scholarly journals Uptake and predictors of colonoscopy use in family members not participating in cascade genetic testing for Lynch syndrome

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Hadley ◽  
Dina Eliezer ◽  
Yonit Addissie ◽  
Andrea Goergen ◽  
Sato Ashida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Risk Perceptions ◽  
Family Members ◽  
The United States ◽  
Carrier Status ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey

Abstract Cascade genetic testing provides a method to appropriately focus colonoscopy use in families with Lynch syndrome (LS). However, research suggests that up to two-thirds at risk to inherit LS don’t participate. Within the United States, no studies have assessed colonoscopy use within this elusive and high-risk subset. We set forth to (1) document colonoscopy use within those not undergoing genetic testing (NGT) and (2) identify factors associated with completing colonoscopy. Data came from a cross sectional survey of families with molecularly confirmed LS. One hundred seventy-six (176) adults participated; 47 of unknown variant status and 129 with variant status known (59 carriers/70 non-carriers). Despite a high level of awareness of LS (85%) and identical recommendations for colonoscopy, NGT reported significantly lower use of colonoscopy than carriers (47% vs. 73%; p = 0.003). Our results show that perceived risk to develop colon cancer (AOR = 1.99, p < 0.05) and physician recommendations (AOR = 7.64, p < 0.01) are significant predictors of colonoscopy use across all family members controlling for carrier status. Given these findings, health care providers, should assess patients’ perceived risk to develop cancer, assist them in adjusting risk perceptions and discuss recommendations for colonoscopy with all members in families with LS. Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00004210.

scholarly journals COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in underserved communities of North Carolina

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0248542
Author(s):  
Irene A. Doherty ◽  
William Pilkington ◽  
Laurin Brown ◽  
Victoria Billings ◽  
Undi Hoffler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Vaccine Safety ◽  
The United States ◽  
Vaccine Hesitancy ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Underserved Communities ◽  
Safety Concerns

Background In the United States, underserved communities including Blacks and Latinx are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. This study sought to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, describe attitudes related to vaccination, and identify correlates among historically marginalized populations across 9 counties in North Carolina. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey distributed at free COVID-19 testing events in underserved rural and urban communities from August 27 –December 15, 2020. Vaccine hesitancy was defined as the response of “no” or “don’t know/not sure” to whether the participant would get the COVID-19 vaccine as soon as it became available. Results The sample comprised 948 participants including 27.7% Whites, 59.6% Blacks, 12.7% Latinx, and 63% female. 32% earned <$20K annually, 60% owned a computer and ~80% had internet access at home. The prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 68.9% including 62.7%, 74%, and 59.5% among Whites, Blacks, and Latinx, respectively. Between September and December, the largest decline in vaccine hesitancy occurred among Whites (27.5 percentage points), followed by Latinx (17.6) and only 12.0 points among Blacks. 51.2% of respondents reported vaccine safety concerns, 23.7% wanted others to get vaccinated first, and 63.1% would trust health care providers about the COVID-19 vaccine. Factors associated with hesitancy in multivariable logistic regression included being female (OR = 1.90 95%CI [1.36, 2.64]), being Black (OR = 1.68 1.16, 2.45]), calendar month (OR = 0.76 [0.63, 0.92]), safety concerns (OR = 4.28 [3.06, 5.97]), and government distrust (OR = 3.57 [2.26, 5.63]). Conclusions This study engaged the community to directly reach underserved minority populations at highest risk of COVID-19 that permitted assessment of vaccine hesitancy (which was much higher than national estimates), driven in part by distrust, and safety concerns.

Supporting families managing parental mental illness: Challenges and resources

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 361-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle D Sherman ◽  
Stephanie A Hooker
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Family Members ◽  
The United States ◽  
Parental Mental Illness ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Treatment Needs

Over five million children in the United States have a parent living with a serious mental illness. These offspring are at higher risk for developing mental health problems themselves due to a complex interplay of biological, psychological, and psychosocial factors. Life with a parent with psychiatric symptoms can be scary, confusing, overwhelming, and sad; children often blame themselves for their parent’s problems, find their parent’s behavior embarrassing, and struggle to explain the illness to their friends. Unfortunately, these children’s needs and experiences are often ignored by overwhelmed parents, worried family members and relatives, separate mental health systems of care for adults and children that often fail to coordinate care, and even well-intentioned health-care providers. Family medicine teams have an opportunity to detect and support these families in unique ways. We offer four recommendations for family medicine teams to help families managing parental mental illness including assessing functioning, treatment needs, and impacts on each family member; educating all family members about mental illness; instilling hope, noting the range of effective treatments for mental illness; and encouraging the use of supports and referral options. Providers can leverage family members’ strengths, work with community-based resources, and offer continuity to these families, as they struggle with an oftentimes chronic, relapsing disease that has ripple effects throughout the family system.

