Interventional Options for Primary Tumors of the Spine

2015 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Tumors

Surgery, Radio- and Chemo- therapy for Multimodal Treatment of Rectal Cancer

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 256-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Link ◽  
Staib ◽  
Kornmann ◽  
Formentini ◽  
Schatz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Multimodal Treatment ◽  
Local Relapse ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
Relapse Rates

The possibilities and results of multimodal treatment in rectal cancer were reviewed with respect to the results of surgical treatment only. Based on the results of 4 studies, reducing local relapse rates and increasing long term survival rates significantly, postoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) + chemotherapy (CT) should remain the recommended standard for R0 resected UICC II and III rectal cancers. The addition of RT to adjuvant CT reduces local relapses without significant impact on survival (NSABP R-02). Vice versa, the addition of CT to RT or an improved CT in the RCT-concept prolongs survival. Preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) reduced local relapse rates in 9 studies, and extended survival in one study that evaluated all eligible patients. Preoperative RT reduced local relapse rates in addition to total mesorectal excision (TME) but did not extend survival. The preoperative RCT + CT downstages resectable and nonresectable tumors and induces a higher sphincter preservation rate. Phase III data justifying its routine use in all UICC II + III stages are not yet available. This treatment may be routinely applied in nonresectable primary tumors or local relapses. Preoperative RCT (or RT) may evolve as standard, if the patient selection is improved and postoperative morbidity and long term toxicity reduced. Intraoperative RT could be added to this concept or be used together with preoperative/postoperative RT at the same indications. Postoperative adjuvant RT reduced local relapses significantly in a single trial, and no impact on survival time is reported. Since postoperative RT is inferior to preoperative RT, this treatment cannot be recommended, if RT is chosen as a single treatment modality in adjunction to surgery. The results of local tumor excisions may be improved with pre- or postoperative RCT + CT. In the future, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer might be more effective, if individualized according to prognostic factors.

Immunszintigraphie mit 111ln-DTPA-markierten monoklonalen Antikörpern: Vergleich zwischen ECT und planarer Szintigraphie

1987 ◽  
Vol 26 (06) ◽  
pp. 258-262
Author(s):  
J. Happi ◽  
R. P. Baum ◽  
J. Frohn ◽  
B. Weimer ◽  
A. Halbsguth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Undifferentiated Carcinoma ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Acquisition Time ◽  
Planar Imaging ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Intraindividual Comparison ◽  
Single Detector ◽  
Increased Sensitivity

The present study was done in order to examine if the use of111ln-DTPA- labeled MAb fragments in place of 131l-labeled MAb fragments increases the sensitivity of tomographic immunoscintigraphy to reach the level of that of planar imaging techniques. In 11 patients with various primary tumors, local recurrences or metastases [colorectal carcinoma (n = 7), ovarian carcinoma (n = 2), papillary thyroid carcinoma (n = 1), undifferentiated carcinoma of the lung (n = 1)], immunoscintigraphy (IS) was carried out using 111ln-DTPA- labeled F(ab’)2 fragments of various MAbs (anti-CEA, OC 125, anti-hTG) and planar and tomographic imaging were compared intraindividually. By conventional diagnostic procedures, the presence of a tumor mass was confirmed (transmission computer tomography, ultrasound) or verified (131l whole-body scintigraphy, histology) in all cases. Immunoscintigraphy was positive in 9 out of 11 cases by ECT and in 10 out of 11 cases by planar imaging. When using 111 In-labeled MAb fragments, intraindividual comparison of ECT and planar imaging resulted in a similar sensitivity. The increased sensitivity of ECT using this tracer in contrast to 131l-labeled MAb fragments may be attributed to the fact that the physical properties of111 In are much more suitable for the gamma cameras most commonly used (single detector, 3/8” crystal); using 111 In-labeled MAb fragments, count rates sufficient for ECT can be obtained within a reasonable acquisition time. This allows to combine IS with the advantages of ECT regarding tumour localization and prevention of artefacts due to superposition of background.

