scholarly journals Proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and carfilzomib used for the treatment of multiple myeloma do not inhibit the serine protease HtrA2/Omi

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1619-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilmos Csizmadia ◽  
Paul Hales ◽  
Christopher Tsu ◽  
Jingya Ma ◽  
Jiejin Chen ◽  
...  

The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is associated with the development of peripheral neuropathy in patients, but the mechanism is not fully understood.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 5023-5023
Author(s):  
Joseph Senn ◽  
Vilmos Csizmadia ◽  
Paul Hales ◽  
Larry Dick ◽  
Vivek J. Kadambi

Abstract Abstract 5023 Based on unprecedented efficacy, the proteasome inhibitor (PI) bortezomib has become the cornerstone of multiple myeloma treatment. Nevertheless, in a subset of patients bortezomib causes painful peripheral neuropathy and this side effect can limit its potential benefit for those patients. Although the mechanism of bortezomib associated neuropathy is unknown, we have previously suggested that it is related to the mechanism of action (Csizmadia at. al. Vet Pathol 2010; 47:358–367.). Recently Arastu-Kapur et al. (Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:2734–2743.) have reported that the serine protease HtrA2/Omi was inhibited by bortezomib (a peptide boronate proteasome inhibitor) and not by carfilzomib (an epoxyketone proteasome inhibitor). Further, since HtrA2/Omi is involved in neuronal survival (Martins et al. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24: 9848–9862.) they suggested that this off target inhibition by bortezomib could be the mechanism underlying bortezomib associated peripheral neuropathy. To confirm and extend these published results, we investigated the effects of these two PIs on HtrA2/Omi activity in recombinant enzyme assays, in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma-, and wild type and HtrA2/Omi double negative mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (MEF). In contrast to the results of Arastu-Kapur et al., our results clearly demonstrated that neither bortezomib nor carfilzomib inhibits HtrA2/Omi in recombinant enzyme assays at concentrations up to 100μM. As a positive control we used Ucf-101 an HtrA2/Omi specific inhibitor (Cilenti et al. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:11489–11494.) which in our assay behaved in a manner consistent with the published literature. Similarly, in MEF cells, only Ucf-101 prevented the degradation of validated HtrA2/Omi substrates eIF4G1 and UCH-L1, while neither bortezomib nor carfilzomib prevented the degradation of these two substrates. In conclusion, we have assessed the protease activity of HtrA2/Omi both in vitro with purified enzyme and in cultured cells and we find that neither PI inhibits this protease. Therefore we think it is unlikely that PI associated peripheral neuropathy is caused by off target inhibition of HtrA2/Omi. Further research is needed to understand the side effects of PIs. Disclosures: Senn: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Csizmadia:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hales:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Dick:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Kadambi:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.



Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3014-3014
Author(s):  
Giada Bianchi ◽  
Vijay G. Ramakrishnan ◽  
Teresa Kimlinger ◽  
Jessica Haug ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3014 Background: Proteasome inhibitors have proven particularly effective in treatment of multiple myeloma, the second most frequent hematologic malignancy in the western world. Bortezomib, the first in class proteasome inhibitor in clinical use, was first approved in 2003 via fast FDA track, given the remarkable activity shown during phase II clinical trials. Nevertheless, more than 50% of multiple myeloma patients did not respond to single agent bortezomib when administered as second line agent. Moreover, bortezomib is only available for intravenous administration, representing a cumbersome therapy for patients, and its use is limited by significant toxicities (especially peripheral neuropathy). MLN9708 (Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), an investigational orally available, small molecule, is a potent, specific and reversible inhibitor of the 20S proteasome. It is currently under clinical investigation for the treatment of hematologic and non-hematologic malignancies. Upon exposure to aqueous solutions or plasma, MLN9708 rapidly hydrolyzes to MLN2238, the biologically active form, and MLN2238 was used for all of the preclinical studies reported here. In vitro biochemistry studies have shown that MLN2238 has a faster dissociation rate from the proteasome compared to bortezomib, and in vivo studies of MLN2238 have shown antitumor activity in a broader range of tumor xenografts when compared to bortezomib. Given these encouraging preclinical results, we set to investigate the anti-myeloma activity of MLN2238 in vitro. Results: MLN2238 proved to have anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic activity against a broad range of MM cell lines with EC50 at 24 hours ranging between 10 and 50 nM, even in relatively resistant MM cell lines (OPM2, DOX6, RPMI, etc.). In MM.1S cells, induction of apoptosis was time and dose dependent and related to activation of both caspase 8 and 9. When compared to MM.1S treated for 24 hours with EC50 dose of bortezomib, treatment with EC50 dose of MLN2238 resulted in the same extent of caspases cleavage occurring at an earlier time point (8-12 hours), possibly suggesting more rapid onset and/or irreversibility of apoptosis in cells treated with MLN2238. Treatment with MLN2238 was associated with early, but persistent induction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress with BiP being induced 2–4 hours after treatment with EC50 dose and gradually increasing over time. While bortezomib has been associated with early induction and late decrease in proteins involved in ER stress, MLN2238 appears to induce a persistent rise in these factors, suggesting either more sustained proteasome blockade with stabilization of proteasome substrates or de-novo induction of unfolded protein response (UPR) genes. MLN2238 also proved effective in reducing phosphorylation of ERK1-2 with no overall alteration in the total ERK level, thus accounting for the observed reduction in proliferation upon treatment. Preliminary data indicate potential for additive and synergistic combination with widely used drugs, including doxorubicin and dexamethasone. Conclusion: While further clinical data are needed to establish the effectiveness of MLN2238 in the treatment of multiple myeloma, these preliminary nonclinical data, together with the favorable biochemical and pharmacokinetic properties, including oral bioavailability, make the investigational agent MLN9708 an appealing candidate for treatment of multiple myeloma. Further in vitro data could help establish whether a difference in the apoptotic mechanisms exist between MLN2238 and other proteasome inhibitors, primarily bortezomib, and could also help inform combination treatment approaches aimed at increasing effectiveness, overcoming bortezomib resistance and decreasing toxicity. Disclosures: Kumar: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding.



2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 204062071983902 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Song ◽  
Kathleen L. Wilson ◽  
Jerry Kagan ◽  
Sumeet Panjabi

Background: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common consequence of multiple myeloma (MM) among those commonly treated with older-generation proteasome inhibitors (PIs). In this study, we evaluated the economic burden attributable to PN among MM patients in real-world practice settings in the US. Methods: Adults diagnosed with MM and first treated (index event) between 1 July 2006 and 28 February 2017 were identified from MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare claim databases. Continuous enrollment for at least 12 months without treatment and PN diagnoses were required pre-index. Patients were followed for at least 3 months until inpatient death or end of data. The International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes were used to identify PN. Propensity-score matching was applied to match every patient with PN to two MM patients without a PN diagnosis (controls). Healthcare utilization and expenditures per patient per month (PPPM) in the postindex period were estimated. Results: Of 11,851 patients meeting the study criteria, 15.5% had PN. After matching 1387 patients with PN and 2594 controls were identified. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between cohorts; mean follow up was 23–26 months. PPPM total costs were significantly higher by $1509 for patients with PN than controls, driven by higher hospitalization (PN 77.4%, controls 67.2%; p < 0.001) and emergency department rates (PN 67.8%, controls 58.4%; p < 0.001) and more outpatient hospital-based visits PPPM (PN 13.5 ± 14.7, controls 11.5 ± 18.0; p < 0.001). Conclusions: PN is a prevalent MM treatment complication associated with a significant economic burden adding to the complexity and cost of MM treatment. Highly effective novel treatments such as carfilzomib may reduce the overall disease burden.



Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1958-1958
Author(s):  
Natalia Gut ◽  
Filiz Yucebay ◽  
Jessica Dempsey ◽  
Junan Li ◽  
Don M. Benson

Abstract Background Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an essentially incurable hematologic malignancy with the goals of therapy being disease control, improved quality of life, and prolonged survival.1,2 Despite improved survival with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agents, outcomes for patients with refractory disease, resistant to these classes of therapy, are poor. Daratumumab, an anti-CD38 antibody, is a commonly utilized therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) as a single agent based on the SIRIUS study which resulted in adequate response and acceptable safety profiles.3,4 Currently, it is approved in various combinations including with bortezomib. The approval of daratumumab in combination with bortezomib days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day cycle was based on the CASTOR study which resulted in high response rates and acceptable safety profiles.5With the addition of bortezomib, additional toxicities in this RRMM setting may be a concern.6 Previous studies of bortezomib in RRMM patients have demonstrated that once-weekly bortezomib is equally as efficacious and better tolerated than the standard twice-weekly schedule, with a lower incidence of peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression.8,9 However, there are currently no published reports of combining once-weekly bortezomib with daratumumab for patients with RRMM. Methods The present study sought to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) of daratumumab administered with once-weekly bortezomib for patients with RRMM. Secondary objectives included evaluation of overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), time to response (TTR), and toxicity of once-weekly bortezomib with daratumumab. Eighteen patients were identified in an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved retrospective review of our institutional experience with daratumumab and once-weekly bortezomib. The median age of patients was 65 years (range 47 - 76, Table 1). Ten patients (55.6%) had three or more prior lines of therapy. Twelve patients (66.7%) had previous autologous stem cell transplantation. Sixteen patients (88.9%) had prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) therapy. Thirteen patients (72.2%) had disease refractory to their last line of therapy. Results The median PFS was 3.5 months. Median OS was not reached and TTR were undetermined due to the small sample size. The ORR was 33.3%, with 6 out of 18 patients experiencing an objective partial response or better (Table 2). Of those that responded, 4 patients (66.7%) remained on therapy at the time of data collection.The side effect profile was more tolerable, with less thrombocytopenia (27.8% all grade) and peripheral neuropathy (33.3% all grade) than previously reported (Table 3). Conclusions Daratumumab monotherapy was approved in heavily pretreated RRMM based on the SIRIUS trial showing promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile.4 The median PFS was 3.7 months compared to our PFS of 3.5 months. The combination of daratumumab with bortezomib administered twice weekly was approved based results from the CASTOR trial showing superiority of daratumumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone over bortezomib and dexamethasone.5 As depicted in Table 2, our ORR of 33.3% is similar to the ORR of 29.2% in the SIRIUS trial, however differs greatly from 82.9% in the CASTOR trial. While the present work is retrospective and hypothesis-generating, our results suggest that further prospective inquiry is necessary to determine the additional efficacy of adding once-weekly bortezomib to daratumumab. Disclosures Dempsey: Heron Therapeutics: Honoraria; TESARO: Honoraria.



2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. e1010058
Author(s):  
Hao Zhang ◽  
Gang Lin

Proteasomes are compartmentalized, ATP-dependent, N-terminal nucleophile hydrolases that play essentials roles in intracellular protein turnover. They are present in all 3 kingdoms. Pharmacological inhibition of proteasomes is detrimental to cell viability. Proteasome inhibitor rugs revolutionize the treatment of multiple myeloma. Proteasomes in pathogenic microbes such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), Plasmodium falciparum (Pf), and other parasites and worms have been validated as therapeutic targets. Starting with Mtb proteasome, efforts in developing inhibitors selective for microbial proteasomes have made great progress lately. In this review, we describe the strategies and pharmacophores that have been used in developing proteasome inhibitors with potency and selectivity that spare human proteasomes and highlight the development of clinical proteasome inhibitor candidates for treatment of leishmaniasis and Chagas disease. Finally, we discuss the future challenges and therapeutical potentials of the microbial proteasome inhibitors.



2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shansa Pranami E. Jayaweera ◽  
Sacheela Prasadi Wanigasinghe Kanakanamge ◽  
Dharshika Rajalingam ◽  
Gayathri N. Silva

The proteasome is crucial for the degradation of intracellular proteins and plays an important role in mediating a number of cell survival and progression events by controlling the levels of key regulatory proteins such as cyclins and caspases in both normal and tumor cells. However, compared to normal cells, cancer cells are more dependent on the ubiquitin proteasome pathway (UPP) due to the accumulation of proteins in response to uncontrolled gene transcription, allowing proteasome to become a potent therapeutic target for human cancers such as multiple myeloma (MM). Up to date, three proteasome inhibitors namely bortezomib (2003), carfilzomib (2012) and ixazomib (2015) have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. This review mainly focuses on the biochemical properties, mechanism of action, toxicity profile and pivotal clinical trials related to carfilzomib, a second-generation proteasome inhibitor that binds irreversibly with proteasome to overcome the major toxicities and resistance associated with bortezomib.



Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3364-3364
Author(s):  
Christopher Maisel ◽  
Nizar Bahlis ◽  
Yanling Miao ◽  
Lili Liu ◽  
Stanton Gerson

Abstract While proteasome inhibitors are effective therapy for multiple myeloma (MM), their efficacy could be improved by synergistic targeting of apoptosis. The intracellular serine/threonine kinase Akt has been demonstrated to have a central role in MM cell growth, survival, and drug resistance. Akt is activated by extracellular cytokines such as IGF-1 and IL-6, and contributes to MM resistance by ameliorating the apoptotic effects of proteasome inhibition. Akt requires chaperone proteins for proper stability and function, including the 90 kD molecule Heat Shock Protein 90 (HSP-90). HSP-90 function is abrogated by geldanamycin and its derivative, 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG). In the U266 MM cell line, the IC50 of the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 and 17-AAG was 100 nM and 800 nM, respectively. Following exposure of U266 MM cells to either drug alone, or the combination at a fixed-ratio of their IC50s (1:8), apoptosis was determined by Annexin V staining and FACScan analysis. Synergy analysis was performed using Calcusyn (Biosoft, Cambridge, UK). We found that the combination index (CI) was synergistic (CI<1) throughout the dose range, with a CI = 0.449 ± 0.298 at the combination IC50 (highly significant). For example, the apoptotic effect of 50 nM MG-132 and 400 nM 17-AAG was 6 ±2 % and 23 ±3 %, respectively, whereas the 50:400 nM combination produced apoptosis in 68 ± 2 % of the cells. To analyze effects on Akt and its substrates, we incubated U266 MM cells with MG-132 (50 nM), 17-AAG (400 nM), or the combination. We harvested lysates after zero, two, six, and 24 hours incubation, and Western blot analysis was performed. Co-incubation with MG-132 and 17-AAG, but not either alone, depleted Akt by 24 hours post-therapy. Co-treatment also produced significantly greater upregulation of HSP-90 and HSP-70 than 17-AAG alone, thus demonstrating greater functional inhibition of Akt. The combination also demonstrated the greatest abrogation of Akt-mediated effects on mitochondrial apoptosis: Co-treatment produced the greatest expression of BAD, decreased BCL-XL expression, reduced phosphorylation of GSK-3, and produced the greatest activation of caspase 3. Monotherapy with 17-AAG upregulated HSP-90 and HSP-70, reduced BCL-XL expression, and activated caspase 9. MG-132 monotherapy produced none of these effects. These findings demonstrate that synergy between proteasome inhibitors and 17-AAG is mediated by Akt depletion and abrogation of Akt signaling, predominantly by MG-132 augmentation of 17-AAG-mediated decay of Akt. Down-regulation of Akt-mediated resistance allows dual-apoptotic signaling and synergistic effect of combination therapy. These findings demonstrate a mechanistic rationale for utilizing heat shock protein inhibitors in combination with proteasome inhibitors as therapy for MM.



Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5011-5011
Author(s):  
Kristin E. McCrea ◽  
Albert Kabore ◽  
James B. Johnston ◽  
Spencer B. Gibson

