scholarly journals Effect of High-dose Antithrombin Supplementation in Patients with Septic Shock and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Youn-Jung Kim ◽  
Byuk Sung Ko ◽  
Seo Young Park ◽  
Dong Kyu Oh ◽  
Sang-Bum Hong ◽  
...  

Abstract The efficacy of antithrombin (AT) administration in patients with septic shock and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was uncertain. This study aimed to investigate whether high-dose AT administration improves outcomes in patients with septic shock and DIC. This observational, prospective cohort study included consecutive adult septic shock patients with DIC who showed AT activity <70% between March 2016 and August 2018. The 28 day mortality of the patients treated with AT and without AT was evaluated by propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Among 142 patients with septic shock and DIC, 45 patients (31.7%) received AT supplementation and 97 did not. The 28 day mortality rate was lower in the AT group, but no statistically significant difference persisted after matching. Multivariable analysis showed that AT supplementation was independently associated with 28 day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.342; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.133−0.876; P = 0.025); however, no such association was observed after matching (OR, 0.480; 95% CI, 0.177−1.301; P = 0.149). High-dose AT administration in septic shock patients with DIC showed the improvement in survival, but the improvement was not observed after matching. Further larger studies are needed to conclusively confirm these findings.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3883
Author(s):  
Sang Min Kim ◽  
Sang-Il Kim ◽  
Gina Yu ◽  
June-Sung Kim ◽  
Seok In Hong ◽  
...  

(1) Background: The currently proposed criteria for diagnosing overt disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are not suitable for early detection of DIC. Thromboelastography (TEG) rapidly provides a comprehensive assessment of the entire coagulation process and is helpful as a guide for correcting consumptive coagulopathy in sepsis-induced DIC. This study aimed to investigate the role of TEG in the prediction of DIC in patients with septic shock. (2) Methods: TEG was conducted prospectively in 1294 patients with septic shock at the emergency department (ED) between January 2016 and December 2019. After exclusion of 405 patients with “do not attempt resuscitation” orders, those refusing enrollment, and those developing septic shock after ED presentation, 889 patients were included. DIC was defined as an International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis score ≥ 5 points within 24 h. (3) Results: Of the 889 patients with septic shock (mean age 65.6 ± 12.7 years, 58.6% male), 158 (17.8%) developed DIC. TEG values, except lysis after 30 min, were significantly different between the DIC and non-DIC groups. Among the TEG values, the maximal amplitude (MA) had the highest discriminating power for DIC, with an area under the curve of 0.814. An MA < 60 indicated DIC with 79% sensitivity, 73% specificity, and 94% negative predictive value. Based on multivariable analysis, MA < 60 was an independent predictor of DIC (odds ratio 5.616 (95% confidence interval: 3.213–9.818)). (4) Conclusions: In patients with septic shock, the MA value in TEG could be a valuable tool for early prediction of DIC.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana J. Kelm ◽  
Juan Carlos Valerio-Rojas ◽  
Javier Cabello-Garza ◽  
Ognjen Gajic ◽  
Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba

Purpose. The goal of this study was to identify potential clinical predictors for the development of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in patients with septic shock. Material and Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of a cohort of adult (>18 years of age) patients with septic shock admitted to a medical ICU in a tertiary care hospital from July 2005 until September 2007. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the association of risk factors with overt DIC. Results. In this study, a total of 390 patients with septic shock were analyzed, of whom 66 (17%) developed overt DIC. Hospital mortality was significantly greater in patients who developed overt DIC (68% versus 38%, P<0.001). A delay in the timing of antibiotics was associated with an increased risk of the development of overt DIC (P<0.001). Patients on antiplatelet therapy prior to hospital admission and who that received adequate early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) were associated with a decreased risk of overt DIC (P<0.001). Conclusions. In our cohort of patients with septic shock, there was a risk reduction for overt DIC in patients on antiplatelet therapy and adequate EGDT, while there was an increased risk of DIC with antibiotic delay.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guang Fu ◽  
Xi-si He ◽  
Hao-li Li ◽  
Hai-chao Zhan ◽  
Jun-fu Lu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Complication of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a determinant of the prognosis in patients with sepsis shock. Procalcitonin (PCT) has been advocated as a marker of bacterial sepsis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between serum PCT levels and DIC with sepsis shock Methods A cohort study was designed which included patients that admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 and the follow-up to discharge. 164 septic shock patients were divided into DIC and non-DIC groups according to international society of thrombosis and homeostasis (ISTH). PCT was measured at the admission to ICU, and all the participants received routine biochemical coagulation test subsequently. Results PCT levels were considerably higher in septic shock patients who developed DIC than those who did not (54.6[13.6–200]vs12.6[2.4–53.3]ng/ml), respectively, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression model revealed that PCT level was significantly associated with risk of DIC independent of conventional risk factors. In addition, curve fitting showed a linear relationship between PCT and DIC score. The Receiver Operating characteristic(ROC) curve suggested that the optimal cut-off point for PCT to predicting DIC induced by septic shock was 42.0 ng/ml, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.701(95% CI [0.619–0.784], P < 0.001). More importantly, incorporating PCT with other risk factors into the prediction model significantly increased the AUC for prediction of DIC induced by sepsis shock (0.801vs 0.706; P = 0.012). Conclusions Our study suggests that PCT levels on admission is significantly and independently associated with DIC development subsequently with septic shock, combining PCT levels with other risk factors could significantly improve the prediction of DIC induced by sepsis shock.


