hydrops and in large hyperechogenic kidneys. Solo-CES, which entails sequencing the fetus alone and only interpreting the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man genes, was performed in multisystem or recurrent structural anomalies. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the study period (2015–2020), 153 NGS studies were performed in 148 structurally abnormal fetuses with a normal CMA. The overall diagnostic yield accounted for 35% (53/153) of samples and 36% (53/148) of the fetuses. Diagnostic yield with the gene panels was 31% (15/49), similar to 37% (38/104) in solo-CES. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A monogenic disease was established as the underlying cause in 35% of selected fetal structural anomalies by gene panels and solo-CES.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiziana Vaisitti ◽  
Monica Sorbini ◽  
Martina Callegari ◽  
Silvia Kalantari ◽  
Valeria Bracciamà ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Autosomal dominant PKD determines formation of multiple cysts predominantly in the kidneys and usually becomes symptomatic during adulthood and can lead to renal failure. In contrast, in autosomal recessive PKD cysts occur in both the kidneys and the liver and usually presents an earlier onset. Obtaining genetic diagnosis is important to confirm clinical diagnosis and is required before treating with vasopressin 2 receptor blockers, which are the only drugs known to slow down the disease. Furthermore, in the case of kidney transplant from a living family member it is essential to exclude the presence of the mutation in the donor. We used clinical exome sequencing to provide genetic diagnosis to a cohort of patients with a clinical suspicion of PKD. Method 175 patients were referred to the Immunogenetics and Transplant Biology Service of the Turin University Hospital through a network of nephrology centers operating in the Piedmont region. Some patients were referred following genetic counseling. All patients signed an informed consent and the referring physicians provided relevant clinical data. DNA from eligible patients was extracted, checked for integrity, quantified and used for library preparation. A clinical exome sequencing (CES) kit by Illumina was used, allowing the analysis of 6,700 clinically relevant genes. Results Out of the 175 recruited patients eligible for CES, 38 (21.7%) had a clinical suspicion or diagnosis of PKD, with 50% of them presenting family history. The majority of the cohort was represented by male subjects (60.5%) and included both children (34.2%) and adults. The analytical approach was based on initial analysis of genes responsible for PKD (PKD1, PKD2 and PKHD1). If no mutation could be identified, analysis was then extended to a panel of 99 genes responsible for ciliopathies. This approach led to the identification of causative variants in 33/38 (86.8%) of the PKD cohort, while no variant could be identified in 5/38 patients. In 5/33 (15.2%) patients, mutations were inconclusive as found in heterozygosity in genes known to have an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance, while 27/33 (81.8%) were in line with the initial clinical suspicion/diagnosis. Of these, the majority was represented by missense mutations (12), followed by frameshift and nonsense mutations (6 each) and 3 splicing variants. As expected, the majority of mutations were found in PKD1 17/27 (63%), PKD2 3/27 (11.1%) and PKHD1 2/27 (7.4%). In these two latter patients, variants were found as compound heterozygosity. We also found mutations in other genes known to cause cysts, including TSC2 and CPT2. Of note, in 7 patients carrying PKD1 mutations, we found a second variant in PKD1 or PKHD1. Interestingly, when looking at patients characterized by kidney failure but lacking a clinical suspicion at recruitment or diagnosed with other phenotypes (66/175), we found variants in PKD1 and in PKD2 in 11 patients (9 and 2, respectively). Of all identified variants in PKD1, PKD2 and PKHD1 genes, 17.6% were annotated as pathogenic (C5), 41.2% were likely pathogenic (C4) and 41.2% were variants of unknown significance (C3). 19 variants in these genes were not previously reported. All the variants found in genes responsible for PKD were validated and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Family segregation studies are ongoing. Finally, it is worth mentioning that in a portion of cases (5/38) with clinical and phenotypic features of PKD, supported also by a positive family history, we could not detect mutations in causative genes. These results may be explained by the presence of intronic variants, in line with data reported in literature. Conclusion These results demonstrate that CES may be applied to PKD patients to identify causative variants during their routine diagnostic flow. Furthermore, CES may be a useful tool to detect mutations in PKD-related genes in patients with undiagnosed diseases, considering its rapidly decreasing costs.


Author(s):  
Tiziana Vaisitti ◽  
Monica Sorbini ◽  
Martina Callegari ◽  
Silvia Kalantari ◽  
Valeria Bracciamà ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A considerable minority of patients on waiting lists for kidney transplantation either have no diagnosis (and fall into the subset of undiagnosed cases) because kidney biopsy was not performed or histological findings were non-specific, or do not fall into any well-defined clinical category. Some of these patients might be affected by a previously unrecognised monogenic disease. Methods Through a multidisciplinary cooperative effort, we built an analytical pipeline to identify patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with a clinical suspicion of a monogenic condition or without a well-defined diagnosis. Following the stringent phenotypical and clinical characterization required by the flowchart, candidates meeting these criteria were further investigated by clinical exome sequencing followed by in silico analysis of 225 kidney-disease-related genes. Results By using an ad hoc web-based platform, we enrolled 160 patients from 13 different Nephrology and Genetics Units located across the Piedmont region over 15 months. A preliminary “remote” evaluation based on well-defined inclusion criteria allowed us to define eligibility for NGS analysis. Among the 138 recruited patients, 52 (37.7%) were children and 86 (62.3%) were adults. Up to 48% of them had a positive family history for kidney disease. Overall, applying this workflow led to the identification of genetic variants potentially explaining the phenotype in 78 (56.5%) cases. Conclusions These results underline the importance of clinical exome sequencing as a versatile and highly useful, non-invasive tool for genetic diagnosis of kidney diseases. Identifying patients who can benefit from targeted therapies, and improving the management of organ transplantation are further expected applications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document