scholarly journals Fault current control methods for multi-terminal DC systems based on fault blocking converters

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (15) ◽  
pp. 871-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Ruffing ◽  
Christina Brantl ◽  
Cora Petino ◽  
Armin Schnettler
Keyword(s):  
Current Control ◽  
Fault Current ◽  
Control Methods

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Classical and MPC Control for Single-Phase MMC Based on V-HIL Simulations

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 3230
Author(s):  
Milovan Majstorovic ◽  
Marco Rivera ◽  
Leposava Ristic ◽  
Patrick Wheeler
Keyword(s):  
Single Phase ◽  
Current Control ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Control Methods ◽  
Reference Tracking ◽  
Voltage Balancing ◽  
Current Reference ◽  
Circulating Current ◽  
Ac Current ◽  
Classical Control

The operation of single-phase Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) is analyzed in the paper. A mathematical model of the converter is developed and described, based on which the structure and selection of parameters for Classical Control and Optimal Switching State Model Predictive Control (OSS-MPC) are defined. Additionally, the procedure for the determination of circuit parameters, such as submodule capacitance and arm inductance, is described and carried out. The listed control methods are designed and evaluated in Virtual Hardware-in-the-Loop together with single-phase MMC power circuit, regarding three control objectives: AC current control, voltage balancing control and circulating current control. Control methods are evaluated for both steady-state and transient performance and compared based on nine criteria: AC current reference tracking, THD of AC current and voltage, submodule capacitor voltage balancing, total submodule voltage control, circulating current magnitude and THD, number of control parameters and computational complexity. This is the first time that a fair comparison between Classical Control and MPC is considered in literature, resulting in superior performance of both control methods regarding four different criteria and the same performance regarding AC current reference tracking.

scholarly journals Emulation of grid-forming inverters using real-time PC and 4-quadrant voltage amplifier

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolf Schulze ◽  
Maurizio Zajadatz ◽  
Michael Suriyah ◽  
Thomas Leibfried
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Control Method ◽  
Current Control ◽  
Control Methods ◽  
Test Bed ◽  
Test Scenario ◽  
Power Semiconductors ◽  
Voltage Amplifier ◽  
Grid Side ◽  
Virtual Synchronous Machine

AbstractA test bed for the evaluation of novel control methods of inverters for renewable power generation is presented. The behavior of grid-following and grid-forming control in a test scenario is studied and compared.Using a real-time capable control platform with a cycle time of 50 µs, control methods developed with Matlab/Simulink can be implemented. For simplicity, a three-phase 4‑quadrant voltage amplifier is used instead of an inverter. Thus, the use of modulation and switched power semiconductors can be avoided. In order to show a realistic behavior of a grid-side filter, passive components can be automatically connected as L‑, LC- or LCL-filter. The test bed has a nominal active power of 43.6 kW and a nominal voltage of 400 V.As state-of-the-art grid-following control method, a current control in the d/q-system is implemented in the test bed. A virtual synchronous machine, the Synchronverter, is used as grid-forming control method. In combination with a frequency-variable grid emulation, the behavior of both control methods is studied in the event of a load connection in an island grid environment.

scholarly journals Resonance Instability of Photovoltaic E-Bike Charging Stations: Control Parameters Analysis, Modeling and Experiment

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziqian Zhang ◽  
Cihan Gercek ◽  
Herwig Renner ◽  
Angèle Reinders ◽  
Lothar Fickert
Keyword(s):  
Major Effect ◽  
Current Control ◽  
Current Loop ◽  
Control Methods ◽  
Control Parameters ◽  
Charging System ◽  
Grid Connected Inverter ◽  
The Time Domain ◽  
Charging Stations ◽  
And Control