CHEST Journal ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 816-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois Fourrier ◽  
Claude Chopin ◽  
Jenny Goudemand ◽  
Sylvie Hendrycx ◽  
Claudine Caron ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
pp. 1292-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balasubramanian Venkatesh ◽  
Simon Finfer ◽  
Jeremy Cohen ◽  
Dorrilyn Rajbhandari ◽  
Yaseen Arabi ◽  
...  

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Two recent randomized controlled trials (Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock [ADRENAL] and Activated Protein C and Corticosteroids for Human Septic Shock [APROCCHSS]) of corticosteroids in patients with septic shock reported different treatment effects on 90-day mortality. Both trials enrolled patients who met the criteria for septic shock using the second international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-2), but the APROCCHSS trial mandated a greater severity of shock as an inclusion criterion. Methods The authors conducted post hoc sensitivity analyses of the ADRENAL trial to determine the effects of hydrocortisone versus placebo in subgroups selected using third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) diagnostic criteria or APROCCHSS inclusion criteria. Results There were 1,950 subjects (973 hydrocortisone and 977 placebo) who met the Sepsis-3 criteria (ADRENAL–Sepsis-3 cohort) and 905 patients (455 hydrocortisone and 450 placebo) who met the APROCCHSS criteria (ADRENAL–APROCCHSS cohort). At 90 days after randomization, in the ADRENAL–Sepsis-3 cohort, 312 of 963 (32.4%) and 337 of 958 (35.2%) patients assigned to hydrocortisone and placebo, respectively, had died (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.06; P = 0.166). The corresponding figures for the ADRENAL–APROCCHSS cohorts were 187 of 453 (41.3%) and 200 of 445 (44.9%), respectively (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.17; P = 0.303). There was no statistically significant difference in the time to death between the groups during the 90 days after randomization (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.02; P = 0.082 for ADRENAL–Sepsis-3; and hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.06; P = 0.156 for ADRENAL–APROCCHSS cohorts). In both cohorts, patients assigned to hydrocortisone had faster resolution of shock. In the ADRENAL–Sepsis-3 cohort, patients assigned to hydrocortisone had an increase in the number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation (57.0 ± 37.2 vs. 53.7 ± 38.2 days; 95% CI, 0.40 to 7.04; P = 0.028) and the number of days alive and free of the intensive care unit (54.3 ± 36.0 vs. 51.0 ± 37.1; 95% CI, 0.82 to 7.24; P = 0.014). Conclusions In a post hoc analysis of the ADRENAL trial participants who fulfilled either the Sepsis-3 or the APROCCHSS inclusion criteria, a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone did not result in a lower 90-day mortality than placebo in septic shock.


1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 583
Author(s):  
Tai Seung Kim ◽  
Jae Lim Cho ◽  
Choong Hyeok Choi ◽  
Sung Hee Oh ◽  
Do Hyeung Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 403-403
Author(s):  
Nabil Adra ◽  
Sandra K. Althouse ◽  
Rafat Abonour ◽  
Mohammad Issam Abu Zaid ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
...  

403 Background: Rate of serum TM decline is prognostic in patients (pts) with GCT receiving first-line chemotherapy. We investigated the prognostic value of TM decline in rGCT treated with HDCT+peripheral-blood stem-cell transplant (PBSCT). Methods: 462 consecutive pts with rGCT treated with HDCT+PBSCT at Indiana University between 1/2004-1/2019. All pts were planned for 2 consecutive HDCT courses with carboplatin+etoposide per protocol (N Engl J Med 2007;357:340-8). Pts with elevated AFP and/or hCG were included (N=347). Slope and half-life (T1/2) were calculated for weekly AFP+hCG during HDCT starting with peak value at days 1-7 to avoid interference from lysis. T1/2 AFP≤7 days and hCG≤3 days were categorized satisfactory (SAT). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared for SAT vs unsatisfactory (UNSAT) using log-rank test and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier. Uni- and multivariable analysis using Cox regression model was performed. Results: 347 pts had elevated TM: 312 had non-seminoma and 35 had seminoma. Median age was 31 (range, 17-58). Primary site: testis (292), mediastinum (26), retroperitoneum/other (29). Metastatic sites included retroperitoneum (277), lung (233), liver (83), brain (77), and bone (21). At initiation of HDCT, 77 pts had elevated AFP, 222 elevated hCG, and 48 elevated both AFP+hCG. Median AFP 9 (1-21,347) and hCG 113 (1-178,140). 314 pts (91%) completed 2 planned cycles of HDCT. Overall, 46/347 pts had SAT decline (13 for AFP; 30 for hCG; 3 for both). Pts with SAT TM decline had superior outcomes compared to UNSAT: 2-yr PFS 69% vs 45% (p=0.006) and 2-yr OS 75% vs 51% (p=0.006). When evaluating each TM separately, SAT decline in hCG had superior outcomes vs UNSAT: 2-yr PFS 74% vs 47% (p=0.002). There was statistically non-significant difference for AFP: 2-yr PFS 48% vs 42% (p=0.65). In univariable analysis, UNSAT decline of hCG, but not AFP, was an adverse prognostic factor for PFS: HR=2.51 (95% CI, 1.40-4.51); p=0.002. Multivariable analysis will be presented. Conclusions: SAT rate of TM decline, particularly in hCG, predicts superior outcomes in rGCT undergoing HDCT+PBSCT. Pts with UNSAT TM decline are at higher risk for relapse and death.


Shock ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Delabranche ◽  
Laure Stiel ◽  
François Severac ◽  
Anne-Cécile Galoisy ◽  
Laurent Mauvieux ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document