Rab11 family-interacting protein 4, RAB11FIP4, is a differentially expressed gene in brain metastatic human breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahan Mamoor
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Differentially Expressed Gene ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Metastatic Tumor ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Brain

Metastasis to the brain is a clinical problem in patients with breast cancer (1-3). We mined published microarray data (4, 5) to compare primary and metastatic tumor transcriptomes for the discovery of genes associated with brain metastasis in humans with metastatic breast cancer. We found that Rab11 family-interacting protein 4, encoded by RAB11FIP4, was among the genes whose expression was most different in the brain metastases of patients with metastatic breast cancer as compared to primary tumors of the breast. RAB11FIP4 mRNA was present at increased quantities in brain metastatic tissues as compared to primary tumors of the breast. Importantly, expression of RAB11FIP4 in primary tumors was significantly correlated with patient recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival. Modulation of RAB11FIP4 expression may be relevant to the biology by which tumor cells metastasize from the breast to the brain in humans with metastatic breast cancer.

Gamma Knife surgery as sole treatment for multiple brain metastases: 2-center retrospective review of 1508 cases meeting the inclusion criteria of the JLGK0901 multi-institutional prospective study

2010 ◽  
Vol 113 (Special_Supplement) ◽  
pp. 48-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toru Serizawa ◽  
Masaaki Yamamoto ◽  
Yasunori Sato ◽  
Yoshinori Higuchi ◽  
Osamu Nagano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Gamma Knife Surgery ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Poor Prognostic Factor ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Object The authors retrospectively reviewed the results of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) used as the sole treatment for brain metastases in patients who met the eligibility criteria for the ongoing JLGK0901 multi-institutional prospective trial. They also discuss the anticipated results of the JLGK0901 study. Methods Data from 1508 consecutive cases were analyzed. All of the patients were treated at the Gamma Knife House of Chiba Cardiovascular Center or the Mito Gamma House of Katsuta Hospital between 1998 and 2007 and met the following JLGK0901 inclusion criteria: 1) newly diagnosed brain metastases, 2) 1–10 brain lesions, 3) less than 10 cm3 volume of the largest tumor, 4) no more than 15 cm3 total tumor volume, 5) no findings of CSF dissemination, and 6) no impairment of activities of daily living (Karnofsky Performance Scale score < 70) due to extracranial disease. At the initial treatment, all visible lesions were irradiated with GKS without upfront whole-brain radiation therapy. Thereafter, gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging was performed every 2–3 months, and new distant lesions were appropriately retreated with GKS. Patients were divided into groups according to numbers of tumors: Group A, single lesions (565 cases); Group B, 2–4 tumors (577 cases); and Group C, 5–10 tumors (366 cases). The differences in overall survival (OS) were compared between groups. Results The median age of the patients was 66 years (range 19–96 years). There were 963 men and 545 women. The primary tumors were in the lung in 1114 patients, gastrointestinal tract in 179, breast in 105, urinary tract in 66, and other sites in 44. The overall mean survival time was 0.78 years (0.99 years for Group A, 0.68 years for Group B, and 0.62 years for Group C). The differences between Groups A and B (p < 0.0001) and between Groups B and C (p = 0.0312) were statistically significant. Multivariate analysis revealed significant prognostic factors for OS to be sex (poor prognostic factor: male, p < 0.0001), recursive partitioning analysis class (Class I vs Class II and Class II vs III, both p < 0.0001), primary site (lung vs breast, p = 0.0047), and number of tumors (Group A vs Group B, p < 0.0001). However, no statistically difference was detected between Groups B and C (p = 0.1027, hazard ratio 1.124, 95% CI 0.999–1.265). Conclusions The results of this retrospective analysis revealed an upper CI of 1.265 for the hazard ratio, which was lower than the 1.3 initially set by the JLGK0901 study. The JLGK0901 study is anticipated to show noninferiority of GKS as sole treatment for patients with 5–10 brain metastases compared with those with 2–4 in terms of OS.

Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for tumors of the spine

2004 ◽  
pp. 413-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah L. Benzil ◽  
Mehran Saboori ◽  
Alon Y. Mogilner ◽  
Ronald Rocchio ◽  
Chitti R. Moorthy
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The extension of stereotactic radiosurgery treatment of tumors of the spine has the potential to benefit many patients. As in the early days of cranial stereotactic radiosurgery, however, dose-related efficacy and toxicity are not well understood. The authors report their initial experience with stereotactic radiosurgery of the spine with attention to dose, efficacy, and toxicity. Methods. All patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery of the spine were treated using the Novalis unit at Westchester Medical Center between December 2001 and January 2004 are included in a database consisting of demographics on disease, dose, outcome, and complications. A total of 31 patients (12 men, 19 women; mean age 61 years, median age 63 years) received treatment for 35 tumors. Tumor types included 26 metastases (12 lung, nine breast, five other) and nine primary tumors (four intradural, five extradural). Thoracic tumors were most common (17 metastases and four primary) followed by lumbar tumors (four metastases and four primary). Lesions were treated to the 85 to 90% isodose line with spinal cord doses being less than 50%. The dose per fraction and total dose were selected on the basis of previous treatment (particularly radiation exposure), size of lesion, and proximity to critical structures. Conclusions. Rapid and significant pain relief was achieved after stereotactic radiosurgery in 32 of 34 treated tumors. In patients treated for metastases, pain was relieved within 72 hours and remained reduced 3 months later. Pain relief was achieved with a single dose as low as 500 cGy. Spinal cord isodoses were less than 50% in all patients except those with intradural tumors (mean single dose to spinal cord 268 cGy and mean total dose to spinal cord 689 cGy). Two patients experienced transient radiculitis (both with a biological equivalent dose (BED) > 60 Gy). One patient who suffered multiple recurrences of a conus ependymoma had permanent neurological deterioration after initial improvement. Pathological evaluation of this lesion at surgery revealed radiation necrosis with some residual/recurrent tumor. No patient experienced other organ toxicity. Stereotactic radiosurgery of the spine is safe at the doses used and provides effective pain relief. In this study, BEDs greater than 60 Gy were associated with an increased risk of radiculitis.

Gamma Knife surgery for metastatic brain tumors

2008 ◽  
Vol 109 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 118-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toru Serizawa ◽  
Masaaki Yamamoto ◽  
Osamu Nagano ◽  
Yoshinori Higuchi ◽  
Shinji Matsuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Selection Criterion ◽  
Gamma Knife Surgery ◽  
Treatment Result ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Patient Selection Criterion

Object The authors compared results of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) for brain metastases obtained at 2 institutions in Japan. Methods They analyzed a consecutive series of 2390 patients with brain metastases who underwent GKS from 1998 through 2005 in 2 institutes (1181 patients in Chiba; 1209 in Mito). In the 2 facilities, 1 neurosurgeon each was responsible for diagnosis, patient selection, GKS procedures, and follow-up (T.S. in Chiba, M.Y. in Mito). Even if tumor numbers exceeded 4, all visible lesions were irradiated with a total skull integral dose (TSID) of ≤ 10–12 J. No prophylactic whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was applied. If new distant lesions were detected, salvage GKS was appropriately performed. Results The distributions of patient and treatment factors did not differ between institutes. The most common primary tumors were lung cancer (1572 patients), followed by gastrointestinal tract (316), breast (211), kidney (113), and other cancers (159). The median survival periods were 7.7 months in Chiba and 7.0 months in Mito (p = 0.0635). The significant poor prognostic factors for overall survival were active extracranial disease status, male sex, and low initial Karnofsky Performance Scale score on multivariate analysis (all p < 0.0001). The neurological survival rates at 1 year were 86.6% in Chiba and 84.2% in Mito (p = 0.3310). Conclusions This 2-institute study demonstrated no significant institutional differences in any of the treatment result items. Gamma Knife surgery for brain metastases without prophylactic WBRT prevents neurological death and allows a patient to maintain good brain condition. However, there is 1 important patient selection criterion: regardless of how many tumors there are, all lesions can be irradiated with a TSID of ≤12 J.

Spinal meningioma after treatment for Hodgkin disease

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Martin ◽  
Christopher J. Hammond ◽  
H. Jane Dobbs ◽  
Safa Al-Sarraj ◽  
Nicholas W. M. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Disease ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Combined Modality Treatment ◽  
Spinal Meningioma ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Mutagenic Effects ◽  
Long Term Survivors

✓ Long-term survivors of Hodgkin disease may develop second primary tumors caused by the mutagenic effects of radio- and chemotherapy. The authors describe the case of a 35-year-old woman who presented with an unusual meningioma of the cervical spine 9 years after undergoing combined-modality treatment for Hodgkin disease. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report of spinal meningioma as a complication of such therapy. Whereas radiation-induced intracranial meningiomas are well described in the literature, treatment-induced meningiomas of the spine have not been widely recognized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document