This article presents an in-situ comparative analysis and power quality tests of a newly developed photovoltaic charging system for e-bikes. The various control methods of the inverter are modeled and a single-phase grid-connected inverter is tested under different conditions. Models are constituted for two current control methods; the proportional resonance and the synchronous rotating frames. In order to determine the influence of the control parameters, the system is analyzed analytically in the time domain as well as in the frequency domain by simulation. The tests indicated the resonance instability of the photovoltaic inverter. The passivity impedance-based stability criterion is applied in order to analyze the phenomenon of resonance instability. In conclusion, the phase-locked loop (PLL) bandwidth and control parameters of the current loop have a major effect on the output admittance of the inverter, which should be adjusted to make the system stable.

scholarly journals Fault Ride through Capability Augmentation of a DFIG-Based Wind Integrated VSC-HVDC System with Non-Superconducting Fault Current Limiter

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Alam ◽  
Mohammad Abido ◽  
Alaa Hussein ◽  
Ibrahim El-Amin
Keyword(s):  
Control Strategy ◽  
Reactive Power ◽  
Current Control ◽  
Control Mode ◽  
Voltage Source ◽  
Fault Current ◽  
Fault Current Limiter ◽  
Hvdc System ◽  
Fault Ride Through ◽  
Current Limiter

This paper proposes a non-superconducting bridge-type fault current limiter (BFCL) as a potential solution to the fault problems of doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) integrated voltage source converter high-voltage DC (VSC-HVDC) transmission systems. As the VSC-HVDC and DFIG systems are vulnerable to AC/DC faults, a BFCL controller is developed to insert sizeable impedance during the inception of system disturbances. In the proposed control scheme, constant capacitor voltage is maintained by the stator VSC (SVSC) controller, while current extraction or injection is achieved by rotor VSC (RVSC) controller. Current control mode-based active and reactive power controllers for an HVDC system are developed. Balanced and different unbalanced faults are applied in the system to show the effectiveness of the proposed BFCL solution. A DFIG wind-based VSC-HVDC system, BFCL, and their controllers are implemented in a real time digital simulator (RTDS). The performance of the proposed BFCL control strategy in DFIG-based VSC-HVDC system is compared with a series dynamic braking resistor (SDBR). Comparative RTDS implementation results show that the proposed BFCL control strategy is very efficient in improving system fault ride through (FRT) capability and outperforms SDBR in all cases considered.

scholarly journals Separated Phase–Current Controls Using Inverter-Based DGs to Mitigate Effects of Fault Current Contribution from Synchronous DGs on Recloser–Fuse

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (20) ◽  
pp. 4311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boonyapakdee ◽  
Konghirun ◽  
Sangswang
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Performance ◽  
Voltage Regulation ◽  
Current Control ◽  
Current Phase ◽  
Fault Current ◽  
Grid Voltage ◽  
Phase Current ◽  
Distributed Generators ◽  
Current Contribution ◽  
Measurement Units

Synchronous distributed generators (SDGs) significantly affect recloser–fuse coordination due to the high fault current contribution. This paper proposes a separated phase–current control using inverter-based distributed generators (IBDGs) to remove the effects of fault current contributions from SDGs during unsymmetrical faults. The three-phase current produced by IBDGs is independently controlled. While the total fault current is reduced by adjusting the current phase angle in the faulty phase, the energy in the DC-link capacitor (Cdc) is delivered to the grid in order to avoid the rise of DC-link voltage (Vdc) by means of injection of the active current into the nonfaulty phase. To maintain the proper grid voltage, the voltage regulation feature is installed in the IBDGs. Moreover, current estimations programmed within the IBDGs are introduced to avoid the performance degradation of separated phase–current controls caused by phasor measurement units (PMUs). The dynamic performance of the separated phase–current controls using IBDGs was evaluated using an IEEE 34-node radial test feeder. According to the simulation results, the IBDGs could eliminate the effects of fault current contributions from the SDG without interruption since the disconnections caused by excessive Vdc were prevented. They could also regulate the grid voltage in the nonfaulty phase.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document