scholarly journals Undergraduate nursing students’ COVID-19 vaccine intentions: A national survey

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261669
Author(s):  
Holly B. Fontenot ◽  
Deborah B. Mattheus ◽  
Eunjung Lim ◽  
Alexandra Michel ◽  
Nicole Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Perceived Risk ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing Students ◽  
Perceived Safety ◽  
Undergraduate Nursing ◽  
Secondary Intention

Introduction In December 2020, the first two COVID-19 vaccines were approved in the United States (U.S.) and recommended for distribution to front-line personnel, including nurses. Nursing students are being prepared to fill critical gaps in the health care workforce and have played important supportive roles during the current pandemic. Research has focused on vaccine intentions of current health care providers and less is known about students’ intentions to vaccinate for COVID-19. Methods A national sample of undergraduate nursing students were recruited across five nursing schools in five U.S. regions in December 2020. The survey measured perceived risk/threat of COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccine attitudes, perceived safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, sources for vaccine information and level of intention to become vaccinated [primary, secondary (i.e., delayed), or no intention to vaccinate]. Results The final sample consisted of 772 students. The majority (83.6%) had intentions to be vaccinated, however of those 31.1% indicated secondary intention, a delay in intention or increased hesitancy). The strongest predictors of primary intention were positive attitudes (OR = 6.86; CI = 4.39–10.72), having lower safety concerns (OR = 0.26; CI = 0.18–0.36), and consulting social media as a source of information (OR = 1.56; CI = 1.23–1.97). Asian (OR = 0.47; CI = 0.23–0.97) and Black (OR 0.26; CI = 0.08–0.80) students were more likely to indicate secondary intention as compared to primary intention. Students in the Midwest were most likely to indicate no intention as compared to secondary intention (OR = 4.6; CI = 1.32–16.11). Conclusions As the first two COVID-19 vaccines were approved/recommended in the U.S. nursing students had overall high intentions to vaccinate. Findings can guide development of educational interventions that reduce concerns of vaccine safety that are delivered in a way that is supportive and affirming to minoritized populations while being respectful of geo-political differences.

The Genetics of Cardiac Arrhythmias

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Terry Beery
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Cardiac Rhythm ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Family Members ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Conduction Disorders ◽  
Genetic Components ◽  
Genetic Contributions

Cardiac rhythm problems result in high levels of morbidity and mortality, with sudden arrhythmic death claiming approximately 300,000 lives in the United States each year. Investigations into the genetic contributions to rhythm and conduction disorders have found genes or loci associated with primary rhythm/conduction disorders such as familial atrial fibrillation and atrio-ventricular block, underscoring the importance of collecting a thorough family history. Combinations of single or multiple genes and environmental risk factors may place only certain family members at risk. Some cardiac muscle problems, such as cardiomyopathy, predispose to arrhythmia and have documented genetic components. Primary health care providers need current knowledge of genetic contributions to rhythm/conduction problems so that family members at risk can be identified early and cared for appropriately. This article provides an overview of the genetic contributions to cardiac rhythm and conduction problems.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Underserved Communities of North Carolina

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene A. Doherty ◽  
William Pilkington ◽  
Laurin Brown ◽  
Victoria Billings ◽  
Undi Hoffler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Vaccine Hesitancy ◽  
List Type ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Underserved Communities ◽  
Safety Concerns