Abstract TRAIL (tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) triggers the TRAIL apoptotic pathway selectively in tumour cells by binding to two death receptors, DR4 and DR5, that are present on the surface of many cancer cells. It is effective at inducing apoptosis in a variety of haematological malignancies, such as multiple myeloma. However, chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells are relatively resistant to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. We have previously shown that the chemotherapeutic drugs, fludarabine and chlorambucil, increase the cell surface expressions of DR4 and DR5, and give synergistic apoptotic responses when combined with TRAIL. Proteasome inhibitors, that are used in the treatment of multiple myeloma, also upregulate TRAIL and its death receptors in CLL cells but not in normal B cells. Herein we have determined that proteasome inhibitors are effective at inducing apoptosis in CLL cells, and that the activation of the TRAIL apoptotic pathway contributes significantly to proteasome inhibitor cytotoxicity. Combining proteasome inhibitors with TRAIL enhanced apoptosis in CLL cells by approximately 15% over treatment with the proteasome inhibitor alone. Another novel approach to trigger the TRAIL apoptotic pathway is to use activating monoclonal antibodies directed against DR4 and DR5. Similar to TRAIL, we demonstrated that when used alone, the monoclonal antibodies were minimally cytotoxic against CLL cells. Proteasome inhibitors in combination with activating monoclonal antibodies against DR4 or DR5 increased the amount of apoptosis in CLL cells. Cell death was enhanced by 23% and 17% when proteasome inhibitors were combined with monoclonal antibodies against DR4 and DR5, respectively. While proteasome inhibitors may have a potential role in CLL treatment as single therapy, they are also cytotoxic to normal B cells. However, when activating monoclonal antibodies against TRAIL death receptors are given in combination with proteasome inhibitors, that upregulate DR4 and DR5 expression, the anti-tumor specificity and cytotoxicity of these agents may be increased in CLL.



Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1513-1513
Author(s):  
Philipp Baumann ◽  
Karin Mueller ◽  
Sonja Mandl-Weber ◽  
Helmut Ostermann ◽  
Ralf Schmidmaier ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is still an incurable disease. Patients become resistant to cytotoxic drugs and die of disease progression. Bortezomib is the first approved member of a new class of antineoplastic agents, the proteasome inhibitors. It has synergistic effects with genotoxic drugs and steroids in vitro and in vivo. However, single agent activity in humans is only moderate and specific toxicity (e.g. neurotoxicity) often limits its clinical use. Further proteasome inhibitors need to be developed to optimize this promising treatment option. Methods: The new proteasome inhibitor S-2209 was characterized by several assays. Inhibition of the chymotryptic activity of the human 20S proteasome was determined with the in-vivo protease inhibition assay. Additionally, proteasome inhibition was determined in isolated PBMCs from S2209-pretreated wistar rats. Inhibition of NFκB activity was determined using a NFκB reporter gene assay. Cell growth rates of MM cells (OPM-2, U266, RPMI-8226 and NCI-H929) were measured with the WST-1 assay. Induction of apoptosis was shown by flow cytometry after staining with annexin-V-FITC and propidium iodide. Intracellular signal modulation was demonstrated by western blotting. Toxicity of the substance was tested in male wistar rats. Results: The proteasome inhibition assay revealed an IC50 at ∼220nM. The NFκB inhibition assay using an A549-NFκB-SEAP transfected cell line showed an EC50 of 0.9μM. Upon incubation with S-2209, cell growth as well as cell proliferation in MM cell lines was significantly inhibited (IC50 100nM – 600nM). Furthermore, the incubation with S-2209 resulted in strong induction of apoptosis in all four MM cell lines even at nanomolar concentrations (IC50 at ∼300nm) as well as primary cells. Western blotting revealed caspase-3 cleavage and upregulon of p53 and increased phosphorylation of IκB. No induction of apoptosis was detected in PBMCs from healthy humans. Despite the administration of 5, 10 or 15mg/kg/day in wistar rats, no toxicity with respect to body weight, hepatic enzymes (ALAT ASAT, ALP), creatinin or hemoglobin was seen. Proteasome inhibition in white blood cells isolated from the treated rats was higher in the S-2209 treated animals than in control animals treated with 0.1mg/kg/d bortezomib (89% vs. 70% respectively). Conclusions: The proteasome inhibitor S-2209 inhibitis MM cell growth and induces apoptosis. This is accompanied by a strong inhibition of proteasome and of the NFκB activity. Because S-2209 shows a favourable toxicity profile in vivo, further clinical development of this promising drug is urgently needed.



Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 430-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi Vij ◽  
Luhua Wang ◽  
Robert Z Orlowski ◽  
A. Keith Stewart ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 430 Background: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a feature of multiple myeloma (MM) itself as well as a debilitating side effect and major dose-limiting toxicity of thalidomide (THAL) and bortezomib (BTZ) (Chaudry et al, J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2008). Although the mechanism of BTZ-induced PN (BIPN) is unknown, PN may not be a proteasome inhibitor class effect. Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a highly selective proteasome inhibitor with activity in relapsed or refractory MM. CFZ overcomes BTZ-resistance in vitro (Kuhn et al, Blood 2007), lacks the off-target activities of BTZ (Kapur et al, Blood 2008), and does not cause neurotoxicity in long-term chronic (e.g. up to 9 months) animal toxicology studies (Kirk et al, Blood 2008). In Phase I and 1b/2 trials (total n=138), CFZ was not associated with dose-limiting PN. Here we report on the experience of CFZ treatment from two ongoing Phase 2 trials in relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory MM received CFZ, 20 mg/m2 IV, Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 in a 28-day cycle for up to 12 cycles on studies PX-171-003 and PX-171-004. Neuropathy history, neurological physical exam and PN-related quality of life data (FACT-GOG/NTx v 4.0 scores) were collected at screening. Prospective neurological exams and subjective reporting of PN using the FACT-GOG/Ntx subscale v.4 questionnaire occurred every 2 cycles until study discontinuation to proactively assess for PN. Adverse Event (AE) data were also collected. AEs reported as ‘neuropathy peripheral', ‘neuropathic pain', ‘neuropathy', and ‘peripheral sensory neuropathy' were included as PN. AE reports of ‘paraesthesias' and ‘dysesthesias' were counted separately. Results: To date, baseline data are availabel for 136 patients. At screening, 73 (54%) patients had active PN, including 64 (47%) with Grade (G) 1 and 9 (7%) with G2. 111 (82%) patients had a history of PN which was attributed to prior chemotherapy, 86 cases of which were attributed to either THAL or BTZ. THAL was implicated in 57 cases, BTZ in 45 cases, and both THAL and BTZ in 17 cases. For 27 of these patients, PN was the primary reason for THAL or BTZ discontinuation. The mean number of CFZ doses was 27 (4.5 four-week cycles) and 27 (20%) patients completed at least 8 cycles. Peripheral neuropathy AEs (all grades) were reported in 21 (15%) patients; 12 (9%) cases were considered possibly related to CFZ. Grade ≥ 3 PN was reported in only 3 (2%) patients. In one patient, the Grade 3 neuropathy lasted from treatment days 2 to 3 (i.e., < 36 hours) and resolved; the patient continued on CFZ at full dose for 30 days before discontinuing study due to progressive MM. In a second patient, Grade 3 neuropathy occurred on study day 91. The dose was reduced from 20 mg/m2 to 15 mg/m2, at the same twice-weekly frequency; the PN resolved to G1 and the patient continued on therapy until day 133. The third patient had G3 PN that occurred from days 260-281 and resolved to G1 while still on full dose CFZ. This patient completed the full 12-cycle protocol (∼1 year CFZ treatment). Paraesthesias and dysesthesia were reported in 10 (7%) patients; all were G1 or 2. There were no missed doses or CFZ treatment discontinuations due to PN, paraesthesias or dysesthesias. Comparative FACT-GOG/Ntx subscale scores were availabel for 95 patients. There was no statistically significant change in FACT-GOG/NTx scores from baseline to the end of the study. Neurological exams did not identify any additional peripheral neuropathy beyond those reported as AEs. Conclusions: In MM patients receiving CFZ therapy, reports of PN, paraesthesias and dysesthesia are generally mild and do not result in missed doses or CFZ discontinuation, allowing long-term treatment and prolonged disease control. These data, along with the experience from other clinical trials, indicate that PN is not a class effect of proteasome inhibitors. Disclosures: Vij: Proteolix: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wang:Proteolix, Inc.: Research Funding. Stewart:Genzyme, Celgene, Millenium, Proteolix: Honoraria; Takeda, Millenium: Research Funding; Takeda-Millenium, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen: Consultancy. Lonial:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Jakubowiak:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Belch:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Le:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Cruickshank:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Bennett:Proteolix: Employment. Molineaux:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document