AbstractBackgroundIn the United States, underserved communities including Blacks and Latinx are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, and widespread vaccination is critical for curbing this pandemic. This study sought to estimate the prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, describe attitudes related to vaccination, and identify correlates among racial minority and marginalized populations across 9 counties in North Carolina.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey with a self-administered questionnaire distributed at free COVID-19 testing events in underserved rural and urban communities from August 27 – December 15, 2020. Vaccine hesitancy was defined as the response of “no” or “don’t know/not sure” to whether the participant would get the COVID-19 vaccine as soon as it became available.ResultsThe sample comprised 948 participants including 27.7% Whites, 59.6% Blacks, 12.7% Latinx, and 63% female. Thirty-two percent earned <$20K annually, 60% owned a computer and ∼80% had internet access at home. The prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 68.9% including 62.7%, 74%, and 59.5% among Whites, Blacks, and Latinx, respectively. Between September and December, the largest decline in vaccine hesitancy occurred among Whites (27.5 percentage points), followed by Latinx (17.6) and the smallest decline was among Black respondents (12.0). 51.2% of the respondents reported vaccine safety concerns, 23.7% wanted others to get of the respondents reported they would trust health care providers with information about the COVID-19 vaccine. Factors associated with hesitancy in multivariable logistic regression included being female (OR=1.90 95%CI[1.36, 2.64]), being Black (OR=1.68 [1.106 2.45]), calendar month (OR=0.76 [0.63, 0.92]), safety concerns (OR=4.28 [3.06, 5.97]), and government distrust (OR=3.57 [2.26, 5.63]).ConclusionsThis study reached underserved minority populations in a number of different locations to investigate COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. We built on existing relationships and further engaged the community, stake holders and health department to provide free COVID-19 testing. This direct approach permitted assessment of vaccine hesitancy (which was much higher than national estimates), distrust, and safety concerns.HighlightsThis study surveyed 948 adults at COVID-19 testing sites in 9 counties of North Carolina between August 27 and December 15, 2020 where vaccine hesitancy was widespread including 74% in Blacks, 62.7% in Whites and 59.5% in Latinx.Vaccine hesitancy declined over time but remained high for Blacks.On-site surveys conducted in underserved areas that were paper-based and self-administered permitted reaching adults with no internet (17%), no cell phone (20%), no computer (40%) and yearly incomes less than 20K (31%).Widespread vaccine hesitancy in predominately minority communities of NC must be addressed to successfully implement mass COVID-19 vaccination programs.

scholarly journals 1387. Current practices in the diagnosis and treatment of varicella infections in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S703-S704
Author(s):  
Jaime Fergie ◽  
Manjiri D Pawaskar ◽  
Phani Veerkani ◽  
Salome Samant ◽  
Carolyn Harley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
The United States ◽  
Varicella Vaccination ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Research Grant

Abstract Background The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended a 1 dose varicella immunization program in 1996, expanding this to include 2 doses in 2006. As a result, more than 3.5 million cases of varicella, 9,000 hospitalizations, and 100 deaths are prevented annually in the United States. Since varicella infections have become uncommon, the response of health care providers (HCPs) to patients presenting with varicella symptoms may result in misdiagnosis and/ mistreatment. This study investigated the diagnostic and treatment strategies used by HCPs for managing varicella infections in US children. Methods An online cross-sectional survey of licensed HCPs was conducted, after an Institution review board approval and HCP consent. 8 clinical vignettes with information on patients with varying varicella symptoms (representing uncomplicated and complicated cases) were presented. For each vignette, HCPs selected a diagnosis and appropriate intervention(s) from pre-determined lists. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results A total of 153 HCPs (50 nurses, 103 doctors) completed the survey. Mean age was 44 years, 62% were female, and 82% were licensed after 1995. Varicella infection was correctly diagnosed 79% of the time. HCPs were able to recognize uncomplicated cases of varicella 85% of the time and complicated cases 61% of the time. HCPs recommended the correct intervention 43% of the time for uncomplicated cases and 25% of the time for complicated cases. For example, HCPs recommended antibiotics 17% of the time and/or antivirals 18% of the time (Table 1), of which 25% and 69% (respectively) were not appropriate per the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines respectively. Antibiotics were incorrectly recommended 6% of the time for uncomplicated cases of varicella. Table 1. Additional Diagnosis & Treatment Results Conclusion Given the low incidence of varicella infections in the US, complicated cases of varicella may be under-recognized or inappropriately treated by some HCPs. Additional training may help HCPs better recognize/ treat cases of varicella. Further, ensuring high rates of varicella vaccination is important to avoid vaccine preventable conditions and to minimize unnecessary exposure to antimicrobial and antiviral therapies. Disclosures Jaime Fergie, MD, AstraZeneca (Speaker’s Bureau)Sobi, Inc. (Speaker’s Bureau) Manjiri D. Pawaskar, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc (Employee, Shareholder) Phani Veerkani, MD, DrPH, Merck (Research Grant or Support) Salome Samant, MBBS, MPH, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee, Shareholder) Carolyn Harley, PhD, Merck (Consultant) Joanna MacEwan, PhD, PRECISIONheor (Employee) Taylor T. Schwartz, MPH, Merck (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Shikha Surati, MPH, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

The Special Perils of Being Old and Sick in Prison

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 276-284
Author(s):  
William J. Jefferson
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
United States Constitution ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Medical Practitioners ◽  
Medical Needs ◽  
Access To Medical Care

The United States Supreme Court declared in 1976 that deliberate indifference to the serious medical needs of prisoners constitutes the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain…proscribed by the Eighth Amendment. It matters not whether the indifference is manifested by prison doctors in their response to the prisoner’s needs or by prison guards intentionally denying or delaying access to medical care or intentionally interfering with treatment once prescribed—adequate prisoner medical care is required by the United States Constitution. My incarceration for four years at the Oakdale Satellite Prison Camp, a chronic health care level camp, gives me the perspective to challenge the generally promoted claim of the Bureau of Federal Prisons that it provides decent medical care by competent and caring medical practitioners to chronically unhealthy elderly prisoners. The same observation, to a slightly lesser extent, could be made with respect to deficiencies in the delivery of health care to prisoners of all ages, as it is all significantly deficient in access, competencies, courtesies and treatments extended by prison health care providers at every level of care, without regard to age. However, the frailer the prisoner, the more dangerous these health care deficiencies are to his health and, therefore, I believe, warrant separate attention. This paper uses first-hand experiences of elderly prisoners to dismantle the tale that prisoner healthcare meets constitutional standards.

A survey of Instagram users with asthma to evaluate the acceptability of a planned clinical trial intervention (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry Spitzer ◽  
Brent Heineman ◽  
Marcella Jewell ◽  
Michael Moran ◽  
Peter Lindenauer
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Social Media ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
College Education ◽  
The United States ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Healthy Behaviors ◽  
Social Media Platforms ◽  
Hispanic White

BACKGROUND Asthma is a chronic lung disease that affects nearly 25 million individuals in the United States. There is a need for more research into the potential for health care providers to leverage existing social media platforms to improve healthy behaviors and support individuals living with chronic health conditions. OBJECTIVE In this study, we assess the willingness of Instagram users with poorly controlled asthma to participate in a pilot study that uses Instagram as a means of providing social and informational support. In addition, we explore the potential for adapting photovoice and digital storytelling to social media. METHODS A survey study of Instagram users living with asthma in the United States, between the ages of 18 to 40. RESULTS Over 3 weeks of recruitment, 457 individuals completed the pre-survey screener; 347 were excluded. Of the 110 people who were eligible and agreed to participate in the study, 82 completed the study survey. Respondents mean age was 21(SD = 5.3). Respondents were 56% female (n=46), 65% (n=53) non-Hispanic white, and 72% (n=59) had at least some college education. The majority of respondents (n = 66, 81%) indicated that they would be willing to participate in the study. CONCLUSIONS Among young-adult Instagram users with asthma there is substantial interest in participating in a study that uses Instagram to connect participants with peers and a health coach in order to share information about self-management of asthma and build social connection.

Effects of Cardiovascular Disease and Related Risk Factors on Neurocognition

2019 ◽  
pp. 83-116
Author(s):  
Spencer W. Liebel ◽  
Lawrence H. Sweet
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Cognitive Processing ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Neurocognitive Functioning ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Related Risk

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) affects approximately 44 million American adults older than age 60 years and remains the leading cause of death in the United States, with approximately 610,000 each year. With improved survival from acute cardiac events, older adults are often faced with the prospect of living with CVD, which causes significant psychological, social, and economic hardship. The various disease processes that constitute CVD also exert a deleterious effect on neurocognitive functioning. Although existing knowledge of neurocognitive functioning in CVD and its subtypes is substantial, a review of these findings by CVD type and neurocognitive domain does not exist, despite the potential impact of this information for patients, health care providers, and clinical researchers. This chapter provides a resource for clinicians and researchers on the epidemiology, mechanisms, and neurocognitive effects of CVDs. This chapter includes a discussion of neurocognitive consequences of CVD subtypes by neuropsychological domain and recommendations for assessment. Overall, the CVD subtypes that have the most findings available on specific neurocognitive domains are heart failure, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Despite a large discrepancy between the number of available studies across CVD subtypes, existing literature on neurocognitive effects by domain is consistent with the literature on the neurocognitive sequelae of unspecified CVD. Specifically, the research literature suggests that cognitive processing speed, attention, executive functioning, and memory are the domains most frequently affected. Given the prevalence of CVDs, neuropsychological assessment of older adults should include instruments that allow consideration of these potential neurocognitive consequences of CVD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document